What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Christine Michael (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc. The running backs coach above was just blabbing excuses. The truth of the matter is that the Seahawks knew that Marshawn Lynch would freak out if he started to take significant snaps. Lynch was threatened by Michael and his talent level and no one wants to see what an overdose on Skittles looks like. The administration caved to Lynch, paid him more and the Seahawks lost a talent because of it. It is more logical to get trade value for a guy on your roster than it is to unhappily bury him for 4 years. They didn't trade him because he sucks, they traded him because it improved their locker room and draft.

I doubt Michael is active this week, or even next, but he will learn the playbook and is in a much better position to succeed. I believe Dallas knows that McFadden is better than Randle. If McFadden can't stay healthy and Randle is the only other option, it won't take C Michael long to show what he has.

BTW, the real knucklehead on this team is Randle, he has been arrested twice since entering the NFL. The guy with the lower Wonderlic can stay out of jail. I would love to see him break out and have all the haters eat their words - NO REASON to dislike this guy.
:thumbup:

Should be good for another 20 pages.

 
So who either drafted Michael late this year, or is going to roll the dice and pick him up off waivers?
Picked him up in my redraft after Jonas Gray was cut.It's a swing for the fences. I don't expect it to pan out but why not take the chance. My expectation is that I don't think he can possibly be relevant until after the Cowboys week 6 bye. However if he does earn the playing time he could be gold for the second half of the fantasy season. So why not?
My thoughts too. Stash and wait
I did too, but the problem is when bye week start coming into play and you are forced to decide whether to drop this "lottery ticket" to pick up a bye week fill-in. I just hope the Cowboys backfield plays out sooner rather than later. Holding for 6 weeks is difficult unless you're ahead of your league in your W-L record.
Yeah, it could become a problem if your bench is light. I will carry one QB and TE if I have to. Michael could pay huge dividends down the road.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc. The running backs coach above was just blabbing excuses. The truth of the matter is that the Seahawks knew that Marshawn Lynch would freak out if he started to take significant snaps. Lynch was threatened by Michael and his talent level and no one wants to see what an overdose on Skittles looks like. The administration caved to Lynch, paid him more and the Seahawks lost a talent because of it. It is more logical to get trade value for a guy on your roster than it is to unhappily bury him for 4 years. They didn't trade him because he sucks, they traded him because it improved their locker room and draft.
:lmao:

 
The tough part about Michael as a flyer is that he's not a flyer that you take, and have a solid answer in a month. He just got to town, no way he sees much action right away.

I know everyone says that now we'll know because he's on Dallas, but it's very possible that some combo of Randle/DMC/Dunbar do just fine behind that line, and Dallas has no reason to put a new guy in a starting role.

Randle could get injured week 11, and Michael could lead someone to fantasy glory.

This is a ticket that could pay off in October, or December. You have to be willing to hold. If he gets no carries for three weeks, would you cut him? Because he can still be relevant later on.

 
The tough part about Michael as a flyer is that he's not a flyer that you take, and have a solid answer in a month. He just got to town, no way he sees much action right away.

I know everyone says that now we'll know because he's on Dallas, but it's very possible that some combo of Randle/DMC/Dunbar do just fine behind that line, and Dallas has no reason to put a new guy in a starting role.

Randle could get injured week 11, and Michael could lead someone to fantasy glory.

This is a ticket that could pay off in October, or December. You have to be willing to hold. If he gets no carries for three weeks, would you cut him? Because he can still be relevant later on.
He's worth a flier because McFadden is McFadden and what has Randle proven? Someone is going to put up numbers for Cowboys so it could easily be Michael at some point.

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
He averaged 100 rushing yards per game at 6.0 YPC in his junior season before getting injured (believe it was a torn ACL). Had he finished that season healthy, he likely would've had enough momentum to leave school early and push for a top 45 draft slot. People make Michael out to be a workout warrior and nothing more, but he was a productive college player. The bigger problem was durability. He couldn't stay healthy on a high workload. That's actually been my biggest fear for his NFL career. He obviously has the talent to produce as a runner, but he could shine for 4-5 games and then blow up a knee again. That's kind of like the sick nightmare scenario that I could see unfolding. After all this time he gets out there, looks like a million bucks for a few games, and then *pop*...

