ghostguy123
Footballguy
With some of the deals and the things I hear people say about Tre mason, he is getting close to being that next one
I can't find another owner who is bullish on Mason in the league I own him. People just don't seem to want him, contrary to the trade thread it seems I'm in the only league who doesn't have a fan of his. As for Michael, I still think there is nothing to do but hold if you are a current owner. Market value just isn't what you would be willing to give him up for. There is no reason to sell unless you feel after these past 2 years that he is nothing but another hyped up bench player. It simply isn't worth it to sell now at an all time low. I still like his talent and I'll be patient til the end, whether that be in 7 months, or 7 years, til he reaches that 30yr old age marker.With some of the deals and the things I hear people say about Tre mason, he is getting close to being that next one
The thing is that even if these negotiations fall apart - it seems that they will at least keep Lynch at the $8.5MM contract he has for next year (Considering they are willing to pay him more).I am a Lynch, Turbin, Michael owner as well. I am okay with Lynch in Seattle a couple more years. That gives me possibly another 2 years of RB1 play with little injury risk due to owning the handcuffs. That said, like you, I would love to see Lynch somewhere else and split the 1 RB1 into potentially 2 RB1s.as a Lynch, Turbin, Michael owner I hope he's starting elsewhere next season.
Can't really lose though. Both situations are good
Next what? Michael?!With some of the deals and the things I hear people say about Tre mason, he is getting close to being that next one
Michael is definitely a hold right now (or a buy).I can't find another owner who is bullish on Mason in the league I own him. People just don't seem to want him, contrary to the trade thread it seems I'm in the only league who doesn't have a fan of his. As for Michael, I still think there is nothing to do but hold if you are a current owner. Market value just isn't what you would be willing to give him up for. There is no reason to sell unless you feel after these past 2 years that he is nothing but another hyped up bench player. It simply isn't worth it to sell now at an all time low. I still like his talent and I'll be patient til the end, whether that be in 7 months, or 7 years, til he reaches that 30yr old age marker.With some of the deals and the things I hear people say about Tre mason, he is getting close to being that next one
the next guy who spikes in value in the offseason and becomes an instant value sell for me.Next what? Michael?!With some of the deals and the things I hear people say about Tre mason, he is getting close to being that next one
Tre's got games already where he's generated more fantasy production than CM's career. Anyone considering Michael anywhere near Tre's value at this point ought to have their FF license revoked.
Let the hype machine commence.Mason should be regarded as fringe top 5 among RB's for dynasty purposes.
Don't agree with that. The hype is building but it's no first round hype and that's his potential. To say his peak hype this off season has reached his career zenith is as false to me as as labeling it as an absolute that Michaels value last season had reached his career high point. Mason's hype is on par or less than guys like Ray Rice and McCoy entering their second seasons after similar production as Mason and their values increased.Let the hype machine commence.Mason should be regarded as fringe top 5 among RB's for dynasty purposes.
This is what I am talking about. I see his value doubling over the next few months based off nothing but talk, in which case he would become an insta-sell for me.
Hey, maybe he is actually going to be really good (though I don't think he has much stud potential), but even if he does become good so what? Chances are the haul he will fetch at peak hype will be just as good. Then if Mason falters, you obviously made out bigtime.
Bazinga! said:Do we know for a fact they are willing to pay him more? That is a rumor the press put out, but I don't think we have heard any decision makers in Seattle actually say that. I am not saying they won't keep him, just that this situation is fluid and could go any direction at this point.Dr. Octopus said:The thing is that even if these negotiations fall apart - it seems that they will at least keep Lynch at the $8.5MM contract he has for next year (Considering they are willing to pay him more).Bazinga! said:I am a Lynch, Turbin, Michael owner as well. I am okay with Lynch in Seattle a couple more years. That gives me possibly another 2 years of RB1 play with little injury risk due to owning the handcuffs. That said, like you, I would love to see Lynch somewhere else and split the 1 RB1 into potentially 2 RB1s.Sabertooth said:as a Lynch, Turbin, Michael owner I hope he's starting elsewhere next season.
Can't really lose though. Both situations are good
Sure, I'm basing it on this report. What else would I be basing it on? These guys have sources where they get their information. This doesn't seem made up.NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the Seahawks have offered Marshawn Lynch "a huge contract extension that would keep him in a Seahawks uniform for years to come."
