Chadstroma
Footballguy
I know they liked Isaiah Pola-Mao a lot, he came in and played pretty close to 100% of the defensive snaps after Epps went down. Maybe they want to see him and Epps together.
Milton Williams - 4/$104 = $26 MM per
6'3'' 290, Age: 25
2023-24: 995 snaps, 5.5 sacks, 64 tackles (32 solo), 10 TFL, 25 Pressures
Grady Jarrett - Bears 3/$43.5 = $14.5 MM per
6'0'' 288, Age: 31
2023-24: 1062 snaps, 4 sacks, 76 tackles (39 solo), 11 TFL, 28 Pressures
Adam Butler - 3/$16 = $5.3 MM per
6'5'' 300, Age: 30
2023-24: 1385 snaps, 10 sacks, 93 tackles (52 solo), 16 TFL, 25 Pressures
:UnderTheRadar:
I know they liked Isaiah Pola-Mao a lot, he came in and played pretty close to 100% of the defensive snaps after Epps went down. Maybe they want to see him and Epps together.
I don’t get this formula. Are they looking at 3 extra picks as of now?Can't retain them all unless you want to overpay. These are the days that teams are splashing money around. You off XX and then an agent comes and says this team is offering XXX you either pay XXXX or let them walk. Sometimes it is best to let them walk and spend the money elsewhere.Lost three defenders so far.
Didn't Carroll say the biggest priority was to retain their defensive free agents?
This is especially true when you factor in the comp pick formula. You get rewarded doubly by not getting caught in the day one UFA wash.
I don’t get this formula. Are they looking at 3 extra picks as of now?Can't retain them all unless you want to overpay. These are the days that teams are splashing money around. You off XX and then an agent comes and says this team is offering XXX you either pay XXXX or let them walk. Sometimes it is best to let them walk and spend the money elsewhere.Lost three defenders so far.
Didn't Carroll say the biggest priority was to retain their defensive free agents?
This is especially true when you factor in the comp pick formula. You get rewarded doubly by not getting caught in the day one UFA wash.
Agreed.HUGE.Koonce re-signed 1 year $12 MM prove it deal. Fair and good for the Raiders and MK.![]()
A healthy Koonce on the other side of Crosby and Wilkins (healthy) and Butler in the middle is a very good Dline with Chasson, Robinson and Snowden all showing that they can contribute in a rotation. I was worried that they were going to let him walk. I am ok spending 12 on him for one year and then hopefully he goes off and we pay up next year.
Yeah, I felt the pangs as well when I saw the Fields/Jets signing and the numbers.We could have kept the 3rd and signed Fields or Darnold for the same/less (way less for Fields) money - that would be the chess move. But I'm ok playing checkers first, taking no chances at missing out on those guys to bigger bags or prettier landscapes and walking out of March like we did last year with no plan. Geno has a great floor and even if the ceiling is limited, it's at least in double digits. The cost wasn't outrageous, and a late 3 is no guarantee to hit anyway, so at least it's a plan. Many years ago when I was in corporate management they had a mantra - "Always have a plan. Always execute to the plan. Constantly evaluate the plan. If the plan stinks change it. Always execute to the plan." At least we're now not going to panic and sign Rodgers or Cousins.
I don’t get this formula. Are they looking at 3 extra picks as of now?
Roughly, yes. I like charts, here's what last year's comp formula looks like for us:It's based on # of signings in and out. I'm not entirely straight on it, but I believe you first have to have lost more UFA than you signed. Once that criteria is established, then they offset lost UFAs with any that were signed to comparable deals on a per annum comparison.
CFAs Lost: 5 | CFAs Gained: 3 | ||||||
Name | Rd | APY | # | Name | Rd | APY | # |
Bilal Nichols | 6 | $7M | 411 | ||||
Amik Robertson | 6 | $4.63M | 452 | ||||
Player lost | AAV | Likely pick gained | Likely pick cancelled | Player gained | AAV |
Moehring | $17.3M | 4th | |||
Hobbs | $12.5M | 4th | |||
$ | $ | ||||
Yep, like I said at least we're playing checkers and not marbles like last year.Yeah, I felt the pangs as well when I saw the Fields/Jets signing and the numbers.
But we know the Geno/Carroll history with each other so I’m trusting in the new regime.![]()
I obviously have not looked at what Raiders are under contract and which are not recentlyI know they liked Isaiah Pola-Mao a lot, he came in and played pretty close to 100% of the defensive snaps after Epps went down. Maybe they want to see him and Epps together.
Pola-Mao and Chinn. I don't think Epps has signed yet and might not.
Looks like you found the new thread titleYep, like I said at least we're playing checkers and not marbles like last year.Yeah, I felt the pangs as well when I saw the Fields/Jets signing and the numbers.