Then again, Curtis Martin and Frank Gore did okay in the NFL after being plagued by injuries in college. Peterson too. You just never know...

 
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc. The running backs coach above was just blabbing excuses. The truth of the matter is that the Seahawks knew that Marshawn Lynch would freak out if he started to take significant snaps. Lynch was threatened by Michael and his talent level and no one wants to see what an overdose on Skittles looks like. The administration caved to Lynch, paid him more and the Seahawks lost a talent because of it. It is more logical to get trade value for a guy on your roster than it is to unhappily bury him for 4 years. They didn't trade him because he sucks, they traded him because it improved their locker room and draft.
:lmao:
That's some serious babbling right there.

 
The Cowboys went from having a special RB (Murray) to ?????

No one denies Michael's talent. He was not sniffing the field behind Lynch. And he has a superstar ego and is a back that has an elite pedigree.

He is now in a place where there is no one in front of him that is just as good if not better.

I fully expect him to take the lead alpha dog role and run with it by week 4 or 5. If not....then he really is not that good. Because he has almost no competition in front of him with a broken down McFadden and a middling average talent like Randle.

Golden opportunity for an out of no where player to emerge this season. Well worth the late round flier I took on him. I will be patient.

 
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc. The running backs coach above was just blabbing excuses. The truth of the matter is that the Seahawks knew that Marshawn Lynch would freak out if he started to take significant snaps. Lynch was threatened by Michael and his talent level and no one wants to see what an overdose on Skittles looks like. The administration caved to Lynch, paid him more and the Seahawks lost a talent because of it. It is more logical to get trade value for a guy on your roster than it is to unhappily bury him for 4 years. They didn't trade him because he sucks, they traded him because it improved their locker room and draft.

I doubt Michael is active this week, or even next, but he will learn the playbook and is in a much better position to succeed. I believe Dallas knows that McFadden is better than Randle. If McFadden can't stay healthy and Randle is the only other option, it won't take C Michael long to show what he has.

BTW, the real knucklehead on this team is Randle, he has been arrested twice since entering the NFL. The guy with the lower Wonderlic can stay out of jail. I would love to see him break out and have all the haters eat their words - NO REASON to dislike this guy.
Lol nope.

 
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc. The running backs coach above was just blabbing excuses. The truth of the matter is that the Seahawks knew that Marshawn Lynch would freak out if he started to take significant snaps. Lynch was threatened by Michael and his talent level and no one wants to see what an overdose on Skittles looks like. The administration caved to Lynch, paid him more and the Seahawks lost a talent because of it. It is more logical to get trade value for a guy on your roster than it is to unhappily bury him for 4 years. They didn't trade him because he sucks, they traded him because it improved their locker room and draft.

I doubt Michael is active this week, or even next, but he will learn the playbook and is in a much better position to succeed. I believe Dallas knows that McFadden is better than Randle. If McFadden can't stay healthy and Randle is the only other option, it won't take C Michael long to show what he has.

BTW, the real knucklehead on this team is Randle, he has been arrested twice since entering the NFL. The guy with the lower Wonderlic can stay out of jail. I would love to see him break out and have all the haters eat their words - NO REASON to dislike this guy.
2nd charge dismissed for lack of evidence.

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
He averaged 100 rushing yards per game at 6.0 YPC in his junior season before getting injured (believe it was a torn ACL).
But was he the starter?

It seems even in that year that the other RB was getting more carries.

Gray at 159 and CMike at 149 at times of injury. And Gray had more carries in a majority of those games (5-4). And x4 as many catches.

