What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2017 Raiders - how's the 2018 draft looking? (3 Viewers)

https://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/ has the Raiders @ about 32 million under the cap. I assume that doesn't count Carr's new contract. If so, that leaves them at about 7 million over the cap. Reggie has said getting Gabe Jackson signed is the next priority, and it is gonna take about 7 million to get that deal done. Unless I am completely off on these numbers I do not thin there is much left to sign FAs.

 
https://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/ has the Raiders @ about 32 million under the cap. I assume that doesn't count Carr's new contract. If so, that leaves them at about 7 million over the cap. Reggie has said getting Gabe Jackson signed is the next priority, and it is gonna take about 7 million to get that deal done. Unless I am completely off on these numbers I do not thin there is much left to sign FAs.
The new deal is an extension. No idea how much of that would hit this year as guaranteed money, but I would imagine that Carr would want to structure as much as possible being paid in a few years as there is no income tax in Nevada versus the high taxes of CA.

 
Wait till Stafford and Cousins, QBs I would not trade Carr for, get their new deals. 
Yeah.  This deal could look pretty cheap within just a few months

If you are fortunate enough to have a franchise QB, that's the price of keeping him around. 

 
Yeah.  This deal could look pretty cheap within just a few months

If you are fortunate enough to have a franchise QB, that's the price of keeping him around. 
That's just not true. Neither Cam Newton nor Matt Ryan became the highest paid when they signed their extensions.

 
That's just not true. Neither Cam Newton nor Matt Ryan became the highest paid when they signed their extensions.
He won't stay the highest paid for long and maybe the Raiders wanted to lock their guy up and not create a Kirk Cousins situation.  With the increase in the salary cap, I don't think this contract is out of line moving forward.

Not every extension is going to set a new watermark, but at some point, one will, so the fact than neither Newton or Ryan got a record contract doesn't really seem relevant here.  The Raiders locked up their guy for what IMO, will seem a pretty decent deal fairly quickly. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's just not true. Neither Cam Newton nor Matt Ryan became the highest paid when they signed their extensions.
True. 

Also, whatever.

It's a difference of 1-2 mil a year. Has Carr shown enough to be the highest paid QB?  No. 

Whatever. Don't care.

 He will be surpassed shortly by a QB I wouldn't take over him. Cousins and Stafford will probably both pass him in per year deal, the Raiders IMO saved money by getting him signed first. 

 
I am sure the NFL would love it if the truly best players were also the highest paid.  Much easier for their salary structure if nobody made more than Rodgers and Brady until they surpassed them in the QB pecking order.   Obviously doesn't work that way, so the fact that Carr is temporarily the highest paid QB doesn't mean Oakland overpaid. 

 
This is a no-win media situation for the Raiders.  Pay him, the story becomes "they over spent".  Don't pay him, the story becomes "they let their franchise QB get away"

Carr is everything the Raiders needed on the field, in the locker room, and off the field in all aspects across the board.  I'm happy the deal is done without any issues or hang ups.  I'm happy he is getting paid by all accounts.  And I'm exceptionally excited that he will remain a Raider.  Consistency at the QB position is something we haven't been able to enjoy for a long long time.  

Today is a good day.

 
This is a no-win media situation for the Raiders.  Pay him, the story becomes "they over spent".  Don't pay him, the story becomes "they let their franchise QB get away"

Carr is everything the Raiders needed on the field, in the locker room, and off the field in all aspects across the board.  I'm happy the deal is done without any issues or hang ups.  I'm happy he is getting paid by all accounts.  And I'm exceptionally excited that he will remain a Raider.  Consistency at the QB position is something we haven't been able to enjoy for a long long time.  

Today is a good day.
That's not "the story" at all.  It's the words of a few ignorant in the ways of the NFL.

 
Bottom line... It's a great day for the Raider Nation. I could care less what anyone outside the organization thinks.

 
Bottom line... It's a great day for the Raider Nation. I could care less what anyone outside the organization thinks.
couldn't. 

Pet peeve.

