What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Chicago Bears Thread*** Ben Johnson hired. The Resurrection Begins! (3 Viewers)

Regardless of who they get, the Bears should end up with a high quality player at 10. That said, is there anyone you would be willing to trade up for? At what cost? In a similar vein, would you consider trading the number 10 for Trey Hendrickson?
 
Regardless of who they get, the Bears should end up with a high quality player at 10. That said, is there anyone you would be willing to trade up for? At what cost? In a similar vein, would you consider trading the number 10 for Trey Hendrickson?
I would rather NOT trade up, but if they can do it for a reasonable price, and they have a clear vision, I would be OK with carter, hunter, or (gulp) jeanty. I don't LIKE it, but I would give Ben Johnson the benefit of the doubt. I saw a mock draft that had us trading back with Cincinnati for the #17 pick and Trey Hendrickson. I would be OK with that, because I don't think the #10 pick is worth much more than #17, but I really struggle to see how they would pay Hendrickson.
 
I think I’d only be willing to trade up for Carter. If Jeanty falls to them I’d be ok with the pick, but I wouldn’t give up draft capital for him.
 
Regardless of who they get, the Bears should end up with a high quality player at 10. That said, is there anyone you would be willing to trade up for? At what cost? In a similar vein, would you consider trading the number 10 for Trey Hendrickson?
I would rather NOT trade up, but if they can do it for a reasonable price, and they have a clear vision, I would be OK with carter, hunter, or (gulp) jeanty. I don't LIKE it, but I would give Ben Johnson the benefit of the doubt. I saw a mock draft that had us trading back with Cincinnati for the #17 pick and Trey Hendrickson. I would be OK with that, because I don't think the #10 pick is worth much more than #17, but I really struggle to see how they would pay Hendrickson.
This is a prime draft to sit tight and take the BPA. The Bears aren't in a spot where they are 1 player away from a superbowl run. They also aren't super deficient at one particular spot. Add rotational-to-starter players in this draft with 10, 39, and 41 (primarily on both lines) and let's start building a dynasty!
 
Ok, go time is tomorrow. What's everyone's prediction for number 10?
I'm going with Tyler Warren. Not my preferred position, but I believe he'll be the best player available.
 
Ok, go time is tomorrow. What's everyone's prediction for number 10?
I'm going with Tyler Warren. Not my preferred position, but I believe he'll be the best player available.
Kelvin Banks. I don't love it, but, if they have done their homework, I am OK with. I would almost prefer conerly, even at 10. My biggest hope is that they trade down.
 
Ok, go time is tomorrow. What's everyone's prediction for number 10?
I'm going with Tyler Warren. Not my preferred position, but I believe he'll be the best player available.
Kelvin Banks. I don't love it, but, if they have done their homework, I am OK with. I would almost prefer conerly, even at 10. My biggest hope is that they trade down.
That's the kind of pick that scares me. A tweener guy who 'can play every position on the line, but we don't know where he'll play in the NFL '. Like you said, if we trade down a few picks, maybe.
I dunno though, everything I've read says he's an excellent pass blocker, so what do I know.
 
Lots of chatter about the Bears trading up to take Jeanty. As much as I like Jeanty, I’m not sure I like moving up to get him.

Also heard the bengals might be willing to move Hendrickson on draft day. I wouldn’t mind the Bears moving down to get him.
 
Best case scenarios in round 1 in my opinion:
1. Trade up for Hunter
2. Trade up for Carter
3. Stay put, get Jeanty
4. Trade up for Jeanty but keep the 39 or 41.

Worst case scenarios:
1. Force an EDGE, if its not Carter, its not worth a top-10 pick.
2. Take a TE. I like both TEs, but Kmet is fine, and you can likely move down and still get 1 of them.
3. Trade up for Jeanty but deal both 2nds
4. Trade up for Jeanty and deal the 2026 1st

Middle of the pack scenarios:
1. Take McMillan, move DJ to slot.
2. Graham falls
3. Take an OL
4. Trade down
 
Best case scenarios in round 1 in my opinion:
1. Trade up for Hunter
2. Trade up for Carter
3. Stay put, get Jeanty
4. Trade up for Jeanty but keep the 39 or 41.

