What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2023-24 NBA (Playoffs!) Thread: Message board poster furiously types out one more horrible post before thread closes (8 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thinking about that Bruce brown deal a little more, it is a little surprising that he would take that over staying in Denver, assuming there were no better offers.

It definitely has better upside between the potential for next year’s salary and the potential for a bigger role so that he could show off more and get paid more later, but he basically chose a guaranteed $22 million over a guaranteed $16 million to stay.

Maybe he didn’t trust the kroenkes to make things right down the line. (I probably wouldn’t.)

For a guy like Brown you only got so many opportunities to cash in...there is a good chance his value may never be higher due to winning a title...he has now put his family in a very good spot...if he rolls the dice and gets hurt or his play takes a step backwards he could easily miss his window.
I made this argument as well and certainly understand how this pacers deal is better, but from a strictly guaranteed money standpoint, it is only a difference of $6 million (assuming Denver would have given the 1+1 at 7.8), which is far closer than I anticipated it being.
He's only made $15M in his career, taking that vs the Nuggets' offer was a no-brainer.
 
He could have gotten 7.8 this year with a Player option for next year. That is essentially $16 million guaranteed.
Instead he got a guaranteed 22.5 million for one year. How is this even a debate?
Because some pro athletes factor winning championships into their career decision-making.

Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce admits he thinks about how much more money he could be making if he "pressed the gas" on his contract, but ultimately, winning is more important to him.

Travis Kelce OK being underpaid
If Travis Kelce could make 3 times as much in one year I am pretty confident he would no longer be a Chief
Maximizing one year's earnings is a simplistic way of viewing the world.

Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career.

Some of you guys are in Bizarro World on this. $22.5M vs. $7.8M this season is a nobrainer for a guy like Brown. Especially given that the implication of the contract is that he will get a bigger role with IND than DEN. It's not even a decision.
 
Maximizing one year's earnings is a simplistic way of viewing the world.

Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career.

Some of you guys are in Bizarro World on this. $22.5M vs. $7.8M this season is a nobrainer for a guy like Brown. Especially given that the implication of the contract is that he will get a bigger role with IND than DEN. It's not even a decision.
Either read more carefully and/or please link to where I said he shouldn't have taken the deal. I'm only answering why its being debated.
 
Maximizing one year's earnings is a simplistic way of viewing the world.

Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career.

Some of you guys are in Bizarro World on this. $22.5M vs. $7.8M this season is a nobrainer for a guy like Brown. Especially given that the implication of the contract is that he will get a bigger role with IND than DEN. It's not even a decision.
Either read more carefully and/or please link to where I said he shouldn't have taken the deal. I'm only answering why its being debated.

Oh. So "Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career" = you agree he should have taken the contract with IND. Turns out we agree.

"I'm only answering why it is being debated." It isn't being debated by anyone who isn't a Denver fan. Because there is literally no reasonable reason for anyone without a bias to debate it.
 
Maximizing one year's earnings is a simplistic way of viewing the world.

Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career.

Some of you guys are in Bizarro World on this. $22.5M vs. $7.8M this season is a nobrainer for a guy like Brown. Especially given that the implication of the contract is that he will get a bigger role with IND than DEN. It's not even a decision.
Either read more carefully and/or please link to where I said he shouldn't have taken the deal. I'm only answering why its being debated.

Oh. So "Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career" = you agree he should have taken the contract with IND. Turns out we agree.

"I'm only answering why it is being debated." It isn't being debated by anyone who isn't a Denver fan. Because there is literally no reasonable reason for anyone without a bias to debate it.
At what one-year figure with second year team option would it not have been a "no-brainer?" That's what Brown's situation made me think about. Everyone's individual balance among winning, intangibles like team camaraderie and geography, and making coin.

Sorry if that doesn't fit into your little box of what is and isn't "reasonable" to discuss.
 
Maximizing one year's earnings is a simplistic way of viewing the world.

Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career.

Some of you guys are in Bizarro World on this. $22.5M vs. $7.8M this season is a nobrainer for a guy like Brown. Especially given that the implication of the contract is that he will get a bigger role with IND than DEN. It's not even a decision.
Either read more carefully and/or please link to where I said he shouldn't have taken the deal. I'm only answering why its being debated.

Oh. So "Brown's decision was more about optimizing the combination of earnings + winning over a career" = you agree he should have taken the contract with IND. Turns out we agree.

