I don't think this has anything to do with Trump, nor is there anything Rudy can offer to get himself off the hook here. He is the big fish, so to speak.Correct. Leftovers from the "Get Trump" campaign.
I don't think this has anything to do with Trump, nor is there anything Rudy can offer to get himself off the hook here. He is the big fish, so to speak.Correct. Leftovers from the "Get Trump" campaign.
Yeah, we all know about Ukraine - just ask Hunter Biden.![]()
This has been a long investigation that started last year, if not earlier.
Giuliani is in a bit of hot water over his dealings with Ukraine - and I doubt this is directly related to anything Trump said or did. I think Rudy got himself in trouble all by himself here - and he is the big fish.
As numerous legal analysts have pointed out, the standard to serve a warrant on an attorney, let alone a former attorney for the President is pretty high - so that a judge is not going to sign off unless there is a compelling reason (most likely that they already have the phone logs/messages).
The fact that a grand jury is empaneled, and service of the warrant, suggests - like it did with Flynn, Cohen, Manafort, et al, that an indictment of some sort is coming.
Right. If they couldn't get Trump BY GOD the Democrats are going to get someone.I don't think this has anything to do with Trump, nor is there anything Rudy can offer to get himself off the hook here. He is the big fish, so to speak.
You keep saying "DEMOCRATS" - this is not the Dems doing this - these are the same US Attorneys who were in place under Trump.Right. If they couldn't get Trump BY GOD the Democrats are going to get someone.![]()
This seems way to convenient. But, we'll see. That's all I can promise you.You keep saying "DEMOCRATS" - this is not the Dems doing this - these are the same US Attorneys who were in place under Trump.
I know you won't like/believe it - but Biden came out yesterday and said he found out about the raid the same time everyone else did - his directive is for DOJ to operate without influence from the White House.
Rudy f'ed up here - it remains to be seen how badly.
The mueller investigation was a proper legitimate invest. It wasnt over pee tapes...why must you lie? Seriously...that is a completely false claim to make about the basis of the Mueller investigation.And yet we had the Mueller investigation over pee tapes, Russian hookers and collusion.![]()
Let's not play games here. Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones so maybe next time think before you post. Just a friendly tip.
Not mention Mueller is a Republican, appointed by a Republican, and roundly praised by Republicans.The mueller investigation was a proper legitimate invest. It wasnt over pee tapes...why must you lie? Seriously...that is a completely false claim to make about the basis of the Mueller investigation.
If you don’t want to play games...don’t make bogus claims and now make assertions that the democrats are doing this as revenge.
No glass houses or stones from me...and my post was spot on.
Yeah, okay.Not mention Mueller is a Republican, appointed by a Republican, and roundly praised by Republicans.
What he said was factual. Like literally facts.Yeah, okay.![]()
It's sounds like you're actually trying to convince yourself.
Look at this guy.Once again the folks screaming about LAW AND ORDER!!! don't want it applied to them. Laws and jails are reserved for "thugs" in their mind.
No, it will be a win for America.Man I hate this sort of story. I hate that we spend so much time on these sorts of scandals, be it Giuliani, Trump, or Cuomo.
If Giuliani ends up going to prison, will that be a “win” for liberals? If he is found to be innocent of wrongdoing, is that a “victory” for conservatives? It’s all so silly.
Don’t get me wrong, I want to see all bad guys punished, be they liberal or conservative. If they did something wrong lock them up, as the Trump crowd used to shout. But damn why do we always have to make a political game out of it?
In what way?No, it will be a win for America.
Less conspiring with intelligence agencies of our adversaries?In what way?
Seriously: putting aside whether he deserves to go to prison (that’s a different issue) how would sending him there be beneficial for America?
Late 2019 you say?Rudy W. Giuliani @RudyGiuliani
The DOJ in late 2019 covertly obtained access to my iCloud and never notified me. They invaded the attorney client relationship as we were defending against the phony impeachment. These prosecutors violated the laws, not me. If again, nothing is done, you could be next.
Bill Barr...Democratic deep state...just like Mueller.Late 2019 you say?
Partisan witch hunt!
Be a shame if the period of surveillance included 1/6.
If he broke the law, it will be a win because it will show that rich, politically connected people aren't above the law. And that's important for our society - that at least purports to be structured on laws.In what way?
Seriously: putting aside whether he deserves to go to prison (that’s a different issue) how would sending him there be beneficial for America?
Less conspiring with intelligence agencies of our adversaries?
Showing nobody is above the law?
Both of these posts nailed it.If he broke the law, it will be a win because it will show that rich, politically connected people aren't above the law. And that's important for our society - that at least purports to be structured on laws.
I agree theoretically.If he broke the law, it will be a win because it will show that rich, politically connected people aren't above the law. And that's important for our society - that at least purports to be structured on laws.
It may be harsh...but so what? Those people will never agree with anything anyway. We are talking about something instituted during Trump’s term by his DOJ. If people refuse facts...there is nothing that will appease them...so why try?I agree theoretically.
But in this case it’s specifically become part of the whole Trump war. And as such there are millions of people who will never see this as anything other than part of the supposed liberal witch-hunt against Donald Trump, which means that, rather than contribute to the legitimacy of the system, this prosecution will end up doing the opposite.
Again that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it. If he’s guilty of a crime, there is no choice. But I don’t think the results will be positive.