Worst case scenarios:
1. Force an EDGE, if its not Carter, its not worth a top-10 pick.
2. Take a TE. I like both TEs, but Kmet is fine, and you can likely move down and still get 1 of them.
3. Trade up for Jeanty but deal both 2nds
4. Trade up for Jeanty and deal the 2026 1st

Middle of the pack scenarios:
1. Take McMillan, move DJ to slot.
2. Graham falls
3. Take an OL
4. Trade down
I would hate to see them trade both 2nds. This is their last chance to get top-tier talent cheap.
 
Lots of chatter about the Bears trading up to take Jeanty. As much as I like Jeanty, I’m not sure I like moving up to get him.

Also heard the bengals might be willing to move Hendrickson on draft day. I wouldn’t mind the Bears moving down to get him.
Vrabel will be waiting for your call and I hope he takes it.
 
My preferences of realistic choices in order are as follows:

OT Campbell
OT Membou
CB Johnson
RB Jeanty
Trade down into the early 20s

I don't like the idea of trading up at all if it pulls from 39/41 or from future draft assets, nor do I like the idea of taking a TE at 10.
 
Graham and Jeanty are the top 2 targets.

Campbell and Warren are the backup targets.

Will Johnson is my dark horse.

An edge at 10 is my only losing scenario tonight. Hampton or the 3rd OL (Banks?) Would be questionable.
 
For those who like the idea of trading up for Carter, what would you be willing to give up?
I'd gladly give up 10, 39 and 72.

Graham and Jeanty are the top 2 targets.

Campbell and Warren are the backup targets.

Will Johnson is my dark horse.

An edge at 10 is my only losing scenario tonight. Hampton or the 3rd OL (Banks?) Would be questionable.
Might be a minority opinion, but I want no part of Will Johnson unless they trade down like 10 picks. Way too many issues with his speed/health/scheme fit. I'd think for a Dennis Allen defense, Johnson would be behind Barron as a prospect.
 
Looking more and more like the top 3 picks are set so any scenario of the Bears moving up to get Carter is going to cost them BIG time.

Interestingly enough, a lot of teams in the top ten NOT looking for a QB are going BPA based on consensus rankings which have a small variance. It's the second and third rounds that are going to make or break teams. 39 and 41 might just be a make/ break for the Bears. I can live with BPA and trade down scenarios but hard pressed for any type of trade up. Trading up means they believe they are 1 player away from drastically increasing their chances to win many more division games but is this short term or long term?

Holding steady is a long term winning strategy. I think Jags or Raiders take Jeanty with a potential that the Cowboys try to move up.

Alas, who knows what the Bears are going to do. Please for the love of all these years of suffering, don't do anything foolish.
 
Ok, go time is tomorrow. What's everyone's prediction for number 10?
I'm going with Tyler Warren. Not my preferred position, but I believe he'll be the best player available.
Kelvin Banks. I don't love it, but, if they have done their homework, I am OK with. I would almost prefer conerly, even at 10. My biggest hope is that they trade down.
I like the idea to keep stacking Oline. I like Banks. Dude is massive and only 21. Read he's moving up some boards though. Or just take value that slides. As much as I like Warren, I hate the idea of burning a top 10 for a TE. I mean get Fannin later if you really want a TE.
 
The Bears trading up for Jeanty is a nightmare scenario for me. Running backs just aren't important enough to use the 10th & 41st picks (or similar) on one. 80 players make more money per year than the highest paid RB (Barkley), including 61 non-QBs.

