What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Commish says Big Ben doing "more" than expected (1 Viewer)

Jason Wood

Zoo York
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp...tory?id=5437043

WESTMINSTER, Md. -- NFL commissioner Roger Goodell says Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger is doing more than he was asked to do by the league when given a six-game suspension after being accused of sexual assault.

Goodell says he will meet with Roethlisberger before the regular season starts in September and determine whether to reduce the punishment to four games.

During a visit to the Baltimore Ravens' training camp Wednesday, Goodell said: "He is doing what he's been asked to do -- and frankly more."

Goodell added that Roethlisberger "understands the seriousness of this and the fact he has to change the way he's doing things. I'm encouraged by that."

Goodell is scheduled to visit Steelers camp Thursday and plans to meet with Roethlisberger.
Sounds like the Commish is leaning toward a 4 game suspension based on his positive comments about Ben.
 
It'd be nice if Goodell did like the original Vick suspension and moved a six game suspension down to two. Especially in light of some other incidents (the shooting at Vick's party, Vince Young's brawl in a strip club, Cedric Benson getting charged again with another alcohol related incident) not warranting any suspensions.

 
Big difference for fantasy owners between six and four. We can probably get by without for him four games and if you have a decent backup it won't hurt you too much.

 
The NFL is a joke with its policy.

Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.

Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.

I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"

 
The NFL is a joke with its policy.Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"
4 games would be a lot for someone that was never officially charged with anything. In Baseball that's 40 games, Basketball would be 20...it is a lot of time and cripples the Steelers for the first month of the season, probably ensures they miss the playoffs. The Eli/Big Ben combo is one I like for FF this year.
 
Goodell is just making this up as he goes along, it's a horrible way to conduct business. Between the way he handles his conduct policy, and how he's wanting to move the NFL season to 18 games... he's been an awful commish.

 
The NFL is a joke with its policy.Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"
4 games would be a lot for someone that was never officially charged with anything. In Baseball that's 40 games, Basketball would be 20...it is a lot of time and cripples the Steelers for the first month of the season, probably ensures they miss the playoffs. The Eli/Big Ben combo is one I like for FF this year.
I have to agree. You need to put it in perspective and then consider the fact that he has never been charged with a crime much less convicted.
 
The only way Ben was/is going to do 6 games was if he royally screwed up... again.

Meanwhile Rog keeps holding a suspension over Vick's head.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The NFL is a joke with its policy.Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"
4 games would be a lot for someone that was never officially charged with anything. In Baseball that's 40 games, Basketball would be 20...it is a lot of time and cripples the Steelers for the first month of the season, probably ensures they miss the playoffs. The Eli/Big Ben combo is one I like for FF this year.
The amount of games suspended is irrelevant to me. If you're gonna suspend someone, suspend them. Don't make this adjustable scale with the expectations of conduct that are set so low that it would take Natural Born Killers type rampage to warrant the full suspension. Using your example, it's like a baseball player getting suspended 50 games for using steriods with a possible reduction to 15 games if you don't use steriods in the interim.Big Ben had to go a whole 6 months without trying to rape a young coed. How did he survive?
 
The NFL is a joke with its policy.Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"
4 games would be a lot for someone that was never officially charged with anything. In Baseball that's 40 games, Basketball would be 20...it is a lot of time and cripples the Steelers for the first month of the season, probably ensures they miss the playoffs. The Eli/Big Ben combo is one I like for FF this year.
The amount of games suspended is irrelevant to me. If you're gonna suspend someone, suspend them. Don't make this adjustable scale with the expectations of conduct that are set so low that it would take Natural Born Killers type rampage to warrant the full suspension. Using your example, it's like a baseball player getting suspended 50 games for using steriods with a possible reduction to 15 games if you don't use steriods in the interim.Big Ben had to go a whole 6 months without trying to rape a young coed. How did he survive?
6:4=50:15 :thumbdown: that's something MOP would do in the FFA, be careful there GB. Snots, I'm not condoning what Ben did, quite frankly it was immoral and a poor use of power but the fact is he will be a starting NFL QB and owners are gonna take him at some point so we gotta deal with the here and now. Wishing for him to go away won't cut it.
 
