Why is everyone looking so much at that final play? (packers/hawks) I watch that game and their was a horrible pass interference call on browner that resulted in green bay scoring a TD. If that was called right who knows how the game flow would go. Also like everyone saying the lions had plenty of time and chances to put away texans... Green bay couldn't do crap against the Seahawks who r apparently a way worse team. The all mighty packers team had 4 quarters to put away the weaksauce Seahawks and could not. Their fault for keeping it close. By the way the lions blown call was 100x worse. At least it was obvious he had a elbow and a knee down. The packers misfortune could have went either way.

There were a number of bad calls in that game, both ways. To say that GB should have been awarded that game just because the final play was arguably a bad call ignores the effects of all those previous bad calls. If there were no bad calls that game, who knows who would have won?Detroit still may have lost even if that bad call was overturned, but the fact remains that it was more clearly a bad call than the GB/SEA one (though it's more the rule not allowing the review that's bad). Does anyone dispute that Forsett was down? Many still dispute the GB/SEA call.