Dream scenarios still involve a trade-down, or more than one. Maybe that means moving down to the late teens at a mediocre price, and then from there to the early 2nd at a great price with a team that's coming up for a QB.

Tetairoa McMillan or Mason Graham are still my favorite options if they stick at 10. Looking back at my post from a few weeks ago, I'm now lower on the CBs and higher on the OL options. I'm worried about Will Johnson's athleticism, given his choice not to run the 40 and his poor testing at the drills he did do. Barron has fallen a bit on consensus boards, and extending Kyler Gordon makes it a bigger concern that they both might be best suited to the slot (Barron because of his lack of size). The top 3 offensive linemen at least have a strong BPA case, treating your 6th man at OL like a highly valued starter isn't that crazy, and getting a good tackle could at least let the team save a bunch of money instead of paying up for Jones & Wright.
I'd be happy with a trade-down, even if it's for a usual return rather than this kind of huge haul like the Fields & Mahomes trades. Trading down is usually a win, I'm not wild about anyone at 10, and there are some players I like who are projected to go in the 20s like WR Egbuka, DT Nolen, DT Harmon, and maybe EDGE Pearce.

Here's an attempt to rank the Bears' options at 10, focusing on the guys in the top 16 on the consensus board (excluding Carter & Hunter who will be gone by 10, and the QBs):

Mason Graham, Tetairoa McMillan, Will Johnson, Ashton Jeanty, Tyler Warren, Will Campbell, Jahdae Barron, Jalon Walker, Armand Membou, Kelvin Banks, Mykel Williams, Shemar Stewart

Where the biggest negatives are positional value for Jeanty and (to a lesser extent) Warren, lack of need/fit for the OL, Warren, Barron, and Walker, and negative player takes on Williams, Stewart, and (to a lesser extent) Walker. For most of the players outside the top 4, having the pick work out will depend a lot on the team's plan for the player/roster/scheme and how well they execute on making it work, e.g. Jalon Walker would be a terrible pick if Dennis Allen doesn't want him & have a plan for him.
 
a lot of smoke that the bears will trade up with the jags at 5 to take jeanty
I honestly think the Jags were throwing out the rumors about their interest in Jeanty to get some one to trade up. Could be Chicago. Could be Dallas. Maybe even Denver, but I suspect that's much farther down than Jax wants to move.
 
I'm trying to give the new coach the benefit of the doubt, but, if they trade up for Jeanty, I don't love the process, irrespective of the results. The Bears, and Poles specifically, need to start living the idea of building through the draft. More chances at good players is what they need, not fewer chances. Almost nobody is good enough at evaluation to consolidate risk like that, certainly not Poles.
 
a lot of smoke that the bears will trade up with the jags at 5 to take jeanty
10 and 41 for 5 and 107 isn't a terrible deal if they think there is a drop off after the top 5 talent.
Is that the trade being proposed? I like the idea of getting 107 - that cushions the blow from losing 41, but I do still think the process is flawed. Jeanty would have to be unrealistically good to make this make sense. When was the last time a team traded into the top 5 for a runningback?
 
I'm trying to give the new coach the benefit of the doubt, but, if they trade up for Jeanty, I don't love the process, irrespective of the results. The Bears, and Poles specifically, need to start living the idea of building through the draft. More chances at good players is what they need, not fewer chances. Almost nobody is good enough at evaluation to consolidate risk like that, certainly not Poles.
Arguably RB1 is the biggest hole in the offense. I don't like Hampton at 10, but thats an option. I'm almost scared to see who's left at 39/41. Kaleb and judkins are decent there, but if those two are gone, I don't like round 3 options personally.
 
a lot of smoke that the bears will trade up with the jags at 5 to take jeanty
10 and 41 for 5 and 107 isn't a terrible deal if they think there is a drop off after the top 5 talent.
Is that the trade being proposed? I like the idea of getting 107 - that cushions the blow from losing 41, but I do still think the process is flawed. Jeanty would have to be unrealistically good to make this make sense. When was the last time a team traded into the top 5 for a runningback?
Its what the Chat Sports Bears guy is reporting. Gets the Bears a pick in the 4th again, so it's not a massive gap between 3 and 5 now.