 
How long will you guys keep this guy on your bench? 4 weeks? 6 weeks?
It depends on several things. How deep a bench? How are Randle and McFadden playing? He's an injury away from joining the committee. I doubt he excels so much in practice that they have to play him. I suspect his maturity/professionalism issues will continue to cause coaches to pause. I was at several Dallas practices in August. At one Peter King spent considerable time with Gary Brown RB coach. Later he reported that Dallas doesn't think McFadden can stay healthy, duh. But there was more to it he didn't report like loving Dunbar out of the backfield and wanting to see in games what they've seen in practice so many times, and also having great confidence in Randle on the field. I think adding an RB was all about McFadden injury concerns and who (Michael) came available. God knows the other backs in camp were... not NFL caliber.

 
I'll mentally write him off if he's not seeing the field by the week after the bye, but probably wouldn't cut him loose yet. (dynasty)

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
He averaged 100 rushing yards per game at 6.0 YPC in his junior season before getting injured (believe it was a torn ACL). Had he finished that season healthy, he likely would've had enough momentum to leave school early and push for a top 45 draft slot. People make Michael out to be a workout warrior and nothing more, but he was a productive college player. The bigger problem was durability. He couldn't stay healthy on a high workload. That's actually been my biggest fear for his NFL career. He obviously has the talent to produce as a runner, but he could shine for 4-5 games and then blow up a knee again. That's kind of like the sick nightmare scenario that I could see unfolding. After all this time he gets out there, looks like a million bucks for a few games, and then *pop*...

Then again, Curtis Martin and Frank Gore did okay in the NFL after being plagued by injuries in college. Peterson too. You just never know...
Broke his leg as a sophomore. Tore his acl in game nine mid november of his junior season. He was running hard by April. Injuries were not the issue his senior year.

 
Agreed with all of the above -- no point in rostering him if you're not willing to hold through the week after the buy. If you're looking for immediate results, there have to be better options out there than the player that is learning a new system.

 
How long will you guys keep this guy on your bench? 4 weeks? 6 weeks?
The Cowboys have a week 6 bye. If he is not doing anything for Dallas in week 7 then it's time for me to see if there is something more appealing on the WW.
I think this is the right strategy. Gotta let this play out a while.
I still have him, Randle and Tavon Austin on my dynasty DTS, last year for all 3 I think though.

 
The tough part about Michael as a flyer is that he's not a flyer that you take, and have a solid answer in a month. He just got to town, no way he sees much action right away.

I know everyone says that now we'll know because he's on Dallas, but it's very possible that some combo of Randle/DMC/Dunbar do just fine behind that line, and Dallas has no reason to put a new guy in a starting role.

Randle could get injured week 11, and Michael could lead someone to fantasy glory.

This is a ticket that could pay off in October, or December. You have to be willing to hold. If he gets no carries for three weeks, would you cut him? Because he can still be relevant later on.
Michael's intrigue is in his potential to win the job outright, not take over due to injury. Their are plenty of huge upside backs (Knile Davis, Hillman, Mathews, etc) that could be league winners with an injury in front of them, so that part isn't really anything new.

 
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc.
He has 1 fumble in 52 carries.
Not reported on statistics? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8469/christine-michael
According to ESPN, one fumble which was recovered by Seattle. Wouldn't call that a fumbling problem.
He fumbled in the preseason, it sounds like it was one of the aggravating factors to the staff. He also went just 17/42 in the first part of the preseason, 32/118/0 overall. He did have a 29 yard run, take that away (yeah I know...) 31/89/0/2.8 on the PS.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
FreeBaGeL said:
massraider said:
The tough part about Michael as a flyer is that he's not a flyer that you take, and have a solid answer in a month. He just got to town, no way he sees much action right away.

I know everyone says that now we'll know because he's on Dallas, but it's very possible that some combo of Randle/DMC/Dunbar do just fine behind that line, and Dallas has no reason to put a new guy in a starting role.

Randle could get injured week 11, and Michael could lead someone to fantasy glory.

This is a ticket that could pay off in October, or December. You have to be willing to hold. If he gets no carries for three weeks, would you cut him? Because he can still be relevant later on.
Michael's intrigue is in his potential to win the job outright, not take over due to injury. Their are plenty of huge upside backs (Knile Davis, Hillman, Mathews, etc) that could be league winners with an injury in front of them, so that part isn't really anything new.
Kind of brings me to my question, picked up Michael off the wire and cut my kicker to do so, need to cut someone in the next few days, it's either Michael back, Knile or Crowell, basically looking for the most upside with bell/forte/gordon/ivory ahead of all of them. No PPR.

