To get started, no matter the amount, I'd do like 1/3 BTC, 1/3 ETH, and play around with the other 1/3 in whatever looks interesting to you.I've been sitting on the sideline for a while in case there was an opportunity with a dip. But I haven't been paying close attention and there were a few that I missed. If someone (I) was going to enter to test the waters with something like $1k, would you guys recommend getting in now or see how this plays out again? If you were going to pick a price to buy in, what would it be? Would you go all BTC to start and diversify later or pick a few horses right off the bat. Thanks in advance for any thoughts / advice and I realize this is volatile and won't be blaming anyone for a wrong call.
Next Technical support is 32ish... though I'd be shocked if we got there.BTC absolutely blew through the support at $40k and continues to tumble. Same with ETH at $3k. Predictions on where this bottoms out?
i’d say you should be in good shape to jump in if/when total crypto market capitalization falls below $1T. it still feels pretty overbought to me. in 2018 we took an 80% haircut from about $1T to ~$200B. i mean who literally thinks a bitcoin is worth more than $50,000 dollars and would make that trade today. i sure as hell wouldn’t.I've been sitting on the sideline for a while in case there was an opportunity with a dip. But I haven't been paying close attention and there were a few that I missed. If someone (I) was going to enter to test the waters with something like $1k, would you guys recommend getting in now or see how this plays out again? If you were going to pick a price to buy in, what would it be? Would you go all BTC to start and diversify later or pick a few horses right off the bat. Thanks in advance for any thoughts / advice and I realize this is volatile and won't be blaming anyone for a wrong call.
You might be the only person in here still viewing BTC through the lens of a transactional currency vs a store of value.i’d say you should be in good shape to jump in if/when total crypto market capitalization falls below $1T. it still feels pretty overbought to me. in 2018 we took an 80% haircut from about $1T to ~$200B. i mean who literally thinks a bitcoin is worth more than $50,000 dollars and would make that trade today. i sure as hell wouldn’t.
i mean i like crypto long term, specifically bat and eth and dex/defi tokens. but bitcoin’s blocksize limit and fee structure basically kills its utility as a sovereign currency, at least while prices are this high. it’s a speculative gambling token fueled by cult-like delusion. people are going to figure this out eventually. i really miss the days when people traded 30,000 bitcoin for a pizza.
it’s just the tail end of the govt’s insane moneyprinting spree, which appears to be coming to a close. for once in their lives they appear to be sensitive to people’s concerns about inflation, and look serious about raising rates (aka ending the gravy train somewhat). i’m glad i got a whole bunch of gold and silver, it is extremely comfy over here. i’ve been 65/35 metal/crypto for a long time now, it’s a risk allocation i like a lot and imo a good hedge against what’s coming. now i don’t pull my hair out anymore like i did in 2018
At what point does it start storing value? $50k? $30k? $10k? Or the hope that it one day becomes worth $100k and you sell it for usd? I doubt people who bought it at $60k feel like it stored value for them.You might be the only person in here still viewing BTC through the lens of a transactional currency vs a store of value.
Lighting said $1k on fire?I've been sitting on the sideline for a while in case there was an opportunity with a dip. But I haven't been paying close attention and there were a few that I missed. If someone (I) was going to enter to test the waters with something like $1k, would you guys recommend getting in now or see how this plays out again? If you were going to pick a price to buy in, what would it be? Would you go all BTC to start and diversify later or pick a few horses right off the bat. Thanks in advance for any thoughts / advice and I realize this is volatile and won't be blaming anyone for a wrong call.
Well, that doesn't seem smart. Looking for an investing activity to do with the kids (15&13) and they've been hearing about this... or buying Gamestop stock.Lighting said $1k on fire?
IT's certianly not stable enough yet for a fair comparison, but at what point does Gold start holding value? You hold Gold for many different reasons... I'd think eventually you'd hold BTC for those same reasons. We've not stabilized enough yet but with the massive influx of institutional money I suspect we'll get there.At what point does it start storing value? $50k? $30k? $10k? Or the hope that it one day becomes worth $100k and you sell it for usd? I doubt people who bought it at $60k feel like it stored value for them.
