What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Buffalo Safety-Damar Hamlin is awake and **Bills at Bengals** Game has been Canceled (1 Viewer)

Long read if you want to know more about Hamlin: https://www.golongtd.com/p/why-damar-hamlin-is-exactly-what

(the article is behind a paywall but if you open the link, exit out and re-enter it should open)
Thanks for posting that. I think the author took down the paywall.

Damar sounds like a strong dude who has overcome adversity and if his body is physically able to recover from this (to whatever degree) then he will mentally recover to the point that he still leads a productive and impactful life.
 
It may be well done past time that we reconsider how this game is played. Player safety is critical and the NFL needs to step up and see what changes are needed.
So you saw the replay....what would you change?
Sorry...this wasn't the fault of football. Sudden cardiac arrest is far from unheard of in young athletes. It's RARE in the NFL where the young athletes are already in their 20s...but hardly a new phenomenon.
Young people do, on rare occasions, die suddenly.
 
Dr. David Chao is on the Jim Rome show right now and he said he's cautiously optimistic about Hamlin's recovery. He said it was crucial that the medical staff were able to restore Hamlin's heartbeat and breathing right there on the field (i.e., within seconds).
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
Well, we're going off DM's paraphrase of the interview, but I would assume that Chao meant it was crucial that they were able to begin treatment within seconds
 
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
 
@Anarchy99
@Grigs Allmoon

Appreciate you both, let me work this out so I am on the same page as you all

-There is no interest in completing the game before Week 18, this Sunday, does MoP have that correct?
Because if so then it sounds like the game was permanently suspended but it feels more like a cancel. I guess you all are saying they can play this game any time they want to reschedule it, in theory? But they are not going to play it today, tomorrow, and I guess if that's the case and not in Week 18 because they have another game they are scheduled...
When then?

The timeline after that is Wildcard Weekend, there are Playoff games that will start at that point, at least one of Cinci/Buff is highly likely to be playing in that opening Wildcard round.

What am I missing here?
I don't see a path back to this game being completed, not this week, not next week, I'm lost I guess where we're going.
And if it is Winning %, I stated where we are KC-81, Buff-80...that's just where we are

13-3
12-3
1 week left
I really think it would be best for everyone -- all AFC playoff contenders, not just the Bills and Bengals -- if the league announced sooner rather than later that they're cancelling the game and how they're treating the "outcome." It's a hardship on everyone to have uncertainty about the schedule hanging out there.

I know this is very unpopular, especially among my own team's fanbase, but I'm leaning very strongly toward one of two outcomes:

1) Flip a coin to determine who "wins" CIN-BUF. This is the one and only possible solution that doesn't involve a human being choosing an outcome that dramatically helps or harms some assortment of teams, and while we all hate randomness, at least this approach is fair to everyone ex ante.

2) Hand the Bills a loss/forfeit. The principle here is that the competitive harm from an injury falls upon the team of the injured player. If Josh Allen had tore his knee instead of tweaking it, and the Bills went on to lose, nobody would find that outcome unfair or controversial. Well, last night we had to cut the game short because of an injured Bills player. Is it fair that they lose the game? Not really, but it's no less fair than Miami losing a game because they had to stick their third string rookie QB in there.

3) No contest/draw. Belated Christmas present for KC, but it's not as if they chose to have this happen.

I really hate the idea of rearranging the schedule to make this game up. In particular, I passionately hate the idea of giving every playoff team except the Bills and Bengals a bye week just to squeeze this game in during "week 19." That's stupid. As a fan of one of these teams, I'd rather have the forfeit and just roll with the 2nd/3rd seed. The makeup game seems like the worst possible resolution for all parties.
 
It may be well done past time that we reconsider how this game is played. Player safety is critical and the NFL needs to step up and see what changes are needed.
So you saw the replay....what would you change?
Sorry...this wasn't the fault of football. Sudden cardiac arrest is far from unheard of in young athletes. It's RARE in the NFL where the young athletes are already in their 20s...but hardly a new phenomenon.
Young people do, on rare occasions, die suddenly.
I still remember that guy who dropped dead at mile 4 of the Olympic marathon trials a few years ago. The guy just had an undiagnosed heart condition somehow and that was that.
 
