Nigel Kennedy has always been at the forefront of bringing rock music to classical music.Baba O'Riley might be top 5 too. This version with Nigel Kennedy on violin just rules https://youtu.be/EJ9LuXXhQ6Q
The rock album was still a brand spanking new art form. The Who progressed from "A Quick One, While He's Away" to "Sell Out" to "Tommy" in just two years. Townshend rapidly ran out of room to expand the format after that but it didn't stop him from trying.They fell prey to the double album thing while at the same time making a couple of pretty good ones.I like a lot of their other stuff but as was the way of the late 60s and 70s, the band got over self- indulgent and could have really used a strong editor.
We will be discussing some of these albums for sure.I just saw that Kansas' tour this summer is billed as: "Point of Know Return Performed In Its Entirety" and thought of this discussion.
Not a classic perhaps, but when I think back to that time in my life, when these records you're discussing came out, this record definitely comes to mind. Schlocky, cliched, and totally awesome AOR rock n roll. Also Journey, Foreigner, Cheap Trick, Styx and REO Speedwagon. I saw all of them at Alpine Valley in Wisconsin in the late 70s/early 80's.
I call dibs on their early singles collection "Meaty, Beaty, Big and Bouncy"Ziggy Stardust and Who's Next are right in my wheelhouse. While not totally true, IMO you could almost keep the rest of The Who's catalog and I'd be more than happy with just Who's Next.
Yeah my dad was a regular at the Grande Ballroom in Detroit which one of the real meccas of 60s rock. He saw everybody come through their but he said The Who were the best live band ever.I agree with those who think Who's Next is one of the best rock albums ever. It is great from start to finish. A 1989 show I saw of theirs is still the best concert I have ever been to.
as openers. I found the whole experience to be kind of a letdown.I saw that tour at Shea Stadium except that before The Clash was Buster Poindexter.I saw The Who on their first farewell tour in 1982. It was a stadium show in Oakland with The Clash and T-Bone Burnettas openers. I found the whole experience to be kind of a letdown.
I'd seen the Clash headline a much smaller venue earlier that summer and they tore it up. The huge ballpark and a crowd who'd come to see the headliners robbed them of much of their power. The Who were surprisingly low energy as well. They were nearing the end of the first leg of their tour and seemed tired. Pete had some wrist or shoulder issues that prevented him from windmilling. I listened to a bootleg of the show and Daltrey's voice sounded pretty good so maybe it's just that I hate Day on the Green shows.
I also have a bone to pick on the whole farewell tour business. I'm sure the band thought it was their last tour at the time but it's crazy to think they're still playing 35 years later. We won't get fooled again indeed.
I saw them on that tour also July 19th at Cleveland Stadium. Fantastic show!I agree with those who think Who's Next is one of the best rock albums ever. It is great from start to finish. A 1989 show I saw of theirs is still the best concert I have ever been to.
I didn't think Johansen did that character until later in the 80sI saw that tour at Shea Stadium except that before The Clash was Buster Poindexter.
Same here. First concert I ever went to.I saw that tour at Shea Stadium except that before The Clash was Buster Poindexter.
Maybe it was Johanson. I didn't see his set, I got to my seat as The Clash started.I didn't think Johansen did that character until later in the 80s
Not as good as burgers but better than sloppy joesForget The Who. What about Meatloaf?
Ma....Maaaaaaa.......... The Meatloaf!Not as good as burgers but better than sloppy joes
They were high energy when I saw them in '89. Pete did his windmills and Roger swung his mic in the air. They were loud pounding rock'n'roll. I saw them again in '97 when they did a Quadrophenia tour, and they were good, but it wasn't the high octane show they did in '89. That could be because in '97 they did an album in its entirety, and it was somewhat theatrical. They closed the show with a mix of hits. The '89 show was a mix of their entire catalog throughout the whole concert.The huge ballpark and a crowd who'd come to see the headliners robbed them of much of their power. The Who were surprisingly low energy as well. They were nearing the end of the first leg of their tour and seemed tired. Pete had some wrist or shoulder issues that prevented him from windmilling. I listened to a bootleg of the show and Daltrey's voice sounded pretty good so maybe it's just that I hate Day on the Green shows.
I saw the same show. I was at Chico St at the time, and saw several DotG shows that were great but this was disappointing. I was biting my tongue trying not to criticize, but had to chime since we were there together. Also, our plan, since it was farewell, was to see the show in the LA Coliseum a few days later. We decided not to. I'm jealous of your earlier show with The Clash.I saw The Who on their first farewell tour in 1982. It was a stadium show in Oakland with The Clash and T-Bone Burnettas openers. I found the whole experience to be kind of a letdown.
I'd seen the Clash headline a much smaller venue earlier that summer and they tore it up. The huge ballpark and a crowd who'd come to see the headliners robbed them of much of their power. The Who were surprisingly low energy as well. They were nearing the end of the first leg of their tour and seemed tired. Pete had some wrist or shoulder issues that prevented him from windmilling. I listened to a bootleg of the show and Daltrey's voice sounded pretty good so maybe it's just that I hate Day on the Green shows.
