What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Asiata vs. McKinnon (2 Viewers)

Here's an interesting stat between Asiata and an anonymous RB.

Matt Asiata last three games

13 rush 36 yards 2.8 avg

12 rush 35 yards 2.9 avg

20 rush 78 yards 3.9 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.2 yards and 3 total TDs

Anonymous RB for comparison

14 rush 48 yards 3.4 avg

27 rush 90 yards 3.3 avg

14 rush 47 yards 3.4 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.3 yards and 3 total TDs

The anonymous RB is...

Gio Bernard. We keep making fun of Asiata. Stats are stats no matter where or how they come from.
What happens to this analysis when you factor receptions and receiving yards/tds into the equation?

 
Here's an interesting stat between Asiata and an anonymous RB.

Matt Asiata last three games

13 rush 36 yards 2.8 avg

12 rush 35 yards 2.9 avg

20 rush 78 yards 3.9 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.2 yards and 3 total TDs

Anonymous RB for comparison

14 rush 48 yards 3.4 avg

27 rush 90 yards 3.3 avg

14 rush 47 yards 3.4 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.3 yards and 3 total TDs

The anonymous RB is...

Gio Bernard. We keep making fun of Asiata. Stats are stats no matter where or how they come from.
What happens to this analysis when you factor receptions and receiving yards/tds into the equation?
Asiata - 11/106/1

Gio - 12/148

 
Here's an interesting stat between Asiata and an anonymous RB.

Matt Asiata last three games

13 rush 36 yards 2.8 avg

12 rush 35 yards 2.9 avg

20 rush 78 yards 3.9 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.2 yards and 3 total TDs

Anonymous RB for comparison

14 rush 48 yards 3.4 avg

27 rush 90 yards 3.3 avg

14 rush 47 yards 3.4 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.3 yards and 3 total TDs

The anonymous RB is...

Gio Bernard. We keep making fun of Asiata. Stats are stats no matter where or how they come from.
What happens to this analysis when you factor receptions and receiving yards/tds into the equation?
Asiata - 11/106/1

Gio - 12/148
So, they are both pretty good.

 
Here's an interesting stat between Asiata and an anonymous RB.

Matt Asiata last three games

13 rush 36 yards 2.8 avg

12 rush 35 yards 2.9 avg

20 rush 78 yards 3.9 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.2 yards and 3 total TDs

Anonymous RB for comparison

14 rush 48 yards 3.4 avg

27 rush 90 yards 3.3 avg

14 rush 47 yards 3.4 avg

Total 3 game average: 3.3 yards and 3 total TDs

The anonymous RB is...

Gio Bernard. We keep making fun of Asiata. Stats are stats no matter where or how they come from.
Tellywahat that extra 0.5 ypc means a lot, if he has a couple more of those sub-3.0 ypc games, that ain't good.

 
Yeah, closer than I ever thought it was.

Over the last 3 games...

Asiata

45/149/3 rushing

11/106/1 receiving

Bernard

55/185/3 rushing

12/148/0 receiving

Bernard has roughly 80 more combined yards and Asiata has the extra touchdown.

 
Yeah, closer than I ever thought it was.

Over the last 3 games...

Asiata

45/149/3 rushing

11/106/1 receiving

Bernard

55/185/3 rushing

12/148/0 receiving

Bernard has roughly 80 more combined yards and Asiata has the extra touchdown.
Asiatas 3 TDs came in one game, does anyone think he will keep up with Bernard through the entire season? I sure dont.

 
Asiatas 3 TDs came in one game, does anyone think he will keep up with Bernard through the entire season? I sure dont.
Bernard is getting the majority of the goal line looks in Cincy, but I think Hill gets more opportunity there as the season progresses.

I like McKinnon, but Asiata should maintain the majority of looks at the goal line.

 
I think maybe the McKinnon people will have to pul the party on hold.

I sense Asiata is a mudder, they will let him plunge it 30 times if they must.

 
Mr. Retukes said:
I kept the guy that is having his snaps increase every week.
McKinnon's offensive snap counts decreased from Week 2 to Week 3. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Snap counts for both players for weeks 2-4

McKinnon
Week 2 - 23 of 61 for 38%
Week 3 - 17 of 54 for 31%
Week 4 - 34 of 74 for 45%

Asiata
Week 2 - 47 of 61 for 77%
Week 3 - 40 of 54 for 74%
Week 4 - 45 of 74 for 60%
 
I thought I saw some plays where both were on the field. I see a Tom Rathman/Roger Craig pro set offense where both can catch passes rush, or Rathman can block to spring Craig. Aww the good ole days. If this was the 80s and Walsh was coach ... I am sure he would see a fit here.

 
I just traded Vereen straight up for Asiata.

Dynasty non ppr

I don't think wither are great and Verren is more talent and has a better upside but Asiata for the short term is going to see the ball

 
Well, I had Asiata and picked up McKinnon off waivers. I honestly have no idea which one to start on Thursday.

Asiata is the "safer" guy, as it's a pretty sure bet he'll get 70-80 total yards, 2-4 receptions. A TD is also very possible.

McKinnon is the high upside guy, but we still aren't quite sure what the split will be. Will it go back to a 80/20 or 70/30, or has he now beaten the door down into a full 50/50 split.
Or will the weather and a couple of bum ankles keep the chumps on the field and the studs on the bench without helmets on. Who the hell knows...It's all...classified.
Love the Top Gun quote. :thumbup:
 
Mr. Retukes said:
I kept the guy that is having his snaps increase every week.
McKinnon's offensive snap counts decreased from Week 2 to Week 3. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Uh, no. The total number of snap counts increased from 2-3 to make the percentage look lower, but in week 2, he had 21 snaps, week 3 he had 24 and week 4 he had 42.

Feel free to change the week and the position and check for yourself.

No need to apologize. I get it. Math is hard.

 
Mr. Retukes said:
I kept the guy that is having his snaps increase every week.
McKinnon's offensive snap counts decreased from Week 2 to Week 3. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Snap counts for both players for weeks 2-4

McKinnon
Week 2 - 23 of 61 for 38%
Week 3 - 17 of 54 for 31%
Week 4 - 34 of 74 for 45%

Asiata
Week 2 - 47 of 61 for 77%
Week 3 - 40 of 54 for 74%
Week 4 - 45 of 74 for 60%
Where are you getting that from because I found vastly different numbers on another site. It had 21, 24, and 42 for McKinnon but the Asiata numbers are closer on Football Outsiders with 45, 40 and 44.

 
Mr. Retukes said:
I kept the guy that is having his snaps increase every week.
McKinnon's offensive snap counts decreased from Week 2 to Week 3. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Uh, no. The total number of snap counts increased from 2-3 to make the percentage look lower, but in week 2, he had 21 snaps, week 3 he had 24 and week 4 he had 42.

Feel free to change the week and the position and check for yourself.

No need to apologize. I get it. Math is hard.
You seem to be talking about total snaps, while the other poster is referring to offensive snaps. Perhaps ST snaps are causing the confusion?

 
I just traded Vereen straight up for Asiata.

Dynasty non ppr

I don't think wither are great and Verren is more talent and has a better upside but Asiata for the short term is going to see the ball
With what we've seen so far you won that trade by a wide margin. I don't know about long term, but this year you made out nicely.

 
There is certainly some inconsistency in reported data.

FO has the Vikings with 76 total offensive plays while this has the Vikings running 79 total offensive plays.

There were some plays nullified by holding and other penalties that could be the difference in this accounting or it may be another error.

 
Mr. Retukes said:
I kept the guy that is having his snaps increase every week.
McKinnon's offensive snap counts decreased from Week 2 to Week 3. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Snap counts for both players for weeks 2-4

McKinnon
Week 2 - 23 of 61 for 38%
Week 3 - 17 of 54 for 31%
Week 4 - 34 of 74 for 45%

Asiata
Week 2 - 47 of 61 for 77%
Week 3 - 40 of 54 for 74%
Week 4 - 45 of 74 for 60%
Where are you getting that from because I found vastly different numbers on another site. It had 21, 24, and 42 for McKinnon but the Asiata numbers are closer on Football Outsiders with 45, 40 and 44.
PFF

They call it play counts which is only offensive plays including penalties and kneel downs. It appears we are getting different numbers from different sites but I tend to believe PFF since they charge for the numbers. :shrug:

 
Again, from the tape I've watched McKinnon looks like a capable blocker but..