The NFL is a joke with its policy.Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"
4 games would be a lot for someone that was never officially charged with anything. In Baseball that's 40 games, Basketball would be 20...it is a lot of time and cripples the Steelers for the first month of the season, probably ensures they miss the playoffs. The Eli/Big Ben combo is one I like for FF this year.
I have to agree. You need to put it in perspective and then consider the fact that he has never been charged with a crime much less convicted.
:goodposting: Frankly I thought 4 games was rather harsh considering he was never charged with anything. I understand the "behavior unbecoming a player" aspect but 1/4 of the season is coming down hard.That said, it does seem to have had the intended affect, at least in the short-term. Roethlisberger complied with all of the behavior analysis and counseling (might still be doing this, we don't know). He came into camp in the best shape of his career, has been saying all the right things, reportedly making more of an effort with teammates and has been the last one off the field, staying 45 minutes after the afternoon practices to sign autographs and pose for pictures with fans. Perhaps it is all a front just to get in the good graces with the commish & fans or maybe he has genuinely changed. As a Steelers fan I just hope he stays in line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The NFL is a joke with its policy.Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"
hes not raping as much.
 
The NFL is a joke with its policy.

Big Ben is doing more then asked? Could he be more vague. What's he doing, going to 4 AA meetings instead of 2 a week.

Short of Big Ben going on a two week, multi-state, alcohol/sex bender, the chances of him missing any serious time were slim to none.

I have one question for Goodell: "Are you gonna bark all day doggy, or are you gonna bite?"
4 games would be a lot for someone that was never officially charged with anything. In Baseball that's 40 games, Basketball would be 20...it is a lot of time and cripples the Steelers for the first month of the season, probably ensures they miss the playoffs. The Eli/Big Ben combo is one I like for FF this year.
I have to agree. You need to put it in perspective and then consider the fact that he has never been charged with a crime much less convicted.
:shrug: Frankly I thought 4 games was rather harsh considering he was never charged with anything. I understand the "behavior unbecoming a player" aspect but 1/4 of the season is coming down hard.

That said, it does seem to have had the intended affect, at least in the short-term. Roethlisberger complied with all of the behavior analysis and counseling (might still be doing this, we don't know). He came into camp in the best shape of his career, has been saying all the right things, reportedly making more of an effort with teammates and has been the last one off the field, staying 45 minutes after the afternoon practices to sign autographs and pose for pictures with fans.

Perhaps it is all a front just to get in the good graces with the commish & fans or maybe he has genuinely changed. As a Steelers fan I just hope he stays in line.
The NFL isn't a second judicial system. Punishments are based on harming the NFL through obviously poor decision making. Not based on whether they are criminals who deserve punishment from society.

Regardless of being charged or not, it was a major black eye for the NFL. There is still a public perception that one of the NFL's poster boys is a rapist, possibly a repeat rapist, and that he's lucky prosecutors didn't think they had enough physical evidence to prove that in court.

So a big punishment should be expected, regardless of whether he's charged. Being charged or not would only have contributed to the black eye being worse by having it be drawn out even longer. As it was, it was still bad.

:thumbup: about your comments about Ben complying though. Hopefully he uses what happened to seriously examine his life and how he's lived it and make some positive changes. And not necessarily related to the football field.

 
No way that Goodell keeps the suspension at 6 games.

I'm thinking he's reinstated after 2!
The original suspension was 6 games with a possible reduction to 4. I guess Goodell can do whatever he wants but I would be VERY surprised to see him change his stance. Assuming Ben doesn't screw up he is going to sit 4 games.
 
Might help me with my decision of taking Mendenhall at the 1.12 / 2.1 turn.
Bruce Arians isn't going to institute a "Three Yards and a Cloud of Dust" offense but there is no question the Steelers emphasis is going to be on the running game the first 4 games of the season. Mendenhall will be getting a lot of carries this season.
 
Goodell is just making this up as he goes along, it's a horrible way to conduct business.
I've been saying the same thing for a long time. There's no pattern or objective standard to what he does. That being said, if Roethlisberger can stay out of trouble that's good for the Steelers. A 2-game difference can be huge.
 
Might help me with my decision of taking Mendenhall at the 1.12 / 2.1 turn.
Bruce Arians isn't going to institute a "Three Yards and a Cloud of Dust" offense but there is no question the Steelers emphasis is going to be on the running game the first 4 games of the season. Mendenhall will be getting a lot of carries this season.
I just think he is better with Ben in there. Ben will keep the defense respecting the passing game.
 
Might help me with my decision of taking Mendenhall at the 1.12 / 2.1 turn.
Bruce Arians isn't going to institute a "Three Yards and a Cloud of Dust" offense but there is no question the Steelers emphasis is going to be on the running game the first 4 games of the season. Mendenhall will be getting a lot of carries this season.
I just think he is better with Ben in there. Ben will keep the defense respecting the passing game.
Agreed... but getting a lot of carries is good too.
 