I also have a bone to pick on the whole farewell tour business. I'm sure the band thought it was their last tour at the time but it's crazy to think they're still playing 35 years later. We won't get fooled again indeed.
I had tickets to the DC show that year. I ended up not going because I thought it was good idea to start the off-site pre-show tailgate 24 hours before with a fun combo of shrooms, moonshine, and white lines. Last thing I truly recall is the sun coming up the morning of the show. My friends who were supposed to go with me said they were banging on my door a few hours before the show that it was time to go and that I told them all to go to hell (I still had an eight-ball with me, so I was SET!!).I saw The Who on their first farewell tour in 1982. It was a stadium show in Oakland with The Clash and T-Bone Burnettas openers. I found the whole experience to be kind of a letdown.
I also have a bone to pick on the whole farewell tour business. I'm sure the band thought it was their last tour at the time but it's crazy to think they're still playing 35 years later. We won't get fooled again indeed.
It does, but it doesn't hold up well to me. There's not a lot of the era's live albums that do. The Allman Brother's Live At Fillmore East is the gold standard. And, of course, Grand Funk's Caught In The Act Live, but that should go without sayingAlso, let's not forget Side 2 of Live at Leeds, consisting of 2 songs, an epic 15 minute My Generation followed by Magic Bus to close the show with Daltry's acid-fueled harmonica solo. Leeds still routinely tops the "best live records of all time" lists.
Yeah, around that time of The Who concert, he was rolling out his Animals medley (which was rather good).I didn't think Johansen did that character until later in the 80s
I have a soft spot for Johansen's 1979 solo album "In Style". It's all over the map stylistically and not all of it works but it's a lot better than most punk guys' attempts to crossover to the mainstream. Mick Ronson produced the record.Yeah, around that time of The Who concert, he was rolling out his Animals medley (which was rather good).
I like that album a lot, particularly Walsh’s “In the City” (which IMO rivals his best work both solo and The James Gang), and “I Can’t Tell You Why” which is one of the best soft pop ballads of the late 70s (and Timothy B Schmidt’s only important contribution to the band that I can see.)It’s not a better album, but I like The Long Run more.
The Donald Trump of rock albums - the occurrence which convinced anyone one who cared that music's only way out was revolution.The Eagles- Hotel California (1976)
Side One
Hotel California
New Kid In Town
Life In the Fast Lane
Wasted Time
Side Two
Wasted Time (reprise)
Victim of Love
Pretty Maids All In a Row
Try and Love Again
The Last Resort
The addition of Joe Walsh transformed the Eagles from a country rock band to a pop band with some hard rock overtones. The title track is arguably in competition with Stairway to Heaven, Bohemian Rhapsody, and Won’t Get Fooled Again as the greatest rock song of the 70s, greatest rock song ever, etc.
The rest of the album is either high quality or excess depending on who you believe. I always liked it, but I have a few old timer punk rock friends who picked on this album (and Life in the Fast Lane especially) as representative of the “corporate, bland rock” they were seeking to escape in bands like the Ramones, Sex Pistols, Clash, etc.
Damn. This sounds like some of my old friends.The Donald Trump of rock albums - the occurrence which convinced anyone one who cared that music's only way out was revolution.
Great album. But i have no problem with the Eagles as the symbols of what went wrong with rock & roll - my favorite personal story is about their spoiled reaction when friends of mine in a local band upstaged them as the opener and the audience walked out on their Peaceful Easy Feelins and the industry stories i've heard about their procurement & use of underage girls would make a mudshark hurl.. Disco (replacing as many music venues as it did) probably caused punk as much as the LAization of music mgmt & record production, but few bands are more deserving of their unfair place in rock history.Damn. This sounds like some of my old friends.
I get the sentiment of wanting a different sound (and we’re all better off that there were bands to offer it) but do The Eagles really deserve such scorn?
Henley bagged the hottest girl in my HS when she was 17. She was really proud of herself.the industry stories i've heard about their procurement & use of underage girls would make a mudshark hurl..
I've heard that one of his associates had a taste for virgins as prodigious as Louis XV (in one of history's great ironies, the King was so paranoid of syphillis that he kept a stable, called Parc aux Cerfs (Deer Park), of young virgins in order to avoid it but caught a mortal dose of smallpox from one of them) and would have batches of them lined up bent over an oak table on his lanai for his attention.Henley bagged the hottest girl in my HS when she was 17. She was really proud of herself.
I like The Long Run, but like HC better. Love the song King of Hollywood off TLR album.It’s not a better album, but I like The Long Run more.
And the storybook comes to a closeI've heard that one of his associates had a taste for virgins as prodigious as Louis XV (in one of history's great ironies, the King was so paranoid of syphillis that he kept a stable, called Parc aux Cerfs (Deer Park), of young virgins in order to avoid it but caught a mortal dose of smallpox from one of them) and would have batches of them lined up bent over an oak table on his lanai for his attention.