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
Yes. Even though Cyrus Gray had a nice college career and has been a backup in the NFL, it was always pretty clear that Michael was the better back. Had it not been for injuries, Gray wouldn't have ever gotten the chance to break out and probably wouldn't have been drafted.

I remember watching him mistakenly steal the ball from Tannehill on what was supposed to be a fake handoff for a play-action pass and take it for like a 32 yard score. That play really epitomizes him as a player. Supremely talented but boneheaded.
Wow. That is a priceless example of Michael's "special traits."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBQnOz6nhxE

I got it wrong. It was a straight up pass play and it was 48 yards. Play starts at 0:09 (second play of the clip). Best angle is at 0:27. Effing hilarious.

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
Yes. Even though Cyrus Gray had a nice college career and has been a backup in the NFL, it was always pretty clear that Michael was the better back. Had it not been for injuries, Gray wouldn't have ever gotten the chance to break out and probably wouldn't have been drafted.

I remember watching him mistakenly steal the ball from Tannehill on what was supposed to be a fake handoff for a play-action pass and take it for like a 32 yard score. That play really epitomizes him as a player. Supremely talented but boneheaded.
Wow. That is a priceless example of Michael's "special traits."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBQnOz6nhxE

I got it wrong. It was a straight up pass play and it was 48 yards. Play starts at 0:09 (second play of the clip). Best angle is at 0:27. Effing hilarious.
That's hysterical - you can practically see the "WTF?" thought bubble over Tannehill's head.

 
According to Wonderlic, Inc. the average test score is about a 20 out of 50. The company also states a score of at least 10 proves a person is literate.

http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2015/02/18/10-players-with-the-worst-wonderlic-scores-in-nfl-combine-history/
4 of the most notable lowest 10 wonderlic scores include:

Jeff George

Frank Gore

Seabass

Vince Young

What I see on that list are all guys that had extra special talent and, at some point in the NFL, ff relevance. Maybe its a thing where when you know you got something that other guys don't, you don't take this thing seriously because you know you're going to be fine on the field (or think you will).

I wonder if FBG could get their hands on this thing and let the members take it. That would be fun.

 
According to Wonderlic, Inc. the average test score is about a 20 out of 50. The company also states a score of at least 10 proves a person is literate.

http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2015/02/18/10-players-with-the-worst-wonderlic-scores-in-nfl-combine-history/
4 of the most notable lowest 10 wonderlic scores include:

Jeff George

Frank Gore

Seabass

Vince Young

What I see on that list are all guys that had extra special talent and, at some point in the NFL, ff relevance. Maybe its a thing where when you know you got something that other guys don't, you don't take this thing seriously because you know you're going to be fine on the field (or think you will).

I wonder if FBG could get their hands on this thing and let the members take it. That would be fun.
It's available online, and it's easy as hell. The guys doing really poorly on it have to be either not paying attention, LD, or just frighteningly dumb.

 
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc.
He has 1 fumble in 52 carries.
Not reported on statistics? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8469/christine-michael
You only have "Lost" on roto, go to another site.
Have to check the most recent posts first my man. 10 minutes late on that nugget.

Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc.
He has 1 fumble in 52 carries.
Not reported on statistics? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8469/christine-michael
According to ESPN, one fumble which was recovered by Seattle. Wouldn't call that a fumbling problem.
 
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc.
He has 1 fumble in 52 carries.
Not reported on statistics? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8469/christine-michael
You only have "Lost" on roto, go to another site.
Have to check the most recent posts first my man. 10 minutes late on that nugget.

Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc.
He has 1 fumble in 52 carries.
Not reported on statistics? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8469/christine-michael
According to ESPN, one fumble which was recovered by Seattle. Wouldn't call that a fumbling problem.
The coaches seem to differ with you.

