If we draft a QB at #4 I am going to be pissed (unless we traded pick #1 for a haul, but even then I would be a little upset if it meant we drafted a QB at 4).Knowing that it'll take any rookie QB significant time to develop, I've begun thinking we should just take the guy who is there at #4. I'm most intrigued by Josh Allen.
This might be a better question for Bracie... If you were to trade 1.1 to BUF, what compensation would you require?If we draft a QB at #4 I am going to be pissed (unless we traded pick #1 for a haul, but even then I would be a little upset if it meant we drafted a QB at 4).
I wouldnt trust a front office that thinks "eh, we will just get whichever if these 2-3 QBs that falls to 4". You take the guy you like the most at #1. Simple as that.
21, 22, 53This might be a better question for Bracie... If you were to trade 1.1 to BUF, what compensation would you require?
What if they consider two or three as equivalent in talent, all worthy of numbers 1, but knowing one will be available at number 4? Why would you use the number 1 on them when you know you'll be happy with what's available with a later pick?If we draft a QB at #4 I am going to be pissed (unless we traded pick #1 for a haul, but even then I would be a little upset if it meant we drafted a QB at 4).
I wouldnt trust a front office that thinks "eh, we will just get whichever if these 2-3 QBs that falls to 4". You take the guy you like the most at #1. Simple as that.
Because it is QB, the most important position of any sport, so get the one you want and not get cute over it.What if they consider two or three as equivalent in talent, all worthy of numbers 1, but knowing one will be available at number 4? Why would you use the number 1 on them when you know you'll be happy with what's available with a later pick?
We have not settled the QB position and WR is far from stable. It is jumping the gun to say we have those pieces in place where we only need the RB to create triplets.To have the chance, the opportunity to define your team, your offense in one draft,
No. 1 - Saquon Barkley, Penn State
Average number of defenders in the box- 6.29
Average number of blockers in the box - 5.78
Before we begin, let’s make one thing abundantly clear: Saquon Barkley is the best running back in the 2018 draft class. He is one of the best overall talents the position has seen in years. However, that does not mean his game is without flaws. Charting his 2017 season showed that there are some reasons to be concerned about him going forward.
Of the five running backs that were charted, Barkley saw the least number of defenders in the box on average. He saw six or fewer defenders in the box on nearly 69 percent of his runs. That’s not something that is likely to translate to the NFL...
...to Barkley’s credit, he dominated teams out of 10 and 11 personnel, averaging an insane 6.2 yards per carry. But when he was asked to run out of any other type of personnel grouping, Barkley's yards per carry dropped all the way down to 3.01 yards per rush.
Due to the amount of time Barkley ran out of 10 and 11 personnel, he rarely faced loaded boxes at the collegiate level. Of his 151 charted runs, Barkley faced eight or more men in the box just six times, averaging two yards per carry. Even against seven-man fronts, Barkley averaged just 4.6 yards per carry on 41 carries,
Still not a fan of going Mayfield. Didn't he do more idiotic things prior to being drafted than Johnny did? Is he all of a sudden going to become MORE responsible once he has millions in the bank?
Yes he is a better football player than Johnny, and all the comparisons to Johnny are not really fair, but the fact remains he was rather immature, and now will be thrown bags of cash. I am very skeptical to say the least.
He also hasn't been paid yet.Biggest difference is
- Johnny was a drunk
- Johnny was celebrity who was more interested in his five minutes than playing NFL QB
- Johnny had serious mental issues with anger control to the point his parents sent him to counselling
Baker has issues but he is a grinder with a photographic memory. He will do the work and he will know the plays. Everyone has questioned him but check out every evaluation. They begin by saying, 'I wasn't expecting to like him so much but he showed improvement.' That is what I will expect out of Baker Mayfield. He'll come in and look shaky at first but he will do the work and he'll learn and show improvement.
- Johnny DIDN'T DO THE WORK he didn't know the plays and winged it because that is what he did in college and it worked there
I have a high floor on him because I know he will do the work and he'll stick around the NFL. I don't know his upside but I am confident of his floor. I think he will turn into a solid starter.
He isn't a celebrity and isn't seeking out the sort of crowd that Johnny did. He isn't sneeking around wearing wigs so he can party in Vegas hours after his first NFL win. He ISN'T Johnny Manziel.
Yeah, that is the answer to the one question each rookie QB will face.He also hasn't been paid yet.
He obviously isn't going to do all the dumb stuff johnny suckball did, but I can easily see him doing a bunch of other less-stupid things that could easily still derail his career.
Cant really call Baker a "drunk" for one time. However, between that rather STUPID AS HELL incident and some of his on field antics, I question his maturity. I think it is a reasonable thing to question based on just those few things.Yes, Johnny was a drunk, but wasn't Mayfield arrested for the same thing? Are we sure about him?
I get ya, but I don't know anyone who ever got drunk "just once".Cant really call Baker a "drunk" for one time. However, between that rather STUPID AS HELL incident and some of his on field antics, I question his maturity. I think it is a reasonable thing to question based on just those few things.
