Leeroy Jenkins
Footballguy
I love Tim Duncan, but you have to put Shaq ahead of him I think. Those Lakers teams beat the Spurs more than once. I do think Duncan is top 10-12.
Ah. I assumed it was serious because this thread is serious business.I assumed it was in jest, given this is the #HOTTAKESHERE threadTerrible? Really?Terrible listCorrection, Duncan was ten.Yeah I did this the other day and it’s so hard. I think I had Duncan at nine.That whole 5-10 area of the all-time list is always a pretty tough one to rank. Duncan definitely has an argument there. So do contemporaries like Kobe, Shaq, and now Steph. I think what Tim did with the Spurs is pretty highly rated by most fans.
My top ten:
MJ
Lebron
Kareem
Russell
Magic
Shaq
Wilt
Kobe
Bird
Duncan
I could see argue for moving some guys up and some down but terrible? C'mon.
I'd argue Bird and Duncan are both a bit too low and should be ahead of Shaq. Not sure Kobe is really deserving of a top 10 spot either.
Yeah. I always find the absolute peak of Shaq so hard to ignore. Peak vs longevity is what makes this area so tough to rank. Your past the guys that clearly have both and it really is about what you prefer. Worse, the preferences between those two can change daily.Shaq and Kobe are some of the toughest to rank. While Duncan and Bird probably had better careers than Shaq, Shaq is probably the most dominant player ever at any single point in NBA history. As for Kobe, he, along with MJ, are probably the absolute fiercest competitors in NBA history and Kobe garnered more respect from his peers than any player in history. So, while I very much appreciate and did also factor in advanced statistics and longevity, I couldn't ignore these factors when ranking players like Shaw and Kobe.
I think Wilt would disagree if he were alive.Shaq is probably the most dominant player ever at any single point in NBA history
I think Bill Russell might disagree with you about his friend Wilt. Wilt was a dominant offensive force, but he gets bested by Russell's Celtics in 7 out of 8 matchups. The year Wilt averages 50 PPG, Russell holds him to 37 PPG.I think Wilt would disagree if he were alive.Shaq is probably the most dominant player ever at any single point in NBA history
BTW, AD is the closest thing to a Wilt clone that I've ever seen.
The year Wilt averaged 50 ppg, Russell had 51 first place votes for MVP vs. 9 for Chamberlain. Oscar Robertson even had more first place votes (13) but ended up 3rd in total MVP points.I think Bill Russell might disagree with you about his friend Wilt. Wilt was a dominant offensive force, but he gets bested by Russell's Celtics in 7 out of 8 matchups. The year Wilt averages 50 PPG, Russell holds him to 37 PPG.I think Wilt would disagree if he were alive.Shaq is probably the most dominant player ever at any single point in NBA history
BTW, AD is the closest thing to a Wilt clone that I've ever seen.
It is a team sport and everything, but dominance includes winning IMO. Not that we were around to see it. Those series must have been awesome.
Yeah there's definitely something to "pick guys for one game" vs "pick guys for a one year all time season" vs "pick guys whose careers were greatest"Some of this comes down to how the player played at their peak vs. how they played over their entire career. Maybe your top 10 values continued contribution over the course of their career. Maybe your top 10 values peak performance and how dominate that player was at their best.I'd argue Bird and Duncan are both a bit too low and should be ahead of Shaq. Not sure Kobe is really deserving of a top 10 spot either.
IMO, peak Shaq was better than peak Duncan. Shaq was essentially unguardable at his peak and the rules in place at the time. Remember, Hack-a-Shaq? When the guy is hitting 60% of his FGs, all from like 3' from the basket and he shoots 50% from the FT line... do the math. Duncan was never that dominant. Without looking at the stats, I think Shaq better on D during his peak, getting more blocks, more rebounds than Duncan. I think he affected the opposition slightly more than Duncan.
This is serious business.Ah. I assumed it was serious because this thread is serious business.I assumed it was in jest, given this is the #HOTTAKESHERE threadTerrible? Really?Terrible listCorrection, Duncan was ten.Yeah I did this the other day and it’s so hard. I think I had Duncan at nine.That whole 5-10 area of the all-time list is always a pretty tough one to rank. Duncan definitely has an argument there. So do contemporaries like Kobe, Shaq, and now Steph. I think what Tim did with the Spurs is pretty highly rated by most fans.