My guess is the game will be declared a tie. 9 minutes of football wasn’t enough played to say one team or another definitely would’ve won. The Bengals were up 7-3 but fat chance that score was going to stay that way. As others have mentioned, the logistics don’t favor a makeup game happening.

Hoping for some more positive developments with Hamlin’s condition. I’m not running a billion dollar business so thankfully I don’t have to worry about anything else. Just want this young man to survive and get his quality of life back.
I don't see how they can call a 7-3 game that was suspended in the 1st quarter a tie.

Seems much more likely they will just cancel it and go with winning percentage for Bills/Bengals over 16-games.

Which is the same thing as calling it a tie.
Never mind. It's not the same thing. Don't know why I thought it was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zow
Why not just not play the game and each team has a 16 game season instead of 17. So, if they're 13-3, they're ahead of a team that is 13-4 and behind a team that is 14-3.
 
@Anarchy99
@Grigs Allmoon

Appreciate you both, let me work this out so I am on the same page as you all

-There is no interest in completing the game before Week 18, this Sunday, does MoP have that correct?
Because if so then it sounds like the game was permanently suspended but it feels more like a cancel. I guess you all are saying they can play this game any time they want to reschedule it, in theory? But they are not going to play it today, tomorrow, and I guess if that's the case and not in Week 18 because they have another game they are scheduled...
When then?

The timeline after that is Wildcard Weekend, there are Playoff games that will start at that point, at least one of Cinci/Buff is highly likely to be playing in that opening Wildcard round.

What am I missing here?
I don't see a path back to this game being completed, not this week, not next week, I'm lost I guess where we're going.
And if it is Winning %, I stated where we are KC-81, Buff-80...that's just where we are

13-3
12-3
1 week left
I really think it would be best for everyone -- all AFC playoff contenders, not just the Bills and Bengals -- if the league announced sooner rather than later that they're cancelling the game and how they're treating the "outcome." It's a hardship on everyone to have uncertainty about the schedule hanging out there.

I know this is very unpopular, especially among my own team's fanbase, but I'm leaning very strongly toward one of two outcomes:

1) Flip a coin to determine who "wins" CIN-BUF. This is the one and only possible solution that doesn't involve a human being choosing an outcome that dramatically helps or harms some assortment of teams, and while we all hate randomness, at least this approach is fair to everyone ex ante.

2) Hand the Bills a loss/forfeit. The principle here is that the competitive harm from an injury falls upon the team of the injured player. If Josh Allen had tore his knee instead of tweaking it, and the Bills went on to lose, nobody would find that outcome unfair or controversial. Well, last night we had to cut the game short because of an injured Bills player. Is it fair that they lose the game? Not really, but it's no less fair than Miami losing a game because they had to stick their third string rookie QB in there.

3) No contest/draw. Belated Christmas present for KC, but it's not as if they chose to have this happen.

I really hate the idea of rearranging the schedule to make this game up. In particular, I passionately hate the idea of giving every playoff team except the Bills and Bengals a bye week just to squeeze this game in during "week 19." That's stupid. As a fan of one of these teams, I'd rather have the forfeit and just roll with the 2nd/3rd seed. The makeup game seems like the worst possible resolution for all parties.
I completely agree with you here. This game should not be replayed. I think the league should just call it a no contest and go off of winning percentages.*

*This is distinguishable from a draw/tie because a tie in the record column would impact the winning percentages.
 
Also, @Joe Bryant can you use the email alert if there is an update on DHam? I keep checking back into this thread for news on his condition and then getting sucked into all the various side conversations. If and when there is actually news on it, I know I (and probably most of us here) would be grateful if it was emailed out ASAP. I'm still worried sick about him... It's weird, I'm not a Bills fan and clearly don't know the guy, but like many of us, I watched it happen and I guess that invests us in it. This is somehow sorta personal for us.
 
I don't see them extending the season for all 32 teams just to have a week with one game.
I don't think it gets played.
Plus under this scenario the #1 seed would have 3 weeks off before they played (the NFC team at least, and maybe KC).
I’m not sure that’s a good thing.
 
The league does need to act quickly now. I get that there are massive complexities involved and any solution will be imperfect but there has to be clarity on the way forward asap. They can't just wait for the medical situation to become clear because that may take days.
They WILL take days if there hasn't already been strong positive news
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
CPR doesn't give anywhere close to the same blood flow as a normal heartbeat. If it did, we'd do CPR for much longer periods then we do. Generally speaking, the longer the period of CPR, the lower the chances of a complete recovery, and we rarely go over 30 minutes total
 
Honestly, from a mental health perspective, the league should do everything is reasonably can to keep the Bills players out of the Cinci stadium for the remainder of this year.
 