Adam Levitan@adamlevitan 59m59 minutes ago
PFF has graded 53 RBs this season. Matt Asiata is their No. 1 blocker. Jerick McKinnon is No. 46.
So maybe it isn't so much that McKinnon isn't capable but that Asiata is just a wall back there?
So if you just drafted Bridgewater and were probably about to lose AP, what would you do? I don't think Zimmer is going to risk either the potential franchise QB or an electric talent like McKinnon in a year they probably aren't going to do much. I'm not suggesting Asiata is disposable, necessarily, or expendable, but I don't see them building the franchise around him either. Love him this year for fantasy, however, and wish I had him. Absolutely perfect flex play - especially in PPR.

 
Vegas player props on Asiata (non on McKinnon). O/U 52.5 rushing yards, 20.5 receiving yards, 2.5 receptions +120 to score a TD, -150 not to. Vegas is a bit more fond of Lacy tonight.

 
Again, from the tape I've watched McKinnon looks like a capable blocker but..


Adam Levitan@adamlevitan 59m59 minutes ago
PFF has graded 53 RBs this season. Matt Asiata is their No. 1 blocker. Jerick McKinnon is No. 46.
So maybe it isn't so much that McKinnon isn't capable but that Asiata is just a wall back there?
9-48 are considered average blockers. Only 49-53 are considered below average (significantly negative ratings).

So, even given those ratings, they aren't particularly down on McKinnon as a pass blocker.

 
an already dinged McKinnon who isn't as good at pass protection ?

I'll take Asiata now and in the immediate future, and I bet in 2015 draft MIN goes high for a RB

 
an already dinged McKinnon who isn't as good at pass protection ?

I'll take Asiata now and in the immediate future, and I bet in 2015 draft MIN goes high for a RB
I beg to differ.

If McKinnon shows up like last game, I doubt Minnesota wants to waste a high pick for RB.

 
Looks like Ponder is going to start.

I'm gonna start Asisata but I don't feel good about it at all....I'll take 5-7 points and be happy...

 
+50% 54+ rushing

+20% 20+ receiving yard.

+40% 2.5+ reception

-40% on TD

In half PPR

floor: 8.9

ceiling: ~13.7-19.3

 
I'm really having a bad feeling about Asiata. I'm switching him out for Sankey, I think.
Same dilemma. Asiata is the more proven, as hard as that is to believe.
He is, but I can see Green Bay shutting down the running game and forcing Ponder to beat them. I can see Asiata getting like 30 yards and they completely abandon the running game.

Sankey, on the other hand, sounds like he's in line for a bigger work load and has a great matchup vs the Browns.

Sankey has the higher ceiling, IMO, and might have the higher floor this week.

 
Asiata's rushing prop moved up to 54.5 before closing. Honestly, he needs like ~18 carries to hit that. I don't know how I feel about this.

 
Matt Asiata... the only fantasy player I've ever owned whose stock dropped after scoring 3 TDs. :kicksrock:
:lol: I know. Over the past 3 weeks he's been the 3rd best RB on a PPG basis, behind only Davis and Murray. It's funny how he's outscored L. Bell, who looks like the next coming of LT in that time span. I have a feeling were going to continue to hear how dreadfully unathletic Asiata, and how it's a crime that McKinnon isn't touching the ball 20 times a game (not in this thread, this thread has evolved) from now until the end of the year. We'll then look back at his 800-1000 all purpose yards, 40-50 catches, double digit TDs and laugh.
Asiata's stats are extremely over inflated due to the TD's. Three TD games are very much an anomaly. I mean, if you are counting on that every game, then by all means keep starting him. But pretty soon, we're going to see that the guy is good at getting a couple of yards near the goal line, or the scrimmage line in all reality, but if he had to score from the three, he'd have a hard time getting there. TD's are a fickle beast, not a guarantee. TY Hilton is going to have a great year in terms of yardage, but has no TD's, on a team with a QB on pace to hit 52 TD's this year.
doug martin rode big td games to an elite rb1 season!

 
GB 5th worst against RBs, averaging 4.24 per carry, allowing 10th most passing yards to RBs at 181 total pass yards. 5 TD's. how do you slow down A. Rodgers when you have a bad QB named C. Ponder starting and Norv Turner as OC? run the crap out of the ball, eat up clock, move the chains, etc.

not sure where people think it isnt going to be a wet field, 100% chance of rain tonight.

 
I've got Asiata in as my flex. He's getting the start over two of these three wideouts (all currently Questionable):

Megatron

Julio Jones

Andre Johnson

:oldunsure:

I missed Asiata's big game last week when I threw Megatron into the mix at the last possible moment.

:oldunsure:

Overcorrecting: the first mistake before ending up in the ditch.

:drive:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top