"I'm only answering why it is being debated." It isn't being debated by anyone who isn't a Denver fan. Because there is literally no reasonable reason for anyone without a bias to debate it.
At what one-year figure with second year team option would it not have been a "no-brainer?" That's what Brown's situation made me think about. Everyone's individual balance among winning, intangibles like team camaraderie and geography, and making coin.

Sorry if that doesn't fit into your little box of what is and isn't "reasonable" to discuss.

Stop being obtuse. He is going to make $14M to $15M more in the upcoming season. That is not a debatable choice, period.

If any team offered him substantially more than Denver could, I would have the same reaction. It happened to be Indiana.

I don't have a "little box of what is and isn't reasonable to discuss." If you think there is a discussion about whether a guy should take a contract making $22M+ vs. stay with his current team and make $7.8M in the upcoming season, then you're in Bizarro World. I heard it's nice there, so maybe that's fine. (y)
 
Jalen McDaniels 2yr $9.3mm to Toronto. Seems like one Sixers could have kept.

Every Morey move has ended up a net negative so far
I'm resigned to the fact that we're not winning a championship by who we bring in. The only way it happens is if Joel and Maxey elevate to a whole other level of play. I don't think that ever happens though.
 
Since the Lillard thing is so similar to the KG thing (superstar who wants to stay and win, stays for a long time, finally has to leave but reamins loved by the fans) so I finally did somethingi I have always wanted to do. I traced the entire legacy of the KG trade. It's definitely the nerdiest thing I've ever done - and that's a high bar - but I had nothing better to do today.

For example, KG was traded for (in part) Sebastien Telfar, who was traded Mark Blount, who was traded for Antoine Walker, who was traded for Kevin Love, who was traded for Thaddeus Young, who as traded for KG, who retired which ends that line.

So without further delay, here is everyong who played for the Wolves whose time here can be traced back to the big KG to the Celtics trade. So this is about what you can expect @General Malaise once Lillard is traded.

(bold means still on team)

Al Jefferson
Sebastian Telfair
Ryan Gomes
Gerald Green
Theo Ratliff
Wayne Ellington
Jonny Flynn
Kosta Koufos
Mark Blount
Martell Webster
Kirk Snyder
Paolao Prestes
Dante Cunningham
Eddy Curry
Anthony Randolph
Brad Miller
Nikola Mirotic
Chase Budinger
Lior Eiyahu
Michael Doleac
Wayne Simien
Antoine Walker
Tyus Jones
Norris Cole
Malcolm Lee
Damjan Rudez
Treveon Graham
Shabazz Napier
Luke Babbitt
Jason Collins
Kevin Love
Mike Miller
Lorenzo Brown
Alessandro Gentile
Allen Crabbe
Evan Turner
Malik Beasley
Juancho Hernangomez
Jarred Vanderbilt
Darko Milicic
Anthony Bennett
Andrew Wiggins
Thaddeus Young
Darius Songaila
Oleskiy Pecherov
Ricky Rubio (2nd time)
Jaden McDaniels
Rudy Gobert

Patrick Beverley
Jacob Evans
D'Angelo Russell
Omari Spellman
KG (2nd time)
Antonio Daniels
Josh Okogie
Taurean Prince
Josh Minott
Ed Davis
Mike Conley
Nickeil Alexander-Walker
Leonard Miller

Ed Davis
Jaylen Clark
2024 2nd
2025 2nd
 
Can't believe Brooks GOT BOTH the AAV and length. I thought with how all ended in Memphis, he'd have to do a near vet min one year deal.

(I haven't looked deep into deal....maybe there's team options/no guarantees in there).

What he and FVV got is absolutely nuts. Both are average to below average NBA starters at their positions IMO. Why it's always laughable when I hear "they had money to spend!!". Ok well, don't tie it up moronically for the next many years on guys that have zero business making that type money
 
Houston had a great draft. Think they had a horrific free agent period blowing money and locking up long term on marginal players.

I don't even know HTF Dillon Brooks fits on the team. And is FVV - a career 40% shooter - gonna give Amen Thompson shooting tips? 🤣🤣🤣 (Even though the money's insane, I can at least somewhat understand FVV with a vet PG angle).

Dillon there for the old "veteran leadership"?
 
