trader jake
Footballguy
With Draymond, I wonder about some around here. He's a Hall of Fame player that just doesn't get the credit he deserves as a defensive player and team thermostat.More like noD chess.When Draymond signs with Portland, Golden State can sign Plumlee since he's a much better version than Draymond I'm told.
6d chess.
Teams paying Plumlee anything but minimum (or near enough minimum to be anything but a luxury tax consideration) are fools. There are very few bench 5s worth big dollars in today's game, and Plumlee isn't one of them. He's skilled, but he always tries to do too much. Always. He has yet to understand he's a role player.
It is a running joke. During the playoffs this year someone said the Warriors should let Draymond walk and sign Plumlee at a third of the price and he would be just as good. We kind of ran with it.
Most teams in the league don't have a player on their roster that can play defense like him. Most teams don't have a player that pushes their teammates to compete like him. Almost none have one player that does both.
Instead we get 10 player comps to him each draft, read how Curry is the only reason he's good, or have people post crap like Plumlee could do most of what he does for a fraction of the cost. It's ridiculous. I get why some slag Draymond, but unlike the Dillon Brooks and Rudy Goberts of the league - he's a true difference maker on the court. Especially in the postseason when the game changes and little edges really matter.
If Draymond leaves GSW, that team is done as a championship contender without a major, blockbuster of a roster addition next to Curry.