My top ten:
MJ
Lebron
Kareem
Russell
Magic
Shaq
Wilt
Kobe
Bird
Duncan
I could see argue for moving some guys up and some down but terrible? C'mon.
I'd argue Bird and Duncan are both a bit too low and should be ahead of Shaq. Not sure Kobe is really deserving of a top 10 spot either.
Shaq and Kobe are some of the toughest to rank. While Duncan and Bird probably had better careers than Shaq, Shaq is probably the most dominant player ever at any single point in NBA history. As for Kobe, he, along with MJ, are probably the absolute fiercest competitors in NBA history and Kobe garnered more respect from his peers than any player in history. So, while I very much appreciate and did also factor in advanced statistics and longevity, I couldn't ignore these factors when ranking players like Shaw and Kobe.
This is serious business.Ah. I assumed it was serious because this thread is serious business.I assumed it was in jest, given this is the #HOTTAKESHERE threadTerrible? Really?Terrible listCorrection, Duncan was ten.Yeah I did this the other day and it’s so hard. I think I had Duncan at nine.That whole 5-10 area of the all-time list is always a pretty tough one to rank. Duncan definitely has an argument there. So do contemporaries like Kobe, Shaq, and now Steph. I think what Tim did with the Spurs is pretty highly rated by most fans.
My top ten:
MJ
Lebron
Kareem
Russell
Magic
Shaq
Wilt
Kobe
Bird
Duncan
I could see argue for moving some guys up and some down but terrible? C'mon.
I'd argue Bird and Duncan are both a bit too low and should be ahead of Shaq. Not sure Kobe is really deserving of a top 10 spot either.
Shaq and Kobe are some of the toughest to rank. While Duncan and Bird probably had better careers than Shaq, Shaq is probably the most dominant player ever at any single point in NBA history. As for Kobe, he, along with MJ, are probably the absolute fiercest competitors in NBA history and Kobe garnered more respect from his peers than any player in history. So, while I very much appreciate and did also factor in advanced statistics and longevity, I couldn't ignore these factors when ranking players like Shaw and Kobe.
Too much deference given to older dudes and taller dudes.
Curry and Durant belong in the top 10. Kobe is barely top 20
I love Tim Duncan, but you have to put Shaq ahead of him I think. Those Lakers teams beat the Spurs more than once. I do think Duncan is top 10-12.

Not singling you out, but a lot / many / most people these days seem to have Wilt ranked higher than Russell. Except back in the day, it was more the opposite. Russell ended up playing one season less than Wilt did, but Russell won 5 MVP's vs. 4 for Wilt and had more MVP shares than Chamberlain did. All these years later, Russell still ranks 6th in MVP vote shares (vs. 11th for Wilt). Wilt always had better offensive numbers, but obviously Bill had more rings (11 to 2). When I talk to old timers, they generally side with Russell . . . but I chalk that up to living in New England.4. Wilt
7. Russell
LOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.

Small Forwards:
Again, this gets nit picky bc a lot of SG = Small forwards especially in how the game has changed, but...
Bird is really the only true SF on this list.
KD gets some love here as well.
James Worthy probably deserves a mention here.
Shooting guards:
MJ
Lebron
Kobe
guys like Drexler and Wade and a whole slew of similar guys get in fot the next tier.
LOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.
Not sure why it is so automatic that Larry Bird deserves to be higher on any list than Durant. And I say this as a 48 year old who grew up in Boston and am still a huge Celtic fan. Bird rebounded and passed better than Durant, but he was a far more inefficient scorer (Bird's best year was a TS% of .612, Durant is at .619 for his career) and a worse defender
I alluded to my reasoning with the "downgrade championships" comment. Russell benefitted from playing against a weak league with by far the best team. He was a big part of that, but Wilt had to do his work without much help for most of his career. Wilt was better on offense and a freak.Not singling you out, but a lot / many / most people these days seem to have Wilt ranked higher than Russell. Except back in the day, it was more the opposite. Russell ended up playing one season less than Wilt did, but Russell won 5 MVP's vs. 4 for Wilt and had more MVP shares than Chamberlain did. All these years later, Russell still ranks 6th in MVP vote shares (vs. 11th for Wilt). Wilt always had better offensive numbers, but obviously Bill had more rings (11 to 2). When I talk to old timers, they generally side with Russell . . . but I chalk that up to living in New England.4. Wilt
7. Russell
Elgin Baylor and Oscar Robinson need to be on more lists - especially the top 20 ones.