Grammar police aside, I have always rooted for the Raiders a bit, moreso with Reggie there now lately. I felt Carr was the best QB in his class and still feel that way. I think this is a huge moment in Raider history that needed to happen to keep the ball rolling.

Things keep getting better for the Raiders and it's fun to watch! 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
True. 

Also, whatever.

It's a difference of 1-2 mil a year. Has Carr shown enough to be the highest paid QB?  No. 

Whatever. Don't care.

 He will be surpassed shortly by a QB I wouldn't take over him. Cousins and Stafford will probably both pass him in per year deal, the Raiders IMO saved money by getting him signed first. 
Rodgers is re-doing his deal after/during this season. I would expect this to be a benchmark for his deal. A lot of QBs are signing their deals- which should surpass this one- and, I agree, I'd take very few of them over Carr

 
Complete list of QBs in NFL history to throw more than 80 TD passes & fewer than 40 INTs in 1st 3 seasons:

Derek Carr

 
https://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/ has the Raiders @ about 32 million under the cap. I assume that doesn't count Carr's new contract. If so, that leaves them at about 7 million over the cap. Reggie has said getting Gabe Jackson signed is the next priority, and it is gonna take about 7 million to get that deal done. Unless I am completely off on these numbers I do not thin there is much left to sign FAs.
You're probably way off, but only because they haven't announced the contract details yet.  They announced 40 million guaranteed.  A lot of this is probably in a signing bonus, which are paid out over the life of the contract.  His original contract for this year was for $1.1 million.  They could have structured the deal to be anywhere from the 1.1 number all the way to 32.  Usually teams will try and backload contracts because then the cap will be higher, and if the player is cut after the guaranteed money has run out then the team has no liability.  His cap hit for this year is probably somewhere in the middle, like $16-20 million.  Gives them room to work with other players, or if there's an injury room to sign other players.

 
Worth. Every. Penny.

I have every faith that this deal is somewhat structured with a heavier backend as, as others have mentioned, it's a win-win for Carr (deferring ~13.5%+ CA tax for 0% NV tax) and the team (saves some cap space for next priority deals like Gabe).

Comparatively, this total package puts him just about $1M above the next highest paid players in the NFL, Luck, Brees, and Cousins. Given youth, what he has shown so far, and the trajectory of the team and the weapons around him that augment his skill/talent, I would honestly prefer Carr over any of these guys. The deal looks fair and will look like a bargain when Stafford, Cousins, and potentially even Ryan go to the bargaining table (and perhaps Rodgers and Wilson if their teams look to lock them in as QB rates rise before their deals are up in 3 years).

Slightly overpaying for the hottest young QB in the NFL, and the cornerstone of this turned-around Raiders franchise, is a no-brainer. 

 
Complete list of QBs in NFL history to throw more than 80 TD passes & fewer than 40 INTs in 1st 3 seasons:

Derek Carr
Winston might join that list this year as might Mariota.  (edit, cuz math / Winston probably throws more than 7 INT)

yeah, Carr is really good, a franchise QB and easily among the top 5 young QBs in the league.  I don't like the Raiders but admit the league is more fun when they're good. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Winston probably joins that list this year.

Mariota might but is less likely. 

but yeah, Carr is really good, a franchise QB and easily among the top 5 young QBs in the league.  I don't like Oakland but admit the league is more fun when they're good. 
31 and 6?  Um, no.

 
I am sure the NFL would love it if the truly best players were also the highest paid.  Much easier for their salary structure if nobody made more than Rodgers and Brady until they surpassed them in the QB pecking order.   Obviously doesn't work that way, so the fact that Carr is temporarily the highest paid QB doesn't mean Oakland overpaid. 
exactly.  Fully expect Winston and Mariota to at least approach the contract if not exceed it.  Heck, Kirk Cousins might

 
31 and 6?  Um, no.
you caught me before the edit.   You're right, I misread his current total INT.  

FWIW, MM is far more likely to join him simply based on INT.  > 35, < 21 is within reach with Decker. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been sitting here for awhile trying to best describe how I feel about this news.