I think I'd do that deal if that's all it takes.

I know RBs have lost value over the years, but he's still a blue chip guy vs whoever is left at 10.
 
Lots of chatter about the Bears trading up to take Jeanty. As much as I like Jeanty, I’m not sure I like moving up to get him.

Also heard the bengals might be willing to move Hendrickson on draft day. I wouldn’t mind the Bears moving down to get him.

Should stay away from Hendrickson. He's at that age where pass rushers start to decline and you'll have to give him a new deal.
 
I'm trying to give the new coach the benefit of the doubt, but, if they trade up for Jeanty, I don't love the process, irrespective of the results. The Bears, and Poles specifically, need to start living the idea of building through the draft. More chances at good players is what they need, not fewer chances. Almost nobody is good enough at evaluation to consolidate risk like that, certainly not Poles.
Arguably RB1 is the biggest hole in the offense. I don't like Hampton at 10, but thats an option. I'm almost scared to see who's left at 39/41. Kaleb and judkins are decent there, but if those two are gone, I don't like round 3 options personally.
Im trying to understand the necessity to add Jeanty after the team signed Swift for 3 years and he still has a few good years in the tank. If it's to add the next gen star then I would think Swift is tradable. Swift was good not great last year but as we know, so many factors contributed to the average year. I would like to see what he could do behind a better OL and what we hope will be a step up in QB play. Is Jeanty really worth moving up to grab? I understand the talent but isn't this the status quo Bear's strategy - defense and running game? Just trying to will a change in strategy but if there are only decent backs in the draft after the top 3 or 4 - do we need to see the Bears take the future starter now or a solid compliment to Swift? Like your perspectives for sure. I have seen so many opinions from many respectable outlets that the Bears are in a catalyst big move position. Very interesting
 
a lot of smoke that the bears will trade up with the jags at 5 to take jeanty
10 and 41 for 5 and 107 isn't a terrible deal if they think there is a drop off after the top 5 talent.
Is that the trade being proposed? I like the idea of getting 107 - that cushions the blow from losing 41, but I do still think the process is flawed. Jeanty would have to be unrealistically good to make this make sense. When was the last time a team traded into the top 5 for a runningback?
Its what the Chat Sports Bears guy is reporting. Gets the Bears a pick in the 4th again, so it's not a massive gap between 3 and 5 now.

I think I'd do that deal if that's all it takes.

I know RBs have lost value over the years, but he's still a blue chip guy vs whoever is left at 10.
This feels a little bit like convincing an addict that it makes sense to just have ONE drink. I named my son after Walter Payton, and I think running the ball is the soul of the game, so the idea of Jeanty DOES excite me, even though I think the process is wrong. Sigh. Damn. I'm watching the underdog fantasy breakdown of Jeanty right now and, yep....................I guess I'm in. Pour me a tall glass of Jeanty...................
 
Lots of chatter about the Bears trading up to take Jeanty. As much as I like Jeanty, I’m not sure I like moving up to get him.

Also heard the bengals might be willing to move Hendrickson on draft day. I wouldn’t mind the Bears moving down to get him.

