As another confirmed Catholic I have to disagree with this take. I heard a great homily a couple weeks ago that put it in this context: JP II was a philosopher, B XVI a theologian, and Francis a pastor. I think that's an apt analogy and recognize that there is historically a lot of diversity to be found in our approaches. The 70 years or so after a council is a period of upheaval in the church, as I mentioned in another thread recently, and personally while some of the things he said may have seemed controversial, I think that on balance he did a pretty good job.i hope they get a pope in the mold of francis we need a whole helluva lot more of that kinda guy in the world take that to the bank brochachos
As a confirmed Catholic I massively disagree and think that liberation theology is a nightmare. He was a disaster for philosophical doctrine and tradition. You might see his love of the poor but his situational ethics (relativism vs. truth) and borderline communist economics (his anti-production and MMT economic adviser) were and are a disaster and a loser proposition for the Church. His absolutism about immigration might cost Vatican City its own character, never mind the countries he administered to.
Worst Pope since Pius XII in WWII
And you can’t take him to the bank because he didn’t believe in banks, brohan.
JP II was 58 when he became pope.The first sign of old age is when you are older than the President. The last sign is when you are older than the Pope.
As another confirmed Catholic I have to disagree with this take. I heard a great homily a couple weeks ago that put it in this context: JP II was a philosopher, B XVI a theologian, and Francis a pastor. I think that's an apt analogy and recognize that there is historically a lot of diversity to be found in our approaches. The 70 years or so after a council is a period of upheaval in the church, as I mentioned in another thread recently, and personally while some of the things he said may have seemed controversial, I think that on balance he did a pretty good job.i hope they get a pope in the mold of francis we need a whole helluva lot more of that kinda guy in the world take that to the bank brochachos
As a confirmed Catholic I massively disagree and think that liberation theology is a nightmare. He was a disaster for philosophical doctrine and tradition. You might see his love of the poor but his situational ethics (relativism vs. truth) and borderline communist economics (his anti-production and MMT economic adviser) were and are a disaster and a loser proposition for the Church. His absolutism about immigration might cost Vatican City its own character, never mind the countries he administered to.
Worst Pope since Pius XII in WWII
And you can’t take him to the bank because he didn’t believe in banks, brohan.
FWIW, I would say the same about B XVI and consider JP II a great pope. Exactly who we needed when we needed him, and a huge influence on my life and most of my age group.
Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
I secretly wish for a 3 year long conclave like back in the 1200s.
Drawback to electing the nearly dead.I secretly wish for a 3 year long conclave like back in the 1200s.
Personally, rather than 3 years with no Pope, I think it'd be more fun to see 1 year with 3 Popes.
Black smoke again this morning. Up to two more votes today.
I'd prefer just going all the way back to the Western Schism where there were 3 living popes.I secretly wish for a 3 year long conclave like back in the 1200s.
Personally, rather than 3 years with no Pope, I think it'd be more fun to see 1 year with 3 Popes.
Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
Yeah 1st vote is generally where a wide variety of Cardinals get votes - somewhat to take the overall temperature and also probably to put names out there that maybe haven't had heavy consideration but get more of a look because they get a surprise vote. Going back to 1830-31 the minimum number of ballots have been 3. Benedict XVI was 4, Francis was 5, John Paul II was 8. With less Italian speakers and less interaction amongst each other and being from more places my personal guess is it goes to vote 9.
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
It does seem like maybe it is time for another Pope Urban...
-QG
Can they pick any name they want or are there guidelines? Can we end up with "Pope Pizza Balla Banana Hammock Humperdink" if that's what he wanted?
They are sequestered until they pick a pope. They know the results, but no one else. There was a break between the votes this morning and the votes this afternoon, which is when I’m sure a decent amount of bargaining was done. Pope Benedict and Pope Francis were both second day selections.Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
Yeah 1st vote is generally where a wide variety of Cardinals get votes - somewhat to take the overall temperature and also probably to put names out there that maybe haven't had heavy consideration but get more of a look because they get a surprise vote. Going back to 1830-31 the minimum number of ballots have been 3. Benedict XVI was 4, Francis was 5, John Paul II was 8. With less Italian speakers and less interaction amongst each other and being from more places my personal guess is it goes to vote 9.
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
It does seem like maybe it is time for another Pope Urban...
-QG
Thanks. Sorry for the dumb question, but I'm assuming the totals for votes are made clear to the Cardinals voting, right? Anyone else?
Do they have set time for meeting and discussion between the votes?
Is there "bargaining" type stuff that happens where people are convinced to vote for ________ if the party receiving votes puhes policy a certain way? That kind of thing?
There is time for prayer and discussion in between the votes.Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
Yeah 1st vote is generally where a wide variety of Cardinals get votes - somewhat to take the overall temperature and also probably to put names out there that maybe haven't had heavy consideration but get more of a look because they get a surprise vote. Going back to 1830-31 the minimum number of ballots have been 3. Benedict XVI was 4, Francis was 5, John Paul II was 8. With less Italian speakers and less interaction amongst each other and being from more places my personal guess is it goes to vote 9.
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
It does seem like maybe it is time for another Pope Urban...
-QG
Thanks. Sorry for the dumb question, but I'm assuming the totals for votes are made clear to the Cardinals voting, right? Anyone else?
Do they have set time for meeting and discussion between the votes?
Is there "bargaining" type stuff that happens where people are convinced to vote for ________ if the party receiving votes puhes policy a certain way? That kind of thing?
