Yea I don't think that's correctwhen did it become 2 weeks? I'm behind on the Bryant watch, but wasn't super 2 always more like 2 months than 2 weeks?An extra year of control of Bryant in his prime is worth a lot more wins then what they would lose in the first two weeks of this season. It's a no-brainer for the Cubs.
Whether the wins come now or in six years what does it matter when you own the team? With this young team I'd want the extra wins six years from now.
The CBA defines the first full year of service time at something like 173 out of 182 days. Players are under team control for a minimum of 6.00 years. So, if Bryant is only a major leaguer for something like 170 out of the 182 days, the Cubs gain a full extra year of arbitration service time.Yeah can someone explain how being sent down 2 weeks gives him an extra year of eligibility
Most big market teams don't care too much about Super 2, but they do care about an extra year of team control.when did it become 2 weeks? I'm behind on the Bryant watch, but wasn't super 2 always more like 2 months than 2 weeks?An extra year of control of Bryant in his prime is worth a lot more wins then what they would lose in the first two weeks of this season. It's a no-brainer for the Cubs.
Whether the wins come now or in six years what does it matter when you own the team? With this young team I'd want the extra wins six years from now.
No innings cap for Norris or SanchezHe barely pitched over 130 innings last year. I wouldn't expect him to throw more than 150-60 innings this season.Any idea if they'll treat Norris like a No. 5 starter in terms of skipping his spot, etc?Northern Voice said:To be more specific, in terms of how starts will shake out, it's expected to go Hutchison-Dickey-Norris-Buerhle-Sanchez. They're doing this so Buerhle doesn't face New York and Hutch does face Baltimore, based on their past results vs. those teams.
Super two only involves moving up the arbitration clock, it has nothing to do with service time for free agency. Two different clocks.Yea I don't think that's correctwhen did it become 2 weeks? I'm behind on the Bryant watch, but wasn't super 2 always more like 2 months than 2 weeks?An extra year of control of Bryant in his prime is worth a lot more wins then what they would lose in the first two weeks of this season. It's a no-brainer for the Cubs.
Whether the wins come now or in six years what does it matter when you own the team? With this young team I'd want the extra wins six years from now.
If Bryant breaks camp with the Cubs, he can become a free agent after the 2020 season. The Cubs, however, can push that back to 2021 because of service time if Bryant stays in the minors until at least mid-April this season.
What do you see for Norris?No innings cap for Norris or Sanchezhttps://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/581813163026472960He barely pitched over 130 innings last year. I wouldn't expect him to throw more than 150-60 innings this season.Any idea if they'll treat Norris like a No. 5 starter in terms of skipping his spot, etc?Northern Voice said:To be more specific, in terms of how starts will shake out, it's expected to go Hutchison-Dickey-Norris-Buerhle-Sanchez. They're doing this so Buerhle doesn't face New York and Hutch does face Baltimore, based on their past results vs. those teams.
So they are considering paying him 4 years of arbitration?If he's up too early for super 2 but down long enough to not be FA, is that the result?Super two only involves moving up the arbitration clock, it has nothing to do with service time for free agency. Two different clocks.Yea I don't think that's correctwhen did it become 2 weeks? I'm behind on the Bryant watch, but wasn't super 2 always more like 2 months than 2 weeks?An extra year of control of Bryant in his prime is worth a lot more wins then what they would lose in the first two weeks of this season. It's a no-brainer for the Cubs.
Whether the wins come now or in six years what does it matter when you own the team? With this young team I'd want the extra wins six years from now.
If Bryant breaks camp with the Cubs, he can become a free agent after the 2020 season. The Cubs, however, can push that back to 2021 because of service time if Bryant stays in the minors until at least mid-April this season.
Correct.So they are considering paying him 4 years of arbitration?If he's up too early for super 2 but down long enough to not be FA, is that the result?Super two only involves moving up the arbitration clock, it has nothing to do with service time for free agency. Two different clocks.Yea I don't think that's correctwhen did it become 2 weeks? I'm behind on the Bryant watch, but wasn't super 2 always more like 2 months than 2 weeks?An extra year of control of Bryant in his prime is worth a lot more wins then what they would lose in the first two weeks of this season. It's a no-brainer for the Cubs.
Whether the wins come now or in six years what does it matter when you own the team? With this young team I'd want the extra wins six years from now.
If Bryant breaks camp with the Cubs, he can become a free agent after the 2020 season. The Cubs, however, can push that back to 2021 because of service time if Bryant stays in the minors until at least mid-April this season.
I think there will be an adjustment period since its such a big jump. Could easily see 180 IP and ERA around 4 for the season, close to 9 k/9. Similar year to Hutchison last year?What do you see for Norris?No innings cap for Norris or Sanchezhttps://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/581813163026472960He barely pitched over 130 innings last year. I wouldn't expect him to throw more than 150-60 innings this season.Any idea if they'll treat Norris like a No. 5 starter in terms of skipping his spot, etc?Northern Voice said:To be more specific, in terms of how starts will shake out, it's expected to go Hutchison-Dickey-Norris-Buerhle-Sanchez. They're doing this so Buerhle doesn't face New York and Hutch does face Baltimore, based on their past results vs. those teams.
I would tend to agree, but the MLBPA did sign off on that in the CBA.I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
Why would any organization not do this for an extra year of player control?I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
because they have to sell that to the fanbase, it leaves a bad taste in bryants mouth, and im sure the rest of his teammates want the player that gives them the best chance to win now.Why would any organization not do this for an extra year of player control?It's a business, "class" has nothing to do with anything.I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
I'm buying itbecause they have to sell that to the fanbase, it leaves a bad taste in bryants mouth, and im sure the rest of his teammates want the player that gives them the best chance to win now.Why would any organization not do this for an extra year of player control?It's a business, "class" has nothing to do with anything.I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
Rays did this to Longoria and then he signed like a 20-year contract later on down the road. It's not a big deal.And you think bryant cares if its a smart business move? From his perspective he played his ### off all spring and hes gonna get sent down anyway PLUS he will now be a free agent a year later.
His agent is Scott Boras. Bryant knows what he signed up for the minute he chose him.And you think bryant cares if its a smart business move? From his perspective he played his ### off all spring and hes gonna get sent down anyway PLUS he will now be a free agent a year later.
are you saying if he had another agent they may not have done this because another agent would be willing to allow his client sign an extension early in their career? Thats a fair point.His agent is Scott Boras. Bryant knows what he signed up for the minute he chose him.And you think bryant cares if its a smart business move? From his perspective he played his ### off all spring and hes gonna get sent down anyway PLUS he will now be a free agent a year later.
Yep, not gonna raise an eyebrow at the cubs for making the best business decision.Want it to change? Then make issue of it when this cba is up.I would tend to agree, but the MLBPA did sign off on that in the CBA.I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
Theo would call it a baseball decisionYep, not gonna raise an eyebrow at the cubs for making the best business decision.Want it to change? Then make issue of it when this cba is up.I would tend to agree, but the MLBPA did sign off on that in the CBA.I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
It is exactly what I'm saying. Cubs would sign a Longoria-style extension and have him in opening day lineup with an agent that was willing to negotiate the terms.are you saying if he had another agent they may not have done this because another agent would be willing to allow his client sign an extension early in their career? Thats a fair point.His agent is Scott Boras. Bryant knows what he signed up for the minute he chose him.And you think bryant cares if its a smart business move? From his perspective he played his ### off all spring and hes gonna get sent down anyway PLUS he will now be a free agent a year later.
I can see that though. An extra year of control of a prime Bryant is worth more wins then his first two weeks in the bigs.Theo would call it a baseball decisionYep, not gonna raise an eyebrow at the cubs for making the best business decision.Want it to change? Then make issue of it when this cba is up.I would tend to agree, but the MLBPA did sign off on that in the CBA.I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
I'm having trouble believing you are "gifted."shadyridr said:because they have to sell that to the fanbase, it leaves a bad taste in bryants mouth, and im sure the rest of his teammates want the player that gives them the best chance to win now.Doctor Detroit said:Why would any organization not do this for an extra year of player control?It's a business, "class" has nothing to do with anything.shadyridr said:I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
compared to normal people i am but clearly nowhere near the intelligence of you or anyone else here except maybe emI'm having trouble believing you are "gifted." This is not that hard to understand.shadyridr said:because they have to sell that to the fanbase, it leaves a bad taste in bryants mouth, and im sure the rest of his teammates want the player that gives them the best chance to win now.Doctor Detroit said:Why would any organization not do this for an extra year of player control?It's a business, "class" has nothing to do with anything.shadyridr said:I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
Well duh.compared to normal people i am but clearly nowhere near the intelligence of you or anyone else here except maybe emI'm having trouble believing you are "gifted." This is not that hard to understand.shadyridr said:because they have to sell that to the fanbase, it leaves a bad taste in bryants mouth, and im sure the rest of his teammates want the player that gives them the best chance to win now.Doctor Detroit said:Why would any organization not do this for an extra year of player control?It's a business, "class" has nothing to do with anything.shadyridr said:I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
As Bryant has already said, Boras works for him, not the other way around. Considering his draft bonus and his ability, there doesn't seem to be much reason for him to settle for a deal. Even if he gets injured, he'll make millions more on his potential alone. And really, the Longoria contract is an agent's blueprint on how to screw your client.RnR said:It is exactly what I'm saying. Cubs would sign a Longoria-style extension and have him in opening day lineup with an agent that was willing to negotiate the terms.shadyridr said:are you saying if he had another agent they may not have done this because another agent would be willing to allow his client sign an extension early in their career? Thats a fair point.RnR said:His agent is Scott Boras. Bryant knows what he signed up for the minute he chose him.shadyridr said:And you think bryant cares if its a smart business move? From his perspective he played his ### off all spring and hes gonna get sent down anyway PLUS he will now be a free agent a year later.
