BobbyLayne
Footballguy
I think that even though these observations might have been covered in BL's presser, this is a really informative must-read to outsiders looking to get a grip on Detroit's coaching personnel changes. It goes into their history and where their tendencies might be showing up. Perhaps it's too dilettantish, but it seems, unless Sunday was due to a particular exception (and it could well have), to be the best explanation of how deeply personnel was disrupted and how far out of the organization Detroit actually reached (I was led to believe in casual passing that this was direct promotion from within with similar philosophies—it doesn't seem that way at all when you break it down). Matt Harmon is a really bright guy and isn't gonna spill the beans overtly and for show, but he's not going to carry anybody's water no matter how much we like them.
![]()
Fantasy Football: Consider eyebrows raised after Lions once 'too-big-to-fail' offense struggles in Week 1
Matt Harmon examines the Lions' struggles on offense in Week 1 and whether it will impact us in fantasy football the rest of 2025.sports.yahoo.com
Well reasoned and presented in a nuanced manner. Buuuttttt.....as Matt notes several times, 1 game sample size. Reception perception is based off an 8 g sample for a good reason. As we saw last night, it may be the biggest issue Week 1 is the Packers defense is a Top 5 unit.
This was also potentially technically correct and perhaps the reporter could have been more artful but it actually sounds like he doesn't want to piss Campbell off but needs a comment on an obvious disparity. I mean, give whatever reason, but this answer isn't quite up to snuff in any meaningful way.
https://x.com/ScottBarrettDFB/status/1965854596338954408
Sidebar - this exchange was widely panned locally by fans. There's also some subtext folks aren't accounting for, but let's start with the substance.
The Lions did motion less. Even more telling, I don't think live or on the rewatch did I notice multiple shifts. This week they spoke about we're going to simpliy and give the players less so we can focus on fundamentals. In my head I was screaming at YT "TF are you talking about, you made it easy for the Pack and the solution is to make it easier for the Bears??"
Not sure this will land, but for those who play chess, you know that three things you should think about before every move are "checks, threats, & captures." Actually, the first thing you should note is where your opponent moved, what is he threatening or preparing to threaten, what are his ST and LT plans? Then after you complete that assessment, you ask yourself OK what can I do that will cause him to think more?
It's super important to not be too passive. Quiet moves are sometimes OK if you need your opponent to reveal more (i.e., is he intending to castle short side or long?), but generally you want to move you pieces forward and place them on good squares where you are threatening pieces or moving in for the checkmate. Are your threatening an attack? Is it a forcing move the opponent cannot ignore? That allows you to dictate the tempo.
Back to football. Not only did we not see any unusual formations or multiple shifts, I don't think we ran any fast motion. It very much reminded me of the days of Caldwell & Jim Bob Cooter. Jamo runs from one side of the formation to the other, and completes his motion or sets, then they snap the ball. Why not fast motion and snap the ball when ARSB or Jamo are running full speed in motion? That puts stress on the defense. Slow shifts that slow down or even stop before the snap give the defense time to communicate with each other and adjust.
It's like trying to compare the accuracy of someone playing chess with not time controls to when they play rapid, blitz or bullet. The lower time controls induce blunders because your mind feels the pressure of "I've got to move somewhere or I'll end up losing on time." Static formations and less pre-snap movement puts no stress on the defense.
Finally, the questioner in that sequence is John "Doc" Maakaron. He's a local podcaster and writes for Lions on SI. We know SI is a shell of the magazine we grew up with, many of their writers are of dubious distinction. Maakaron is a child psychotherapist and wasn't particularly accomplished in his chosen profession. So he started moonlighting, writing articles for off brand sites and podcasting, eventually reaching a point where he could more or less do sports mostly full time and cut back on his not very lucrative practice. Kudos to him for finding a way to monetize what he loves, but he is in no way qualified to be a beat reporter or football expert - unless you think I am or you are qualified for that job.
There are newspaper guys in that room who went to journalism school at Mizzou and Northwestern, how do you think they feel about psych majors from Michigan State who have anointed themselves as beat writers? (to be clear, he is a licensed therapist, having completed his masters at Detroit Mercy, but he's not a psychologist and the "doc" moniker is disingenuous. He never completed the extern/intern residencies that would qualify him to be a psychologist, he is miles away from being board certified, he never received medical school training to become psychiatrist. That doesn't mean he is not a qualified therapist, but his educational achievement is the same as a social worker.)
Anyway, he has a lot of bad takes and his press conference questions are often cringy. It's rare to see Campbell get snippy but the guy he was answering is something of a fraud. Although in today's world, he's actually typical of the folks now covering sports and politics.
#oldmanyellingatclouds
Good post @rockaction, I definitely think Morton needs to show more creativity in his preparation. Don't tell me the guys have to win their one on ones; you are the one who is supposed to scheme them open and stress the defense enough that running lanes open up because you have forced the defense to make a choice between multiple threats. When the defense only has one thing to worry about the offense is going to flounder.
One week sample size, maybe they turn it around this week. But IMO (and I'm just a fan with an opinion) simplifying and putting less on the players plates is not the approach that will make life harder on teams trying to defend you.
edit - I need an intern to proof these things before I hit post
Last edited: