What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**2015 MLB Season Thread: This is how the chapter ends (2 Viewers)

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooof

Scherzer
Dude leaned into that one pretty badly... Pretty ##### move against a guy dealing a perfect game with 1 out to go, IMO.
sorry, but I don't buy this one. it's hard as hell to hit a baseball, you've got <1 second from the time the pitcher throws the ball to the time you have to react. really no way this guy could have had time to think "is that ball coming at me? crap, scherzer's got a PG going, also the game is not really close right now, I should get out of the way." he has an approach at the plate and I don't expect him to alter it because some dude on the other team is about to do something cool.

of course, you could be of the opinion that he went up there with malicious intent, thinking "if this dude throws anything remotely inside, I'm leaning into it. #### yo perfect game!" but that seems like a stretch imo.

:shrug:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooof

Scherzer
Dude leaned into that one pretty badly... Pretty ##### move against a guy dealing a perfect game with 1 out to go, IMO.
sorry, but I don't buy this one. it's hard as hell to hit a baseball, you've got <1 second from the time the pitcher throws the ball to the time you have to react. really no way this guy could have had time to think "is that ball coming at me? crap, scherzer's got a PG going, also the game is not really close right now, I should get out of the way." he has an approach at the plate and I don't expect him to alter it because some dude on the other team is about to do something cool. of course, you could be of the opinion that he went up there with malicious intent, thinking "if this dude throws anything remotely inside, I'm leaning into it. #### yo perfect game!" but that seems like a stretch imo.

:shrug:
dude did you see it? He ####in leaned into it. Its not like he just didnt move out of the way. He physically moved his elbow TOWARDS the baseball.
 
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooof

Scherzer
Dude leaned into that one pretty badly... Pretty ##### move against a guy dealing a perfect game with 1 out to go, IMO.
sorry, but I don't buy this one. it's hard as hell to hit a baseball, you've got <1 second from the time the pitcher throws the ball to the time you have to react. really no way this guy could have had time to think "is that ball coming at me? crap, scherzer's got a PG going, also the game is not really close right now, I should get out of the way." he has an approach at the plate and I don't expect him to alter it because some dude on the other team is about to do something cool. of course, you could be of the opinion that he went up there with malicious intent, thinking "if this dude throws anything remotely inside, I'm leaning into it. #### yo perfect game!" but that seems like a stretch imo.

:shrug:
dude did you see it? He ####in leaned into it. Its not like he just didnt move out of the way. He physically moved his elbow TOWARDS the baseball.
lol, yes I saw it. believe it or not, leaning into pitches is a regular part of some guy's approaches. my point was this guy is not going up there and changing his approach because Scherzer is one out away from a no-hitter, nor should he.

it's a split second decision. the guy has had 1000s of PAs prior to this. if he has made a habit out of leaning in to try to get a base on a pitch inside like that, chances are he's not going to have time to decide not to do it this time because the circumstances are different.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scherzer’s opponents are 1 for 55 with one walk and one hit-by-pitch against him over his past two starts with 26 strikeouts, 10 coming Saturday. In that span, he has more hits — two singles — than his opponents. Scherzer became the first player since Jim Tobin of the Boston Braves in 1944 to allow one hit or fewer in consecutive complete games.
 
Nobody likes reminding you of how right he is more than RN. He never bumps any of his wrong posts though.
You couldn't be more incorrect about your second point. Let me know how much money you'll send me for each post I can find where I bump a terrible prediction I made.

And let me get this straight... I first-guess A-Rod having a great year, everyone lines up to ridicule me, and now before the All-Star break he's on pace to obliterate the "unreasonable" numbers I suggested, and I'm not allowed to mention it?

Yeah, okay.

 
Nobody likes reminding you of how right he is more than RN. He never bumps any of his wrong posts though.
You couldn't be more incorrect about your second point. Let me know how much money you'll send me for each post I can find where I bump a terrible prediction I made.

And let me get this straight... I first-guess A-Rod having a great year, everyone lines up to ridicule me, and now before the All-Star break he's on pace to obliterate the "unreasonable" numbers I suggested, and I'm not allowed to mention it?

Yeah, okay.
i actually predicted a good year for him too but for the life of me cant find the post or even what thread I predicted it too and I too was ridiculed.
 
Nobody likes reminding you of how right he is more than RN. He never bumps any of his wrong posts though.
You couldn't be more incorrect about your second point. Let me know how much money you'll send me for each post I can find where I bump a terrible prediction I made.And let me get this straight... I first-guess A-Rod having a great year, everyone lines up to ridicule me, and now before the All-Star break he's on pace to obliterate the "unreasonable" numbers I suggested, and I'm not allowed to mention it?

Yeah, okay.
I bumped some really wrong post you made a while back and you got super pissy about it. :shrug:

 
Nobody likes reminding you of how right he is more than RN. He never bumps any of his wrong posts though.
You couldn't be more incorrect about your second point. Let me know how much money you'll send me for each post I can find where I bump a terrible prediction I made.And let me get this straight... I first-guess A-Rod having a great year, everyone lines up to ridicule me, and now before the All-Star break he's on pace to obliterate the "unreasonable" numbers I suggested, and I'm not allowed to mention it?

