Hopefully this move means nothing when it comes to bringing Tevin Jenkins back.4. The flexibility of having a G that can slide over to the C position and start is huge.I am OK with this for 3 main reasons:Bears are trading for Rams G Jonah Jackson, giving up a 6th round pick. He'll cost the Bears $17.5M this year, and they have a team option for $17M for 2026.
Jackson was a slightly above average guard for the Lions in 2021-2023, according to PFF, who graded him as the 22nd, 23rd, and 32nd best guard out of the 60ish who played >50% of the snaps in 2021, 2022, and 2023. For the 2021 season, he went to the Pro Bowl as an alternate.
Last year the Rams signed him to a 3 year, $51M deal and used him as their starting center to begin the season. He started a couple games, then missed half the season with a shoulder injury, came back and started 1 game, then was benched for rookie 6th rounder Beaux Limmer.
$17.5M is a lot to pay for a guy who was benched last year, and it's even fairly pricey for a slightly above average starter.
1) What the Bears need (O line) is not readily available in the draft or free agency - sometimes you have to pay a premium because of a need that is in short supply.
2) Ben Johnson spent 3 years with this guy. I don't think he would have signed off on the move if Jackson were the Nate Davis type.
3) The guaranteed money is only for 2025. If things don't work out, they can move on with no penalty in 2026. If he is good, he can be extended or kept via franchise tag through 2027. He is still pretty young.
Interior O line is 100% a need, we just have to bite the bullet and pay the price. Throw in Dalman and Zeitler and suddenly I'm pretty happy with this line.
I still think the Bears sign at least two more OL in free agency. I'd love to see them nab Dalman and either Aaron Banks or Will Fries and then draft a day 2 tackle to compete and/or add to the rotation.