2) Hand the Bills a loss/forfeit. The principle here is that the competitive harm from an injury falls upon the team of the injured player. If Josh Allen had tore his knee instead of tweaking it, and the Bills went on to lose, nobody would find that outcome unfair or controversial. Well, last night we had to cut the game short because of an injured Bills player. Is it fair that they lose the game? Not really, but it's no less fair than Miami losing a game because they had to stick their third string rookie QB in there.
This was my take. It isn't fair to the Bills, but injuries are NEVER fair. It's the only solution that's fair to the rest of the league.
There could never be a perfect solution to something like this
 
imo, the most likely solution is to declare no game.

this will be treated similarly to a game that was disrupted by weather and was never able to be played. (in this case, there were conditions that were not suitable to play the game.)

i do agree that they should make a decision asap, dragging this out does no one any good.
 
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
High quality CPR can briefly keep someone alive, but it’s no substitute for the return of spontaneous circulation. Because CPR is seldom performed flawlessly, prolonged resuscitation times are associated with worse outcomes, principally from anoxic brain injury (brain damage from not enough oxygenated blood circulating).

Immediate CPR and access to an AED are part of the best case scenario, but prolonged resuscitation (more than 3-4 minutes) is prognostically bad for full recovery. While rare exceptions occur, hardly anyone survives when resuscitation extends beyond 10 minutes.
 



2) Hand the Bills a loss/forfeit. The principle here is that the competitive harm from an injury falls upon the team of the injured player. If Josh Allen had tore his knee instead of tweaking it, and the Bills went on to lose, nobody would find that outcome unfair or controversial. Well, last night we had to cut the game short because of an injured Bills player. Is it fair that they lose the game? Not really, but it's no less fair than Miami losing a game because they had to stick their third string rookie QB in there.
This was my take. It isn't fair to the Bills, but injuries are NEVER fair. It's the only solution that's fair to the rest of the league.
There could never be a perfect solution to something like this
Do we know that the Bengals wanted to play but the Bills refused? If not, how can that be called a forfeit? Why not just go by winning percentages?
 
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
High quality CPR can briefly keep someone alive, but it’s no substitute for the return of spontaneous circulation. Because CPR is seldom performed flawlessly, prolonged resuscitation times are associated with worse outcomes, principally from anoxic brain injury (brain damage from not enough oxygenated blood circulating).

Immediate CPR and access to an AED are part of the best case scenario, but prolonged resuscitation (more than 3-4 minutes) is prognostically bad for full recovery. While rare exceptions occur, hardly anyone survives when resuscitation extends beyond 10 minutes.
Based on what you've heard so far, are you discouraged regarding Hamlin's long-term prognosis?
 
I don't see them extending the season for all 32 teams just to have a week with one game.
I don't think it gets played.
Plus under this scenario the #1 seed would have 3 weeks off before they played (the NFC team at least, and maybe KC).
I’m not sure that’s a good thing.
Right. Any solution will have unfair outcomes, but there's a difference between unfair outcomes that are immediately resolved (ie, Bills and/or Bengals get screwed on playoff seeding) and unfair outcomes that cause ongoing knock-on effects (moving the entire playoff schedule back a week). I think the league will choose the former.
 
Honestly, from a mental health perspective, the league should do everything is reasonably can to keep the Bills players out of the Cinci stadium for the remainder of this year.

Agreed

Although I would say the players traumatized by [last] night is not limited to the 96 players who dressed last night

This ****ed with everybody’s head

****************

Every team has licensed and experienced mental health professionals on staff and in their facility

They are fully integrated into the team environment

New York sent a memo to all teams today recommending they utilize the full time mental health counselors available to their players, and/or reach out to the Pyschologist at NFL HQ to arrange for expanding their resources

Have heard several former players talk about texts they’ve received from players who have been out of the league XX years and didn’t sleep last night

This messed people up and it’s important to give players an opportunity to talk it out either with a counselor or just sharing with each other

source: I’m a combat veteran who has been managing PTSD for several decades

This stuff doesn’t just magically go away on it’s own
 
Last edited:
I’ll walk back a bit of my initial anger at the NFL if the reports are true that there was never any 5 minutes and then play resumes order. That’s good. And shame on whoever put that out there if that wasn’t true.
You're being naive. Joe Buck just didn't decide to say that without someone telling him.
Like I said


ESPN’s Joe Buck said on the air that the NFL told the Bills and Bengals were being given five minutes to warm up after Buffalo’s
This has led to a back-and-forth between the league and one of its most important network partners.

