I know some people love it but the beauty pageant subjectiveness of it makes me not care that much. The dismissal of strength of schedule is wild. I've no doubt I'm in the minority there.
Okay, you're in charge of college football now. What would you do to remedy all of this subjectiveness?
Easy.
I think I'm back to where I started: Nobody really knows.
The current system is a subjective beauty pageant that feels massively flawed and unfair in rewarding the best teams. And by “best teams”, I actually mean best teams.
And of course, that’s the real question here. In this current setup, defining “Best” is a challenge.
I feel certain the NCAA as a whole is not smart enough or organized enough to have intentionally orchestrated this, but it feels like they’ve locked in to system that attracts attention.
And in 2024, attention is the gold standard and primary metric.
So it seems like it’s working for them.
And I don’t see it changing anytime soon.
But if you let me be in charge: A 32 or 48-team superconference for just college football can make sense. Mike Leach talked about that and I think Chip Kelly did as well. I would put some sort of NIL salary cap factor in place and organize into two Conferences with Divisions of four teams.
Seems like we’ve seen that work pretty well…
But that’s too radical for most. It solves a problem that I may have with fairness, but it seems clear the current way gets loads of attention.
And as we said, attention is what wins.