Should stay away from Hendrickson. He's at that age where pass rushers start to decline and you'll have to give him a new deal.
It's the new deal that scares me away. If he has so much value - why is Cincy eager to part ways with him when defense is probably a liability? I think you are correct
 
I'm trying to give the new coach the benefit of the doubt, but, if they trade up for Jeanty, I don't love the process, irrespective of the results. The Bears, and Poles specifically, need to start living the idea of building through the draft. More chances at good players is what they need, not fewer chances. Almost nobody is good enough at evaluation to consolidate risk like that, certainly not Poles.
Arguably RB1 is the biggest hole in the offense. I don't like Hampton at 10, but thats an option. I'm almost scared to see who's left at 39/41. Kaleb and judkins are decent there, but if those two are gone, I don't like round 3 options personally.
Im trying to understand the necessity to add Jeanty after the team signed Swift for 3 years and he still has a few good years in the tank. If it's to add the next gen star then I would think Swift is tradable. Swift was good not great last year but as we know, so many factors contributed to the average year. I would like to see what he could do behind a better OL and what we hope will be a step up in QB play. Is Jeanty really worth moving up to grab? I understand the talent but isn't this the status quo Bear's strategy - defense and running game? Just trying to will a change in strategy but if there are only decent backs in the draft after the top 3 or 4 - do we need to see the Bears take the future starter now or a solid compliment to Swift? Like your perspectives for sure. I have seen so many opinions from many respectable outlets that the Bears are in a catalyst big move position. Very interesting
I don't know how true, but rumor is Ben Johnson doesn't like Swift. Anyone know how much overlap they had in Detroit?

Swift did seem like a guy who missed the easy gain for a big play. I like him at fringe RB1, and think even a Judkins/Swift backfield would be pretty darn good.

Bottom line is I'm confused on the direction of this draft, but heck if I don't trust Johnson to tell Poles who he wants.

I like Jeanty and Warren from the gameplan aspect. I like OL or DL because I believe games are won up front. I can even get behind a DB because of long term roster management.

No idea how tonight will break. I think its 40% I like or love the pick, 40% I understand the pick and 20% WTF.
 
I'm trying to give the new coach the benefit of the doubt, but, if they trade up for Jeanty, I don't love the process, irrespective of the results. The Bears, and Poles specifically, need to start living the idea of building through the draft. More chances at good players is what they need, not fewer chances. Almost nobody is good enough at evaluation to consolidate risk like that, certainly not Poles.
Arguably RB1 is the biggest hole in the offense. I don't like Hampton at 10, but thats an option. I'm almost scared to see who's left at 39/41. Kaleb and judkins are decent there, but if those two are gone, I don't like round 3 options personally.
Im trying to understand the necessity to add Jeanty after the team signed Swift for 3 years and he still has a few good years in the tank. If it's to add the next gen star then I would think Swift is tradable. Swift was good not great last year but as we know, so many factors contributed to the average year. I would like to see what he could do behind a better OL and what we hope will be a step up in QB play. Is Jeanty really worth moving up to grab? I understand the talent but isn't this the status quo Bear's strategy - defense and running game? Just trying to will a change in strategy but if there are only decent backs in the draft after the top 3 or 4 - do we need to see the Bears take the future starter now or a solid compliment to Swift? Like your perspectives for sure. I have seen so many opinions from many respectable outlets that the Bears are in a catalyst big move position. Very interesting
I don't know how true, but rumor is Ben Johnson doesn't like Swift. Anyone know how much overlap they had in Detroit?

Swift did seem like a guy who missed the easy gain for a big play. I like him at fringe RB1, and think even a Judkins/Swift backfield would be pretty darn good.

Bottom line is I'm confused on the direction of this draft, but heck if I don't trust Johnson to tell Poles who he wants.

I like Jeanty and Warren from the gameplan aspect. I like OL or DL because I believe games are won up front. I can even get behind a DB because of long term roster management.

No idea how tonight will break. I think its 40% I like or love the pick, 40% I understand the pick and 20% WTF.
Please no WTF picks.......Shea Mclellin has forever scarred me. There are a dozen guys I would be happy with, for real. Please no underathletic tweeners from small schools to play a non-featured position in the Bears defense. It would be very tough to ruin this night the way that draft was ruined, but if anyone can do it, the bears can.
 
Lots of chatter about the Bears trading up to take Jeanty. As much as I like Jeanty, I’m not sure I like moving up to get him.