Buck told The Post he relayed the information from ESPN’s rules analyst, John Parry, who was in direct communication with the league. Buck’s network backed his telling of the events.
“There was constant communication in real time between ESPN and league and game officials,” ESPN said in a statement. “As a result of that, we reported what we were told in the moment and immediately updated fans as new information was learned. This was an unprecedented, rapidly-evolving circumstance. All night long, we refrained from speculation.”
 
Also, @Joe Bryant can you use the email alert if there is an update on DHam? I keep checking back into this thread for news on his condition and then getting sucked into all the various side conversations. If and when there is actually news on it, I know I (and probably most of us here) would be grateful if it was emailed out ASAP. I'm still worried sick about him... It's weird, I'm not a Bills fan and clearly don't know the guy, but like many of us, I watched it happen and I guess that invests us in it. This is somehow sorta personal for us.

News cycle is pretty fast but major outlets seem to think no major news until perhaps Thursday at the earliest. He is in a hyperthermia protocol which is 48-72 hrs. No I have no idea what that means.
 
I’ll walk back a bit of my initial anger at the NFL if the reports are true that there was never any 5 minutes and then play resumes order. That’s good. And shame on whoever put that out there if that wasn’t true.
You're being naive. Joe Buck just didn't decide to say that without someone telling him.
Like I said


ESPN’s Joe Buck said on the air that the NFL told the Bills and Bengals were being given five minutes to warm up after Buffalo’s
This has led to a back-and-forth between the league and one of its most important network partners.

Buck told The Post he relayed the information from ESPN’s rules analyst, John Parry, who was in direct communication with the league. Buck’s network backed his telling of the events.
“There was constant communication in real time between ESPN and league and game officials,” ESPN said in a statement. “As a result of that, we reported what we were told in the moment and immediately updated fans as new information was learned. This was an unprecedented, rapidly-evolving circumstance. All night long, we refrained from speculation.”
I think the 5 minute warm-up may be protocol after such a long delay for injury. Whoever mentioned that likely had no idea what the condition of Hamlin was at the time.
 
We don't know what was said between the coaches and/or teams. It's quite possible the Bengals said they'd back the Bills decision either way, up to and including a double-forfeit. Might have tied the NFL's hands with what options are available to them. Like, for sure, the NFL could have insisted the players re-take the field. But the players could have countered back "we don't want to be here, but, fine... we'll put in our 3rd stringers and both just take a knee for the next 50 minutes and you can sell all the beer commercials you want to the people that are sitting through it."
 
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
High quality CPR can briefly keep someone alive, but it’s no substitute for the return of spontaneous circulation. Because CPR is seldom performed flawlessly, prolonged resuscitation times are associated with worse outcomes, principally from anoxic brain injury (brain damage from not enough oxygenated blood circulating).

Immediate CPR and access to an AED are part of the best case scenario, but prolonged resuscitation (more than 3-4 minutes) is prognostically bad for full recovery. While rare exceptions occur, hardly anyone survives when resuscitation extends beyond 10 minutes.
Based on what you've heard so far, are you discouraged regarding Hamlin's long-term prognosis?
Too few details, and it’s too early, but requiring mechanical ventilation post-resuscitation isn’t ideal. Sometimes a shock is all it takes. On the other hand, it’s good news they needed to sedate him while on the vent, as it suggests enough functionality to fight the tube in his airway.
 
Any of you FF commissioners out there getting questions from your league about how championship game / 3rd place games will be handled?

I said no idea waiting until we learn more tomorrow
No questions, but I already declared everything final. Most were blowouts so irrelevant, one was close-ish but the guy leading had an extra player going too so a comeback would have been highly unlikely. High caliber guys that I would guess don't dispute since there's only about $100 at stake. If there's a dispute at all I'll just chop it.
 
