Long Ball Larry
Footballguy
Maybe under Ted Owens?Has Kansas been the Final Four before? I'm not sure.
Maybe under Ted Owens?Has Kansas been the Final Four before? I'm not sure.
Sometimes we assume a game is well played because of the uniforms they are wearing.Love all the upsets and stuff but it was really nice to watch this well played game between two really good teams.
Duke's zone was definitely weak, and on offense their shot allocation was all KU could've asked for. Their big guys, both future top-10 picks, took 9 shots apiece while the guards took 13, 16, and 18. Against a team that defends the perimeter well and is weaker inside.Sometimes we assume a game is well played because of the uniforms they are wearing.
Duke's defense was pathetic in this game. Wide open 3's for Kansas all night long with minimal effort, including when they had a 3 point lead with under 20 seconds to go and inexplicably left several good three point shooters wide open to shoot uncontested 3's. Then with two unstoppable big men they swallowed their timeout and let Grayson Allen pathetically juke around and throw up an off balance shot while Bagley/Carter stood still.
Fwiw, Wasn't carter fouled out at that point?Sometimes we assume a game is well played because of the uniforms they are wearing.
Duke's defense was pathetic in this game. Wide open 3's for Kansas all night long with minimal effort, including when they had a 3 point lead with under 20 seconds to go and inexplicably left several good three point shooters wide open to shoot uncontested 3's. Then with two unstoppable big men they swallowed their timeout and let Grayson Allen pathetically juke around and throw up an off balance shot while Bagley/Carter stood still.
No that was at the end of regulation. Carter didn't foul out until OT.Fwiw, Wasn't carter fouled out at that point?
it did seem odd and panicky.
Yeah, with 20+ seconds left, it shouldn't be difficult to figure out their best shot at a W is to find Bagley in the post when they just need a single point. That was painful to watch Allen in that spot.Sometimes we assume a game is well played because of the uniforms they are wearing.
Duke's defense was pathetic in this game. Wide open 3's for Kansas all night long with minimal effort, including when they had a 3 point lead with under 20 seconds to go and inexplicably left several good three point shooters wide open to shoot uncontested 3's. Then with two unstoppable big men they swallowed their timeout and let Grayson Allen pathetically juke around and throw up an off balance shot while Bagley/Carter stood still.
Yeah, with 20+ seconds left, it shouldn't be difficult to figure out their best shot at a W is to find Bagley in the post when they just need a single point. That was painful to watch Allen in that spot.
Played it back over and over and over again after the game.![]()
Not at all.
The look on Self’s face after that possession said pretty much the same thing.18-minute review and that is the best shot Kansas could get off?![]()
Yep. Probably his least talented group. But maybe that's the key?Bizarre that THIS is the team Self gets to the final four with again. They’ve been loaded the past ten years so many times. Been painful at times watching them play with four guards.
Billy Preston could have been such a difference maker...
Certainly not the deepest. Anyone else just about have a panic attack thinking Lightfoot was coming in late when Doke went out and DeSousa might have been hurt?Yep. Probably his least talented group. But maybe that's the key?
oh i see what you mean. had already forgotten about grayson's previous pathetic failure.No that was at the end of regulation. Carter didn't foul out until OT.
pretty sure he means that he was really happy kansas being the beneficiaryWhat? You think a mid range off balance shot is optimal?
Watching the ill-advised early threes the new offense has wrought sting a little. But IMO it doesn’t hurt as much as some of the old Flex plays where they would reverse the ball three times and then look to see if Ellis has established inside position on his man.Bizarre that THIS is the team Self gets to the final four with again. They’ve been loaded the past ten years so many times. Been painful at times watching them play with four guards.
Billy Preston could have been such a difference maker...
Right.pretty sure he means that he was really happy kansas being the beneficiary
I was so wrapped up in the moment, I didn’t notice until halftime that Lightfoot hadn’t played and was probably on his way to a DNP-CD. Thought maybe he would play a couple possessions to give Svi a break in the second half, but then I realized that’s a move Self makes in December, not March.Certainly not the deepest. Anyone else just about have a panic attack thinking Lightfoot was coming in late when Doke went out and DeSousa might have been hurt?
Nova is the clear favorite to win it. They’ll be favored by 6 over Michigan and 10+ over Loyola imo.If they can hit their free throws consistently, Michigan should win this thing.
FYPMALIK NEWMAN playing with a lot of swagger that often derails the predestined favorites like Nova.
I'm a fan of Duke and NOT a fan of Kansas, but it is still fun to watch teams celebrate like that.Self's post-game locker room speech
This win was personal for him. Not in the speech I linked above, but last night he said it was his biggest win since the 2008 title game.
Loyola has 2 chances. Slim and Nun.Loyola is on a mission from God.
There aren't many times when Self reveals he feels the pressure and expectations of running the program. Fair or unfair, he got some heat for delivering zero Final Fours from the monster Wiggins/Embiid/Selden/Greene/Frankamp/Mason recruiting class. He needed a Final Four run to get some naysayers off his ###. You can see it early in this thread with all the "KU always chokes" and a few users seriously discussing Penn beating KU in the first round.I'm a fan of Duke and NOT a fan of Kansas, but it is still fun to watch teams celebrate like that.
Great shtick here.Wins by Conference, Rounds of 64, 32, 16, and 8:
Pac-12 - 0 (Conference Of Champions)
Loyola has 2 chances. Slim and Nun.