It's believed the deal would make Lynch the highest-paid running back in terms of annual average not named Adrian Peterson. It's a big swing of events after it's been rumored for the better part of a calendar year now that 2014 could be Lynch's final season in Seattle due to age, inflated salary, and edginess. Per RapSheet, the new deal would pay Lynch around $10 million next season.
Sure you can make any assumption that you want.Exactly my point....Just because it is reported, doesn't make it fact. I'm not saying they didn't make an offer and Dr Octopus, I saw the same quote, so I knew that was what was being referenced. I was asking the question because things get misreported so often. I think it is fair to assume that there is a decent chance they haven't offered him anything.If they truly offered that, why hasnt he jumped at it yet?
because they may be negotiating other details of the contract and also there was a game on Sunday called "the Super Bowl" that may have put a few other things on the back burner for now.If they truly offered that, why hasnt he jumped at it yet?
Do you really think Dan Quinn just decided to become HC of the Falcons on Monday morning?All the more reason to assume we are just hearing rumors. Why would they negotiate anything before the SB when it could have potentially created issues between them and Lynch/distracted him from what he really needed to focus on (the games).because they may be negotiating other details of the contract and also there was a game on Sunday called "the Super Bowl" that may have put a few other things on the back burner for now.If they truly offered that, why hasnt he jumped at it yet?
It's a three year contract, I am pretty sure this year is not his time. Gonna have to hold for at least another full season.Just want to point out a little glimmer of hope for us C-Mike owners. Non of Lynch's contract is guaranteed after this year, so in theory any of the next 3 years COULD be his time.
I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
Huh? Most 3rd string RBs aren't even rosters in fantasy. Michael is owned in just about every league and people owning him actually seem to think he's worth a mid/high-level rookie 1st.Michael has the same value as most third string backs. He's got less value than some at this point. Personally I'd rather have Terrance West or somebody like him. If Michael was a great player, he'd be on the field.
Terrance West is not a 3rd string back. He's projected as sharing the starting job next year.Michael has the same value as most third string backs. He's got less value than some at this point. Personally I'd rather have Terrance West or somebody like him. If Michael was a great player, he'd be on the field.
just like michael was projected to have worth year after year?Terrance West is not a 3rd string back. He's projected as sharing the starting job next year.Michael has the same value as most third string backs. He's got less value than some at this point. Personally I'd rather have Terrance West or somebody like him. If Michael was a great player, he'd be on the field.
it's to the point where the Seahawks would be better off dumping CM for a pick if there's a buyer.I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
It is to the point where CM and CM owners would be better off if he gets traded. Not sure that is true for Seattle. What could they realistically get for him? A 4th next year or 5th this year? Why bother?it's to the point where the Seahawks would be better off dumping CM for a pick if there's a buyer.I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
If CM's contract is no longer than Lynch's new deal and he hasn't shown that he could be the lead back if Lynch was out for any time, a 4th would probably help them more. Even if they just wanted to get a new RB, the new guy would be cheaper and contribute just as much.It is to the point where CM and CM owners would be better off if he gets traded. Not sure that is true for Seattle. What could they realistically get for him? A 4th next year or 5th this year? Why bother?it's to the point where the Seahawks would be better off dumping CM for a pick if there's a buyer.I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
Seahawks are arguably better at the back at the draft than the front. Most of their secondary is made up of picks made after the 4th round.It is to the point where CM and CM owners would be better off if he gets traded. Not sure that is true for Seattle. What could they realistically get for him? A 4th next year or 5th this year? Why bother?it's to the point where the Seahawks would be better off dumping CM for a pick if there's a buyer.I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
More opportunity cost lost.Michael is a FA in 2 years
And let's not forget, West has actually PLAYED and had a role.Terrance West is not a 3rd string back. He's projected as sharing the starting job next year.Michael has the same value as most third string backs. He's got less value than some at this point. Personally I'd rather have Terrance West or somebody like him. If Michael was a great player, he'd be on the field.
Wait, when did anyone say that he was better than APP or Lynch????Anyone still want to say he's better than Lynch and AD?