Also heard the bengals might be willing to move Hendrickson on draft day. I wouldn’t mind the Bears moving down to get him.

Should stay away from Hendrickson. He's at that age where pass rushers start to decline and you'll have to give him a new deal.
I agree, tough age for a top contract at his position. This is why I am glad Detroit did not go all in on an aging DE like some have wanted.
 
I'm trying to give the new coach the benefit of the doubt, but, if they trade up for Jeanty, I don't love the process, irrespective of the results. The Bears, and Poles specifically, need to start living the idea of building through the draft. More chances at good players is what they need, not fewer chances. Almost nobody is good enough at evaluation to consolidate risk like that, certainly not Poles.
Arguably RB1 is the biggest hole in the offense. I don't like Hampton at 10, but thats an option. I'm almost scared to see who's left at 39/41. Kaleb and judkins are decent there, but if those two are gone, I don't like round 3 options personally.
Im trying to understand the necessity to add Jeanty after the team signed Swift for 3 years and he still has a few good years in the tank. If it's to add the next gen star then I would think Swift is tradable. Swift was good not great last year but as we know, so many factors contributed to the average year. I would like to see what he could do behind a better OL and what we hope will be a step up in QB play. Is Jeanty really worth moving up to grab? I understand the talent but isn't this the status quo Bear's strategy - defense and running game? Just trying to will a change in strategy but if there are only decent backs in the draft after the top 3 or 4 - do we need to see the Bears take the future starter now or a solid compliment to Swift? Like your perspectives for sure. I have seen so many opinions from many respectable outlets that the Bears are in a catalyst big move position. Very interesting
I don't know how true, but rumor is Ben Johnson doesn't like Swift. Anyone know how much overlap they had in Detroit?

Swift did seem like a guy who missed the easy gain for a big play. I like him at fringe RB1, and think even a Judkins/Swift backfield would be pretty darn good.

Bottom line is I'm confused on the direction of this draft, but heck if I don't trust Johnson to tell Poles who he wants.

I like Jeanty and Warren from the gameplan aspect. I like OL or DL because I believe games are won up front. I can even get behind a DB because of long term roster management.

No idea how tonight will break. I think its 40% I like or love the pick, 40% I understand the pick and 20% WTF.
I think that Poles has to shine here. He owns the mess of 2024. Doesn't mean that he is not partnering with Johnson. Far from it.

In looking at the picks after 39 (41 and 72), Poles has to be assured by this coaching staff that players in target are solid character guys that can be developed at the NFL level. Players that do not fit this mold don't need to be on the bus.

If Johnson and Swift are not going to be compatible and struggle to partner, we don't need to go through the season with Swift on the bus. This will alter tonight's approach. I am drawing the assumption that Poles knew of potential conflict with Johnson and Swift when making the decision to give Johnson the HC position. Maybe Johnson had conditions like Swift has to go before mini-camp or we go into a room and iron this out. If Swift is on the block, Bears will be able to get some draft capital tonight but they are going to be giving up quality draft capital to move up for Jeanty and hopefully another team like Dallas doesn't force the Bears into a bidding war that benefits someone in the top 5.

Additionally, the Bears lose the veteran presence and will have a rookie RB and second year QB going into 2025 with another patched up OL.

Well buckle up fellas, it's going to be a ride.
 
I'm trying to give the new coach the benefit of the doubt, but, if they trade up for Jeanty, I don't love the process, irrespective of the results. The Bears, and Poles specifically, need to start living the idea of building through the draft. More chances at good players is what they need, not fewer chances. Almost nobody is good enough at evaluation to consolidate risk like that, certainly not Poles.
Arguably RB1 is the biggest hole in the offense. I don't like Hampton at 10, but thats an option. I'm almost scared to see who's left at 39/41. Kaleb and judkins are decent there, but if those two are gone, I don't like round 3 options personally.
Gotta think one, if not both, of the OSU backs will be there in the second for them. Maybe not? I'm hoping they just let the draft come to them and not get crazy. Would be really disappointed if they burn a top 10 on a TE though.
 