I get ya, but I don;t have any friends and family that are "drunks", and they have all been drunk dozens of times.I get ya, but I don't know anyone who ever got drunk "just once".
Right! That's why I asked if we are sure. I guess we'll find out...I get ya, but I don;t have any friends and family that are "drunks", and they have all been drunk dozens of times.
I also don't know many people in general who have never been drunk. I can only think of one person I have ever met that has never been drunk. Every QB in this draft has been drunk.
Are you sure on Josh Allen? Josh Rosen? Sam Darnold?daveR said:Right! That's why I asked if we are sure. I guess we'll find out...
Josh Allen is Dave R's preferred rookie QB.Allen is not anywhere on my radar. Anywhere in the first round, at all. Or really in any round.
I still wanna pay through the nose for Cousins, trade down, and continue to infuse talent all over the field while having actual decent QB play for once.
Right. I don't have much personal info on anyone, so I have to hope the current group of GMs do better vetting than Farmer,et al.Are you sure on Josh Allen? Josh Rosen? Sam Darnold?
Your proffered QB is Allen. He has prototypical NFL size and arm strength but lacks NFL accuracy and rarely do college QBs improve their accuracy in the NFL. Pittsburgh GM Colbert said he would not touch any college QB who did not complete at least 63% of their throws.
Allen falls far below that threshold.
Allen is seen as the biggest risk of the top college QB prospects because everything is based on him improving his accuracy and that rarely happens in the NFL. That is the answer to the question of the one single reason why he'd fail.
No takers? I thought this would be fun...daveR said:If you could draft any players you wanted, who would top your list?
Tier-1 Must have...
(nobody)
Tier-2 Really want...
Josh Allen, Derwin James, Minkah Fitz, Quenton Nelson, Derrious Guice
Tier-3 Would be happy with...
Barkley, another QB, a top OT, Roquan Smith, Mike Hughes
wait, are you suggesting a sign and trade?Josh Allen is Dave R's preferred rookie QB.
The Jets are sitting on over $73 million on available cap space and can free up over $100 million.
They will structure their contract offer with a front loaded fully guaranteed contract like the one Miami offered Ndamukong Suh for three years instead of the norm of two full years guaranteed so that Elway and Denver can't match it.
They aren't trying to outmaneuver us because we are going to take a rookie with a top-four pick, likely Darnold #1.
We do have over $109 million in available cap space and we could use that to get the #5 pick from Denver if Kirk and Elway play along by blowing out the Jets with more up-front guaranteed money and making a Brock Osweiler deal with Denver where we'd eat $60 million in fully guaranteed money off the top of Kirk's contract and they'd get their QB without destroying their cap or gutting the team.
They know he is a leader, something that Simien and Pax-Lynch are woefully lacking.
They know his floor and ceiling and would get him without any cap concerns, at basically a rookie deal.
They would have to give up the #5 pick but it would be worth it.
We'd still have ~approximately $50 million which would still be near the top of available cap space but would hold a huge power position in the draft if teams came calling to move-up for a QB.
Yeah for the 5th pick in the draft. We did exactly the same thing for the #35 for $16 million.wait, are you suggesting a sign and trade?
Allen took more sacks than average - he had 22 sacks on 292 dropbacks, when the average FBS quarterback would've had only 17 with that many dropbacks. It's possible that he was pressured a lot more than average which led to more throwaways as well as more sacks, but it at least looks like wasn't the sort of QB who reliably threw it away instead of taking the sack.Right. I don't have much personal info on anyone, so I have to hope the current group of GMs do better vetting than Farmer,et al.
Regarding completion percentage, I heard FWIW that Allen did a lot of throwing the ball away to prevent sacks. I can't verify it, though. Still, given that all these guys will require significant work to get to NFL level, I like the value he brings as well as the physical tools.
Bottom line: I'm not a professional GM or guru and my opinion is only valuable to me.
i don’t think so, but they did need to get up to the spending floor.Yeah for the 5th pick in the draft. We did exactly the same thing for the #35 for $16 million.
Was that worth it?
You don't think so? We have $109 million in available cap space. If we didn't make that trade we'd have over $125 million.i don’t think so, but they did need to get up to the spending floor.
you asked if a second round pick was worth 16 million.You don't think so? We have $109 million in available cap space. If we didn't make that trade we'd have over $125 million.
PFT said that we have so much money available that we could sign Drew Brees and still have $60 million availble which would be more than only 4 NFL teams.
The amount of money that we have available is staggering. We can sit around and keep compiling it like you want or we can actually spend some to help the team.
Size, rocket arm, progress during Senior bowl week, frees up pick #1 inasmuch as I think he'll be there at 4 (ie. value). In my amateur opinion, he's as likely as the others to develop.Dave, what is your case FOR Allen? Sorry if I missed it, I just skimmed the last page. I don’t care if you address the potential negative stuff or not (kind of already did anyways with completion percentage). Or if your opinion is based on some scouting reports, could you link them as I’d like to read them.