I can't believe they don't get more love fo the 14 straight championships especially in a major conference. I think it is as astounding an achievemnet as there has maybe ever been in team sports.Since hiring Self, Kansas is 16-5 against the other Blue Bloods. And on winning streaks against all four: four in a row against UCLA, three straight against Kentucky and Duke, 3-0 against UNC.
Stuff like that and 14 straight conference titles doesn't mean much to casual fans, but to a program that puts the name of the inventor of the sport on its court and the name of the guy who got the sport into the Olympics on the fieldhouse, it means a lot.
Just to be contrary, it's not like the rest of the BIg 12 are on their level. It's like people saying the 50s were baseball's golden age when only the Yankees (8) and Indians (2) won AL pennants between '49--58.Jackstraw said:I can't believe they don't get more love fo the 14 straight championships especially in a major conference. I think it is as astounding an achievemnet as there has maybe ever been in team sports.
I guess. Come in here an mix it up with Texas, Baylor, Ok State, TCU, Iowa State, K State, Missouri, OU etc and be better than everyone of them for fifteen years without fail and come talk to me.Just to be contrary, it's not like the rest of the BIg 12 are on their level. It's like people saying the 50s were baseball's golden age when only the Yankees (8) and Indians (2) won AL pennants between '49--58.
Yup. Only one other Final Four team during that run: Oklahoma (2016, RIP).Just to be contrary, it's not like the rest of the BIg 12 are on their level. It's like people saying the 50s were baseball's golden age when only the Yankees (8) and Indians (2) won AL pennants between '49--58.
I see your point; I tend to be resistant to instant nostalgia. However, thinking it over convinces me you're most likely right.I guess. Come in here an mix it up with Texas, Baylor, Ok State, TCU, Iowa State, K State, Missouri, OU etc and be better than everyone of them for fifteen years without fail and come talk to me.
Easy and convenient measure. But another version of you would be in here criticizing using postseason success as a measure of conference strength faster than you can type "arbitrary" or "sample size". Was the Big XII not that good this season because Kansas was the only Big XII school to make the Final Four? Or are the four teams in the Sweet 16 an indicator that the conference was really deep?Yup. Only one other Final Four team during that run: Oklahoma (2016, RIP)..
Another version of you would come in here asking how you arrived at "consistently weak conference" because there isn't a set of numbers that supports that claim.Yup. Only one other Final Four team during that run: Oklahoma (2016, RIP).
Still pretty impressive not to have even one down year, though. You'd expect them to win at least 11 or 12 of those titles just based on their obvious recruiting advantages over a consistently weak conference because of visibility and tradition. But the other elite teams have each had one or two stinkers during that time due to fluctuations with draft departures and whatnot. Duke 2007, UNC 2010, Kentucky 2013. Nothing like that for Kansas.
The Atlanta Braves of the men's D1 basketball.Bruce Dickinson said:Since hiring Self, Kansas is 16-5 against the other Blue Bloods. And on winning streaks against all four: four in a row against UCLA, three straight against Kentucky and Duke, 3-0 against UNC.
Stuff like that and 14 straight conference titles doesn't mean much to casual fans, but to a program that puts the name of the inventor of the sport on its court and the name of the guy who got the sport into the Olympics on the fieldhouse, it means a lot.
I don't think 14 years' worth of tournaments with an average of maybe 6-8 teams per season is necessarily all that small of a sample size. Over one season, sure, but not over 14 seasons. Obviously it's still not perfect, but the fact is that the bulk of inter-conference clashes among quality teams playing at full strength happen in the postseason, so that's the best data we've got. And the best data we've got suggests that the Big XII is a pretty weak major conference. I mean do you really think they'd pull off that run in any other major conference? OK, maybe the PAC-12Easy and convenient measure. But another version of you would be in here criticizing using postseason success as a measure of conference strength faster than you can type "arbitrary" or "sample size". Was the Big XII not that good this season because Kansas was the only Big XII school to make the Final Four? Or are the four teams in the Sweet 16 an indicator that the conference was really deep?
There's been a bunch of 2- and 3-seeds in the Big XII during Kansas's streak. Five different schools made the Elite 8. Texas had a three-year run with players like LaMarcus Aldridge, DJ Augustin, and one season of Kevin Durant. Didn't win the conference, but two 2-seeds and 2 Elite 8 appearances. Is Kansas supposed to apologize because they were better than a team with Kevin Durant? Oklahoma had a Blake Griffin team that was 25-1 when Griffin got a concussion. Was that OU team not any good because they only got to the Elite 8 with the #1 player in the draft concussed? Mizzou's last Big XII team spent most of the season ranked top 10, got as high as #2, and there was some head-scratching when they got a 2-seed instead of a 1. Not Kansas's fault they lost in the first round of the NCAAs, just like it's not UNC's fault when Duke loses to a 14- or 15-seed.
Another version of you would come in here asking how you arrived at "consistently weak conference" because there isn't a set of numbers that supports that claim.
Since Self got the program in his image will a roster of all of his recruits in the 2007 season, Kansas has been a 1- or 2-seed 11 times. Their only miss was in 2009, coming off a national title where they replaced all five starters and plunged all the way down to the 3-seed line, still winning the conference with a Mizzou team that got a 3-seed and went to the Elite 8 and an Oklahoma team with future #1 overall pick and national POY Blake Griffin that got a 2-seed and went to the Elite 8.