Bird was a 3x 2nd team all defense.LOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.
Not sure why it is so automatic that Larry Bird deserves to be higher on any list than Durant. And I say this as a 48 year old who grew up in Boston and am still a huge Celtic fan. Bird rebounded and passed better than Durant, but he was a far more inefficient scorer (Bird's best year was a TS% of .612, Durant is at .619 for his career) and a worse defender
The fact that Shaq was one of the worst FT shooters of all time should not be used in an argument FOR his greatness. Opposing teams hacked him because he completely sucked at shooting free throws, and it improved the opposing team's chance to win.Some of this comes down to how the player played at their peak vs. how they played over their entire career. Maybe your top 10 values continued contribution over the course of their career. Maybe your top 10 values peak performance and how dominate that player was at their best.I'd argue Bird and Duncan are both a bit too low and should be ahead of Shaq. Not sure Kobe is really deserving of a top 10 spot either.
IMO, peak Shaq was better than peak Duncan. Shaq was essentially unguardable at his peak and the rules in place at the time. Remember, Hack-a-Shaq? When the guy is hitting 60% of his FGs, all from like 3' from the basket and he shoots 50% from the FT line... do the math. Duncan was never that dominant. Without looking at the stats, I think Shaq better on D during his peak, getting more blocks, more rebounds than Duncan. I think he affected the opposition slightly more than Duncan.
Defenses in the 80's were absolute garbage. If I took that into account I am not sure it would be helpful for your caseLOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.
Not sure why it is so automatic that Larry Bird deserves to be higher on any list than Durant. And I say this as a 48 year old who grew up in Boston and am still a huge Celtic fan. Bird rebounded and passed better than Durant, but he was a far more inefficient scorer (Bird's best year was a TS% of .612, Durant is at .619 for his career) and a worse defender
You are completely ignoring the difference in eras in this comparison. That matters.
Not a Boston homer, but I do find the arguements for Russell over Wilt very convincing. I get discounting the era, but the relative ranking of the two seems obvious to be Russell IMO.Not singling you out, but a lot / many / most people these days seem to have Wilt ranked higher than Russell. Except back in the day, it was more the opposite. Russell ended up playing one season less than Wilt did, but Russell won 5 MVP's vs. 4 for Wilt and had more MVP shares than Chamberlain did. All these years later, Russell still ranks 6th in MVP vote shares (vs. 11th for Wilt). Wilt always had better offensive numbers, but obviously Bill had more rings (11 to 2). When I talk to old timers, they generally side with Russell . . . but I chalk that up to living in New England.4. Wilt
7. Russell
this is a great story was that at the bradley center or what take that to the bank brochachoI saw Duncan play in the NCAA tournament many years ago. Will never forget it because I went to the early games with a friend the first day. We were coming from work and had our suits on. Right after we get in the building, he walked up to the Wake Forest table in the concourse, introduced himself as Professor someone and asks for his tickets for the second day. As they're scrambling trying to find his name on the list, he feigns increasing annoyance. Ended up getting two sweet tickets for the second round games down low in the Wake section. Duncan was dominant and his team won both games but were knocked out the following weekend in the regionals.
Defenses in the 80's were absolute garbage. If I took that into account I am not sure it would be helpful for your caseLOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.
Not sure why it is so automatic that Larry Bird deserves to be higher on any list than Durant. And I say this as a 48 year old who grew up in Boston and am still a huge Celtic fan. Bird rebounded and passed better than Durant, but he was a far more inefficient scorer (Bird's best year was a TS% of .612, Durant is at .619 for his career) and a worse defender
You are completely ignoring the difference in eras in this comparison. That matters.
I agree with you and don't think it's particularly close, but my experience seeing Kobe elected to all defensive teams leads me to believe that metric shouldn't be our focus here. Also Durant isn't a lockdown guy but his defensive versatility is a big reason why he's so awesome.Bird was a 3x 2nd team all defense.LOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.
