PAO
Footballguy
Had another request for a few smilies to be added. Sorry, but we can't seem to get them to upload into the board. Dodds says he'll look into it when the season is over. Looking forward to be able to use a :fishingtrip: smilie.![]()

Had another request for a few smilies to be added. Sorry, but we can't seem to get them to upload into the board. Dodds says he'll look into it when the season is over. Looking forward to be able to use a :fishingtrip: smilie.![]()

Should fit in fine here.He's not. He's a friend of mine who...is... certifiable.
Since I figured that "lickmykneecaps" was part of my misunderstood genius. I changed it to something more simple. I could change it again to "upyours," but that would be a little direct wouldn't it? UpInYa, is here to stay.Smoooooth up in Yeeeeeah!Hmm....he also has the same avatar as LickMyKneeCaps, who also has 3 posts. (Although he did register November 14 - impressive alias stashing).He's not. He's a friend of mine who I sent a link to this thread and the Russian Bride thread... certifiable newbie.In fact, let's choose the lurker now, so he can be preparing the selection.How about it UpInYa, are you game?Call me crazy but he cold be an alias...Total Posts: 3( 0.00% of total forum posts ) Posts per day: 3 Joined: Dec 3 2003, 11:00 AM
Not doubting you (or your friend's existence), just making an observation. Carry on.Maybe he likes to change his ID every three posts. Not an alias... ask Shick!, he'll be more than glad to roll over on somebody.Hmm....he also has the same avatar as LickMyKneeCaps, who also has 3 posts. (Although he did register November 14 - impressive alias stashing).He's not. He's a friend of mine who I sent a link to this thread and the Russian Bride thread... certifiable newbie.In fact, let's choose the lurker now, so he can be preparing the selection.How about it UpInYa, are you game?Call me crazy but he cold be an alias...Total Posts: 3( 0.00% of total forum posts ) Posts per day: 3 Joined: Dec 3 2003, 11:00 AM
It strikes me that since we've determined sub-species as the de facto definition of "fully identified," that ANY subsequent drafter could have "defined" the original vague pick of ASIAN ELEPHANT with any appropriate sub-species. Since it was the original drafter himself who was the first subsequent drafter to bother, INDIAN ELEPHANT seems like it's the way to go, for purposes of official roster records. (And so voters know what they're dealing with.)Here's the good part, though:You must identify animal fully, i.e., you cannot draft a "bear", but you may draft a "grizzly bear." If you fail to fully identify your choice, any subsequent drafter may "define" it, such as "Panda" for your "bear."
Had another request for a few smilies to be added. Sorry, but we can't seem to get them to upload into the board. Dodds says he'll look into it when the season is over. Looking forward to be able to use a :fishingtrip: smilie.![]()

I think when the commish closed the whole elephant debacle, he was trying to say no more shenanigans with sub species. I could be wrong....This whole sub species thing can get a little confusing..... :wacko:An additional thought on the elephant issue:
From the Rulebook, page 1...
It strikes me that since we've determined sub-species as the de facto definition of "fully identified," that ANY subsequent drafter could have "defined" the original vague pick of ASIAN ELEPHANT with any appropriate sub-species. Since it was the original drafter himself who was the first subsequent drafter to bother, INDIAN ELEPHANT seems like it's the way to go, for purposes of official roster records. (And so voters know what they're dealing with.)
Here's the good part, though:
Lots of selections so far aren't "fully defined," and the intrepid seeker (I love that phrase) could REALLY screw over some of the selections already made. We could turn this into a full-on screw-your-buddy funfest for the google-savvy.![]()
I DEMAND A FINGERMONKEY SMILIE, SCHICKIE-Shick!!! (I ALSO DEMAND NOT TO HAVE FINGERMONKEY'S ALIAS OUTED)!!!!!Had another request for a few smilies to be added. Sorry, but we can't seem to get them to upload into the board. Dodds says he'll look into it when the season is over. Looking forward to be able to use a :fishingtrip: smilie.![]()
Unfortunately, at this point, there's no way around "shenanigans." The die has been cast, and the full definition been set at sub-species. The issue can't help but continue to come up with each decent animal picked. With a "no shenanigans" ruling, does a pick of "snake" now lock out every other snake? Does a pick of Cobra lock out all other cobras? Does a pick of ANY subspecies, like the Eastern Lowland Gorilla, lock out all other Gorillas?Either a further definition of the rules needs be made, or the rules as established should be followed to maximize hilarity. You can unscrew a lightbulb, but you can't unscrew an animal draft.I think when the commish closed the whole elephant debacle, he was trying to say no more shanangins with sub species. I could be wrong....This whole sub species thing can get a little confusing..... :wacko:
For his team's sake, I really hope you're a miracle worker.Just so you guys know - I've taken Fast Eddie up on his offer for an assistant coach/offensive coordinator.He hasn't gotten back to me on this yet, but I'm ready to go with a couple picks that will salvage his hapless jellyfish/alligator combo and bring that team back into contention!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hey that jellyfish is a solid pick. You just have to convince the elephant to go into the ocean...Just so you guys know - I've taken Fast Eddie up on his offer for an assistant coach/offensive coordinator.He hasn't gotten back to me on this yet, but I'm ready to go with a couple picks that will salvage his hapless jellyfish/alligator combo and bring that team back into contention!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bad-mouthing a potential employer may not be the best way to secure a position... We will see what FE says.Just so you guys know - I've taken Fast Eddie up on his offer for an assistant coach/offensive coordinator.He hasn't gotten back to me on this yet, but I'm ready to go with a couple picks that will salvage his hapless jellyfish/alligator combo and bring that team back into contention!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Without hosiery? Good luck.Hey that jellyfish is a solid pick. You just have to convince the elephant to go into the ocean...Just so you guys know - I've taken Fast Eddie up on his offer for an assistant coach/offensive coordinator.He hasn't gotten back to me on this yet, but I'm ready to go with a couple picks that will salvage his hapless jellyfish/alligator combo and bring that team back into contention!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Gepetto can take care of the hosiery- if the price is right and it will benefit his team.Without hosiery? Good luck.Hey that jellyfish is a solid pick. You just have to convince the elephant to go into the ocean...Just so you guys know - I've taken Fast Eddie up on his offer for an assistant coach/offensive coordinator.He hasn't gotten back to me on this yet, but I'm ready to go with a couple picks that will salvage his hapless jellyfish/alligator combo and bring that team back into contention!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
, if the original drafter were to draft Antarctic Elephant (mythical), but there were two subspecies extant -- the Giant A.E., and the Pygmy A.E. -- any drafter may stick the original owner with the Pygmy, and the Giant would still be available.
I'm a little confused. How can these two statements be reconciled?I'd also shut off all already-made picks at whatever level of classification they were originally made.
Where's my pick...?By "already made," I mean all picks made AS OF whatever time the rule were instituted - say through wherever we are in round 2. That rule would theoretically go into effect for all future selections.I'm a little confused. How can these two statements be reconciled?
...really...good schitt!Much more active than a fat, lazy-acss cow, the Buffalo's meat is leaner. It is also lower in cholesterol than the puCy chicken.
Eat Buffalo.As for how it would fare in said DeathMatch...I will point to the fact that Indians were able to get hundreds of them to run off cliffs...
Of course the all powerful commish would want to retain the ability to close out a species once he feels like it. You wouldn't want each team to have a slightly different version of the same species. That kinda takes the fun out of the upcoming matchups IMHO.If it were me -- and thank God it's not -- I would redefine the drafted animal rule something like...
All animals may be defined up to subspecies level by the original drafter. That's to say: Genus species subspecies. All verifiable subspecies are legal. Should the drafter fail to define his animal to that level, any other drafter may then define the animal up to the subspecies level with any verifiable subspecies. Thus, if the original drafter were to draft Antarctic Elephant (mythical), but there were two subspecies extant -- the Giant A.E., and the Pygmy A.E. -- any drafter may stick the original owner with the Pygmy, and the Giant would still be available.
All elephants, as per stated addendum, would be off limits, of course. I'd also shut off all already-made picks at whatever level of classification they were originally made. But I think for all FUTURE picks, this would end the controversy. Maybe.
Well, sure.This suggestion is just a clearer way of saying what was already said in the rules. The commish's arbitrary rules still prevail, and indeed often rock and cause much hilarity.Of course the all powerful commish would want to retain the ability to close out a species once he feels like it. You wouldn't want each team to have a slightly different version of the same species. That kinda takes the fun out of the upcoming matchups IMHO.If it were me -- and thank God it's not -- I would redefine the drafted animal rule something like...
All animals may be defined up to subspecies level by the original drafter. That's to say: Genus species subspecies. All verifiable subspecies are legal. Should the drafter fail to define his animal to that level, any other drafter may then define the animal up to the subspecies level with any verifiable subspecies. Thus, if the original drafter were to draft Antarctic Elephant (mythical), but there were two subspecies extant -- the Giant A.E., and the Pygmy A.E. -- any drafter may stick the original owner with the Pygmy, and the Giant would still be available.
All elephants, as per stated addendum, would be off limits, of course. I'd also shut off all already-made picks at whatever level of classification they were originally made. But I think for all FUTURE picks, this would end the controversy. Maybe.
I only fear what may come of my lion due to bigjay's lack of promptness.Some scientists believe that every isolated lion population represents a different subspecies.
Other scientist have looked at the genes of the different lion populations that now exist in the wild and have concluded that all the African lions are genetically so similar that they can be considered one subspecies. Those scientists say that there are only two distinct subspecies: the African and Asiatic lions.
Perhaps.... but perhaps not. I have a pick lying around that requires that this not be closed. Commish is already aware of it.I present theAsiatic Lion.
