What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016 Oakland Raiders thread (1 Viewer)

Nice post, mass, as always. Thanks for trying to talk me off the Impatience Ledge...

but it it ain't working. Sign someone now, Reggie! :)

On on another note, and as a counter point to this high we've all been feeling in free agencies, there are multiple articles yesterday on the cost of the 1-year lease for the Raiders in Oakland, and how it went up 4 times. Ugh. Crash back down to earth with the reality that our team barely has a place to call home. Another article about the NFL and Vegas. Mara quote saying Vegas is a non-starter but Goodel seems to be playing lip service saying the NFL is open to all options and will assess when the time comes. All bull imo. Vegas will be blocked by the owners, backing the raiders into a corner. 

 
Faux push hard for San Antonio, then meet with Jerry Jones and Bob McNair at PF Chang's when they cry foul, and say "Help me move to Vegas then".  Let Jones and McNair handle Mara.  Maybe Kroenke should help too, because you know he wants the Raiders nowhere near LA further stealing his fanbase.

 
:yes:   Low balling a lifetime Bengal... sounds just like what the Bengals do to their players.
I have a completely unfounded theory that it's a lot like Penn and the Raiders.  32 year old guy, on a team he likes, doesn't wanna go anywhere for one or two more years.  Team knows it, team takes advantage.

Stay strong, Reggie!! (Nelson that is)

 
I think it's high time this team had TWO Reggie's. 

Reggie, call Reggie's agent, and give Reggie a nice, front loaded, two year deal, Reggie. 

 
Amazing how Al Davis' passing has turned the organization around.

Future is looking bright.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Man, safeties would rather retire than try to fill Charles Woodson's shoes....

;)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fairley is washed out. Took a one year $5 million deal last year and takes almost half the next on a one year deal. There is a reason nobody wants him. Production doesn't match the name.

 
OK, here's the roundup for our secondary:

Woodson is gone.

Nate Allen had a torn MCL and was out for most of last season -- he looked great in preseason, but we'll see how he'll rebound turning 29 this year.

Asante is a journeyman backup who isn't, IMHO, very dependable or is a gamechanger. JAG on his best day at the position.

Amerson looks strong and certainly looked to be a force in games last year (vs Tenn with 1 INT and 6 deflections), and if I recall may have been pressed into safety coverage at times with TJ Carrie given the injuries we had last year in the secondary. We picked him up off waivers as a stopgap.

Hayden is a disappointment -- talented, but I don't think he's the answer at corner.

So aside from Sean Smith, who else we got? Tevin McDonald, a young corner who has bounced on and off our 53-man roster. A completely untested Dexter and/or DeweyMcDonald? Neiko Thorpe? 

Nope. The cupboard is bare, gents, and I'd rather see us spend a little more right now to get Nelson -- the last of the Top 50 free agents still around who has tangible value as a day one starter -- than try and get lucky at the position in the draft. We don't seem to have much luck developing defensive backs, so why not get a known quantity right now, especially if CIN is playing the waiting game with him?

 
Hayden experiment as a key starter is over. He's got no ball skills to speak of and would be a liability at safety. Really his upside is nickel corner. Not expecting much anymore from that guy, and wouldn't be surprised nor upset if he doesn't get his 5th year option picked up.

 
OK, here's the roundup for our secondary:

Woodson is gone.

Nate Allen had a torn MCL and was out for most of last season -- he looked great in preseason, but we'll see how he'll rebound turning 29 this year.

Asante is a journeyman backup who isn't, IMHO, very dependable or is a gamechanger. JAG on his best day at the position.

Amerson looks strong and certainly looked to be a force in games last year (vs Tenn with 1 INT and 6 deflections), and if I recall may have been pressed into safety coverage at times with TJ Carrie given the injuries we had last year in the secondary. We picked him up off waivers as a stopgap.

Hayden is a disappointment -- talented, but I don't think he's the answer at corner.

So aside from Sean Smith, who else we got? Tevin McDonald, a young corner who has bounced on and off our 53-man roster. A completely untested Dexter and/or DeweyMcDonald? Neiko Thorpe? 

Nope. The cupboard is bare, gents, and I'd rather see us spend a little more right now to get Nelson -- the last of the Top 50 free agents still around who has tangible value as a day one starter -- than try and get lucky at the position in the draft. We don't seem to have much luck developing defensive backs, so why not get a known quantity right now, especially if CIN is playing the waiting game with him?