What's the average price a Cubs fan would pay just for a playoff berth, let alone a World Series? First born?Wrigley said:Theo would call it a baseball decisionMAC_32 said:Yep, not gonna raise an eyebrow at the cubs for making the best business decision.Want it to change? Then make issue of it when this cba is up.Dickie Dunn said:I would tend to agree, but the MLBPA did sign off on that in the CBA.shadyridr said:I know its the smart move but its pretty low class move to keep the guy down 2 weeks if he earned the spot.
If you're buying that line, I can't help you. Hiring Scott Boras is drawing a line in the sand saying "I want the most money, period." I don't fault him for doing so, but indicating that anyone but Scott is calling the shots is just being naive. He simply won't take clients that won't follow his blueprint. It's not like he has a shortage of interested clientele.As Bryant has already said, Boras works for him, not the other way around. Considering his draft bonus and his ability, there doesn't seem to be much reason for him to settle for a deal. Even if he gets injured, he'll make millions more on his potential alone. And really, the Longoria contract is an agent's blueprint on how to screw your client.RnR said:It is exactly what I'm saying. Cubs would sign a Longoria-style extension and have him in opening day lineup with an agent that was willing to negotiate the terms.shadyridr said:are you saying if he had another agent they may not have done this because another agent would be willing to allow his client sign an extension early in their career? Thats a fair point.RnR said:His agent is Scott Boras. Bryant knows what he signed up for the minute he chose him.shadyridr said:And you think bryant cares if its a smart business move? From his perspective he played his ### off all spring and hes gonna get sent down anyway PLUS he will now be a free agent a year later.
Peter Gammons @pgammo 4m4 minutes ago
Harper NL ROY '12 played first 21 games in AAA, Posey '10 opened with 47 G in AAA, won world series. AL '13 ROY Myers opened w/64 G in AAA..
I had a joke loaded about Miles Teller complaining the pitch wasn't quite his tempo, but I'll just keep that to myself now.JK Simmons is going to throw out the first pitch for the Tigers on Opening Day.
No word on whether Beecher will be catching.![]()
http://www.freep.com/story/sports/mlb/tigers/2015/03/27/detroit-tigers-jk-simmons/70541372/
Longoria was a top pick and got a $3M signing bonus less than two years prior to his debut. Not as significant as the $17.5M guarantee for his first 6 years, but he was fairly set already. In exchange for the added security, he gave away his rights to 4 years of arbitration and options on his 3 most valuable free agent years totaling $26.5M - basically the ballpark rate for one of his prime PA years.Also, buying out arbitration years for guaranteed cash can be team friendly, but it is hardly screwing your client. Evan Longoria was set for life before he even established a major league identity. There's some security for a young kid there. If he turned into Mike Moustakas instead, we'd be praising his agent for securing the cash. I seriously doubt Evan is losing any sleep over the contract he signed.
http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/12587428/kris-bryant-javier-baez-addison-russell-sent-minors-chicago-cubsThe Chicago Cubs have reassigned top prospect Kris Bryant, who leads the majors with nine spring training home runs, to their minor league camp.
The Cubs made the move Monday, less than a week before they open their season against the St. Louis Cardinals.
We all knew he was going back down. Why is everyone so bent out of shape about it? Sure, it sucks, but that's the way it is. 12 games now or 162 6 years from now. How many wins, guys?http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/12587428/kris-bryant-javier-baez-addison-russell-sent-minors-chicago-cubsThe Chicago Cubs have reassigned top prospect Kris Bryant, who leads the majors with nine spring training home runs, to their minor league camp.
The Cubs made the move Monday, less than a week before they open their season against the St. Louis Cardinals.
Seriously, it's hard to believe this is still causing any issues. All the casual fans have had this gently explained to them by now.We all knew he was going back down. Why is everyone so bent out of shape about it? Sure, it sucks, but that's the way it is. 12 games now or 162 6 years from now. How many wins, guys?http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/12587428/kris-bryant-javier-baez-addison-russell-sent-minors-chicago-cubsThe Chicago Cubs have reassigned top prospect Kris Bryant, who leads the majors with nine spring training home runs, to their minor league camp.
The Cubs made the move Monday, less than a week before they open their season against the St. Louis Cardinals.
They're going to miss the wild card by a game leading to riots and the ritual slaughter of all goats in greater Chicagoland.We all knew he was going back down. Why is everyone so bent out of shape about it? Sure, it sucks, but that's the way it is. 12 games now or 162 6 years from now. How many wins, guys?http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/12587428/kris-bryant-javier-baez-addison-russell-sent-minors-chicago-cubsThe Chicago Cubs have reassigned top prospect Kris Bryant, who leads the majors with nine spring training home runs, to their minor league camp.
The Cubs made the move Monday, less than a week before they open their season against the St. Louis Cardinals.
thats not buenoRendon to Dr. Andrews for 2nd opinion on knee. Dangit...
thats not buenoRendon to Dr. Andrews for 2nd opinion on knee. Dangit...