When his first read is not there and he senses pressure he does a good job keeping the play alive. The problem is he doesn't know when to bail. He keeps going. And going. And going. For as frustrating of a watch as he is this part is very entertaining. But only because he isn't on my team.Allen took more sacks than average - he had 22 sacks on 292 dropbacks, when the average FBS quarterback would've had only 17 with that many dropbacks. It's possible that he was pressured a lot more than average which led to more throwaways as well as more sacks, but it at least looks like wasn't the sort of QB who reliably threw it away instead of taking the sack.
Ironically Wentz who was infamously passed by the Browns was the exception to your 2nd paragraph. He played in a pro style offense at ND State which by all accounts put him well ahead of the curve and clearly offset any quality of competition/speed of the game concerns that his D 1AA to NFL jump might have inspired. He started game 1 of his rookie year despite missing the majority of his first training camp with injurySize, rocket arm, progress during Senior bowl week, frees up pick #1 inasmuch as I think he'll be there at 4 (ie. value). In my amateur opinion, he's as likely as the others to develop.
I get a lot of info from listening to interviews on the radio. One guy who was from within the NFL said (sorry, I don't remember who he was) that there are no QBs who come out of college ready for the NFL anymore. The college system has been dumbed down for them with the object being quick play. He said everyone of them would benefit from sitting out his first professional season. To this I add a personal observation: those who are successful early on seem to have the same attribute -- a clean pocket to throw from.
Correct. He came from a Pro-set, had protypical size/arm strength and could move around in the pocket and scramble but Carson Wentz had solid completion stats in college.He played in a pro style offense at ND State which by all accounts put him well ahead of the curve and clearly offset any quality of competition/speed of the game concerns that his D 1AA to NFL jump might have inspired.
I just don't think Kirk wants to sign with us. If Kirk signs with the Jets we'd have $109 million available cap space.Bracie, are you saying you WANT to sign and trade Cousins for the #5, or that you think Denver might actually do it, or both?
I would be a bit torn on that but would not be upset at all if they did it. I just cant see our new GM who probably wants to start winning right away do something like that. Not sure he would want to take that kind of heat right off the bat with the perception of what that looks like.
Say hypothetically we did that sort of deal, what impact would it have on our cap space in 2019-2020-2021.....
Agreed that nothing, other than the Osweiler deal is anything close to something like this so it would catch fans off guard but it would benefit:The odds of Dorsey and Elway both doing that, IMO, are quite low. Both fanbases would probably riot, even though the move just migt actually be good for both teams.
If we are willing to trade, teams will come calling.i would be on board with the move provided we trade for a few more future picks
Man, I think my list would be almost the exact opposite. I think Allen is the 6th best QB in this class. Obviously assuming just 1 QB would be added, I'll go with the following.daveR said:If you could draft any players you wanted, who would top your list?
Tier-1 Must have...
(nobody)
Tier-2 Really want...
Josh Allen, Derwin James, Minkah Fitz, Quenton Nelson, Derrious Guice
Tier-3 Would be happy with...
Barkley, another QB, a top OT, Roquan Smith, Mike Hughes
Honestly I can’t see the NFL allowing this to happen. It’s not the same as the Browns taking on Osweilers contract for a second. This just seems way too manipulative and a way to work around the salary cap. If the Broncos don’t have room to sign Cousins, then they don’t have room. I’m not sure the NFL wants to keep making precedent for teams to “sell” their salary cap space instead of just using it.Bracie, are you saying you WANT to sign and trade Cousins for the #5, or that you think Denver might actually do it, or both?
I would be a bit torn on that but would not be upset at all if they did it. I just cant see our new GM who probably wants to start winning right away do something like that. Not sure he would want to take that kind of heat right off the bat with the perception of what that looks like.
Say hypothetically we did that sort of deal, what impact would it have on our cap space in 2019-2020-2021.....
Plus Cousins would need to be on board with it as well.The odds of Dorsey and Elway both doing that, IMO, are quite low. Both fanbases would probably riot, even though the move just migt actually be good for both teams.
Is it against the rules right now?Honestly I can’t see the NFL allowing this to happen. It’s not the same as the Browns taking on Osweilers contract for a second. This just seems way too manipulative and a way to work around the salary cap. If the Broncos don’t have room to sign Cousins, then they don’t have room. I’m not sure the NFL wants to keep making precedent for teams to “sell” their salary cap space instead of just using it.
Seems like, if Cousins wants to play in Denver, that he would be the easiest one to get on board considering there is no way they can realistically sign him without dropping key players.Plus Cousins would need to be on board with it as well.
I’m not sure - but it seems to violate the spirit of the rules if not. It’s creative, as was the Brock deal, but I just don’t see how the league would allow “sign and trades” outside of the team who can tag him doing it.Is it against the rules right now?
Serious question, why would the NFL be against this? It would spurn a crap ton of publicity, plus nobody is getting any sort of unfair advantage.I’m not sure - but it seems to violate the spirit of the rules if not. It’s creative, as was the Brock deal, but I just don’t see how the league would allow “sign and trades” outside of the team who can tag him doing it.
willing to admit I may be way off base here.