Since the Lillard thing is so similar to the KG thing (superstar who wants to stay and win, stays for a long time, finally has to leave but reamins loved by the fans) so I finally did somethingi I have always wanted to do. I traced the entire legacy of the KG trade. It's definitely the nerdiest thing I've ever done - and that's a high bar - but I had nothing better to do today.

For example, KG was traded for (in part) Sebastien Telfar, who was traded Mark Blount, who was traded for Antoine Walker, who was traded for Kevin Love, who was traded for Thaddeus Young, who as traded for KG, who retired which ends that line.

So without further delay, here is everyong who played for the Wolves whose time here can be traced back to the big KG to the Celtics trade. So this is about what you can expect @General Malaise once Lillard is traded.

(bold means still on team)

Al Jefferson
Sebastian Telfair
Ryan Gomes
Gerald Green
Theo Ratliff
Wayne Ellington
Jonny Flynn
Kosta Koufos
Mark Blount
Martell Webster
Kirk Snyder
Paolao Prestes
Dante Cunningham
Eddy Curry
Anthony Randolph
Brad Miller
Nikola Mirotic
Chase Budinger
Lior Eiyahu
Michael Doleac
Wayne Simien
Antoine Walker
Tyus Jones
Norris Cole
Malcolm Lee
Damjan Rudez
Treveon Graham
Shabazz Napier
Luke Babbitt
Jason Collins
Kevin Love
Mike Miller
Lorenzo Brown
Alessandro Gentile
Allen Crabbe
Evan Turner
Malik Beasley
Juancho Hernangomez
Jarred Vanderbilt
Darko Milicic
Anthony Bennett
Andrew Wiggins
Thaddeus Young
Darius Songaila
Oleskiy Pecherov
Ricky Rubio (2nd time)
Jaden McDaniels
Rudy Gobert

Patrick Beverley
Jacob Evans
D'Angelo Russell
Omari Spellman
KG (2nd time)
Antonio Daniels
Josh Okogie
Taurean Prince
Josh Minott
Ed Davis
Mike Conley
Nickeil Alexander-Walker
Leonard Miller

Ed Davis
Jaylen Clark
2024 2nd
2025 2nd


Trade trees! Rays fans on a blog I like do this. I think they have one going back to 2005 still active.
 
The Pistons roster has 8 guards and 4 guys that can only play center or old school power forward. I liked the Troy Weaver hire a few years ago, but he has got to go now.

We have 4 wing players. Bodan, Livers, Buddy Boeheim, and the Thompson kid we just drafted. T
Love love love the Buddy Boeheim shoutout, but he ain't a wing.

When you are 6'6" and play on the Pistons you might as well be a power forward.
 
Can't believe Brooks GOT BOTH the AAV and length. I thought with how all ended in Memphis, he'd have to do a near vet min one year deal.

(I haven't looked deep into deal....maybe there's team options/no guarantees in there).

What he and FVV got is absolutely nuts. Both are average to below average NBA starters at their positions IMO. Why it's always laughable when I hear "they had money to spend!!". Ok well, don't tie it up moronically for the next many years on guys that have zero business making that type money
Brooks contract is the first one I literally laughed out loud at. Thought it had to be a fake Woj account. Houston’s offense is going to be breathtakingingly bad this year, might be my favorite league pass team.
 
Pistons free agency, pick up team options on Livers and Burks. Get two 2nd round picks to take on Joe Harris and his Forrest Gump like back, leaving only 10 million in cap space left.

The worst part is you could have held the Nets hostage and at least got a 1st from them. Instead they took 2nd round picks in 2027 and 2029. We are literally getting picks to scout 6th graders and not even good ones.

Hate Troy Weaver
 
Sabonis with a 5 year / 217 extension. I love the guy but that’s pretty gross unless he learns to shoot consistently.

He lead the NBA in rebounds. He led the Kings in assists as well. Assists ... from the center position. I hope he hits his midrange shot a little more consistently, but if he never shoots the ball outside of five feet, he's still worth the money.
 
Not sure what the heat trade will look like. They want to offload either Lowry or herro. Not sure about Duncan at this point and Caleb may or may not be in the deal

heat will likely take the lottery protection off the pick to okc to allow them to give 3 first rounders to Portland and then it just becomes which players get shuffled.

the only players safe in this deal are himmy and Bam and now Javier jaquez jr as he signed his contract and cannot be traded for 30 days. (Anyone else recently signed is also, I think, out of the picture).

let’s hope Riles brings this home and dame gets his ring. Heat are going to need to hit on a few more udfa guys for the foreseeable future bc they will have as many draft picks as I do.
 