Seriously though if you are a fan you should probably buy now in dynasty. You'll probably be waiting for 2 years but the value will come back when FA hits. Also, please stop bad mouthing Turbin. Guy does everything well and it is not an insult to be behind a guy who is a jack of all trades.
A handful of people in this thread and the Lynch thread last summer said it.Wait, when did anyone say that he was better than APP or Lynch????Anyone still want to say he's better than Lynch and AD?
Seriously though if you are a fan you should probably buy now in dynasty. You'll probably be waiting for 2 years but the value will come back when FA hits. Also, please stop bad mouthing Turbin. Guy does everything well and it is not an insult to be behind a guy who is a jack of all trades.
Could be 100 or more by the time he starts a gameHa. 60 pages on this guy.
I believe they like Turbin better as a third down back but I don't think anything is definitive in terms of which one they'd prefer if Lynch was out of the picture.I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
So.id take overall.IMO the Hawks' almost panicked desire to keep Lynch tells me that they don't see R Wilson as a true franchise QB. They need Lynch because it is him - not Wilson - who is the emotional leader of the offense.I believe they like Turbin better as a third down back but I don't think anything is definitive in terms of which one they'd prefer if Lynch was out of the picture.I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
The problem for both Turbin and Michaels is I get the sense the Seahawks don't trust either of them in expanded roles. The way they went after Lynch offering more money when his only leverage was not playing was one huge sign but the other was the slew of credible people who felt Seattle would look at Rb's as high as the first round. Nothing about their actions seems to indicate they feel comfortable they have Lynch's replacment on the roster, at least not a bell cow type RB.
But I don't agree with those who say Michaels will never be anything but hype or a nonfactor. He might never fully live up to the hype, but some players just take longer than others to get their chance especially when play behind a future HOF player.
My feelings on Michaels remain unchanged. I think he's an incredible athlete but he's never been a consistent bell cow guy even in college, more of a lead part or co-part of a RBBC. When I see him run he looks like he has one speed and it's full go. That's great sometimes, but true feature backs learn some preservation running skills and not just rely on being a better athlete. When you run like Michaels does I just don't think you can have a heavy usage. So despite having the size for it I just don't think he's ever going to be 20 carry a week back, but I think at some point in time he'll be the lead part of a RBBC and be a dangerous weapon and useful fantasy player.
Sorry but that's a dumb comment.IMO the Hawks' almost panicked desire to keep Lynch tells me that they don't see R Wilson as a true franchise QB. They need Lynch because it is him - not Wilson - who is the emotional leader of the offense.
Or You know, they could just want to keep the team that went to back to back super bowls together.So.id take overall.IMO the Hawks' almost panicked desire to keep Lynch tells me that they don't see R Wilson as a true franchise QB. They need Lynch because it is him - not Wilson - who is the emotional leader of the offense.I believe they like Turbin better as a third down back but I don't think anything is definitive in terms of which one they'd prefer if Lynch was out of the picture.I believe they like Turbin more than Michael. I don't think this is a big secret.Maybe a loaded question in this thread, but does anyone have any thoughts on how the Hawks are viewing Michael these days? Does he still have potential to take over if Lynch goes down with injury or maybe in 2016?
The problem for both Turbin and Michaels is I get the sense the Seahawks don't trust either of them in expanded roles. The way they went after Lynch offering more money when his only leverage was not playing was one huge sign but the other was the slew of credible people who felt Seattle would look at Rb's as high as the first round. Nothing about their actions seems to indicate they feel comfortable they have Lynch's replacment on the roster, at least not a bell cow type RB.
But I don't agree with those who say Michaels will never be anything but hype or a nonfactor. He might never fully live up to the hype, but some players just take longer than others to get their chance especially when play behind a future HOF player.
My feelings on Michaels remain unchanged. I think he's an incredible athlete but he's never been a consistent bell cow guy even in college, more of a lead part or co-part of a RBBC. When I see him run he looks like he has one speed and it's full go. That's great sometimes, but true feature backs learn some preservation running skills and not just rely on being a better athlete. When you run like Michaels does I just don't think you can have a heavy usage. So despite having the size for it I just don't think he's ever going to be 20 carry a week back, but I think at some point in time he'll be the lead part of a RBBC and be a dangerous weapon and useful fantasy player.