Not sure why it is so automatic that Larry Bird deserves to be higher on any list than Durant. And I say this as a 48 year old who grew up in Boston and am still a huge Celtic fan. Bird rebounded and passed better than Durant, but he was a far more inefficient scorer (Bird's best year was a TS% of .612, Durant is at .619 for his career) and a worse defender
Durant has zero I believe. Bird was also a FAR superior passer/playmaker and won 3 straight MVPs against the likes of Magic, Kareem and Moses Malone.
Peak Bird>>>>Peak Durant
The fact that Shaq was one of the worst FT shooters of all time should not be used in an argument FOR his greatness. Opposing teams hacked him because he completely sucked at shooting free throws, and it improved the opposing team's chance to win.Some of this comes down to how the player played at their peak vs. how they played over their entire career. Maybe your top 10 values continued contribution over the course of their career. Maybe your top 10 values peak performance and how dominate that player was at their best.I'd argue Bird and Duncan are both a bit too low and should be ahead of Shaq. Not sure Kobe is really deserving of a top 10 spot either.
IMO, peak Shaq was better than peak Duncan. Shaq was essentially unguardable at his peak and the rules in place at the time. Remember, Hack-a-Shaq? When the guy is hitting 60% of his FGs, all from like 3' from the basket and he shoots 50% from the FT line... do the math. Duncan was never that dominant. Without looking at the stats, I think Shaq better on D during his peak, getting more blocks, more rebounds than Duncan. I think he affected the opposition slightly more than Duncan.
For whatever it counts for - Bird shot 105% of the league average TS% during his career (i.e. if the league average was 50% one year, he shot 52.5%), Durant is at 113%.LOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.
Not sure why it is so automatic that Larry Bird deserves to be higher on any list than Durant. And I say this as a 48 year old who grew up in Boston and am still a huge Celtic fan. Bird rebounded and passed better than Durant, but he was a far more inefficient scorer (Bird's best year was a TS% of .612, Durant is at .619 for his career) and a worse defender
You are completely ignoring the difference in eras in this comparison. That matters.
For whatever it counts for - Bird shot 105% of the league average TS% during his career (i.e. if the league average was 50% one year, he shot 52.5%), Durant is at 113%.LOL at Durant being a top 10 all time NBA player *today*.
Not sure why it is so automatic that Larry Bird deserves to be higher on any list than Durant. And I say this as a 48 year old who grew up in Boston and am still a huge Celtic fan. Bird rebounded and passed better than Durant, but he was a far more inefficient scorer (Bird's best year was a TS% of .612, Durant is at .619 for his career) and a worse defender
You are completely ignoring the difference in eras in this comparison. That matters.
ETA: Shaq finished at 111% higher than league average.
this is a great story was that at the bradley center or what take that to the bank brochachoI saw Duncan play in the NCAA tournament many years ago. Will never forget it because I went to the early games with a friend the first day. We were coming from work and had our suits on. Right after we get in the building, he walked up to the Wake Forest table in the concourse, introduced himself as Professor someone and asks for his tickets for the second day. As they're scrambling trying to find his name on the list, he feigns increasing annoyance. Ended up getting two sweet tickets for the second round games down low in the Wake section. Duncan was dominant and his team won both games but were knocked out the following weekend in the regionals.
I know that All-NBA teams will be positionless under the new CBA, but will that be the case for All-Defense as well? I feel like the 1-center limit for All-Defense is even more ridiculous than it is for All-NBA, considering the outsized role that centers play in team defense.2022-23 NBA All-Defensive teams:
First team: Jaren Jackson Jr., Brook Lopez, Alex Caruso, Evan Mobley, Jrue Holiday
Second team: Bam Adebayo, OG Anunoby, Dillon Brooks, Draymond Green, Derrick White
Very cool that Caruso got first team honors. He turned a team with DeRozan, LaVine and Vucevic into a top 5 defensive team. I’m not sure any other player in the NBA could have done that.