Reggie, call Reggie, Reggie!!!!!

 
OK, here's the roundup for our secondary:

Woodson is gone.

Nate Allen had a torn MCL and was out for most of last season -- he looked great in preseason, but we'll see how he'll rebound turning 29 this year.

Asante is a journeyman backup who isn't, IMHO, very dependable or is a gamechanger. JAG on his best day at the position.

Amerson looks strong and certainly looked to be a force in games last year (vs Tenn with 1 INT and 6 deflections), and if I recall may have been pressed into safety coverage at times with TJ Carrie given the injuries we had last year in the secondary. We picked him up off waivers as a stopgap.

Hayden is a disappointment -- talented, but I don't think he's the answer at corner.

So aside from Sean Smith, who else we got? Tevin McDonald, a young corner who has bounced on and off our 53-man roster. A completely untested Dexter and/or DeweyMcDonald? Neiko Thorpe? 

Nope. The cupboard is bare, gents, and I'd rather see us spend a little more right now to get Nelson -- the last of the Top 50 free agents still around who has tangible value as a day one starter -- than try and get lucky at the position in the draft. We don't seem to have much luck developing defensive backs, so why not get a known quantity right now, especially if CIN is playing the waiting game with him?
I am just going to presume that you are taking the doom and gloom route because you want to keep your expectations as low as possible, that way you are less likely to be disappointed.

The cupboard is not bare.  Improved pass rush (Irvin), players coming back healthy (Allen), guys who have played at a high level (Amerson, Carrie) and the luxury to move a first round draft pick to the slot.

And you left out McGill who I don't think the book is closed on just yet.

I am fine with being cautious but the notion that the cupboard is bare is an overstatement.

 
Chaka said:
I am just going to presume that you are taking the doom and gloom route because you want to keep your expectations as low as possible, that way you are less likely to be disappointed.

The cupboard is not bare.  Improved pass rush (Irvin), players coming back healthy (Allen), guys who have played at a high level (Amerson, Carrie) and the luxury to move a first round draft pick to the slot.

And you left out McGill who I don't think the book is closed on just yet.

I am fine with being cautious but the notion that the cupboard is bare is an overstatement.
You forgot Sean Smith who is pretty much as close as you can get to Richard Sherman without being named Richard Sherman. Great fit for Norton's D and a very good defender.

 
You forgot Sean Smith who is pretty much as close as you can get to Richard Sherman without being named Richard Sherman. Great fit for Norton's D and a very good defender.
Stompin' Tom mentioned Smith so I didn't feel that I had to include him.

 
Stompin' Tom mentioned Smith so I didn't feel that I had to include him.
Yea, but I think Sean Smith is worth more than a "aside from". As available corners went he is prob the best fit in terms of scheme and talent that we could have got. I would have liked him to have a couple of less years but it is free agency and 28 is not that old. Amerson turned out to look like a solid CB on the other side (likely will get thrown at more this year and have some more ops to get INT's). Yes, Hayden is a disappointment as a 1st round selection for CB but he should do a decent job as a nickel back. Allen will be back and there is no reason to believe he won't be decent coming off the injury as the MCL tear is pretty routine nowadays for players to come back from. There are serviceable guys to plug in for a year in FA still for the other safety position. I think we are "ok" for starting positions.

More importantly the secondary will get even more help this year. We have got more and more hints towards optimism for Mario. Of course there is Mack and Irvin is a good add as well to help pressure QB's. Later in the year there is still the possibility of adding Aldon too (I think that is a good possibility).

Ideal? No. Would I like Nelson? Sure. Gloom and doom? No, I don't think so, unless the injury bug hits us in the secondary then we are trouble as we have no depth right now. Are we better than last year on D? Absolutely.

 
Yea, but I think Sean Smith is worth more than a "aside from". As available corners went he is prob the best fit in terms of scheme and talent that we could have got. I would have liked him to have a couple of less years but it is free agency and 28 is not that old. Amerson turned out to look like a solid CB on the other side (likely will get thrown at more this year and have some more ops to get INT's). Yes, Hayden is a disappointment as a 1st round selection for CB but he should do a decent job as a nickel back. Allen will be back and there is no reason to believe he won't be decent coming off the injury as the MCL tear is pretty routine nowadays for players to come back from. There are serviceable guys to plug in for a year in FA still for the other safety position. I think we are "ok" for starting positions.

