To be clear, I don't
To be clear, I've posted about 1440 as a source I think is good. That's not the same as claiming they are "unbiased".
They are carving a niche claiming to be "as unbiased as humanly possible" as they say on their site. When you set yourself up with that, I'm sure there are plenty who hold them accountable.
I said last year:
I said recently when someone said they missed the PSF news:
It's my understanding they are not doing original reporting and are aggregating. Which has it's own challenges.
From what I've seen, it seems like they're doing a good job.
You've posted about 1440 as being unbiased. Wasn't aware of them and didn't sign up. Are they doing original reporting or are they aggregating? Based on a quick look at their website, seems aggregating? What sources are they using? Those sources would seem to fit your criteria if you find them unbiased?
To be clear, I've posted about 1440 as a source I think is good. That's not the same as claiming they are "unbiased".
They are carving a niche claiming to be "as unbiased as humanly possible" as they say on their site. When you set yourself up with that, I'm sure there are plenty who hold them accountable.
I said last year:
I've glanced at 1440 a bit and for the quick look I did, they seemed good. That's not an endorsement as I haven't looked closely.
But clearly, there seems to be a need for better news.
I said recently when someone said they missed the PSF news:
It's not worth all the drama that comes with the forum and for sure not coming back.
Not every site is this way. 1440 has done a good job trying to carve out a spot for people looking for just information.
I'd suggest this as a source for folks that want to be informed. https://join1440.com/ It's light years better for staying informed from an objective viewpoint than the PSF ever was in my opinion.
It's my understanding they are not doing original reporting and are aggregating. Which has it's own challenges.
From what I've seen, it seems like they're doing a good job.