:football: to Goodell on his masterful politics in handling this. I never doubted for a second this was anything more than a 4 game pop. But he gives him 6 games to appease the people upset. It's great for PR. But it was all show. He gets 2 extra games worth of impact without ever having to actually do it. Very smart.

J

 
fatness said:
Goodell is just making this up as he goes along, it's a horrible way to conduct business.
I've been saying the same thing for a long time. There's no pattern or objective standard to what he does. That being said, if Roethlisberger can stay out of trouble that's good for the Steelers. A 2-game difference can be huge.
I'd disagree there fatness. I think he planned this exactly this way from the start. PR / Perception / protecting the shield is all about a case by case thing where you're digging into the details. With the number of "constituents" he rules over, he can do this. If he had to make rules for 50,000 people, you have to get into more standardized formats and such. When it's the volume of people he has now, you can be personally involved in each one and weigh out the details in each case. I think he's being masterful in how he's handling all of this. Mainly because of the bottom line - his goal is to defend the reputation of the league or protect the shield as he likes to say. With a group of people where it's pretty challenging to do that, he's done it exceptionally well in my opinion.J
 
fatness said:
Goodell is just making this up as he goes along, it's a horrible way to conduct business.
I've been saying the same thing for a long time. There's no pattern or objective standard to what he does. That being said, if Roethlisberger can stay out of trouble that's good for the Steelers. A 2-game difference can be huge.
I'd disagree there fatness. I think he planned this exactly this way from the start. PR / Perception / protecting the shield is all about a case by case thing where you're digging into the details. With the number of "constituents" he rules over, he can do this. If he had to make rules for 50,000 people, you have to get into more standardized formats and such. When it's the volume of people he has now, you can be personally involved in each one and weigh out the details in each case. I think he's being masterful in how he's handling all of this. Mainly because of the bottom line - his goal is to defend the reputation of the league or protect the shield as he likes to say. With a group of people where it's pretty challenging to do that, he's done it exceptionally well in my opinion.J
I still don't think it's a great idea for one person to be the judge, jury, and executioner, especially when there's no set rules or guidelines in place and it basically comes down to how much Goodell thinks you've "stained the shield" or however you want to put it. Especially in the Roethlisberger case, where he was suspended over very questionable allegations and never saw as much as a pair of handcuffs, let alone a trial of any sort. I think that's setting a terrible precedent for the rest of the league, and frankly I'm surprised the players union has bent over and taken it like they have. My only guess is that the conduct policy is something they're looking to address in the new CBA, at least setting up some sort of committee system or something along those lines, and are not putting up much a fight for their players now hoping to take on that battle for the new contract.
 
I think they need to address the amount of fines the commish can levy at someone in the new CBA without NFLPA interference so that transgressions can be punished financially. It's really unfair that the entire team, franchise, and fan base pay the penalty for Ben's actions here. The AFC is brutal right now.. a 9-7 Steelers team last year missed the playoffs on a tie-break. Had Ben been playing rather than Dennis Dixon, that 23-20 OT loss in Baltimore is probably a win, and the Steelers are probably in the playoffs with a shot at winning it all again. That was 1 game missed. Suspending the starting QB for 4 games is a very tough penalty not just for Ben, but for the team and all its fans.

 
Could Roethlisberger's suspension be fewer than 4 games?

Goodell talks to quarterback, reporters

Thursday, August 05, 2010

By Ray Fittipaldo, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell spoke to reporters this morning at Steelers training camp and appeared to leave the door open that quarterback Ben Roethlisberger's suspension could be fewer than four games.

Roethlisberger had been suspended for a minimum of four games and a maximum of six games by Goodell after he was accused of sexually assaulting a woman in Georgia in the spring.

When asked if there was any chance Roethlisberger's suspension could be fewer than four games, Goodell responded: "I'll make that decision later this month, but that's the way it was designed. We'll evaluate all of that at the end of the month."

When he was asked to clarify whether the suspension could be fewer than four games, Goodell was vague: "We'll make that decision on what the suspension is going to be at the end of the month."

Goodell said Roethlisberger has gone above and beyond what the commissioner asked him to do when he was suspended.

"Ben is doing great," Goodell said. "I had a chance to chat with him briefly and hopefully we'll talk again later today. I've been encouraged by what I have seen. He's understanding the seriousness of the issue. I think that's a very positive development."