More importantly the secondary will get even more help this year. We have got more and more hints towards optimism for Mario. Of course there is Mack and Irvin is a good add as well to help pressure QB's. Later in the year there is still the possibility of adding Aldon too (I think that is a good possibility).

Ideal? No. Would I like Nelson? Sure. Gloom and doom? No, I don't think so, unless the injury bug hits us in the secondary then we are trouble as we have no depth right now. Are we better than last year on D? Absolutely.
Agree on all points.  However losing Woodson as a locker room leader and a General on the field will hurt.  There is no getting around that.

 
I think they have as well.  However if Mario does not come back it's closer to a push than anything.  

Gain Smith & Irvin

Lose Woodson & Mario


I'm mostly on the pessimistic side when talking about our defensive backfield (I might have made one or two posts about signing Reggie Nelson asap ;) )

but I wonder if we could/should think of a healthy Nate Allen as the "signing" that's meant to be the Woodson replacement? He barely played last year before getting hurt, so it's like he's a new signing this year. No one is Charles Woodson, but he might have enough of what it takes to put him in the "gain" column for the secondary this year. thoughts?

 
I'm mostly on the pessimistic side when talking about our defensive backfield (I might have made one or two posts about signing Reggie Nelson asap ;) )

but I wonder if we could/should think of a healthy Nate Allen as the "signing" that's meant to be the Woodson replacement? He barely played last year before getting hurt, so it's like he's a new signing this year. No one is Charles Woodson, but he might have enough of what it takes to put him in the "gain" column for the secondary this year. thoughts?
Allen is an X-factor to me.  Lots of people in Phili seemed happy to see him go and there were plenty of people in here who were less than luke warm about bringing him in.  I believe the knock is that he is a liability in coverage. It's difficult to read through the hyperbole and Chicken-Littles to find the truth.  

I agree that he should be viewed as an addition because he was lost so early in the season.  I think he will help the defense, certainly not make up for the loss of Woodson though.  The best thing that could happen for the Raiders defense is for Edwards to come back at full strength.  Even if Allen is only mediocre the defense should still be improved with such a deep defensive line.  Throw in a first round defensive player, and probably a second rounder too and they could be scary good.

There is a lot to like about what Oakland is doing on both sides of the ball.

 
Remember that time, y'know when a bunch of guys in here hated the Mario Edwards draft pick?  You remember that?

That was awesome.

 
Mario was the pick where everyone kind of said, well, OK, let's give this Reggie guy some rope.  Might know what he's doing.

Off topic:  Elliott being there at #14 would be an interesting test of the 'true to his board' McKenzie.  Hard to imagine a better prospect available at any position at that point in the draft.  Top 5 talent, at #14.  Would he skip over more pressing needs to take the best player.  I think he might just take Zeke.

 
Off topic:  Elliott being there at #14 would be an interesting test of the 'true to his board' McKenzie.  Hard to imagine a better prospect available at any position at that point in the draft.  Top 5 talent, at #14.  Would he skip over more pressing needs to take the best player.  I think he might just take Zeke.
Interesting thought. I haven't done much in terms of researching the current crop of rookies but I keep hearing tons of great things about Elliott. Didn't Meyer call him the most complete back he has ever coached or something along those lines? Heard people rave about not just his running but his blocking, receiving and overall football acumen as well. RB has been a devalued position over the last few years and I think the Raiders desired more of a thumper to pair with Murray but if he truly is the best player available- I am on board. Elliott sounds like the type of back that ends up being in the NFL for 10 years- those are not as numerous as the ones that are worth about 3 or 4 years of production for sure.

 
Heck, forget 10 years.

If he is Marshawn Lynch, for the next 5 years (4 year deal plus the team option), that's worth the #14 pick.  For sure it's worth it.  Let him get 10 mill a year from someone else for the last 4 years of his career, who cares if he doesn't re-sign?

Future is now for the team, they have every reason to think they can push for the division this year.  Pretty easy to argue that Elliott could have the biggest impact of any rookie we might take at #14.  

I dunno, I want defense throughout this draft, but if Elliott is a top 5 NFL back.......those guys win games for you all by themselves.  Just like pass rushers.  

 
Mass, you've spent lots of time in this thread breaking down the secondary, available free agents, etc. Would love to hear your take on Nate Allen as discussed a few posts up...