I’m not proposing we try. I don’t want to appease them either.It may be harsh...but so what? Those people will never agree with anything anyway. We are talking about something instituted during Trump’s term by his DOJ. If people refuse facts...there is nothing that will appease them...so why try?
50% of Americans will pay zero attentionI’m not proposing we try. I don’t want to appease them either.
But if you ask me if Giuliani’s prosecution is good for America, I’m forced to say no.
IMO, the bolded is the larger problem. There's a significant portion of Americans who will only believe what one or two "news" organizations tell them. And their source for what's truth comes from one person. Whatever that person says is the absolute truth and no amount of facts to contrary are considered. If you disagree with their truth, you're either a RINO, part of the Deep State, or its from a lyin' news organization.I agree theoretically.
But in this case it’s specifically become part of the whole Trump war. And as such there are millions of people who will never see this as anything other than part of the supposed liberal witch-hunt against Donald Trump, which means that, rather than contribute to the legitimacy of the system, this prosecution will end up doing the opposite.
Again that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it. If he’s guilty of a crime, there is no choice. But I don’t think the results will be positive.
Ask why you keep replying to him.It may be harsh...but so what? Those people will never agree with anything anyway. We are talking about something instituted during Trump’s term by his DOJ. If people refuse facts...there is nothing that will appease them...so why try?
I mean really.... who cares?And as such there are millions of people who will never see this as anything other than part of the supposed liberal witch-hunt against Donald Trump...
Its scary how millions of people have been conditioned to believe what one person tells them. Anyone who disagrees is the enemy. Just look at how quickly they turned on Fox News when they stopped pushing the "stolen election" lie.I mean really.... who cares?And as such there are millions of people who will never see this as anything other than part of the supposed liberal witch-hunt against Donald Trump...
Any prosecution against Trumpism is good for America.I’m not proposing we try. I don’t want to appease them either.
But if you ask me if Giuliani’s prosecution is good for America, I’m forced to say no.
Do you feel the same way about one of Trump’s biggest allies, Matt Gaetz?I’m not proposing we try. I don’t want to appease them either.
But if you ask me if Giuliani’s prosecution is good for America, I’m forced to say no.
Yes. I first made the exact same point about him. If he’s guilty of a crime I want him prosecuted and punished. But it’s not a good thing.Do you feel the same way about one of Trump’s biggest allies, Matt Gaetz?
This is a strange take. I think winning the war on corruption is one of the most important things we should undertake. How is there justice if we ignore corrupt power brokers because they have aligned with “teams” and instead focus on unconnected criminals?Yes. I first made the exact same point about him. If he’s guilty of a crime I want him prosecuted and punished. But it’s not a good thing.
I want to win the war of ideas against the Trumpers. I don’t care about winning the war of corruption (it can’t be won anyhow, there will always be criminals on all sides.)
Uh, it's called 'Justice'.In what way?
Seriously: putting aside whether he deserves to go to prison (that’s a different issue) how would sending him there be beneficial for America?
I didn't know she was 17!!!!!!1111who cares if judges are paid off its just a little corruption take that to the bank brohans
Deterrence for future similar behavior.In what way?
Seriously: putting aside whether he deserves to go to prison (that’s a different issue) how would sending him there be beneficial for America?
its just a little corruption so its all cool who even cares about it take that to the bank bromigoI didn't know she was 17!!!!!!1111who cares if judges are paid off its just a little corruption take that to the bank brohans
I would think the folks on the conservative side would be relieved if Rudy was prosecuted considering he pretty much single handedly got Trump impeached twice with his craziness.I think you guys are missing my point. But thats probably my fault. I agree with all of the arguments about corruption. Commit a crime, do the time. No problem with any of that.
But this is a political forum. And when we discuss Rudy Giuliani here we’re not doing it in the context of criminal behavior; we’re doing it in the context of sides. The “liberal” side is eager to see him behind bars, not solely because he did something wrong, but because he’s Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s right hand man. The “conservative” side would love to see him proved innocent of any wrongdoing for the exact same reason. And that’s what I hate about this whole discussion.
when I paid money to have sex with her!!!!! 1111I didn't know she was 17!!!!!!1111
I suppose she was just standing there?I didn't know she was 17!!!!!!1111
The guy is an out of control alcoholic. Rehab would be a better place for him than jail.I think you guys are missing my point. But thats probably my fault. I agree with all of the arguments about corruption. Commit a crime, do the time. No problem with any of that.
But this is a political forum. And when we discuss Rudy Giuliani here we’re not doing it in the context of criminal behavior; we’re doing it in the context of sides. The “liberal” side is eager to see him behind bars, not solely because he did something wrong, but because he’s Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s right hand man. The “conservative” side would love to see him proved innocent of any wrongdoing for the exact same reason. And that’s what I hate about this whole discussion.
Something that the complainers were never able to grasp....or have a moment of intellectual honesty and admit.Not mention Mueller is a Republican, appointed by a Republican, and roundly praised by Republicans.
That's your first mistake. It's not a war of ideas.Yes. I first made the exact same point about him. If he’s guilty of a crime I want him prosecuted and punished. But it’s not a good thing.
I want to win the war of ideas against the Trumpers. I don’t care about winning the war of corruption (it can’t be won anyhow, there will always be criminals on all sides.)
It is. There are people out there, far too many, who truly believe in the nationalist, xenophobic populist, anti-immigrant garbage that Trump was spreading. These ideas are still with us.That's your first mistake. It's not a war of ideas.