massraider
Footballguy
Now 94%
I don't see it. I wonder if they are projecting generically based on who is leading each state, and not based on what will end up happening. For instance, earlier Trump looked really good in Virginia and then she came back.New York Times projection isn't all breathless like cable news, and they have Trump at 91% chance to win. Holy smokes.
Tom Brokaw looks like he's going to spit out his false teethIt's going to be Trump. I don't see a path for Clinton anymore.
The media is stunned. I am actually enjoying watching NBC right now.....they are in disbelief.
It's going to take some time for this one to settle down - be carefulYou know it.Been sitting on the sidelines with some investible dollars... buying frenzy next week!
She has to have Wisconsin. She's not winning Iowa or Arizona.If HIlary wins Michigan and Pennsylvania, she wins the election. I don't see a path for Trump, even with a win in Wisconsin.
No idea why the NYT has this an 80% Trump win.
I think Hilary will skate by.
But at what?Everyone underestimated how absolutely pissed off people are.
They are coming in big on the economy as the issue.Everyone underestimated how absolutely pissed off people are.
It's like the brexit morning after.Crazy. Think about all the 60 years that voted Trump. Tomorrow they're going to look at their IRAs/401Ks....
![]()
Been saying this for 15 pages.Lots of Wayne County left in MI. Lots of blue votes there.
Exactly. I ####### hate all of them on both sides. Now we have an outside so this could be a path to destroy this 2 party system. If he can win, another outsie can win. Perot failed. That other dude failed Trump has saved us.Everyone underestimated how absolutely pissed off people are.
Pro tip: They don't have either.Crazy. Think about all the 60 years that voted Trump. Tomorrow they're going to look at their IRAs/401Ks....
![]()
Yes but her margins suck.Lots of Wayne County left in MI. Lots of blue votes there.
They are projecting using not just the numbers, but WHERE those votes are coming from.I don't see it. I wonder if they are projecting generically based on who is leading each state, and not based on what will end up happening. For instance, earlier Trump looked really good in Virginia and then she came back.
When inner city Detroit votes are counted, I think she takes Michigan.
Good luck with that.Exactly. I ####### hate all of them on both sides. Now we have an outside so this could be a path to destroy this 2 party system. If he can win, another outsie can win. Perot failed. That other dude failed Trump has saved us.
Crazy. Think about all the 60 years that voted Trump. Tomorrow they're going to look at their IRAs/401Ks....
![]()
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn 1m1 minute agoManhattan, NY
At the moment, we believe there's a 66% chance of a Democratic win in the popular vote and a Trump win in the Electoral College
Weird how water evaporates when the heat is turned up.Squistion or Tobias works too
How else would they do it?This little gem is below the graphs at the top on the NYT page.
"The projections for each state are based on the votes reported so far and how those places have voted in previous elections."