Scientific name: Panthera leo persica
Weight: Male 150-250Kg; Female 120-180Kg
Length (head and body): Male 1.7-2.5m; Female 1.4-1.75m
Length (tail): 70-105cm
Shoulder height: Male 1-1.23m; Female 80-107cm
Typical diet: ***, ***, ***, buffalo
Asiatic Lions are built similar to their African cousins but often look smaller due to their smaller manes. The Asiatic lion has long been celebrated as Lord of Beasts, and it became a symbol for human power and sovereignty.
The Asiatic Lion grows to a height of approximately 90cm, with their length ranging from 200 - 280cm. Their long and hard tails grow to an additional length of 60 - 90cm. Lions can weigh in at between 200 - 275kgs.
The prey is mostly killed by a quick, powerful bite to the spine or with the help of a classic choke grip, with the strong jaws of the lion cutting off air supply to the lungs.
Asiatic lions are genetically distinct from the lions of Sub-Saharan Africa, although the difference is not large, being smaller than the genetic distance between human racial groups. With the African lion going at 1.11, the Asiatic lion is a steal here.
I humbly suggest that the lion (Panthera Leo) species now close. African and Asiatic are the only two widely accepted subspecies.
I only fear what may come of my lion due to bigjay's lack of promptness.Some scientists believe that every isolated lion population represents a different subspecies.
Other scientist have looked at the genes of the different lion populations that now exist in the wild and have concluded that all the African lions are genetically so similar that they can be considered one subspecies. Those scientists say that there are only two distinct subspecies: the African and Asiatic lions.
Nice job, Stu. In fact, probably more than he deserves, but since he really did not commit a major violation, I am only subjecting him to a mild earache.I present theAsiatic Lion.
Scientific name: Panthera leo persica
Weight: Male 150-250Kg; Female 120-180Kg
Length (head and body): Male 1.7-2.5m; Female 1.4-1.75m
Length (tail): 70-105cm
Shoulder height: Male 1-1.23m; Female 80-107cm
Typical diet: ***, ***, ***, buffalo
Asiatic Lions are built similar to their African cousins but often look smaller due to their smaller manes. The Asiatic lion has long been celebrated as Lord of Beasts, and it became a symbol for human power and sovereignty.
The Asiatic Lion grows to a height of approximately 90cm, with their length ranging from 200 - 280cm. Their long and hard tails grow to an additional length of 60 - 90cm. Lions can weigh in at between 200 - 275kgs.
The prey is mostly killed by a quick, powerful bite to the spine or with the help of a classic choke grip, with the strong jaws of the lion cutting off air supply to the lungs.
Asiatic lions are genetically distinct from the lions of Sub-Saharan Africa, although the difference is not large, being smaller than the genetic distance between human racial groups. With the African lion going at 1.11, the Asiatic lion is a steal here.
I humbly suggest that the lion (Panthera Leo) species now close. African and Asiatic are the only two widely accepted subspecies.
I only fear what may come of my lion due to bigjay's lack of promptness.Some scientists believe that every isolated lion population represents a different subspecies.
Other scientist have looked at the genes of the different lion populations that now exist in the wild and have concluded that all the African lions are genetically so similar that they can be considered one subspecies. Those scientists say that there are only two distinct subspecies: the African and Asiatic lions.
I will be drafting the dande-lion next.Asia Lion, african lion, siberian lion------heck why doesn't someone just get it over and draft the Detroit Lions. They MIGHT be able to beat the FingerMonkey...
Ditto...That was a slick pick...Mako's rock...nice pick by poolshark.![]()
Excellent pick. Once again a pick that the JAA/Kovax team had its eyes own.With the seventh selection of the third round, PoolShark, by holy-divined proxy, selects:Shortfin Mako Shark Isurus oxyrinchusEasily the #2 shark on my board, taken as the 4th. Great value pick here IMO, and not likely to slide another round. The Shortfin Mako reaches 12 1/2 feet and up to 1500 lbs. They are far and away the fastest and most agile of the shark family, and possibly the fastest fish period. They are also phenominal jumpers, reaching heights of up to 20 feet above the water. Far greater than Marlin, for example. And then there's their attitude..."It's the oceans version of the grizzly bear. Only this bear, has a wolverines disposition.""The mako has an attitude. It owns the ocean, and you are trespassing in its territory. Chopping tails off other sharks, swordfish , tuna, marlin,-and attacking boats when hooked- gets the message across. According to the IGFA, the short fin mako is the undisputed leader in attacks on boats.""Makos are bullies.""No marlin, or trained dolphin at Seaworld can reach the height an airborne mako can achieve. Makos can clear 20 feet."To sum it up..."Nothing in the Ocean is in a class with the Mako."
You can't really argue with a large angry shark in the third round.nice pick by poolshark.![]()
(Edited to remove rogue apostrophe.
)Does that one have 3 legs?With the eighth selection of the third round, NCCommish, by holy-divined proxy, selects:I want to go with the Spotted Hyena Crocuta crocuta, the second-biggest and most formidable African carnivore, capable of running down and killing unaided a bull wildebeest 3 times its own weight.Spotted HyenaRegardless of the outcome of the death matches, I am guaranteed the last laugh with this pick.