But we know the Geno/Carroll history with each other so I’m trusting in the new regime.![]()
More than don't mind... we need to add to the WR room. It is exceptionally thin after Tre and JakobAgreed.HUGE.Koonce re-signed 1 year $12 MM prove it deal. Fair and good for the Raiders and MK.![]()
A healthy Koonce on the other side of Crosby and Wilkins (healthy) and Butler in the middle is a very good Dline with Chasson, Robinson and Snowden all showing that they can contribute in a rotation. I was worried that they were going to let him walk. I am ok spending 12 on him for one year and then hopefully he goes off and we pay up next year.
Dline is “done”.
Move on to DBs and LBs imo.
And always OL. Always and eternally.
And I don’t mind signing a cheap WR and then we draft a WR this year.
For the most part, I like what we did last year in FA and draft. Some wins, some injuries.... no real huge busts.Yep, like I said at least we're playing checkers and not marbles like last year.Yeah, I felt the pangs as well when I saw the Fields/Jets signing and the numbers.
But we know the Geno/Carroll history with each other so I’m trusting in the new regime.![]()
The smart teams don't overpay on the first day of free agency. You guys are doing fine imo. Really bad teams (like the current Patriots) almost have to overpay because nobody wants to go there.Can't retain them all unless you want to overpay. These are the days that teams are splashing money around. You off XX and then an agent comes and says this team is offering XXX you either pay XXXX or let them walk. Sometimes it is best to let them walk and spend the money elsewhere.
We could have kept the 3rd and signed Fields or Darnold for the same/less (way less for Fields) money - that would be the chess move.
How is Fields a "chess" move?We could have kept the 3rd and signed Fields or Darnold for the same/less (way less for Fields) money - that would be the chess move. But I'm ok playing checkers first, taking no chances at missing out on those guys to bigger bags or prettier landscapes and walking out of March like we did last year with no plan. Geno has a great floor and even if the ceiling is limited, it's at least in double digits. The cost wasn't outrageous, and a late 3 is no guarantee to hit anyway, so at least it's a plan. Many years ago when I was in corporate management they had a mantra - "Always have a plan. Always execute to the plan. Constantly evaluate the plan. If the plan stinks change it. Always execute to the plan." At least we're now not going to panic and sign Rodgers or Cousins.
In the absence of another QB option, getting the QB is far more important. Forfeiting a 4th next year instead of a 3rd year is a much better price, and at the time I wrote that it wasn't known we were going to get any comp picks (still might not) next year in which case we'd forego nothing. I'm genuinely surprised Moehring and Spillane got what they got, I figured we'd re-sign both at mid-market levels but other teams clearly valued them higher.The chess move will be getting a 3rd-4th back for losing Moerhig (albeit the following year). Which would not have happened had they signed Fields, since his contract would have offset Moerhig's.
He's 10 years younger, he's 1/2 the price, he's a better fit in Kelly's system, and we'd have kept our 3rd round pick.How is Fields a "chess" move?
Has to come available first.kupp? sure would like to see some OL signings
The chess move is never signing anyone, I guess, so we get all these compensatory picksWe could have kept the 3rd and signed Fields or Darnold for the same/less (way less for Fields) money - that would be the chess move.
The chess move will be getting a 3rd-4th back for losing Moerhig (albeit the following year). Which would not have happened had they signed Fields, since his contract would have offset Moerhig's.
The chess move is never signing anyone, I guess, so we get all these compensatory picksWe could have kept the 3rd and signed Fields or Darnold for the same/less (way less for Fields) money - that would be the chess move.
The chess move will be getting a 3rd-4th back for losing Moerhig (albeit the following year). Which would not have happened had they signed Fields, since his contract would have offset Moerhig's.![]()
This is exactly what Brad Holmes has done with the Lions.Not true. The chess move is signing value free agents almost exclusively, with very few big dollar guys sprinkled in, every once in a while when a true stud comes available. That formula maximizes your cap flexibility and rewards you with extra swings on draft weekend.
Of course, none of the above precludes you from playing top dollars to your own guys if you think they are worth it.
My winky-face implied I was joking, but I honestly appreciate the extra info and details since this whole process is an unknown to me.The chess move is never signing anyone, I guess, so we get all these compensatory picksWe could have kept the 3rd and signed Fields or Darnold for the same/less (way less for Fields) money - that would be the chess move.
The chess move will be getting a 3rd-4th back for losing Moerhig (albeit the following year). Which would not have happened had they signed Fields, since his contract would have offset Moerhig's.![]()
Not true. The chess move is signing value free agents almost exclusively, with very few big dollar guys sprinkled in, every once in a while when a true stud comes available. That formula maximizes your cap flexibility and rewards you with extra swings on draft weekend.
Of course, none of the above precludes you from playing top dollars to your own guys if you think they are worth it.