 
On today's FBG news thread:

DAL - Starting RB for Dallas undecided - Wed Sep 9, 12:38 AM

While Dallas Cowboys RB Joseph Randle is listed as the starter on the depth chart released before the Week 1 game against the New York Giants, head coach Jason Garrett and vice president Stephen Jones admitted Tuesday, Sept. 8, that they have not yet decided on a starter. RB Darren McFadden could be the starter, or RB Christine Michael might be the option.

Footballguys view: Fantasy owners thought they had something with Joseph Randle earlier this year. Then, Randle did next to nothing in camp or the preseason to impress. Now, with the addition of Michael, the team's backfield is completely up in the air. We feel Randle is the guy to start the season, but Michael is arguably the most naturally talented back on the roster. If Michael finally "gets it" he could be very significant for fantasy owners as the starter for the Cowboys.

 
According to Wonderlic, Inc. the average test score is about a 20 out of 50. The company also states a score of at least 10 proves a person is literate.

http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2015/02/18/10-players-with-the-worst-wonderlic-scores-in-nfl-combine-history/
4 of the most notable lowest 10 wonderlic scores include:Jeff George

Frank Gore

Seabass

Vince Young

What I see on that list are all guys that had extra special talent and, at some point in the NFL, ff relevance. Maybe its a thing where when you know you got something that other guys don't, you don't take this thing seriously because you know you're going to be fine on the field (or think you will).

I wonder if FBG could get their hands on this thing and let the members take it. That would be fun.
It's available online, and it's easy as hell. The guys doing really poorly on it have to be either not paying attention, LD, or just frighteningly dumb.
I had to take this test for my pre-employment application.

Got a 37. The questions aren't ridiculous, but some require a bit of thought. Keep in mind the test is timed, most people don't finish, I didn't.

-biz-

 
Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc.
He has 1 fumble in 52 carries.
Not reported on statistics? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8469/christine-michael
You only have "Lost" on roto, go to another site.
Have to check the most recent posts first my man. 10 minutes late on that nugget.

Christine Michael has fumbled 0 times in the NFL and averaged 4.9 ypc.
He has 1 fumble in 52 carries.
Not reported on statistics? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8469/christine-michael
According to ESPN, one fumble which was recovered by Seattle. Wouldn't call that a fumbling problem.
The coaches seem to differ with you.
I haven't heard Cristine Michael's coaches say one word about it. I'm sure they will make up their own minds after a few practices.

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
Yes. Even though Cyrus Gray had a nice college career and has been a backup in the NFL, it was always pretty clear that Michael was the better back. Had it not been for injuries, Gray wouldn't have ever gotten the chance to break out and probably wouldn't have been drafted.

I remember watching him mistakenly steal the ball from Tannehill on what was supposed to be a fake handoff for a play-action pass and take it for like a 32 yard score. That play really epitomizes him as a player. Supremely talented but boneheaded.
Wow. That is a priceless example of Michael's "special traits."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBQnOz6nhxE

I got it wrong. It was a straight up pass play and it was 48 yards. Play starts at 0:09 (second play of the clip). Best angle is at 0:27. Effing hilarious.
That's hysterical - you can practically see the "WTF?" thought bubble over Tannehill's head.
Yeah, that's exactly what I assumed was going through his mind around 0:28. But hard to argue with results. Watching that whole youtube clip made me want to hang onto him (took him as a trade/cut list flyer late in a few leagues, not a dynasty owner).

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
Yes. Even though Cyrus Gray had a nice college career and has been a backup in the NFL, it was always pretty clear that Michael was the better back. Had it not been for injuries, Gray wouldn't have ever gotten the chance to break out and probably wouldn't have been drafted.

I remember watching him mistakenly steal the ball from Tannehill on what was supposed to be a fake handoff for a play-action pass and take it for like a 32 yard score. That play really epitomizes him as a player. Supremely talented but boneheaded.
Wow. That is a priceless example of Michael's "special traits."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBQnOz6nhxE

I got it wrong. It was a straight up pass play and it was 48 yards. Play starts at 0:09 (second play of the clip). Best angle is at 0:27. Effing hilarious.
That's hysterical - you can practically see the "WTF?" thought bubble over Tannehill's head.
Yeah, that's exactly what I assumed was going through his mind around 0:28. But hard to argue with results. Watching that whole youtube clip made me want to hang onto him (took him as a trade/cut list flyer late in a few leagues, not a dynasty owner).
How do the announcers not even comment on that?