Content, is probably the word that comes closest. Locking down one of the best young quarterbacks in the league. One that was drafted by the team. One that can really be an identity for our organization. One that represents everything I want the Raiders to be. Well worth the money, in my opinion.

Honestly, regardless of the future of his career, I'm not sure there's any way I could look back and fault the organization for paying him this much, based on what he's shown so far and based on the constantly escalating nature of NFL contracts. A bargain at any price, as they say.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, there's a bunch of hot takes on the Twitter about how he's not at so and so level yet, derp derp derp.  Couldn't care less.  He's not at Aaron Rodgers level yet, is one I have seen.  Umm, yeah.  No crap.  

I've seen every throw he's made since joining the team, these online writer guys have not.  

He's plenty good enough for this team to win titles with, what do I care where he ranks among NFL QBs?  

Honestly, I think these hot takes are simply to get a response, they know Raider Nation is vocal on the internet, I just think it's a move to drive traffic.  

Jerry MacDonald retweeted some negative story from some USAToday sub-site I've never heard of.  The writer was a University of Maryland journalism student with 674 Twitter followers.  1.  Who cares? 2.  Why would Jerry even bother retweeting what is essentially a message board post?

 
Raider QBs and their starts before Derek Carr and after Rich Gannon's heyday:

2013 Terrelle Pryor (9) / Matt McGloin (6) / Matt Flynn (1)

2012  Carson Palmer (15) / Terrelle Pryor (1)

2011 Carson Palmer (9) / Jason Campbell (6) / Kyle Boller (1)

2010 Jason Campbell (12) / Bruce Gradkowski (4)

2009 JaMarcus Russell (9) / Bruce Gradkowski (4) / Charlie Frye (3)

2008 JaMarcus Russell (15) / Andrew Walter (1)

2007 Josh McCown (9) / Daunte Culpepper (6) / JaMarcus Russell (1)

2006 Andrew Walter (8) / Aaron Brooks (8)

2005 Kerry Collins (15) / Marques Tuiasosopo (1)

2004 Kerry Collins (13) / Rich Gannon (3)

2003 Rick Mirer (8) / Rich Gannon (7) / Marques Tuiasosopo (1)

Eleven years mostly wandering in the desert. Derek Carr is worth every penny they're giving him.

 
I've been sitting here for awhile trying to best describe how I feel about this news.

Content, is probably the word that comes closest. Locking down one of the best young quarterbacks in the league. One that was drafted by the team. One that can really be an identity for our organization. One that represents everything I want the Raiders to be. Well worth the money, in my opinion.

Honestly, regardless of the future of his career, I'm not sure there's any way I could look back and fault the organization for paying him this much, based on what he's shown so far and based on the constantly escalating nature of NFL contracts. A bargain at any price, as they say.
For a franchise that has been looking for exactly what is bolded since before I can even remember... (maybe Gannon???) this is huge. They hit on Carr and they could not afford to let him get away. Whatever it costed them, it was worth it. This is a great deal for the Raiders. 

When Baltimore signed Flacco to his ridiculous deal everyone knew it was a bad deal for Baltimore. This is nowhere close to that. Sure, Flacco had more on his resume than Carr but the big difference is Carr hasn't hit his ceiling yet. 

Carr may not be the best QB in the league now, or maybe ever (who knows), but he's certainly going to be a top 5 QB in the league and a true franchise, playoff, super bowl caliber QB for the Raiders for a very long time.


Great job by the Raiders... I love seeing Reggie turning everything around for you guys. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
easily among the top 5 young QBs in the league.  
Honest question -- which young QB do you think is better?

Winston's star shines bright but I take Carr over him in a heartbeat given the comparative poise -- Winston really hasn't progressed that much in his first few seasons, and his decision making and high turnover rate makes Carr easily a better prospect.

Mariota? Better TD:INT ratio than Winston, but still lacking in terms of completion percentages (although he's pretty good in the RZ) and his feet/decisions in the pocket under pressure.

