Regarding the bolded, I think it is still worthwhile. He breaks down the IDPs in every weekly matchup. He looks at their production, their share of snaps, reviews injuries and depth chart moves,etc. All the information is available elsewhere online. But, not in one place and not for free. At least, not that I am aware of.How good is the Monster as an article/podcast?
I cancelled my sub to IDP Guys (I was disappointed with the access they were charging for w/r/t to offense) and it cancelled me right away but charged me for this year. That was disappointing, to say the least.
Should I continue to patronize them, or what gives?
IIRC, an Offensive player doesn't get credit for a reception, or the yards on a 2pt play either. It's just a successful conversion or not. I suspect if Fuller would have returned it the other way, he'd be credited for the points.Kendall Fuller did not get credit for the INT on the 2 point conversion from MNF. Looking at player stats on NFL, Fuller was not credited with a pick there. I'm guessing it's because the play is technically not a play, but a PAT attempt. Still, that seems like a terrible way to score it, as any offensive player would get stats for a successful attempt.
Also, since I know the IDPers here will appreciate it...
My team was down 68 point going into the MNF game. I had 5 IDP remaining and my opponent was done. SEA: Brooks / Adams. WFT: Holcomb / Collins / Fuller. I won by 10. \o/ \o/ \o/
Ok, that makes sense. Score or No Score... binary result for stats. I wouldn't even have considered whether yardage gets scored.IIRC, an Offensive player doesn't get credit for a reception, or the yards on a 2pt play either. It's just a successful conversion or not. I suspect if Fuller would have returned it the other way, he'd be credited for the points.
Good question. I don't. He did get credit for 3 PD. I can't find the PDF gamebooks usually published on NFL.com, either. Not sure why, but the play by play in that sheet would show where he got his 3 PDs.
I do have a question about PD's though. I notice every INT also gets a PD. However, I believe in the game on Monday Adams got a PD and INT on his interception but that Wagner also got a PD on that play (and I am still not sure he even touched the ball). Can there be two PD's awarded on one pass?
Gally said:I do have a question about PD's though. I notice every INT also gets a PD. However, I believe in the game on Monday Adams got a PD and INT on his interception but that Wagner also got a PD on that play (and I am still not sure he even touched the ball). Can there be two PD's awarded on one pass?
I also believe that a PD (other than an INT and tips at the line of scrimmage) must be a catchable ball by the offense. I think I have seen balls way overthrown that were touched by a DB that didn't go down as a PD. This is anecdotal only as I have never seen an official description of a "PD". I also think that tight defense where the offense just drops the ball (no touch by the defender) is not a PD, but that could just be a judgement by the official scorekeeper.I've never checked into it but have always assumed those tip-drill type INTs would award multiple PDs. The initial tip is a PD and the INT has always been (the ultimate) PD. IDP scoring isn't advanced enough to award 0.5 PD. 😂
I agree. I cannot come up with any questions that would send him that low unless it was a question of playing or not but as you stated there isn't an injury designation. Seems like he was omitted from the rankings by accident.Thanks Joe. Would have liked to know what the questions were because he had him projected for 0 points up until now. He does not have an injury designation and has practiced all week. Also played 97% of the snaps last week.
I think it would be a great idea if you'd like to have a thread. I haven't seen these happen quite a bit but if you have, we definitely need to see. Please create the thread and tag me. Thanks.His 0 pt projection was changed early afternoon on Friday. These errors happen quite a bit and are normally corrected by the weekend. That's why I suggested a thread last week for members to list these errors although if the IDP projectors aren't visiting this forum, it probably wouldn't make a difference. Thanks for checking into this Joe.
I learn a ton from the guys that might contribute regularly to that. I'd be all for it.To add more to this, I think a weekly thread here for people to discuss rankings or projections they disagree with in general would be a great thing. There can be lots of good discussion to be had if done well (and I know you folks would do it well) on this kind of thing.
We do this every week in our Footballguys Staff Discussion platform where staff members question the projections. It's always done in a "I don't understand why ________ is projected here. Have you thought about _________" type stuff and it's always helpful.
A thread like that each week would be a good idea here I think.
Yeah, we could say things like, "Why is JPP always ranked as top-15 for the rest of the season while being DL68 in points per game?"
This thread has kind of been used for that type of discussion. It's not the sole purpose of this thread but this is kind of a catchall for things happening in the current week. I think it has worked well for some discussion but has tapered off (which is typical as seasons go on and people lose interest in their teams etc).I think it would be a great idea if you'd like to have a thread. I haven't seen these happen quite a bit but if you have, we definitely need to see. Please create the thread and tag me. Thanks.
All I saw is that he is considered “day to day”Does anyone know anything about the severity of Denzel Perryman's ankle injury? I can't find an update on it
Joe, I use the Lineup Dominator. There, JPP is currently the 20th ranked DL rest of season, which I think is lower than he’s been all season. https://imgur.com/a/FnQwdaS shows what I’m seeing.Not sure if you were joking but one of the most important thing for a thread like that to have any chance of being good though is to be accurate. We'll have to use lots of links to make sure we're clear on exactly what we're talking about.
Jason Pierre-Paul is Linebacker #80 in our Rest Of Season Rankings for IDP. https://www.footballguys.com/rankings/rest-of-season?oproj=996&kproj=996&iproj=996&viewpos=lb&week=13&profile=i
They're all free agents except for Cunningham
Titans won’t keep Zach with his current contract, he isn’t good enough irl for $10M plus perBri said:I think Rice's value in IDP just got destroyed. He was the benefactor to the Titans losing 3-5 LBs next year and now he'll be backing up Long and Zach. I'd probably drop him in IDP and let him take up a roster spot on someone else's team.
I don't doubt he'll be a good player. He did look confused but he's a specimen for sure. He looks like an OLB covering at ILB and is odd, but where's the opportunity gonna be?
I believe in FF we get headaches in a draft for a season but we're foolish to hold into a headache for an entire offseason
That's awesome, and League Dominator is the best tool in FF by a mile...Thanks. Matt has been working on this and thinks he understands the issue.
Most sites rank Pierre-Paul as a LB. That's how we rank him on our website. https://www.footballguys.com/rankings/rest-of-season?oproj=996&kproj=996&dproj=996&viewpos=flexidp&week=14&profile=i
But the League Dominator offers a customized experience for your league. If your league does something out of the norm and ranks Pierre-Paul as a DL, we can handle that. We adapt and give you a customized ranking based on your league.
It's a huge advantage to someone using the League Dominator as you can see exactly where he ranks with your league.
That's awesome, and League Dominator is the best tool in FF by a mile...
That said, it doesn't seem to handle dual designations in my Sleeper league... I have Quincy Williams (DB/LB) and Jonathan Greenard (DE/LB) there, and it only treats them as LBs... so it's always telling me to start Chase Young (on IR) and pick up a DB to start, while telling me not to start Wiliams and Greenard.
Again, incredible tool that is exactly what I wanted, and nobody else provides anything comparable... which means it's worth fine-tuning to be perfect.
Yeah, both projections are for 0 points, but I'm starting him. He's been a monster when healthy this season.I question the projection for Marcus Davenport (0 pts). He's been out the last few weeks but practiced this week and active today.
By who? He’s more likely a 2 down guy and you don’t pay $10M for one of those. He can be released before the March bonus so I expect if anything he’s renegotiated for less if that’s what you mean.I haven't looked at the market.
He thrives in this system and had issues in the recent Texans one.
It's largely presumed they keep him
I question the projection for Marcus Davenport (0 pts). He's been out the last few weeks but practiced this week and active today.