More details in tomorrow's Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

Ray Fittipaldo: rfittipaldo@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1230

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10217/10779...m#ixzz0vkIzBo00

 
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has talked briefly to Ben Roethlisberger during a visit to the Pittsburgh Steelers' training camp, but has not yet decided whether the quarterback's suspension for bad behavior will be reduced.

Goodell won't decide whether to trim the suspension from six to four games until the end of the month. For the second day in a row, he praised Roethlisberger's steps to reshape his life, saying he has gone beyond what the NFL asked him to do.

Goodell was vague when asked several times if there was a possibility Roethlisberger's suspension could be reduced below four games. Goodell said the punishment was designed to be a minimum of four games but no final decision will be made until the preseason ends.
 
Goodell was vague when asked several times if there was a possibility Roethlisberger's suspension could be reduced below four games. Goodell said the punishment was designed to be a minimum of four games but no final decision will be made until the preseason ends.
Leaving room for more loosey-goosey haphazard determinations by Goodell.
 
Goodell was vague when asked several times if there was a possibility Roethlisberger's suspension could be reduced below four games. Goodell said the punishment was designed to be a minimum of four games but no final decision will be made until the preseason ends.
Leaving room for more loosey-goosey haphazard determinations by Goodell.
and I am all in favor :lmao: I still think he'll stand by the 4 games though.

 
fatness said:
Goodell is just making this up as he goes along, it's a horrible way to conduct business.
I've been saying the same thing for a long time. There's no pattern or objective standard to what he does. That being said, if Roethlisberger can stay out of trouble that's good for the Steelers. A 2-game difference can be huge.
I'd disagree there fatness. I think he planned this exactly this way from the start. PR / Perception / protecting the shield is all about a case by case thing where you're digging into the details. With the number of "constituents" he rules over, he can do this. If he had to make rules for 50,000 people, you have to get into more standardized formats and such. When it's the volume of people he has now, you can be personally involved in each one and weigh out the details in each case. I think he's being masterful in how he's handling all of this. Mainly because of the bottom line - his goal is to defend the reputation of the league or protect the shield as he likes to say. With a group of people where it's pretty challenging to do that, he's done it exceptionally well in my opinion.J
I still don't think it's a great idea for one person to be the judge, jury, and executioner, especially when there's no set rules or guidelines in place and it basically comes down to how much Goodell thinks you've "stained the shield" or however you want to put it. Especially in the Roethlisberger case, where he was suspended over very questionable allegations and never saw as much as a pair of handcuffs, let alone a trial of any sort. I think that's setting a terrible precedent for the rest of the league, and frankly I'm surprised the players union has bent over and taken it like they have. My only guess is that the conduct policy is something they're looking to address in the new CBA, at least setting up some sort of committee system or something along those lines, and are not putting up much a fight for their players now hoping to take on that battle for the new contract.
I can see that. I just disagree. I love the fact that it's one guy solely tasked with that authority. J
 
I think they need to address the amount of fines the commish can levy at someone in the new CBA without NFLPA interference so that transgressions can be punished financially. It's really unfair that the entire team, franchise, and fan base pay the penalty for Ben's actions here. The AFC is brutal right now.. a 9-7 Steelers team last year missed the playoffs on a tie-break. Had Ben been playing rather than Dennis Dixon, that 23-20 OT loss in Baltimore is probably a win, and the Steelers are probably in the playoffs with a shot at winning it all again. That was 1 game missed. Suspending the starting QB for 4 games is a very tough penalty not just for Ben, but for the team and all its fans.
I realize it sucks to see a key player not there for your team. I'm in a similar boat as a Texans fan having to watch Cushing sit out because he is an idiot.

But I don't think that is a reason to criticize the practice of suspending players. Ben deserves to be suspended. Cushing deserves to be suspended. If either team failed in checking into the character of these players, why should they be sheltered from the consequences?

 
Roger Goodell appears to leave door open for shortened Roethlisberger suspension

Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on August 5, 2010 1:08 PM ET

Let's start out this one by saying we don't know exactly what to make of it.

Speaking to Pittsburgh reporters on Thursday, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell sure made it sound possible that Ben Roethlisberger's suspension could be reduced below the minimum four games originally prescribed. (Roethlisberger's maximum suspension remains six games.)

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette writes that Goodell was asked if the suspension could go below four games. Goodell responded: "I'll make that decision later this month, but that's the way it was designed. We'll evaluate all of that at the end of the month."

The fact the question was asked tells us a reporter caught wind of the possibility. We wouldn't have thought it was even an option based on precedent.