Honestly, from a mental health perspective, the league should do everything is reasonably can to keep the Bills players out of the Cinci stadium for the remainder of this year.
Come on now. This is just ridiculous.
You have clearly ridiculed it so, sure.

That said, if I'm a lawyer for the NFL, I'm consulting with mental health professionals seriously on this idea.
 
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
High quality CPR can briefly keep someone alive, but it’s no substitute for the return of spontaneous circulation. Because CPR is seldom performed flawlessly, prolonged resuscitation times are associated with worse outcomes, principally from anoxic brain injury (brain damage from not enough oxygenated blood circulating).

Immediate CPR and access to an AED are part of the best case scenario, but prolonged resuscitation (more than 3-4 minutes) is prognostically bad for full recovery. While rare exceptions occur, hardly anyone survives when resuscitation extends beyond 10 minutes.
Based on what you've heard so far, are you discouraged regarding Hamlin's long-term prognosis?
Too few details, and it’s too early, but requiring mechanical ventilation post-resuscitation isn’t ideal. Sometimes a shock is all it takes. On the other hand, it’s good news they needed to sedate him while on the vent, as it suggests enough functionality to fight the tube in his airway.
My wife has been a nurse for 25 years including multiple years in Neurology. She mentioned she thought Hamlin suffered a neurological event after he collapsed and fell based on his arm movements (blood clot, stoke, etc.). She believes he suffered a brain related injury before the entire CPR process even got started (in addition to potential limited blood flow to the brain risk from the extended CPR). That's just her opinion from watching the replay . . . curious if you had an opinion on that. She fears he's more at risk from the neurological event more than the cardiac event.
 
I’ll walk back a bit of my initial anger at the NFL if the reports are true that there was never any 5 minutes and then play resumes order. That’s good. And shame on whoever put that out there if that wasn’t true.
You're being naive. Joe Buck just didn't decide to say that without someone telling him.
Like I said


ESPN’s Joe Buck said on the air that the NFL told the Bills and Bengals were being given five minutes to warm up after Buffalo’s
This has led to a back-and-forth between the league and one of its most important network partners.

Buck told The Post he relayed the information from ESPN’s rules analyst, John Parry, who was in direct communication with the league. Buck’s network backed his telling of the events.
“There was constant communication in real time between ESPN and league and game officials,” ESPN said in a statement. “As a result of that, we reported what we were told in the moment and immediately updated fans as new information was learned. This was an unprecedented, rapidly-evolving circumstance. All night long, we refrained from speculation.”
I think the 5 minute warm-up may be protocol after such a long delay for injury. Whoever mentioned that likely had no idea what the condition of Hamlin was at the time.
Once we heard CPR everyone in the world knew his condition
 
Why try and complicate things?
The game wasn't played, so nothing should reflect a game being played in the standings.
So, they each play 16 games.
 
Why try and complicate things?
The game wasn't played, so nothing should reflect a game being played in the standings.
So, they each play 16 games.
They were just discussing on the radio and tv here (Boston market) that the last time an NFL game was started and not completed was in 1935. Certainly there is nothing that demands they finish the game, but it hasn't happened in 87 years.

They are discussing on TV now the Bills may not be together and composed enough to play the Patriots this weekend. Then what? Do the Bills only play 15 games? The Patriots play 16 games? Lots of uncertainty.
 
Loss for the Bills seems to be the fairest solution to me within a competitive vacuum. However, that would be a PR nightmare, and I would be shocked were the NFL to go that route. I strongly suspect a no-contest result will be the decision with the playoff slotting determined by winning %
 
Why try and complicate things?
The game wasn't played, so nothing should reflect a game being played in the standings.
So, they each play 16 games.
They were just discussing on the radio and tv here (Boston market) that the last time an NFL game was started and not completed was in 1935. Certainly there is nothing that demands they finish the game, but it hasn't happened in 87 years.

They are discussing on TV now the Bills may not be together and composed enough to play the Patriots this weekend. Then what? Do the Bills only play 15 games? The Patriots play 16 games? Lots of uncertainty.
If the Bills dont play next week, seems obvious it would be a forfeit
 
Why try and complicate things?
The game wasn't played, so nothing should reflect a game being played in the standings.
So, they each play 16 games.
They were just discussing on the radio and tv here (Boston market) that the last time an NFL game was started and not completed was in 1935. Certainly there is nothing that demands they finish the game, but it hasn't happened in 87 years.