Yeah, okay.
I bumped some really wrong post you made a while back and you got super pissy about it. :shrug:
Show me. And I'm not sure how that refutes anything I wrote.

 
Nobody likes reminding you of how right he is more than RN. He never bumps any of his wrong posts though.
You couldn't be more incorrect about your second point. Let me know how much money you'll send me for each post I can find where I bump a terrible prediction I made.

And let me get this straight... I first-guess A-Rod having a great year, everyone lines up to ridicule me, and now before the All-Star break he's on pace to obliterate the "unreasonable" numbers I suggested, and I'm not allowed to mention it?

Yeah, okay.
i actually predicted a good year for him too but for the life of me cant find the post or even what thread I predicted it too and I too was ridiculed.
Is this the one?

How big of a league would you need to be in to consider keeping A-Rod?
150 keepers total? 200?

I think maybe 300
per team
 
Sorry guys, this is a tough day for me. I used to drink a lot. I hold my breath every year waiting for some kid I've never seen before to show up at my front door holding a Father's Day present.

 
I think in fantasy circles A-Rod wasn't undervalued because people didn't think he'd perform, it was because there were questions about the Yankees willingness to play him and him staying healthy if he got sustained at bats. I'm not an A-Rod hater, you should have probably found some of those posts to bump instead IMO. I don't mind you bumping my post, my answer was honest and justified...not shtick. :shrug:

 
I think in fantasy circles A-Rod wasn't undervalued because people didn't think he'd perform, it was because there were questions about the Yankees willingness to play him and him staying healthy if he got sustained at bats. I'm not an A-Rod hater, you should have probably found some of those posts to bump instead IMO. I don't mind you bumping my post, my answer was honest and justified...not shtick. :shrug:
If you legitimately valued 300 players higher than him, then I apologize. Thought you were being humorous.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think in fantasy circles A-Rod wasn't undervalued because people didn't think he'd perform, it was because there were questions about the Yankees willingness to play him and him staying healthy if he got sustained at bats. I'm not an A-Rod hater, you should have probably found some of those posts to bump instead IMO. I don't mind you bumping my post, my answer was honest and justified...not shtick. :shrug:
If you legitimately valued 300 players higher than him, then I apologize. Thought you were being humorous.
Everyone did this, he was about a #300 player. It wasnt a joke at all.

 
Rank going forward, this year only:

MadBum, Kluber, Gray, Carrasco

This would be for a points league... wins (8), ip (1), k (1), qs (3).

Anyone way ahead or way below in your opinion? The purpose would be to shop Bryant around.

 
I boarded a plane in Dallas with a 10-1 lead, roughly the same as it had been all week.

Touch down in Boston and I lose 6-5.

I LOVE Sundays in a Yahoo! head-to-head league.

:ptts:

 
So my kids are close enough in age that this year they're playing on the same tee ball team. Somehow I ended up as coach accidentally. Their team name is the Cubs. That Marmol jersey is going to get a workout.

 
LOOK AT ME I WAS WRONG ABOUT A BASEBALL PLAYER'S PERFORMANCE.

He's obviously hitting great, as for keeping him, I think it gets more complicated. If you're contending/close he obviously has a lot more value, if you're tearing down, then you're probably better off dealing him. It's all relative. I think he's basically fantasy's new David Ortiz, where he's DH only, providing a lot of value...but the cliff is inevitably coming, you just don't know when. I don't know what that makes David Ortiz now.

 
LOOK AT ME I WAS WRONG ABOUT A BASEBALL PLAYER'S PERFORMANCE.

He's obviously hitting great, as for keeping him, I think it gets more complicated. If you're contending/close he obviously has a lot more value, if you're tearing down, then you're probably better off dealing him. It's all relative. I think he's basically fantasy's new David Ortiz, where he's DH only, providing a lot of value...but the cliff is inevitably coming, you just don't know when. I don't know what that makes David Ortiz now.
Your mom

 
Someone please shoot me a PM when AROD talk is over.

And speaking of shooting, can we shoot any / all Yankee fans that give this ##### a standing O when he reaches these milestones?

 
I was on the AROD train before the season...

Now that my drafts are done, Im adding Tulo to my overvalued list (wanted him in every league, didnt get him in any) and Im adding Jay Bruce, Jordan Zimmerman and ARoid to my undervalued list.
Of course, I was pretty much wrong about everything else so :wall:

 
So much for any chance of a Pete Rose reconciliation:

SportsCenter ‏@SportsCenter 6m6 minutes ago

BREAKING: @OTLonESPN obtains previously undisclosed evidence that Pete Rose bet on Reds games he played in during 1986 season.
I dont see the big deal. This isnt really new news. Its just more of the old news we already knew. Until someone tells me Rose was betting against the Reds and intentionally throwing games, Im in favor of him being back in baseball.

