Are we to believe that Georgia is no longer one of the top 4 teams in the country because they lost by 3 points in part due to questionable officiating?
By questionable officiating I'm referring to them not reviewing the Bond catch on 4th and 4, allowing Alabama to get points right before the half instead of turning the ball over on downs.
I absolutely believe Georgia is one of the 4 best teams.
So if the 2 best teams are in the NFC, should the Super Bowl be 2 teams from the NFC?
I'm not even advocating that Georgia should get in. Just that, they're one of the 4 best teams.
I think you can acknowledge that college sports and pro sports are not the same. So we shouldn't conflate the 2.
The NFL and NBA have 2 conferences. College has how many? Again. You really can't compare the 2. Sure, the pro leagues have divisions. But the divisions are still under the umbrella of each conference.
The NFL has a very structured playoff system. It's very clearly laid out how the playoffs work. The NBA has a very clearly laid out playoff structure.
College Football and basketball have committees. There are no clear cut guidelines. It's largely objective, but there is also a lot of subjective in there. If they feel their mission is to get the 4 best teams, then that's what they're going to do. If 2 of the best 4 teams are in the SEC, then those teams get to play in the playoffs.
Some people are advocating for a system that gives each Power 5 Champion a bid, and the best group of 5. If they up and decide we're going to do a bid tied to winning each conference, then cool. That's just not the current system.