To answer a couple questions - there is a process where a team of 3 Cardinals (randomly selected before rounds) examine each ballot and the 3rd Cardinal announces each ballot and they keep the tally.Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
Yeah 1st vote is generally where a wide variety of Cardinals get votes - somewhat to take the overall temperature and also probably to put names out there that maybe haven't had heavy consideration but get more of a look because they get a surprise vote. Going back to 1830-31 the minimum number of ballots have been 3. Benedict XVI was 4, Francis was 5, John Paul II was 8. With less Italian speakers and less interaction amongst each other and being from more places my personal guess is it goes to vote 9.
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
It does seem like maybe it is time for another Pope Urban...
-QG
Thanks. Sorry for the dumb question, but I'm assuming the totals for votes are made clear to the Cardinals voting, right? Anyone else?
Do they have set time for meeting and discussion between the votes?
Is there "bargaining" type stuff that happens where people are convinced to vote for ________ if the party receiving votes puhes policy a certain way? That kind of thing?
There is time for prayer and discussion in between the votes.Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
Yeah 1st vote is generally where a wide variety of Cardinals get votes - somewhat to take the overall temperature and also probably to put names out there that maybe haven't had heavy consideration but get more of a look because they get a surprise vote. Going back to 1830-31 the minimum number of ballots have been 3. Benedict XVI was 4, Francis was 5, John Paul II was 8. With less Italian speakers and less interaction amongst each other and being from more places my personal guess is it goes to vote 9.
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
It does seem like maybe it is time for another Pope Urban...
-QG
Thanks. Sorry for the dumb question, but I'm assuming the totals for votes are made clear to the Cardinals voting, right? Anyone else?
Do they have set time for meeting and discussion between the votes?
Is there "bargaining" type stuff that happens where people are convinced to vote for ________ if the party receiving votes puhes policy a certain way? That kind of thing?
It would be a mistake to consider this a political event (although there are certainly aspects of it where politics come into play). It's actually held in a chapel for a reason. "Election" is the mechanism used to determine the new pope, but discernment is what's really going on. And Catholics believe that the Holy Spirit is the most important conclave participants.
LET'S GO PIZZABALLA!
Can they pick any name they want or are there guidelines? Can we end up with "Pope Pizza Balla Banana Hammock Humperdink" if that's what he wanted?
I understand you're being funny but for anyone genuinely curious, the decision is deeply personal and generally they base their name off a predecessor or a saint.
Shams: The Popes are strongly considering Luis Antonio Tagle with this upcoming pick. Congratulations to Rich Paul and Klutch Sports for negotiating this historic deal.I hope ESPN doesn't spoil the pick before they announce it at the podium
-QG
Definitely, and I didn't think you were saying that. But a lot of the words used in the reporting makes it sound just like a political negotiation, and I think it's important to mention that it's not intended to be that way and I'd like to hope that most of the cardinals don't see it that way either. The lines between electioneering and discernment are certainly not clear and distinct, but I think QuizGuy says it well above that it's not bargaining in the conventional way.There is time for prayer and discussion in between the votes.Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
Yeah 1st vote is generally where a wide variety of Cardinals get votes - somewhat to take the overall temperature and also probably to put names out there that maybe haven't had heavy consideration but get more of a look because they get a surprise vote. Going back to 1830-31 the minimum number of ballots have been 3. Benedict XVI was 4, Francis was 5, John Paul II was 8. With less Italian speakers and less interaction amongst each other and being from more places my personal guess is it goes to vote 9.
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
It does seem like maybe it is time for another Pope Urban...
-QG
Thanks. Sorry for the dumb question, but I'm assuming the totals for votes are made clear to the Cardinals voting, right? Anyone else?
Do they have set time for meeting and discussion between the votes?
Is there "bargaining" type stuff that happens where people are convinced to vote for ________ if the party receiving votes puhes policy a certain way? That kind of thing?
It would be a mistake to consider this a political event (although there are certainly aspects of it where politics come into play). It's actually held in a chapel for a reason. "Election" is the mechanism used to determine the new pope, but discernment is what's really going on. And Catholics believe that the Holy Spirit is the most important conclave participants.
Thanks. I didn't say I considered it a political event. I don't know and that's why I was asking, In this case, I was asking if "bargaining" type stuff happened.
I have heard a lot of reporting that there is significant "discussion" between the votes -especially at meals. I assume they are trying to form loose coalitions based on their progressive ,moderate or conservative perspectives. So in a way, kind of political.There is time for prayer and discussion in between the votes.Black smoke.
Am I right in thinking we don't know anything about who got most votes or anything like that?
Just that nobody got the required 2/3?
Yeah 1st vote is generally where a wide variety of Cardinals get votes - somewhat to take the overall temperature and also probably to put names out there that maybe haven't had heavy consideration but get more of a look because they get a surprise vote. Going back to 1830-31 the minimum number of ballots have been 3. Benedict XVI was 4, Francis was 5, John Paul II was 8. With less Italian speakers and less interaction amongst each other and being from more places my personal guess is it goes to vote 9.
CBS may need to do an Urban Dictionary check.
It does seem like maybe it is time for another Pope Urban...
-QG
Thanks. Sorry for the dumb question, but I'm assuming the totals for votes are made clear to the Cardinals voting, right? Anyone else?
Do they have set time for meeting and discussion between the votes?
Is there "bargaining" type stuff that happens where people are convinced to vote for ________ if the party receiving votes puhes policy a certain way? That kind of thing?
It would be a mistake to consider this a political event (although there are certainly aspects of it where politics come into play). It's actually held in a chapel for a reason. "Election" is the mechanism used to determine the new pope, but discernment is what's really going on. And Catholics believe that the Holy Spirit is the most important conclave participants.
Thanks. I didn't say I considered it a political event. I don't know and that's why I was asking, In this case, I was asking if "bargaining" type stuff happened.
We have a Leo.
Wow... this is pretty huge.American Pope!!!!
CHICAGO CARDINALS WIN
-QG