I don't think a reliable store of value falls 30% in a month or gains 20% because of an elon musk tweet. How many of you are planning to hold it forever to store your value?
You guys are doing it right. You're going to love these purchases in the future.same![]()
Technically we just cut through major support. I see more pain ahead with BTC to hit $30k if not lower.
I bought 150 GBTC around 42k & another 150 today when it was around 38.5k. 30k was my next target to buy more if it keeps dropping. I appreciate your post!Technically we just cut through major support. I see more pain ahead with BTC to hit $30k if not lower.
I'd be surprised (stunned even) if it didn't hit below that mark.52w low is 28.8. Don’t think we will see it. But there is that. Ill be dcaing in the meantime.
Im set and forget right now too. not selling at a down time for sure.I don't have anything like what some of you guys have invested in this but I've consolidated down to about 5 coins and forgetting about it. I'm sure it will tick back up but it's brutually ugly right now and not worth the everyday watch for me anymore.
About 4,000 years agoIT's certianly not stable enough yet for a fair comparison, but at what point does Gold start holding value?
BTC, ETH, ALGO, MATIC, SOL not in any particular orderKGB said:Im set and forget right now too. not selling at a down time for sure.
What are your 5?
What amount of volatility do you find acceptable for a store of value asset and how does gold's fall of nearly 50% from 2011 to 2016 fall into that?ren hoek said:About 4,000 years ago
Wouldn't it be cool to say this instead.2Squirrels1Nut said:I bought 150GBTC around 42k & another 150 today when it was around 38.5k.
Gold is an insurance policy IMO -- its value rises when people become concerned with SHTF scenarios and historic-level currency or market instability.What amount of volatility do you find acceptable for a store of value asset and how does gold's fall of nearly 50% from 2011 to 2016 fall into that?
I use different definitions for insurance policy and crypto than you do. Something capable of losing 50% of its value is not an insurance policy. Crypto is a technology, not just store of value asset like Bitcoin.Gold is an insurance policy IMO -- its value rises when people become concerned with SHTF scenarios and historic-level currency or market instability.
Those things sometimes correlate with inflation, but it's not a short term inflation hedge even though in long run it will likely keep up with inflation.
And given how much of our portfolios (everyone in the US) are dollar-based (our house, our stocks, our savings, basically everything we own) having an insurance policy that's paid out for @ren hoek's 4000 years seems wise to me. Especially today as too many dollars (and every other currency) chase trash.
I'm sure crypto is a fun ride, and lots of people have made money in it, but there's no chance I'm using it as an insurance policy.
YMMV
I agree with your premise but you can't look back now on the people of 1850s California and think they were dumb not to just hold on to the gold since eventually the volatility would decrease.Do you guys think that gold immediately became a stable, low volatility store of value upon introduction, or did it take years, likely hundreds, before it's volatility quieted to what we see today?
BTC's volatility is decreasing as the network increases. Adoption takes time, and if its current volatility is too risky for you at the moment, then perhaps you'll check back in a few years. However, I'm confident that by the time its volatility is more suitable for you, trillions more will have piled into the network and you'll be buying $500k BTC instead of $30k. Of course, you'll have your gold holdings whose performance in real terms will have guaranteed you lost money. That's not my bag, but to each his own.
I agree. What I take exception to is the people in 1850's California saying gold isn't a store of value because of its volatility while storing their value in something that will likely lose value in real terms.I agree with your premise but you can't look back now on the people of 1850s California and think they were dumb not to just hold on to the gold since eventually the volatility would decrease.
Something losing 50% of it's value isn't a store of value.I use different definitions for insurance policy and crypto than you do. Something capable of losing 50% of its value is not an insurance policy.
Dinsy Ejotuz said:Something losing 50% of it's value isn't a store of value.