Aren't there three centers on first team in JJJ, Mobley, and Lopez?I know that All-NBA teams will be positionless under the new CBA, but will that be the case for All-Defense as well? I feel like the 1-center limit for All-Defense is even more ridiculous than it is for All-NBA, considering the outsized role that centers play in team defense.2022-23 NBA All-Defensive teams:
First team: Jaren Jackson Jr., Brook Lopez, Alex Caruso, Evan Mobley, Jrue Holiday
Second team: Bam Adebayo, OG Anunoby, Dillon Brooks, Draymond Green, Derrick White
Very cool that Caruso got first team honors. He turned a team with DeRozan, LaVine and Vucevic into a top 5 defensive team. I’m not sure any other player in the NBA could have done that.
(I promise I'm not just saying this because Nic Claxton was shut out)
I believe Jaren and Mobley got voted in as the two first team forwards since they spent a lot of time at PF this year.Aren't there three centers on first team in JJJ, Mobley, and Lopez?I know that All-NBA teams will be positionless under the new CBA, but will that be the case for All-Defense as well? I feel like the 1-center limit for All-Defense is even more ridiculous than it is for All-NBA, considering the outsized role that centers play in team defense.2022-23 NBA All-Defensive teams:
First team: Jaren Jackson Jr., Brook Lopez, Alex Caruso, Evan Mobley, Jrue Holiday
Second team: Bam Adebayo, OG Anunoby, Dillon Brooks, Draymond Green, Derrick White
Very cool that Caruso got first team honors. He turned a team with DeRozan, LaVine and Vucevic into a top 5 defensive team. I’m not sure any other player in the NBA could have done that.
(I promise I'm not just saying this because Nic Claxton was shut out)
I know that All-NBA teams will be positionless under the new CBA, but will that be the case for All-Defense as well? I feel like the 1-center limit for All-Defense is even more ridiculous than it is for All-NBA, considering the outsized role that centers play in team defense.2022-23 NBA All-Defensive teams:
First team: Jaren Jackson Jr., Brook Lopez, Alex Caruso, Evan Mobley, Jrue Holiday
Second team: Bam Adebayo, OG Anunoby, Dillon Brooks, Draymond Green, Derrick White
Very cool that Caruso got first team honors. He turned a team with DeRozan, LaVine and Vucevic into a top 5 defensive team. I’m not sure any other player in the NBA could have done that.
(I promise I'm not just saying this because Nic Claxton was shut out)
NahIt would be so awesome if the Warriors could come back down 3-1 against Lebron.
Don't know if it was the same year and I'm not going to look it up, but I saw the game Duncan got eliminated his senior year at the good ole HHH Metrodome. They were bounced by Kentucky (who would go on to win) and I have rarely seen a player swarmed like that every time he touched the ball. I swear Kentucky was triple and quadruple teaming him. And it worked!I saw Duncan play in the NCAA tournament many years ago. Will never forget it because I went to the early games with a friend the first day. We were coming from work and had our suits on. Right after we get in the building, he walked up to the Wake Forest table in the concourse, introduced himself as Professor someone and asks for his tickets for the second day. As they're scrambling trying to find his name on the list, he feigns increasing annoyance. Ended up getting two sweet tickets for the second round games down low in the Wake section. Duncan was dominant and his team won both games but were knocked out the following weekend in the regionals.
From a statistics perspective it makes sense given where the two series stand. I imagine it would flip back if / when Denver is up 3-2 and the Warriors win game 5 to make it a 3-2 series with the Lakers.In other news, the Lakers have jumped all the way to the top after last night's win as favorites out of the West.
The disrespect to Denver is.....something.
2022-23 NBA All-Defensive teams:
First team: Jaren Jackson Jr., Brook Lopez, Alex Caruso, Evan Mobley, Jrue Holiday
Second team: Bam Adebayo, OG Anunoby, Dillon Brooks, Draymond Green, Derrick White
Very cool that Caruso got first team honors. He turned a team with DeRozan, LaVine and Vucevic into a top 5 defensive team. I’m not sure any other player in the NBA could have done that.
Told my buddy on Saturday this whole thing has a very 2020 rematch feel to it for the finals. Lakers and Heat are hot, getting some big performances out of unexpected players.In other news, the Lakers have jumped all the way to the top after last night's win as favorites out of the West.
The disrespect to Denver is.....something.