BigJim®
Footballguy
It isn't in Peterson's case. Regardless of what was happening in Texas, the Hennipen County attorney in Minnesota filed a petition in September prohibiting Peterson from unsupervised conduct with the 4 year old. More recently in November, after the plea, a second petition was filed prohibiting unsupervised contact with a 2nd Peterson child who resides in Hennipen county. I don;t think the criminal pleading has the impact you feared.Referring to the supposed people that are plead down in child cases solely for the purposes of saving money for taxpayers. Again, I hope that's not the case...but I guess nothing would really surprise me.Who are you referring to that is allowed unsupervised contact with his child?JimmyJabroni said:Even in cases where a child's well being is at stake? I'm asking seriously because I hope that's not the case. I would hope that if a prosecutor thought a child would be in danger of abuse at the hands of a parent that they would not allow a plea to a lesser charge that would allow the parent to continue to have unsupervised contact.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:Happens all the time with first timers especially if they have moneyTDorBust said:Wait I thought he was CHARGED with a Felony? He just plead down to a lower charge? Also how often to people charged with the Felony end up with lessor convictions because they plead it down thus saving tax-payer money?CalBear said:I would point out here that while this policy does allow longer suspensions "when circumstances warrant," it's pretty clear that the circumstances of the abuse don't warrant it here. The policy defines the baseline punishment for domestic abuse first offenders (6 weeks), and this situation is pretty clearly in that bucket. If the kid wound up in the hospital, or Peterson was charged with a felony, there might be a case for a longer suspension, but this situation is pretty much open-and-shut on the baseline punishment being appropriate. This differs from the Ray Rice situation for that reason.Semantics don't even matter here. Under the prior CPC, a player can be suspended for conduct generally that reflects poorly on the NFL, whether or not convicted of a crime (see Roethlisberger). Under the new policy "Effective immediately, violations of the Personal Conduct Policy regarding assault, battery, domestic violence or sexual assault that involve physical force will be subject to a suspension without pay of six games for a first offense, with consideration given to mitigating factors, as well as a longer suspension when circumstances warrant." Anyone who believes the new policy to be limited to their definition of domestic abuse needs to read the policy, and understand what the word "or" means. Peterson pled no contest to assault, which is covered by the policy whether or not it is domestic abuse of a spouse.
So the question is whether it will be six weeks tacked on after he's reinstated, or whether he'll get credit for time served.
with