This could just be Goodell using vague language out of habit. Again, we're not sure if something was lost in translation here. But asked to clarify, Goodell essentially chose not to.

"We'll make that decision on what the suspension is going to be at the end of the month."

Goodell said on Wednesday that Roethlisberger has done all he's been asked "and more." (Video below [click on link].) Could "more" lead to a suspension reduction bigger than anyone imagined?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/...ger-suspension/

 
Not so fast...

Per Brian McCarthy, NFL PR:

Roethlisberger is suspended for first 6 games. Goodell to review progress before season & consider whether to reduce it to 4, but not less

 
Not so fast...Per Brian McCarthy, NFL PR:Roethlisberger is suspended for first 6 games. Goodell to review progress before season & consider whether to reduce it to 4, but not less
I suspect that Goodell was just being cryptic. I don't think he has any intention of going less than 4 games.
 
I think they need to address the amount of fines the commish can levy at someone in the new CBA without NFLPA interference so that transgressions can be punished financially. It's really unfair that the entire team, franchise, and fan base pay the penalty for Ben's actions here. The AFC is brutal right now.. a 9-7 Steelers team last year missed the playoffs on a tie-break. Had Ben been playing rather than Dennis Dixon, that 23-20 OT loss in Baltimore is probably a win, and the Steelers are probably in the playoffs with a shot at winning it all again. That was 1 game missed. Suspending the starting QB for 4 games is a very tough penalty not just for Ben, but for the team and all its fans.
I realize it sucks to see a key player not there for your team. I'm in a similar boat as a Texans fan having to watch Cushing sit out because he is an idiot.

But I don't think that is a reason to criticize the practice of suspending players. Ben deserves to be suspended. Cushing deserves to be suspended. If either team failed in checking into the character of these players, why should they be sheltered from the consequences?
What if they did their due diligence and Ben's apparent sense of entitlement vis-a-vis women didn't emerge until after he signed his big contract? There's no way to know what people are going to down their lives are suddenly changed by fame and fortune. Bottom line is that a suspension punsihes the player and everyone else who's involved with/cares about the team. Hell, you might even be putting the coach's job in jeopardy in many cases. A fine punsihes only the person who committed the transgression, that's why I favor monetary penalties.
 
What if they did their due diligence and Ben's apparent sense of entitlement vis-a-vis women didn't emerge until after he signed his big contract? There's no way to know what people are going to down their lives are suddenly changed by fame and fortune. Bottom line is that a suspension punsihes the player and everyone else who's involved with/cares about the team. Hell, you might even be putting the coach's job in jeopardy in many cases. A fine punsihes only the person who committed the transgression, that's why I favor monetary penalties.
Gotta agree with EG on this one. Fine him up the wazoo, require all the counseling you want, but don't suspend him for 6 games especially in a sitiation where a man has not been charged with a crime.I know as a season ticket holder I feel like I am getting ripped off to a certain extent because the NFL is purposely not putting the best product possible out there on the field. You may be punishing the player but you are also punishing the team, the coaching staff and most importantly, your customers and TV networks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still don't think it's a great idea for one person to be the judge, jury, and executioner, especially when there's no set rules or guidelines in place and it basically comes down to how much Goodell thinks you've "stained the shield" or however you want to put it. Especially in the Roethlisberger case, where he was suspended over very questionable allegations and never saw as much as a pair of handcuffs, let alone a trial of any sort. I think that's setting a terrible precedent for the rest of the league, and frankly I'm surprised the players union has bent over and taken it like they have. My only guess is that the conduct policy is something they're looking to address in the new CBA, at least setting up some sort of committee system or something along those lines, and are not putting up much a fight for their players now hoping to take on that battle for the new contract.
Its not so much the off-season / off the field fines and suspensions that get me... the players should have someway to appeal it or atleast defend themselves, but what gets me is the fines that the players receive during the season... sometimes they just come out of no where and amounts are off the top of his head. And I remember last yr there were some heavy fines for legal hits while there was nothing done on some cheaps shots. The NFLPA should of and hopefully will have some ability to fight those after 2011... have your fun now Rog
 
According to league spokesman Brian McCarthy, Goodell will not consider reducing Roethlisberger's suspension below four games. He will consider whether to reduce the six-game suspension to four, which has been the plan all around.

The confusion likely came from Goodell not hearing the questions asked by a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reporter this morning. (Or just the odd nature of the question itself.) The paper says Goodell was asked twice whether it was possible for Roethlisberger's suspension to dip below four games, and both times Goodell gave vague answers.
Link
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top