I should've known it would be this kind of game and bet the under.This Michigan/Penn State game might end up lower than the O/U on the Rutgers/Iowa game.
This is like watching football in 1920.
With a walkie talkie... whispering and not talking to anyone in the stands.Kinda surprised the rumors havent already startedHe might be in disguiseNoIf Michigan focuses on their TEs, it will be a good day
On thetisdroad
I know Harbaugh made the trip, is he on the sideline for this game?
Nice stop there…
If I was a Penn State fan and was at the game I would have dressed up like him just for the laughs.
Timely postPsu 1st down. They just need a bunch more Michigan penalties and they'll be in business.
126 yards combined passing
feels like a game from 1973
Close enoughMichigan doesn't have their coach but Penn State still has theirs?
Mich 28
PSU 9




126 yards combined passing
feels like a game from 1973
Iowa likes this stat.
Lol. He’s terrible. I told my son as soon as he went for 2 (it wasn’t even close), they’d regret it. They never got the ball back but you miss two pointers in a close game and guess what you are down 9 instead of 7. Way too early to go for 2 against a solid red zone defense.Franklin never seems to hep his team win. Only hurts them
Welcome to 10-00 passes in the second half. Welcome to 1933.
If they're going to give it to you, why not take it?0 passes in the second half. Welcome to 1933.
I assume that they'd kick the ball and play defense if they got the 2-point conversion, and go for the onside kick if it failed.Why not kick the extra point to get it to 8?
If they're going to give it to you, why not take it?0 passes in the second half. Welcome to 1933.
I'd guess Michigan's adjustment on offense was due to the latter. The game was called as if they only needed 20 points to win.If they're going to give it to you, why not take it?0 passes in the second half. Welcome to 1933.
UM had a long run-only FG drive and then punted 3 times before PSU started going for it on 4th - not sure Michigan took much. PSU’s offense was just putrid.
Oh hell yeah. Take a seat Michigan haters. Go Blue!
Yeah, I take no issue with the go for 2 decision late. The play call was laugh out loud bad, but that's the spot to go for 2. Unlike in the 1st half...I assume that they'd kick the ball and play defense if they got the 2-point conversion, and go for the onside kick if it failed.Why not kick the extra point to get it to 8?
I think that one was the right call. Of course, they wouldn't have needed it if not for the dumb decision to go for 2 in the first half.
I'd guess Michigan's adjustment on offense was due to the latter. The game was called as if they only needed 20 points to win.If they're going to give it to you, why not take it?0 passes in the second half. Welcome to 1933.
UM had a long run-only FG drive and then punted 3 times before PSU started going for it on 4th - not sure Michigan took much. PSU’s offense was just putrid.
He actually had a guy get open late in the front right of the end zone who was waving his hands around. QB just never even looked at him.Yeah, I take no issue with the go for 2 decision late. The play call was laugh out loud bad, but that's the spot to go for 2. Unlike in the 1st half...I assume that they'd kick the ball and play defense if they got the 2-point conversion, and go for the onside kick if it failed.Why not kick the extra point to get it to 8?
I think that one was the right call. Of course, they wouldn't have needed it if not for the dumb decision to go for 2 in the first half.
I wasn't thrilled about it either. It isn't a new approach and lends itself to the opposition being one fluke play away from getting back in the game. I've just adapted to that strategy emerging at least a couple times per year and stressing me out.I'd guess Michigan's adjustment on offense was due to the latter. The game was called as if they only needed 20 points to win.If they're going to give it to you, why not take it?0 passes in the second half. Welcome to 1933.
UM had a long run-only FG drive and then punted 3 times before PSU started going for it on 4th - not sure Michigan took much. PSU’s offense was just putrid.
Don’t totally disagree but it was still a one score game late - they had opportunities to put the game away sooner if they were a little more expansive.
PSU line was giving Michigan fits early and often. Yeah, this is flashes of what would happen a few years ago, but for different reasons and now with personnel that can actually execute and do what needs to be done.I wasn't thrilled about it either. It isn't a new approach and lends itself to the opposition being one fluke play away from getting back in the game. I've just adapted to that strategy emerging at least a couple times per year and stressing me out.I'd guess Michigan's adjustment on offense was due to the latter. The game was called as if they only needed 20 points to win.If they're going to give it to you, why not take it?0 passes in the second half. Welcome to 1933.
UM had a long run-only FG drive and then punted 3 times before PSU started going for it on 4th - not sure Michigan took much. PSU’s offense was just putrid.
Don’t totally disagree but it was still a one score game late - they had opportunities to put the game away sooner if they were a little more expansive.
Lol. He’s terrible. I told my son as soon as he went for 2 (it wasn’t even close), they’d regret it. They never got the ball back but you miss two pointers in a close game and guess what you are down 9 instead of 7. Way too early to go for 2 against a solid red zone defense.Franklin never seems to hep his team win. Only hurts them
He’s also not good developing QBs. That freshman looks terrible. I’ve only watched him today and against OSU. Seems like their QB play always holds them back.