That was a steal. Butler is a really good player. Some comparable players got a lot more. In general some of the contracts today were insane.Can't believe Butler didn't get more after looking at most of the deals today!
Ok folks who know stuff….good, bad, meh?Adam Schefter@AdamSchefter
Steelers free-agent linebacker Elandon Roberts reached agreement tonight with the Las Vegas Raiders on a one-year, $3 million deal.[/URL]
Meh to ok depth. I only know him from playing idpOk folks who know stuff….good, bad, meh?Adam Schefter@AdamSchefter
Steelers free-agent linebacker Elandon Roberts reached agreement tonight with the Las Vegas Raiders on a one-year, $3 million deal.[/URL]
Bad if it cancels out a comp pick, this is a total wtf signing at this point. I get that we want to add some depth and high-character guys but there are tons of $3M guys available and we shouldn't be signing any bottom-dollar guys until we either have lost some other lower-tier guys or the comp period closes. Right now he costs us a 4th/5th rounder next year:Ok folks who know stuff….good, bad, meh?
Player lost | AAV | Likely pick gained | Likely pick cancelled | Player gained | AAV |
Moehring | $17.3M | 4th | |||
I am quite certain Carroll asked Kelly for input about Geno. Mobility may suit Kelly but there is a lot more to playing the position than wheels. Geno has plenty of mobility and, more importantly he is incredibly accurate.He's 10 years younger, he's 1/2 the price, he's a better fit in Kelly's system, and we'd have kept our 3rd round pick.
Again, I'm not criticizing the move. It's a nice checkers move, we got kinged yay us. But if we get a quality starter without paying the 3rd it's a better move.A third round picks is hardly a high price for a proven NFL starter.
I like Justin Fields. I would have been intrigued if the Raiders signed him, happy even. His physical attributes scream upside. But he's a fifth year player with 44 starts under his belt and we still don't know if he can play QB at this level (which kinda suggests we know he can't).Again, I'm not criticizing the move. It's a nice checkers move, we got kinged yay us. But if we get a quality starter without paying the 3rd it's a better move.A third round picks is hardly a high price for a proven NFL starter.
To put it in terms more familiar to Raider fans, it's just like us to give away a 3rd and get an old terrible washed up $40M QB when we could have had a 26 year old terrible $20M QB that didn't also cost us a 3rd round pick.
Some of you guys are way too focused on comp picks. Can't run an nfl team and free agency with a large emphasis based on comp picks, that may or may not be awared, based on a formula that is not even fully known. I don't even think Roberts is the caliber FA signing that would even factor into the comp pick formula based on what I have read about it. The Raiders are not in a position to be passing on players they think can help the team.Bad if it cancels out a comp pick, this is a total wtf signing at this point. I get that we want to add some depth and high-character guys but there are tons of $3M guys available and we shouldn't be signing any bottom-dollar guys until we either have lost some other lower-tier guys or the comp period closes. Right now he costs us a 4th/5th rounder next year:Ok folks who know stuff….good, bad, meh?
Player lost AAV Likely pick gained Likely pick cancelled Player gained AAV Moehring $17.3M 4th Hobbs$12.5M4th/5thSpillane$11M4th/5th5thChinn$8M7thRoberts$8M
Ian Rapoport
@RapSheet
#Raiders LB Divine Deablo is signing a with the #Falcons on a 2-year, $14M deal with $8M in year one, source said.
Wow, staff must have not thought much about Deablo at all.
COMP PICK!!!Ian Rapoport
@RapSheet
#Raiders LB Divine Deablo is signing a with the #Falcons on a 2-year, $14M deal with $8M in year one, source said.
Wow, staff must have not thought much about Deablo at all.
I really wanted Koonce back more than any of them so I like that. Also would have liked to get Spillane and Hobbs back. Not too upset about the others.Deablo got slightly better each year but not enough for me to cry over him moving out.
It is interesting that we are letting almost all the FA's walk.
i really want chaisson backI really wanted Koonce back more than any of them so I like that. Also would have liked to get Spillane and Hobbs back. Not too upset about the others.Deablo got slightly better each year but not enough for me to cry over him moving out.
It is interesting that we are letting almost all the FA's walk.
Did he though? In 2022 it looked like he was on his way to a breakout season but he got injured, in 2023 his per game stats never came close to 2022 and last year he seemed to regress terribly.Deablo got slightly better each year but not enough for me to cry over him moving out.
It is interesting that we are letting almost all the FA's walk.
Spillane was a loss. But for the money he got, you got to let him go.I really wanted Koonce back more than any of them so I like that. Also would have liked to get Spillane and Hobbs back. Not too upset about the others.Deablo got slightly better each year but not enough for me to cry over him moving out.
It is interesting that we are letting almost all the FA's walk.
Niners and Ravens. Raiders have three mid-rounders if they play the rest of free agency right.Niners should have a bazillion comp picks so far