They are discussing on TV now the Bills may not be together and composed enough to play the Patriots this weekend. Then what? Do the Bills only play 15 games? The Patriots play 16 games? Lots of uncertainty.
They won’t restrict the Pats to 16 games, that would be unfairly punishing them.
Why try and complicate things?
The game wasn't played, so nothing should reflect a game being played in the standings.
So, they each play 16 games.
They were just discussing on the radio and tv here (Boston market) that the last time an NFL game was started and not completed was in 1935. Certainly there is nothing that demands they finish the game, but it hasn't happened in 87 years.

They are discussing on TV now the Bills may not be together and composed enough to play the Patriots this weekend. Then what? Do the Bills only play 15 games? The Patriots play 16 games? Lots of uncertainty.
If the Bills dont play next week, seems obvious it would be a forfeit
Agreed. It’d be unfair to have the Pats watch the Dolphins or Steelers leapfrog them without having the opportunity to play. I don’t think it’ll come down to a forfeit though.
 
Bert Breer was just on tv and mentioned the Bills waited for everyone to get back from the hospital before flying to Buffalo, so they didn't get back until almost 3:00 AM. He said he checked in with various people in the Bills organization today, and they have not moved on and have not even considered planning for the NE game. They turned down interviews and / or declined requests for more information. As far as Breer could tell, there is no plan for anything football related to get started on Wednesday. He said the entire organization is shell shocked, currently with no talk of doing any game planning, practicing, film review, etc. as of this point.
 
Not sure if this has already been added since I'm a little behind on this thread, but CNN just interviewed a family member of his that said his heart stopped a second time after he got to the hospital, and he had to be resuscitated a second time last night.
 
It may be well done past time that we reconsider how this game is played. Player safety is critical and the NFL needs to step up and see what changes are needed.
So you saw the replay....what would you change?
Sorry...this wasn't the fault of football. Sudden cardiac arrest is far from unheard of in young athletes. It's RARE in the NFL where the young athletes are already in their 20s...but hardly a new phenomenon.
Young people do, on rare occasions, die suddenly.
It goes well beyond this one play and you know that.
 
I was wondering if I could pick the brains of any of the medical professionals here. I know @Terminalxylem is a medical professional and has always been helpful in providing his expertise and knowledge. Full disclosure—I think postponing/cancelling the game was absolutely a sound decision. I feel like the NFL is far from perfect and makes a ton of mistakes—but I can’t really hold anything against them for the decisions they have made in regard to this situation.

Now to my question. I‘m asking this because I’ve watched and played a lot of sports throughout my life. I’ve seen people get badly hurt both in person and on tv. With that said—the feeling I got when I saw what happened last night was different. There was just an uncomfortable unease with me. It was almost as I was shell shocked because I felt like I witnessed somebody pass away in real time. When they drove that ambulance off—for some reason—I almost processed it as if they were driving away a dead body. When I heard that he had a pulse and that he was in intensive care—I was soo happy as I was really hoping for the best even though I somehow processed the worst outcome when watching it. My question to the medical professionals in here is this: In your opinion—did we just witness a person basically get killed on the field, but thanks to amazing medical professionals and the grace of god—somehow get him get revived back to life? Is that potentially an accurate assessment—or—is it more likely that the medical professionals kept him alive the entire time? I know this is a weird question where the answer is probably going to be nothing more than opinion from the medical professionals that choose to answer it at this point in time.
 
I can't even imagine how the Bills and Bengals teams will be able to prepare for Sunday
The Bengals lost Chris Henry and played 3 days later. It sucks but things happen. Not trying to sound like "get over it", if anyone is too affected to play even by Sunday then that is okay for them to not play, but life just goes on for most people.

ETA: And life just goes on does not mean forget about it, it just means that life goes on.
 
I read through most of this, and I appreciate most of the opinions and insights and the care that most are using in putting those forward. One thing that I have not readily seen is the impact this has had specifically on Tee Higgins. The potential guilt that he might feel for being the second person in that collision, for which he has no fault for what happened, could be devastating. Now, this has traumatic for everybody on different levels, but I can only imagine how much this is playing into Tee’s ability to move forward.
 
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
High quality CPR can briefly keep someone alive, but it’s no substitute for the return of spontaneous circulation. Because CPR is seldom performed flawlessly, prolonged resuscitation times are associated with worse outcomes, principally from anoxic brain injury (brain damage from not enough oxygenated blood circulating).