Prescott? Tons of respect  given how much leadership he showed for a backup, but having a solid run game behind an incredible line really helps.

Bortles? Garbage time king and nothing more.

Were any of these guys discussed as league MVP the way Carr was last year? Didn't hear it about Dak, and Carr had him 6:1 in voting.

Even removing my Silver and Black colored glasses, and with due respect to an incredible crop of young QBs who have bright futures, I still think Carr is the best young QB in the league hands down.

I've seen every throw he's made since joining the team, these online writer guys have not.  
And this. Carr passes every single eye test in a way other QBs haven't to me. His technique is great, he's super-poised under pressure, he can make all the throws, from downfield bombs to soft touch leads, all with pinpoint accuracy. His work ethic is incomparable, and it's obvious he's an extraordinary leader. There is a valid point that he doesn't have the same resume as, say, Rodgers or other QBs he's just passed on the highest paid list -- but this amount isn't based on the past it's on the future. And there is zero doubt in my mind, having watched Carr play for the last few seasons, that what you see isn't an anomaly, and that his success will only continue.

 
Honest question -- which young QB do you think is better?

Winston's star shines bright but I take Carr over him in a heartbeat given the comparative poise -- Winston really hasn't progressed that much in his first few seasons, and his decision making and high turnover rate makes Carr easily a better prospect.

Mariota? Better TD:INT ratio than Winston, but still lacking in terms of completion percentages (although he's pretty good in the RZ) and his feet/decisions in the pocket under pressure.

Prescott? Tons of respect  given how much leadership he showed for a backup, but having a solid run game behind an incredible line really helps.

Bortles? Garbage time king and nothing more.

Were any of these guys discussed as league MVP the way Carr was last year? Didn't hear it about Dak, and Carr had him 6:1 in voting.

Even removing my Silver and Black colored glasses, and with due respect to an incredible crop of young QBs who have bright futures, I still think Carr is the best young QB in the league hands down.

And this. Carr passes every single eye test in a way other QBs haven't to me. His technique is great, he's super-poised under pressure, he can make all the throws, from downfield bombs to soft touch leads, all with pinpoint accuracy. His work ethic is incomparable, and it's obvious he's an extraordinary leader. There is a valid point that he doesn't have the same resume as, say, Rodgers or other QBs he's just passed on the highest paid list -- but this amount isn't based on the past it's on the future. And there is zero doubt in my mind, having watched Carr play for the last few seasons, that what you see isn't an anomaly, and that his success will only continue.
I didn't say he was the 5th best.  

yeah, Carr is really good, a franchise QB and easily among the top 5 young QBs in the league.  
My statement doesn't imply that any QB is necessarily better.  Just that I'm putting them in a group in which Carr easily belongs.

Your completion percentage argument for Carr over MM is weak.  First, MM has a higher percentage, second he doesn't have Cooper and Crabtree (although Walker is great). Not to mention he's been in the league one less season, went to a worse team, has a higher rating, and do I need to mention his ability to run? 

My group, not in any specific order, is Luck (he'll be 28 this season, not exactly old by QB standards),  Winston, Mariota, Carr, and I think I like Wentz better than Dak long term but it's too early.  There's no "hand down" best of the bunch (IMO) but Carr is certainly part of the group.

ETA: I'm splitting hairs by including Luck and not Wilson or Cam, but Wilson is 29 and I don't think Cam has the longevity Luck should.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't say he was the 5th best.  

My statement doesn't imply that any QB is necessarily better.  Just that I'm putting them in a group in which Carr easily belongs.

Your completion percentage argument for Carr over MM is weak.  First, MM has a higher percentage, second he doesn't have Cooper and Crabtree (although Walker is great). Not to mention he's been in the league one less season, went to a worse team, has a higher rating, and do I need to mention his ability to run? 

My group, not in any specific order, is Luck (he'll be 28 this season, not exactly old by QB standards),  Winston, Mariota, Carr, and I think I like Wentz better than Dak long term but it's too early.  There's no "hand down" best of the bunch (IMO) but Carr is certainly part of the group.