 
Interesting thought. I haven't done much in terms of researching the current crop of rookies but I keep hearing tons of great things about Elliott. Didn't Meyer call him the most complete back he has ever coached or something along those lines? Heard people rave about not just his running but his blocking, receiving and overall football acumen as well. RB has been a devalued position over the last few years and I think the Raiders desired more of a thumper to pair with Murray but if he truly is the best player available- I am on board. Elliott sounds like the type of back that ends up being in the NFL for 10 years- those are not as numerous as the ones that are worth about 3 or 4 years of production for sure.
The best he's ever coached without the ball in his hands.

 
Remember that time, y'know when a bunch of guys inRaiderfan32904 here hated the Mario Edwards draft pick?  You remember that?

That was awesome.


Was kind of kidding but I fixed it just for you.

ETA: Just kidding Raiderfan32904, you weren't the only one skeptical about the Edwards pick.  The most negative about it, perhaps, but not the only one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Heck, forget 10 years.

If he is Marshawn Lynch, for the next 5 years (4 year deal plus the team option), that's worth the #14 pick.  For sure it's worth it.  Let him get 10 mill a year from someone else for the last 4 years of his career, who cares if he doesn't re-sign?

Future is now for the team, they have every reason to think they can push for the division this year.  Pretty easy to argue that Elliott could have the biggest impact of any rookie we might take at #14.  

I dunno, I want defense throughout this draft, but if Elliott is a top 5 NFL back.......those guys win games for you all by themselves.  Just like pass rushers.  
I would really like to see Zeke at 14....but I believe if he is there at 13 Miami probably takes him

 
Mass, you've spent lots of time in this thread breaking down the secondary, available free agents, etc. Would love to hear your take on Nate Allen as discussed a few posts up...
I think safety is a position I don't belive a lot of people on.  If a safety does his job,  95% of the time you won't hear his name.   

When they screw up,  you see it,  and everyone says he sucks.  How many people watch all-22 film to grade a safety? And even if they do have that film and watch it,  how do they know for sure that the safety did or didn't do his job? 

Even worse in college.  I don't believe for a second that these draft guys have been watching all-22 tape of Boise State, and can tell me for sure if Darian Thompson is any good.   

Short answer: I don't know about Allen, and when fans talk about him confidently,  I think they are full of sh!!.  

No one needs impact safeties.  Just need ones that do their job,  and have range in the passing game.  Nice to watch big hits,  but do we really want Bernard Pollard or Brandon Merriweather?

Only thing I  believe for sure is we need two more decent prospects at that spot. 

 
There is no need to think about Elliott falling to the Raiders at #14.  It is not going to happen.  Elliott is a 3-down back that starts week 1. 

 
I think safety is a position I don't belive a lot of people on.  If a safety does his job,  95% of the time you won't hear his name.   

When they screw up,  you see it,  and everyone says he sucks.  How many people watch all-22 film to grade a safety? And even if they do have that film and watch it,  how do they know for sure that the safety did or didn't do his job? 

Even worse in college.  I don't believe for a second that these draft guys have been watching all-22 tape of Boise State, and can tell me for sure if Darian Thompson is any good.   

Short answer: I don't know about Allen, and when fans talk about him confidently,  I think they are full of sh!!.  

No one needs impact safeties.  Just need ones that do their job,  and have range in the passing game.  Nice to watch big hits,  but do we really want Bernard Pollard or Brandon Merriweather?

Only thing I  believe for sure is we need two more decent prospects at that spot. 
All the talk I heard previous to the injury was that Allen was looking good. :shrug:

 
All the talk I heard previous to the injury was that Allen was looking good. :shrug:
I don't remember thinking he screwed up anytime off top of my head.

I've been reading about Vonn Bell for instance.  One guy says he's a headhunter, another guy says he doesn't love contact. I have a rough time with draft evaluations of safeties. 

 
I don't remember thinking he screwed up anytime off top of my head.

I've been reading about Vonn Bell for instance.  One guy says he's a headhunter, another guy says he doesn't love contact. I have a rough time with draft evaluations of safeties. 
You have to wonder how much tape anyone watches over anyone. This kind of stuff is hilarious.

 
Heck, forget 10 years.

If he is Marshawn Lynch, for the next 5 years (4 year deal plus the team option), that's worth the #14 pick.  For sure it's worth it.  Let him get 10 mill a year from someone else for the last 4 years of his career, who cares if he doesn't re-sign?

Future is now for the team, they have every reason to think they can push for the division this year.  Pretty easy to argue that Elliott could have the biggest impact of any rookie we might take at #14.  