Immediate CPR and access to an AED are part of the best case scenario, but prolonged resuscitation (more than 3-4 minutes) is prognostically bad for full recovery. While rare exceptions occur, hardly anyone survives when resuscitation extends beyond 10 minutes.
Based on what you've heard so far, are you discouraged regarding Hamlin's long-term prognosis?
Too few details, and it’s too early, but requiring mechanical ventilation post-resuscitation isn’t ideal. Sometimes a shock is all it takes. On the other hand, it’s good news they needed to sedate him while on the vent, as it suggests enough functionality to fight the tube in his airway.
My wife has been a nurse for 25 years including multiple years in Neurology. She mentioned she thought Hamlin suffered a neurological event after he collapsed and fell based on his arm movements (blood clot, stoke, etc.). She believes he suffered a brain related injury before the entire CPR process even got started (in addition to potential limited blood flow to the brain risk from the extended CPR). That's just her opinion from watching the replay . . . curious if you had an opinion on that. She fears he's more at risk from the neurological event more than the cardiac event.

I think this scenario is extremely unlikely I've run between 1500-2000 codes and IMO this was cardiac based on the information publicly available and visually. He is surely at risk for a neurological event from anoxia, but I think it is very unlikely that the inciting event was neurological in origin
 
Crediting BUF with a forefit/loss, to me, is the simplest (and probably) fairest thing to do. You'd go into Week 18 with KC still having to win to get the number one seed. If they do....BUF essentially gets (because they only played so little last night) two weeks off before a First Round home game. If KC doesn't win...... BUF still has the ability to win the Conference.
If the Bills forfeit, and the Bengals are credited with a win, the Bills would need to beat the Patriots and have both KC and the Bengals to lose in week 18., not just KC. The Bengals win over the Bills puts the Bengals into the 2 seed and the Bills into the 3 seed, as the Bengals would have the H2H forfeit win. If Bills and Bengals win week 18 in this scenario, and the Chiefs lose, it's a 3-way tie at 13-4, with Bengals having H2H tiebreaker over both Bills and KC, and thus home field advantage.

A tie / no-contest would leave the Bills as the 2 seed and Bengals as the 3 seed, as the Bills would have the better record.

There really aren't any fair scenarios here, absent playing the game out.

Good points.
 
I can't even imagine how the Bills and Bengals teams will be able to prepare for Sunday
Yea that’s an underrated point. They have to go watch film and practice this week? Going to be hard.
The latest I read is that the Bills haven’t even thought about watching film, gameplanning, practicing, etc at this point. I’d say there’s a decent chance they decide to forfeit. Or maybe go play with basically no gameplanning and like it’s a preseason game (the one positive is that it’s a division foe they already know a lot about).
 
Agree the bolded is extremely important, but are we sure Hamlin had return of spontaneous circulation in seconds? I was under the impression he required ~10 minutes of CPR.
I am not a medical expert, but my understanding is that as soon as CPR begins that blood flow (and oxygen) to the brain resumes and that is the biggest factor in outcome. I don't know how many minutes of CPR were performed before the AED was used and brought his heart back to regular rhythm, or if that even matters as long as the CPR is pumping the blood manually, but the reports say his heartbeat had resumed on its own before he left the field.
High quality CPR can briefly keep someone alive, but it’s no substitute for the return of spontaneous circulation. Because CPR is seldom performed flawlessly, prolonged resuscitation times are associated with worse outcomes, principally from anoxic brain injury (brain damage from not enough oxygenated blood circulating).

Immediate CPR and access to an AED are part of the best case scenario, but prolonged resuscitation (more than 3-4 minutes) is prognostically bad for full recovery. While rare exceptions occur, hardly anyone survives when resuscitation extends beyond 10 minutes.
Correct me if I am wrong, but has it actually been released that he was in ventricular fibrillation? Probably statistically most likely, but that is one of the assumptions I've been cautioning against.
For all we know, he was in ventricular tachycardia with a low enough blood pressure / faint or no pulse that required CPR to be started. My point is, he may have significant blood flow and oxygen delivery in those 9 minutes. This isn't an asystole case. I've had plenty of cardiac cases in v fib v tach that survived fine with 9 minutes of cpr
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top