ETA: I'm splitting hairs by including Luck and not Wilson or Cam, but Wilson is 29 and I don't think Cam has the longevity Luck should.
Lets not forget the Raiders WRs led the league in drops. His comp % should be better than it was... 

 
Seems silly for anyone to argue about Carr's contract.  He is one of the best young QBs in the league and got paid accordingly.  No team would have done anything differently than the Raiders in this situation.  Teams struggle for years trying to find a good/great QB that is capable of leading the team to the SB.   The Raiders found their QB and locked him up at the going rate. 

Carr needs to cash in now.  His career could end on any play.  Hopefully, Carr will enjoy a few years of getting paid big money but is then not afraid to restructure his pay in order for the Raiders to continue surrounding him with talent.   

 
In Carr's presser, he says, "I never chased the money" and "It's never going to be about the money for me".  I'm going to have to raise the B.S. flag on that. Did the Raiders really approach him and say, "Hey Derek, can we please make you the highest-paid player in the league?"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In Carr's presser, he says, "I never chased the money" and "It's never going to be about the money for me".  I'm going to have to raise the B.S. flag on that. Did the Raiders really approach him and say, "Hey David, can we please make you the highest-paid player in the league?"
I can guarantee they didn't.  Maybe they said that to Derek... but they definitely did not say that to David.

 
Seems silly for anyone to argue about Carr's contract.  He is one of the best young QBs in the league and got paid accordingly.  No team would have done anything differently than the Raiders in this situation.  Teams struggle for years trying to find a good/great QB that is capable of leading the team to the SB.   The Raiders found their QB and locked him up at the going rate. 

Carr needs to cash in now.  His career could end on any play.  Hopefully, Carr will enjoy a few years of getting paid big money but is then not afraid to restructure his pay in order for the Raiders to continue surrounding him with talent.   
This is a win-win now that will look like even more of a win-win as Cousins, Stafford, et al sign new contracts. 

 
Bruno2 said:
Right! And just wait until it's time to negotiate Mack's deal. That will be another record-breaker. 
No one will question that contract.  For one thing, Mack is a better defender than Carr is a QB, he's DPOY.  For another, you still have Carr backlash.  I cannot fathom another reason.  This isn't just a Carr thing, it happens to other players every single year.  We do it in fantasy football, for pete's sake.  It's natural.  You think a certain thing about a person, and don't like getting proven wrong, and look for anything to confirm your bias.  

You think Todd McShay is rooting for Derek Carr?  Of course not.  Todd McShay stood his ground, planted a flag in the ground that said 'Derek Carr isn't a top QB prospect'.  (Kiper loves throwing this in McShay's face, if you listen to their podcast)  And he was not a alone.  Pro Football Focus know-it-all jagoffs.  Anyone that has the phrase 'Derek Carr' and 'USC game' prominently in their history is going to twist themselves into a pretzel to explain why he's not as good as this guy, or like guys like Cian Fahey, will boldly proclaim that he's not on Aaron Rodgers level--yet.  Effing YPA stat, can they just rename this the Derek Carr stat?  That would be a nice tribute.  Any draft guy that liked to have hot takes, you can find them saying nasty sheet about Carr before the draft, during his rookie year (playing with a terrible, terrible team), and after this extension.  

Andrew Luck's extension was the right thing to do, and so was Carr's.  But no one questions anything about Luck, because everyone loved him coming out of college, and in fact, people talked him up so much, their confirmation bias is tilted the other way.  

Meantime, did you know that Andrew Luck has never thrown for as few INTs as Carr had in 2016?  Did you know Luck has never thrown for as high a completion percentage as Carr in 2016?  Did you know Luck has two seasons, out of five, where his rating was above 90?  Carr has the same number in three seasons.  I didn't know that till I looked it up, because I didn't have people on Twitter or ESPN telling me that.  Because they aren't interested in comparing the players that got the most recent big money extensions.  

