Hey everyone looking in we still need a GM for BUF.
PM me if you're interested.

if you still need a Bills GM, just PM me when I'm up
Hey everyone looking in we still need a GM for BUF.
PM me if you're interested.
if you still need a Bills GM, just PM me when I'm up
Edge & my 2nd for your pick???Minnesota is looking to trade down.
After Drafting Benson Vikings are not looking to add any more RB's. Since there where no trade offers My Pick will be made in 15 Min.Edge & my 2nd for your pick???Minnesota is looking to trade down.
Not sure if you found someone, but if not I will take Green Bay for this mock.Still looking for GB GM!!!!!
Carolina Panthers Looking to move down again from #22... anyone interested? Ill give it about 15-30 mins and if nothing then Ill make my pick.
Crowder and Miller go 20 & 21? Well, this is a "Mock" draft...
I think Miller at #21 is a great choice.Crowder and Miller go 20 & 21? Well, this is a "Mock" draft...
I believe diesel is talking about the recent news concerning Crowder's draft stock. Kiper recently said he thinks Crowder will go anywhere from the 3rd thru the 5th round. Evidently, the 1st round predictions about him were premature (if you believe Kiper...personally, I think he's as plugged-in as anybody).The biggest knocks on Crowder are his injury history (numerous knee surgeries) & questionable character. The main thing is the knee problems, IMO. Some teams may even have him off their board because of that. He does have big-time potential, though, & it was common for him to be in the 1st round of most mocks as recently as a week or two ago.What's the problem? Dallas fills a need with a monster LB.
Crowder and Miller go 20 & 21? Well, this is a "Mock" draft...
I think the Packers need more help against the pass, personally. IMO (I've been wrong before), CB, DE, and LB are the biggest needs, and while the LB crop in the draft is thin, I have three CB's and three DE's rated higher than Hawthorne (again, completely subjective).I'm just saying, I doubt the Packers would pass on Cody or Thomas Davis here.With the last two picks, our clear cut players were gone and left the Packers in a decision to make a tough choice.
With many needs at DL, LB, and Safety, the options were many but the top quality players few.
With that said, we believe that the run defense needs fixing ASAP. With that said, the Packers select....
Anttaj Hawthorne, DT, Wisconsin
With this pick, a few factors come into play.
1. T Johnson and Hawthorne are the clear top DTs in this draft and then it is a big dropoff. Better run defense starts up the middle and we all know where Gilbert Brown is now, McDonalds. Grady Jackson and Hawthorne become a huge stop gap to what was a leaky run defense and magically make the LBs better.
2. There is more chance to see a quality LB or Safety in the 2nd rd where the Pack has two picks than there was a talented run plugger.
3. O line was also a thought but with the recent signings, late round prospects will be added most likely and developed for depth this year.
Thanks. Read the post diesel. It's not who I expected to get to 21. Probed around for trade-up possibilities, but they just were going to cost too much. Jax FO and JDR haven't really shown the desire to do big trades anyway. A true rounded and great pass catching TE is something absent from the Jax arsenal, and it DEFINITELY cost them a couple games last year. If you can draft a guy that should allow you to WIN 2 more games the next season at 1.21.....you're going to pass that up, eh?Well, good thing neither of us is a GM!I think Miller at #21 is a great choice.Crowder and Miller go 20 & 21? Well, this is a "Mock" draft...
First, I will agree that there were CBs and Safeties that were tempting. With that said, the Pack drafted two CBs high last year and they have to be given the opportunity to work with the new DC who is a heck of a coach. The scheme was horrible last year and a real DC should fix that first.Second, a pash rush up the middle and from the ends makes the pass defense improve ten fold. With teams double teaming the DT now, KGB and a pash rush specialist to be drafter later maybe will be free to go at the QB with one on one matchups.I think the Packers need more help against the pass, personally. IMO (I've been wrong before), CB, DE, and LB are the biggest needs, and while the LB crop in the draft is thin, I have three CB's and three DE's rated higher than Hawthorne (again, completely subjective).I'm just saying, I doubt the Packers would pass on Cody or Thomas Davis here.With the last two picks, our clear cut players were gone and left the Packers in a decision to make a tough choice.
With many needs at DL, LB, and Safety, the options were many but the top quality players few.
With that said, we believe that the run defense needs fixing ASAP. With that said, the Packers select....
Anttaj Hawthorne, DT, Wisconsin
With this pick, a few factors come into play.
1. T Johnson and Hawthorne are the clear top DTs in this draft and then it is a big dropoff. Better run defense starts up the middle and we all know where Gilbert Brown is now, McDonalds. Grady Jackson and Hawthorne become a huge stop gap to what was a leaky run defense and magically make the LBs better.
2. There is more chance to see a quality LB or Safety in the 2nd rd where the Pack has two picks than there was a talented run plugger.
3. O line was also a thought but with the recent signings, late round prospects will be added most likely and developed for depth this year.
Third.I would have to 2nd that.When cochies times out, the Falcos should get S Brodney Pool OU.
PHI selects, Khalif Barnes, OT WashingtonHe is there.......Is Khalif Barnes still on the table?
PHI is really only drafting for depth so with this OT still on the board, I must take him.
It was to be a conditional 2006 pick, but I think that went to the wayside when DT Meyers was thrown in instead. Now there is no pick at all, but player v. player.There was only a 2006 draft pick included so it will have no effect on our draft order.