 
So much for any chance of a Pete Rose reconciliation:

SportsCenter ‏@SportsCenter 6m6 minutes ago

BREAKING: @OTLonESPN obtains previously undisclosed evidence that Pete Rose bet on Reds games he played in during 1986 season.
I dont see the big deal. This isnt really new news. Its just more of the old news we already knew. Until someone tells me Rose was betting against the Reds and intentionally throwing games, Im in favor of him being back in baseball.
It is news because he has been saying for the past 26 years that he never bet on baseball when he was a player.

 
So much for any chance of a Pete Rose reconciliation:

SportsCenter ‏@SportsCenter 6m6 minutes ago

BREAKING: @OTLonESPN obtains previously undisclosed evidence that Pete Rose bet on Reds games he played in during 1986 season.
I dont see the big deal. This isnt really new news. Its just more of the old news we already knew. Until someone tells me Rose was betting against the Reds and intentionally throwing games, Im in favor of him being back in baseball.
Oof

 
So much for any chance of a Pete Rose reconciliation:

SportsCenter ‏@SportsCenter 6m6 minutes ago

BREAKING: @OTLonESPN obtains previously undisclosed evidence that Pete Rose bet on Reds games he played in during 1986 season.
I dont see the big deal. This isnt really new news. Its just more of the old news we already knew. Until someone tells me Rose was betting against the Reds and intentionally throwing games, Im in favor of him being back in baseball.
It is news because he has been saying for the past 26 years that he never bet on baseball when he was a player.
I get that Rose is a liar. We already knew that. Just dont see how/why this changes anyones opinion. Either you dont care that he bet on his team or you do care that he bet on his team. Whats the big difference whether he's the player or the manager? Manager has more control over game than an individual player anyway.

I also understand its not that cut-and-dry for the PTB and see why this could ruin his chances. Just dont see why the casual fan would change their opinion over this. :shrug:

 
So much for any chance of a Pete Rose reconciliation:

SportsCenter ‏@SportsCenter 6m6 minutes ago

BREAKING: @OTLonESPN obtains previously undisclosed evidence that Pete Rose bet on Reds games he played in during 1986 season.
I dont see the big deal. This isnt really new news. Its just more of the old news we already knew. Until someone tells me Rose was betting against the Reds and intentionally throwing games, Im in favor of him being back in baseball.
It is news because he has been saying for the past 26 years that he never bet on baseball when he was a player.
I get that Rose is a liar. We already knew that. Just dont see how/why this changes anyones opinion. Either you dont care that he bet on his team or you do care that he bet on his team. Whats the big difference whether he's the player or the manager? Manager has more control over game than an individual player anyway.

I also understand its not that cut-and-dry for the PTB and see why this could ruin his chances. Just dont see why the casual fan would change their opinion over this. :shrug:
Does he?

 
So much for any chance of a Pete Rose reconciliation:

SportsCenter ‏@SportsCenter 6m6 minutes ago

BREAKING: @OTLonESPN obtains previously undisclosed evidence that Pete Rose bet on Reds games he played in during 1986 season.
I dont see the big deal. This isnt really new news. Its just more of the old news we already knew. Until someone tells me Rose was betting against the Reds and intentionally throwing games, Im in favor of him being back in baseball.
It is news because he has been saying for the past 26 years that he never bet on baseball when he was a player.
I get that Rose is a liar. We already knew that. Just dont see how/why this changes anyones opinion. Either you dont care that he bet on his team or you do care that he bet on his team. Whats the big difference whether he's the player or the manager? Manager has more control over game than an individual player anyway.

I also understand its not that cut-and-dry for the PTB and see why this could ruin his chances. Just dont see why the casual fan would change their opinion over this. :shrug:
Does he?
He does if you assume the person is always betting on his team instead of against it. A player isn't gonna try less hard in one game so he can try harder the next game, or because he tried harder the day before. A manager decides who is playing and when- if he had a big bet he'd pull out all the stops to win on a given day even if that meant his club suffered for it over the next couple days because the bullpen was spent or guys didn't get their scheduled off days or whatever.

EZ Glider has a point I think. It doesn't change how I view Rose, I think betting as the manager is way worse (assuming he's betting on his team, not against it). But it looks worse in the eyes of MLB because not betting on games as a player was the thing Rose hung his last remaining hat on.

 
I guess I'm just thinking in the sense of a single game.

For example, I think Miguel Cabrera has more of an impact on if the Tigers win or lose tonight than Brad Ausmus does. But I see what you're saying.

 
scoobus said:
I guess I'm just thinking in the sense of a single game.

For example, I think Miguel Cabrera has more of an impact on if the Tigers win or lose tonight than Brad Ausmus does. But I see what you're saying.
Unless Ausmus decides to give Cabrera the day off to rest. Or the day off cause Ausmus bet 50 grand against the Tigers
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top