It seems like Carr's contract details have come out.  

What's pretty great is that because this deal was done before the start of his 4th year, the team gets to spread out his money over an extra year.  Carr signs a 5 year, 25 mill a year deal, that was the headline.  And yet he only has one year above 25 mill in cap hit.  This upcoming season, when the team had 30 mill in cap space, we get to park 17 mill in cap hit for Carr, which lowers his cap hit over the next five years.  Consider:

Andrew Luck's cap hits in years 2018/19/20:  24.4, 27.5, 28.4.  

Derek Carr's cap hits in 2018/19/20:  25, 22.6, 22.6.  

Man, you know how cheap Carr's deal gonna look in 19/20?  Get this:  We have him for two years after that, at cap hits of 22.6 in 2021, and 18.2 in 2022.   :shock:

By 2021, we're gonna be talking about extending Carr, and trying to lock him up for 31 mill a year.  

 
Also, Zacahary Orr has been rumored to be considering a comeback after getting a 2nd opinion.  A very good MLB might be an unrestricted FA at this moment.  

Free-agent LB Zach Orr will visit the Lions on Thursday. Eight teams have reached out so far since Orr told NFL Network this morning he was okay to play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No one will question that contract.  For one thing, Mack is a better defender than Carr is a QB, he's DPOY.  For another, you still have Carr backlash.  I cannot fathom another reason.  This isn't just a Carr thing, it happens to other players every single year.  We do it in fantasy football, for pete's sake.  It's natural.  You think a certain thing about a person, and don't like getting proven wrong, and look for anything to confirm your bias.  

You think Todd McShay is rooting for Derek Carr?  Of course not.  Todd McShay stood his ground, planted a flag in the ground that said 'Derek Carr isn't a top QB prospect'.  (Kiper loves throwing this in McShay's face, if you listen to their podcast)  And he was not a alone.  Pro Football Focus know-it-all jagoffs.  Anyone that has the phrase 'Derek Carr' and 'USC game' prominently in their history is going to twist themselves into a pretzel to explain why he's not as good as this guy, or like guys like Cian Fahey, will boldly proclaim that he's not on Aaron Rodgers level--yet.  Effing YPA stat, can they just rename this the Derek Carr stat?  That would be a nice tribute.  Any draft guy that liked to have hot takes, you can find them saying nasty sheet about Carr before the draft, during his rookie year (playing with a terrible, terrible team), and after this extension.  

Andrew Luck's extension was the right thing to do, and so was Carr's.  But no one questions anything about Luck, because everyone loved him coming out of college, and in fact, people talked him up so much, their confirmation bias is tilted the other way.  

Meantime, did you know that Andrew Luck has never thrown for as few INTs as Carr had in 2016?  Did you know Luck has never thrown for as high a completion percentage as Carr in 2016?  Did you know Luck has two seasons, out of five, where his rating was above 90?  Carr has the same number in three seasons.  I didn't know that till I looked it up, because I didn't have people on Twitter or ESPN telling me that.  Because they aren't interested in comparing the players that got the most recent big money extensions.  

It seems like Carr's contract details have come out.  

What's pretty great is that because this deal was done before the start of his 4th year, the team gets to spread out his money over an extra year.  Carr signs a 5 year, 25 mill a year deal, that was the headline.  And yet he only has one year above 25 mill in cap hit.  This upcoming season, when the team had 30 mill in cap space, we get to park 17 mill in cap hit for Carr, which lowers his cap hit over the next five years.  Consider:

Andrew Luck's cap hits in years 2018/19/20:  24.4, 27.5, 28.4.  

Derek Carr's cap hits in 2018/19/20:  25, 22.6, 22.6.  