I have to get some semantics out of the way first. There are several definitions we could use for insurance, but generally speaking it is "a thing providing protection against a possible eventuality." You're saying that gold plays that role with stock market exposure. It does not. It is a diversification tool, but it does not provide protection against stock market losses. Put options are insurance policies against stock market losses.Dinsy Ejotuz said:Something losing 50% of it's value isn't a store of value.
But it still functions as an insurance policy because if I ever need to use it it's not going to be at 50% of its value. The premium to buy a similar policy may go up and down after I buy it, but I don't care about that. I just care that I'm covered.
You are comparing an asset that lost 50% over 5 years to another that lost 50% in just the past 2 months. Gold's performance as store of value has been fine. It did lose under 50% over the course of 5 years, but has since recovered. It has thousands of years' worth of performing in that sense, so I'm not worried about its short or even mid term performance. I just know long term it is one of the safest stores of value there is. It's a tangible commodity that actually exists in the real world. Gold is god's money.What amount of volatility do you find acceptable for a store of value asset and how does gold's fall of nearly 50% from 2011 to 2016 fall into that?
You're not worried about gold's short and medium term performance. Just Bitcoin's? Seems a tad inconsistent.You are comparing an asset that lost 50% over 5 years to another that lost 50% in just the past 2 months. Gold's performance as store of value has been fine. It did lose under 50% over the course of 5 years, but has since recovered. It has thousands of years' worth of performing in that sense, so I'm not worried about its short or even mid term performance. I just know long term it is one of the safest stores of value there is. It's a tangible commodity that actually exists in the real world. Gold is god's money.
What you're saying is, at the very least, hyperbole if not downright false. This is conspiracy theory stuff that probably plays well in those circles but won't stand up to any scrutiny. Saying things like Bitcoin "has its own money printing scheme" isn't something to be taken seriously.Most stock/investment assets meanwhile are (or were) peaking because of easy money from the Fed. Bitcoin is a pretty hilarious example of it, because it has its own money printing scheme with Tether. This opaque company run by a handful of people controls one of the top 5 cryptos in the world, rarely discloses its partners or where its billion dollar purchases come from, has not been forthcoming with audits and things of that nature. They were also found to have committed fraud and hidden $850 million in losses by the New York AG. Tether prints billions, pretend dollars go into the price of bitcoin, and the line just magically goes up! There is nothing even remotely similar to that propping up gold/silver markets.
Are you seriously asking if crypto is a safe option? Just buy your bonds and move on already.You guys have convinced me to not own Gold. But it doesn’t make me any higher on Bitcoin as a “store of value.” Bonds are a store of value, no? I-Bonds and TIPS will keep up with inflation.
Is anyone 100% on crypto as a “store of value?” Seems like there are just way safer options.
Check in here.https://youtu.be/YQ_xWvX1n9g
Two hour video, I'm about 45 minutes in, probably understand 25%.
Like to hear people's thoughts tho.
Hmmm. Monopoly money. Is that like paper that gets printed without any real intrinsic value other than society agrees that it has value? I handed some of that to the valet last night.So monopoly money really doesn't have value?
No.Are you seriously asking if crypto is a safe option? Just buy your bonds and move on already.
Why didn't you pay him in bitcoin?Hmmm. Monopoly money. Is that like paper that gets printed without any real intrinsic value other than society agrees that it has value? I handed some of that to the valet last night.
I think this is where people are getting tripped up. We're not there yet. If you want to put your money into something that's guaranteed to hold its value for the next 6 months to a year, it's not BTC. It's too volatile and risky at this point. However, as the network grows, the volatility and risk will decrease.No.
I keep reading “you don’t understand bitcoin. It’s about a store of value.”
And if someone’s argument FOR bitcoin is as a store of value, why would one not go with Bonds/tips/etc?
If you’re looking for the risky asset that may make you stupid rich, then I get it. But between here and Reddit, all the Bitcoin talk seems to be about how it’s a store of value and going to replace Gold.
So I just asked about it as a store of value. No need for the snark.