Sabonis with a 5 year / 217 extension. I love the guy but that’s pretty gross unless he learns to shoot consistently.

He lead the NBA in rebounds. He led the Kings in assists as well. Assists ... from the center position. I hope he hits his midrange shot a little more consistently, but if he never shoots the ball outside of five feet, he's still worth the money.
He was freaking awesome this year but in this day and age I don’t think anyone was going to outbid what the Kings could offer him next offseason. Centers just aren’t as valuable anymore. Maybe I’m underestimating the Pistons.
 
Sabonis with a 5 year / 217 extension. I love the guy but that’s pretty gross unless he learns to shoot consistently.

He lead the NBA in rebounds. He led the Kings in assists as well. Assists ... from the center position. I hope he hits his midrange shot a little more consistently, but if he never shoots the ball outside of five feet, he's still worth the money.
He was freaking awesome this year but in this day and age I don’t think anyone was going to outbid what the Kings could offer him next offseason. Centers just aren’t as valuable anymore. Maybe I’m underestimating the Pistons.

You may be right, but a center that you can run your offense through might be little more valuable. I guess the biggest reason I think this is good news is that they now have a core that is locked up for a few years. If you're going to make a run, you need some consistency. That, and I'm imagining the Kings offense without Sabonis ... and oooooof
 
Sabonis with a 5 year / 217 extension. I love the guy but that’s pretty gross unless he learns to shoot consistently.

He lead the NBA in rebounds. He led the Kings in assists as well. Assists ... from the center position. I hope he hits his midrange shot a little more consistently, but if he never shoots the ball outside of five feet, he's still worth the money.
He was freaking awesome this year but in this day and age I don’t think anyone was going to outbid what the Kings could offer him next offseason. Centers just aren’t as valuable anymore. Maybe I’m underestimating the Pistons.

You may be right, but a center that you can run your offense through might be little more valuable. I guess the biggest reason I think this is good news is that they now have a core that is locked up for a few years. If you're going to make a run, you need some consistency. That, and I'm imagining the Kings offense without Sabonis ... and oooooof

I agree with this...also (and I am not taking a shot at the Kings by saying this just being truthful) the Kings are a franchise that has not been attractive to players for quite some time...they now are a good team that has players wanting to stay there and I think that is an important part of changing their culture and one of the keys to sustained success...this team is headed in the right direction right now.
 
Last edited:
Sabonis with a 5 year / 217 extension. I love the guy but that’s pretty gross unless he learns to shoot consistently.

He lead the NBA in rebounds. He led the Kings in assists as well. Assists ... from the center position. I hope he hits his midrange shot a little more consistently, but if he never shoots the ball outside of five feet, he's still worth the money.
He was freaking awesome this year but in this day and age I don’t think anyone was going to outbid what the Kings could offer him next offseason. Centers just aren’t as valuable anymore. Maybe I’m underestimating the Pistons.

You may be right, but a center that you can run your offense through might be little more valuable. I guess the biggest reason I think this is good news is that they now have a core that is locked up for a few years. If you're going to make a run, you need some consistency. That, and I'm imagining the Kings offense without Sabonis ... and oooooof
Letting him go 100% was not an option, I agree. I would have just rather tried to get another rotation player in FA this year first because I think the flight risk was relatively low. Like a Thybulle type (restricted but the Kings might have been able to offer something the Blazers wouldn’t have matched).
 
Pretty much every signing is getting blasted in here for being an 'overpay'. With the big cap jump, this is just how it's going to be now.
 
heat will likely take the lottery protection off the pick to okc to allow them to give 3 first rounders to Portland and then it just becomes which players get shuffled.
Still don't think they can get to three picks. If they take the protections off, that pick to OKC conveys in 2025. Which means 2024, 2026 are off limits. so best MIA can offer the 2027 and 2029. 2031 is not eligible to be traded yet
 
Pretty much every signing is getting blasted in here for being an 'overpay'. With the big cap jump, this is just how it's going to be now.
There have been 10ish real headscratchers but did the most part I think signings have actually been fairly reasonable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top