I dunno, I want defense throughout this draft, but if Elliott is a top 5 NFL back.......those guys win games for you all by themselves.  Just like pass rushers.  
Nice, dude. Glad to see you coming along here. Elliott is the dream pick at #14. He would make the single biggest difference to our team of any player in this draft, given how our roster is now built. He is exactly what we need to take this offense and team to the next level. Imagine how much better our D will be with rest and leads.

There is no need to think about Elliott falling to the Raiders at #14.  It is not going to happen.  Elliott is a 3-down back that starts week 1. 
I dunno, dude. Dallas is out and I do not believe Philly would take an RB, given they already have Mathews & Sproles and a lot of other needs.

Biggest (only?) risks IMO are Bal #6, NYG #10, Chi #11, Mia #13

But all four of those teams have other needs too and there are enough talked-up other prospects in the draft, so I could see Zeke falling with a pretty decent outside chance. One key will be if 2-3 QBs go ahead of our pick. C'mon run on QBs!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Chaka said:
I am just going to presume that you are taking the doom and gloom route because you want to keep your expectations as low as possible, that way you are less likely to be disappointed.

The cupboard is not bare.  Improved pass rush (Irvin), players coming back healthy (Allen), guys who have played at a high level (Amerson, Carrie) and the luxury to move a first round draft pick to the slot.

And you left out McGill who I don't think the book is closed on just yet.

I am fine with being cautious but the notion that the cupboard is bare is an overstatement.


Yea, but I think Sean Smith is worth more than a "aside from". As available corners went he is prob the best fit in terms of scheme and talent that we could have got. I would have liked him to have a couple of less years but it is free agency and 28 is not that old. Amerson turned out to look like a solid CB on the other side (likely will get thrown at more this year and have some more ops to get INT's). Yes, Hayden is a disappointment as a 1st round selection for CB but he should do a decent job as a nickel back. Allen will be back and there is no reason to believe he won't be decent coming off the injury as the MCL tear is pretty routine nowadays for players to come back from. There are serviceable guys to plug in for a year in FA still for the other safety position. I think we are "ok" for starting positions.

More importantly the secondary will get even more help this year. We have got more and more hints towards optimism for Mario. Of course there is Mack and Irvin is a good add as well to help pressure QB's. Later in the year there is still the possibility of adding Aldon too (I think that is a good possibility).

Ideal? No. Would I like Nelson? Sure. Gloom and doom? No, I don't think so, unless the injury bug hits us in the secondary then we are trouble as we have no depth right now. Are we better than last year on D? Absolutely.
Good comments, both. But I think you are conflating my comments aimed specifically at the secondary to the entire D. There is no question our D got stronger up front with Irvin, and the promise of having Mario come back to form -- along with the unstoppable force that is Mack -- does a lot to make up for poor CB/Safety talent. A great pass rush that disrupts the pocket goes a long way to hide deficiencies in the defensive backfield.

But I can't be fooled into thinking what we have is truly a viable NFL secondary. Again, not including Sean Smith, who is absolutely a gigantic upgrade all by himself, there are a lot of unknowns everywhere else. I don't think it's doom and gloom to say that we are very weak past Smith in both dependable and proven starters and depth -- I mean, which of these guys would realistically start on other NFL teams?

That's not to say I don't have hope that Amerson continues his solid progression, or that guys like Carrie or McDonald will solidify. But they were guys that we picked up or drafted for emergency depth and help on special teams -- point being that they are relatively unproven in terms of consistent and reliable play.

I don't think it's anywhere near a stretch to write off Hayden. Guy has wasted his talent with a weak heart.  I also don't think it's a chicken little statement to worry about Allen coming back to form as a 29 y/o, regardless of how routine ligament tears are in this day and age.

Granted, safeties aren't as important as QBs, a pass rushing end/OLB, left tackle, or even a WR1. But any strong defense needs to be strong down the middle. To be really effective and make the most of our front 7, you need a playmaking safety to patrol the middle effectively and make the QB throw into man coverage (our default scheme) -- and where Smith can then shine.

This is has been a huge need for us since Woodson announced his retirement (and arguable earlier). I think it's smarter for us to nab a proven NFL-starting-caliber safety in Nelson now, rather than gamble in the draft and/or rely on the subpar talent we have. We have the money, but seem to have been waiting on the position and letting other guys (Gipson, Johnson, Weddle, Iloka, etc.) get resigned or taken without seeming interest.

Leaves me scratching my head, I guess.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top