What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Best current logo in sports? (No defunct teams) (1 Viewer)

A lot of modern logos look like they were designed by committees. An artistic process that relies on focus groups is more likely to produce a lowest common denominator outcome.

The truly iconic logos have become iconic over time. If something like the Flyers or Canadiens logo went through a design review today, there would be people who would want to add team names, hockey pucks and mascots into them. The end result would be something that every person who can read would obviously associate with the team but that's not the purpose of a logo.

 
The NBA has the worst collection of logos of all the big four American leagues. Most somehow manage to be both too busy and non-descript. I think the Spurs and Blazers are the best of a poor set. The Mavericks, Raptors and Bucks are among the worst in all of sports.
The NBA's problem is all the teams include the city and mascot names in the logo, leading to the busy/non-descript phenomenon as any actual logo design gets lost in all the words.

The MLB teams that include city/mascot all do it with those in small print, embedded in the edges of the circle. The logo inside the circle stands on it's own.

The only NBA teams that do this (BOS/GSW) have pretty good logos.

You mention Spurs and Blazers. Those work because they really have an NFL feel to them, with a small, simple recognizable logo that stands on it's own.
Yup.

The Sixers and Hawks had nice, simple logos back in the 80s.

Sixers then ... Sixers now

Hawks then ... Hawks now

 
This guy is pretty awesome, too.
As a big Orioles fan, I love the cartoon bird. I've always been partial to the angry bird logo, though:http://content.sportslogos.net/logos/53/52/full/2rgavrd1qgkfw74ji5se5c1yk.gif
I proudly wear my old O's hats around town. Nice to take two from the yanks. The logos good but the overall unis with Baltimore across the front. Esp the Greys, love that look.
Couldn't agree more, on all points.

 
A lot of modern logos look like they were designed by committees. An artistic process that relies on focus groups is more likely to produce a lowest common denominator outcome.

The truly iconic logos have become iconic over time. If something like the Flyers or Canadiens logo went through a design review today, there would be people who would want to add team names, hockey pucks and mascots into them. The end result would be something that every person who can read would obviously associate with the team but that's not the purpose of a logo.
:goodposting:

The best logos can be drawn by a fifth grade fan from memory.

 
As ugly as their old unis were, the TB Bucs newer ones got better, and the logo is pretty great, I think.

For hockey, gimme the Avs and Sabres.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As ugly as their old unis were, the TB Bucs newer ones got better, and the logo is pretty great, I think.
You haven't seen the 2014 version, have you?
Did it change? I was kind of going from memory, without looking any up.
Oh, it changed.
Just looked it up. Not too good, but not awful. If you want awful NFL logos, look no further than the Titans and Bengals.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As ugly as their old unis were, the TB Bucs newer ones got better, and the logo is pretty great, I think.
You haven't seen the 2014 version, have you?
Did it change? I was kind of going from memory, without looking any up.
Oh, it changed.
Is the flag really going to take up the whole side of the helmet like this?

http://www.sportslogos.net/logos/view/17617002014/Tampa_Bay_Buccaneers/2014/Helmet_Logo

 
The NBA has the worst collection of logos of all the big four American leagues. Most somehow manage to be both too busy and non-descript. I think the Spurs and Blazers are the best of a poor set. The Mavericks, Raptors and Bucks are among the worst in all of sports.
The NBA's problem is all the teams include the city and mascot names in the logo, leading to the busy/non-descript phenomenon as any actual logo design gets lost in all the words.

The MLB teams that include city/mascot all do it with those in small print, embedded in the edges of the circle. The logo inside the circle stands on it's own.

The only NBA teams that do this (BOS/GSW) have pretty good logos.

You mention Spurs and Blazers. Those work because they really have an NFL feel to them, with a small, simple recognizable logo that stands on it's own.
Yup.

The Sixers and Hawks had nice, simple logos back in the 80s.

Sixers then ... Sixers now

Hawks then ... Hawks now
The 76ers are using their classic logo again.

 
As ugly as their old unis were, the TB Bucs newer ones got better, and the logo is pretty great, I think.
You haven't seen the 2014 version, have you?
Did it change? I was kind of going from memory, without looking any up.
Oh, it changed.
Is the flag really going to take up the whole side of the helmet like this?

http://www.sportslogos.net/logos/view/17617002014/Tampa_Bay_Buccaneers/2014/Helmet_Logo
Yes, but the digital-clock number font is even worse.

 
The NBA has the worst collection of logos of all the big four American leagues. Most somehow manage to be both too busy and non-descript. I think the Spurs and Blazers are the best of a poor set. The Mavericks, Raptors and Bucks are among the worst in all of sports.
The NBA's problem is all the teams include the city and mascot names in the logo, leading to the busy/non-descript phenomenon as any actual logo design gets lost in all the words.The MLB teams that include city/mascot all do it with those in small print, embedded in the edges of the circle. The logo inside the circle stands on it's own.

The only NBA teams that do this (BOS/GSW) have pretty good logos.

You mention Spurs and Blazers. Those work because they really have an NFL feel to them, with a small, simple recognizable logo that stands on it's own.
Yup.

The Sixers and Hawks had nice, simple logos back in the 80s.

Sixers then ... Sixers now

Hawks then ... Hawks now
The 76ers are using their classic logo again.
The Hawks are also using an updated Pac-Man as their secondary logo.

 
As ugly as their old unis were, the TB Bucs newer ones got better, and the logo is pretty great, I think.
You haven't seen the 2014 version, have you?
Did it change? I was kind of going from memory, without looking any up.
Oh, it changed.
Just looked it up. Not too good, but not awful. If you want awful NFL logos, look no further than the Titans and Bengals.
:hot:

-QG

 
25 things hiding in sports logos

It's funny that this chick saw the devil but never noticed the "NJ" in the Devils logo. I only noticed the "NJ", and not the devil.
Lol she's seeing something that's not there (it's just a stylized J with the horns and tail). The original logo (changed before the first game but shown when they announced the team name) had the N fully formed nestled in the J - they later cleaned it up by fusing the 2 letters).

Off topic but the owner, John McMullen didn't want to name the team the Devils at all - the local newspaper basically announced a name contest and vote and he kinda got force along. He wanted to call them the Meadowlanders (no eyeroll only out of respect for Dr. McMullen) - every year he until he sold the team my tickets were delivered in an envelope with a return address for "Meadowlanders, Inc."

-QG

 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
Red Wings (flyers & Blues are super rip offs)
:confused: How's this now? You realize the P is leaving trails because it's it motion, or "flying", right? Not sure how that's a super ripoff of a tire with wings.

 
Eephus said:
A lot of modern logos look like they were designed by committees. An artistic process that relies on focus groups is more likely to produce a lowest common denominator outcome.

The truly iconic logos have become iconic over time. If something like the Flyers or Canadiens logo went through a design review today, there would be people who would want to add team names, hockey pucks and mascots into them. The end result would be something that every person who can read would obviously associate with team but that's not the purpose of a logo.
:coffee: http://deadspin.com/the-flyers-almost-had-teal-jerseys-1604903391?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+deadspin/full+(Deadspin)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top