3 Rookies Qb's Starting Today! (1 Viewer)

[prymetyme25]

Just interesting to know what everone thinks on these 3 qb's.....

Vince- bad team but has amazing ability. Also has nothing to lose.

Lienart- awesome weapons but horrible O-line but if he can get rid of the ball quickly could be sucessful.

Gradkowski- nice assortment of weapons O-line alomst got the last qb killed but he's smart and surprisingly mobile.

Should be an interesting day for all these guys.

Same results for all these guys? Or do they all have different type of days?

I'll hang up and listen now

 

[[scooter]]

Leinart has a home game against a mediocre team. He will be OK. 225-1-1 with more scrambles and fewer sacks than Kurt Warner. And I think there's a good chance they'll win the game.

Young - winless team vs. undefeated team. Uh-oh. It's going to be a long day but I don't think he'll be worse than Kerry Collins. 170-1-2 with 50+ rushing yards

Gradkowski - call me crazy, but I think he's going to do alright. The Saints are going to be overconfident and Gradkowski is going to take advantage. 250-1-2 and a close game.

 

[prymetyme25]

' date='Oct 8 2006, 11:19 AM' post='5680901']Leinart has a home game against a mediocre team. He will be OK. 225-1-1 with more scrambles and fewer sacks than Kurt Warner. And I think there's a good chance they'll win the game.Young - winless team vs. undefeated team. Uh-oh. It's going to be a long day but I don't think he'll be worse than Kerry Collins. 170-1-2 with 50+ rushing yardsGradkowski - call me crazy, but I think he's going to do alright. The Saints are going to be overconfident and Gradkowski is going to take advantage. 250-1-2 and a close game.

yeah scooter I think Gradkowski is gonna have a good game too. I Actually think he might have a Tom Brady type affect like when Bledsoe went down. Not superbowl type play but play good enough to make simms expendable

 

[The Jacket]

' date='Oct 8 2006, 05:19 PM' post='5680901']

Leinart has a home game against a mediocre team. He will be OK. 225-1-1 with more scrambles and fewer sacks than Kurt Warner.

Mediocre team or not, he's not against a mediocre defense. It doesn't matter one single bit how good the team is.Kinda like any rookie quarterback that might've faced the Ravens last year. They stunk, but you wouldn't wanna face that defense.

 

[prymetyme25]

So far so good

 

[Buckna]

Fox pregame remarked that there are 9 starting QB's today with less than a year experience!

 

[SSOG]

Fox pregame remarked that there are 9 starting QB's today with less than a year experience!

Of course, that number includes Rex Grossman and Phillip Rivers, so take it for what it's worth.

 

[Robbie Cooper]

Leinart is 5/5 for 84 yards for 2 TDs. In the first quarter. Against the "tough" KC D.

I'd say the answer the question posed by this tread has been answered.

 

[prymetyme25]

Leinart is 5/5 for 84 yards for 2 TDs. In the first quarter. Against the "tough" KC D.I'd say the answer the question posed by this tread has been answered.

Neither one won but all had decent games. So who played better?

 

[LHUCKS]

Pac10 = Conference of Champions

Don't forget it.

 

[GoFishTN]

Pac10 = Conference of ChampionsDon't forget it.

 

[bostonfred]

antibumping this to fix the time zone issue

 

[SSOG]

Pac10 = Conference of USC and a bunch of who-dats and also-ransDon't forget it.

I fixed it for you there.Seriously, LHUCKS, nobody is debating that USC is a good team. Nobody's surprised when a USC player does well in the NFL. Why don't you get back to us when somebody else in the Pac-10 starts consistantly producing NFL-caliber talent, kay?By the way... I can't resist taking a shot... but perhaps you can explain why Deuce McAllister has the 3rd highest ypa of any RB with 50+ carries, while your man Reggie has the 3rd LOWEST ypa of any RB with 50+ carries. I mean, they're running behind the same offensive line with the same QB and the same WRs against the same defenses here. Reggie sure did look good running against that conference of champions, though, didn't he?