If the Bears don't trade up to get him...
With the 10th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, the Chicago Bears select Tyler Warren, TE Penn State
They can give Williams a great weapon at TE and we saw what Johnson did with La Porta in Detroit
This one seems easy
 
Looking more and more like the top 3 picks are set so any scenario of the Bears moving up to get Carter is going to cost them BIG time.

Interestingly enough, a lot of teams in the top ten NOT looking for a QB are going BPA based on consensus rankings which have a small variance. It's the second and third rounds that are going to make or break teams. 39 and 41 might just be a make/ break for the Bears. I can live with BPA and trade down scenarios but hard pressed for any type of trade up. Trading up means they believe they are 1 player away from drastically increasing their chances to win many more division games but is this short term or long term?

Holding steady is a long term winning strategy. I think Jags or Raiders take Jeanty with a potential that the Cowboys try to move up.

Alas, who knows what the Bears are going to do. Please for the love of all these years of suffering, don't do anything foolish.
You're asking for A LOT.
 
Looking more and more like the top 3 picks are set so any scenario of the Bears moving up to get Carter is going to cost them BIG time.

Interestingly enough, a lot of teams in the top ten NOT looking for a QB are going BPA based on consensus rankings which have a small variance. It's the second and third rounds that are going to make or break teams. 39 and 41 might just be a make/ break for the Bears. I can live with BPA and trade down scenarios but hard pressed for any type of trade up. Trading up means they believe they are 1 player away from drastically increasing their chances to win many more division games but is this short term or long term?

Holding steady is a long term winning strategy. I think Jags or Raiders take Jeanty with a potential that the Cowboys try to move up.

Alas, who knows what the Bears are going to do. Please for the love of all these years of suffering, don't do anything foolish.
You're asking for A LOT.
I know - its the Bears
 
If the Bears don't trade up to get him...
With the 10th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, the Chicago Bears select Tyler Warren, TE Penn State
They can give Williams a great weapon at TE and we saw what Johnson did with La Porta in Detroit
This one seems easy
I will start breaking things if that happens, and I like Warren, just not at 10. TE inflation.

Lions got Gibbs at 12 and LaPorta at 34. Fannin Jr. comps to LaPorta if the Bears really feel the need for TE.

Paying a top 10 for a TE seems insane. It's recency bias on Bowers going 13 and being a stud. I don't think Warren or Loveland are close to Bowers in talent. I think it would be a huge blunder for the Bears to get caught up in TE FOMO. LaPorta was nice for Johnson and the Lions, but Gibbs is way more valuable.

In the past 25 years, top 10 TE's have included TJ Hockenson (8), Pitts (4), Winslow Jr. (6), Vernon Davis (6). Huge whiff potential.
 
If the Bears don't trade up to get him...
With the 10th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, the Chicago Bears select Tyler Warren, TE Penn State
They can give Williams a great weapon at TE and we saw what Johnson did with La Porta in Detroit
This one seems easy
I will start breaking things if that happens, and I like Warren, just not at 10. TE inflation.

Lions got Gibbs at 12 and LaPorta at 34. Fannin Jr. comps to LaPorta if the Bears really feel the need for TE.

Paying a top 10 for a TE seems insane. It's recency bias on Bowers going 13 and being a stud. I don't think Warren or Loveland are close to Bowers in talent. I think it would be a huge blunder for the Bears to get caught up in TE FOMO. LaPorta was nice for Johnson and the Lions, but Gibbs is way more valuable.

In the past 25 years, top 10 TE's have included TJ Hockenson (8), Pitts (4), Winslow Jr. (6), Vernon Davis (6). Huge whiff potential.
I agree - ten is probably too much but a slide down with some capital coming back might work
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top