Man, you know how cheap Carr's deal gonna look in 19/20?  Get this:  We have him for two years after that, at cap hits of 22.6 in 2021, and 18.2 in 2022.   :shock:

By 2021, we're gonna be talking about extending Carr, and trying to lock him up for 31 mill a year.  
Agree 100%. That's why I said a while back, "its a great day in the Raider Nation, I don't care what anyone outside the organization thinks." Because most "experts" don't know sheet anyway. Johnny Manziel, Gabbert, Ponder, Losman, the list goes on and on. Carr has proven to me he could have gone first overall. And who knows where Carr could have taken the team in 2016 if he didn't break his leg. And for that reason Derek is worth every penny because without him the team collapsed. He earned this deal not only for what he's done on the field, but also for what he does off and for his leadership and intangibles. 

As for Mack, he will most likely become the highest paid defensive player. Then there's Gabe Jackson who will probably command KO money (which he deserves) and Cooper after that, who I'm sure will be asking top WR money. I see why now Davis had to pull the trigger on the Vegas move. They're going to need that bump in revenue. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What numbers are y'all expecting for Gabe Jackson's extension? I wouldn't be surprised to see him as our next guy extended for pretty big money (relative to the position). Not record breaking or standard setting for the position, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him pull in $42 million over 5 years, with $21 million to $22 million guaranteed (I'm thinking Marshall Yanda type numbers from his extension a few years back, just over 5 years instead of 4, affected by the year to year salary cap increases), hopefully on a team friendly schedule.

I still think we see Jackson's extension happen before the season starts this year. Thankfully, Mack's fifth year option will give us a little breathing room to work through some of these massive cap decisions.

 
How much cash does Mark Davis have (or how big a credit line) - remember the guaranteed money goes in escrow now, not the year it is paid out

 
Also, Zacahary Orr has been rumored to be considering a comeback after getting a 2nd opinion.  A very good MLB might be an unrestricted FA at this moment.  
He was on Good Morning Football and confirmed he wants to come back and play and has been given the medical ok. The only thing that has to be done now is him picking a team and getting that teams doctor to sign off on it. 

He is a difference maker at a position we sorely need. What is nice is he is also young. 

I think the only thing that might not make sense is how much is he looking to get? Could be too pricey for us. 

But just think, if we could get him?! How much would the favor of the football gods have swayed to poo on us for all those years to smiling on us in ridiculous ways!

 
What numbers are y'all expecting for Gabe Jackson's extension? I wouldn't be surprised to see him as our next guy extended for pretty big money (relative to the position). Not record breaking or standard setting for the position, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him pull in $42 million over 5 years, with $21 million to $22 million guaranteed (I'm thinking Marshall Yanda type numbers from his extension a few years back, just over 5 years instead of 4, affected by the year to year salary cap increases), hopefully on a team friendly schedule.

I still think we see Jackson's extension happen before the season starts this year. Thankfully, Mack's fifth year option will give us a little breathing room to work through some of these massive cap decisions.
Sounds about right. I think low end will be $40 million as a floor with $45 the ceiling over 5 years. 

 
How much cash does Mark Davis have (or how big a credit line) - remember the guaranteed money goes in escrow now, not the year it is paid out
I think that's a big part of why Carr's original contract only calls for $40M guaranteed, with more guaranteeing later, to help with the cash flow.  At his press conference Carr mentioned multiple times he asked Reggie "is this going to hurt us signing other guys" so there was a lot of maneuvering done. 

 
What numbers are y'all expecting for Gabe Jackson's extension? I wouldn't be surprised to see him as our next guy extended for pretty big money (relative to the position). Not record breaking or standard setting for the position, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him pull in $42 million over 5 years, with $21 million to $22 million guaranteed (I'm thinking Marshall Yanda type numbers from his extension a few years back, just over 5 years instead of 4, affected by the year to year salary cap increases), hopefully on a team friendly schedule.

I still think we see Jackson's extension happen before the season starts this year. Thankfully, Mack's fifth year option will give us a little breathing room to work through some of these massive cap decisions.
Start at 25% below Osemele, that's the area. 8 mill a year or so? 

 
Reggie going to Reggie. 

Love that he is focusing on extending the players he drafted for long term deals where and when it makes sense.  This proactive cap management is so refreshing from the past we were used to seeing. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top