 
No doubt he has elite level skills.

It's between the ears that needs to mature. I hope it does. He has such a great open door in front of him, unlike Seattle where Beast Mode ruled and was not going anywhere.

Something did not work out with him and the Seattle staff. We don't know what. But from a physical stand point he can be elite if he "get's it"

And the late round flier cost he has is well worth a wait and see risk/reward for redraft.

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
Yes. Even though Cyrus Gray had a nice college career and has been a backup in the NFL, it was always pretty clear that Michael was the better back. Had it not been for injuries, Gray wouldn't have ever gotten the chance to break out and probably wouldn't have been drafted.

I remember watching him mistakenly steal the ball from Tannehill on what was supposed to be a fake handoff for a play-action pass and take it for like a 32 yard score. That play really epitomizes him as a player. Supremely talented but boneheaded.
Wow. That is a priceless example of Michael's "special traits."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBQnOz6nhxE

I got it wrong. It was a straight up pass play and it was 48 yards. Play starts at 0:09 (second play of the clip). Best angle is at 0:27. Effing hilarious.
That's hysterical - you can practically see the "WTF?" thought bubble over Tannehill's head.
Yeah, that's exactly what I assumed was going through his mind around 0:28. But hard to argue with results. Watching that whole youtube clip made me want to hang onto him (took him as a trade/cut list flyer late in a few leagues, not a dynasty owner).
How do the announcers not even comment on that?
Pretty clear fake from Tanne there. If you replay the "handoff," it's too seamless to not be purposeful. If Tanne wasn't planning to hand it off, there would be a pause when CMike essentially takes the ball from him. But there's not. Tanne seamlessly drops the ball in CMike's pocket and promptly fakes a throwing motion. There's no miscommunication there. Clear pass fake.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
Yes. Even though Cyrus Gray had a nice college career and has been a backup in the NFL, it was always pretty clear that Michael was the better back. Had it not been for injuries, Gray wouldn't have ever gotten the chance to break out and probably wouldn't have been drafted.

I remember watching him mistakenly steal the ball from Tannehill on what was supposed to be a fake handoff for a play-action pass and take it for like a 32 yard score. That play really epitomizes him as a player. Supremely talented but boneheaded.
Wow. That is a priceless example of Michael's "special traits."
What? No, that was absolutely not intentional. And if I recall correctly, they slowed it down and the announcers did eventually catch on to what happened and said something.

 
No doubt he has elite level skills.
Oh there is doubt, lots of it actually.
Have you watched him run? I'd be surprised if you would not think he has elite level running skills after actually watching him. But hey ... we all end up with different viewpoints after watching the same player. Supposedly Breshad Perriman has skills ... I don't see them.
Elite athletic measurables -- yes. Elite running skills -- TBD. 52 career carries is waaaaay to early to slap an elite label on anyone, IMO.

 
No doubt he has elite level skills.
Oh there is doubt, lots of it actually.
Have you watched him run? I'd be surprised if you would not think he has elite level running skills after actually watching him. But hey ... we all end up with different viewpoints after watching the same player. Supposedly Breshad Perriman has skills ... I don't see them.
And yet he's always been behind Robert Turbin on the depth chart.

That's not even CFL elite.

 
Seriously...

Was CMike ever the starter (sans injury) for Texas A&M in his 4 seasons? :confused:
Yes. Even though Cyrus Gray had a nice college career and has been a backup in the NFL, it was always pretty clear that Michael was the better back. Had it not been for injuries, Gray wouldn't have ever gotten the chance to break out and probably wouldn't have been drafted.

I remember watching him mistakenly steal the ball from Tannehill on what was supposed to be a fake handoff for a play-action pass and take it for like a 32 yard score. That play really epitomizes him as a player. Supremely talented but boneheaded.
Wow. That is a priceless example of Michael's "special traits."
:no:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top