What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Denarius Moore - CIncinnatti Bengals (1 Viewer)

What a bunch of know-it-all douchebags — Moore was worth taking a flier on. I don't recall anyone declaring him an every-week starter, but I'm not going to read through 19 pages to check....Clearly, it was a risk to think the Raiders passing game might take off with these young receivers. I'm pretty sure you don't hit it big without going out on a limb now and then.

That said, Ford is worth owning for me as a bye-week fill in because he got me 20 points in my PPR-return yardage league so it was worth owning Moore to see if the two of them could produce. Campbell may not be a worthy fantasy starter but he is managing a very good offense with an elite running back and is in position to help the Raiders contend for a division title. And any dumb### knows that a rookie like Moore is going to be inconsistent.
then go back and read - some posters had him as the second coming . . .please read before you comment . . .
I'd read most of this thread. Let me apologize for not memorizing every single thing that I've read in the past weeks...what I recall is people being excited about his big game against Buffalo. Some maybe overly excited. Anyone with any sense knows not to read too much into one game. Anyone starting him blindly after 1 big game must have been desperate for a WR. Reading too much into his failures the past two games could be a mistake too.
So is attaching some sort of Revis like status to Joseph in attempting to explain Moore's performance yesterday. I'm a Moore owner, but I'm just a bit more realistic than some.
 
What a bunch of know-it-all douchebags — Moore was worth taking a flier on. I don't recall anyone declaring him an every-week starter, but I'm not going to read through 19 pages to check....Clearly, it was a risk to think the Raiders passing game might take off with these young receivers. I'm pretty sure you don't hit it big without going out on a limb now and then.

That said, Ford is worth owning for me as a bye-week fill in because he got me 20 points in my PPR-return yardage league so it was worth owning Moore to see if the two of them could produce. Campbell may not be a worthy fantasy starter but he is managing a very good offense with an elite running back and is in position to help the Raiders contend for a division title. And any dumb### knows that a rookie like Moore is going to be inconsistent.
then go back and read - some posters had him as the second coming . . .please read before you comment . . .
I'd read most of this thread. Let me apologize for not memorizing every single thing that I've read in the past weeks...what I recall is people being excited about his big game against Buffalo. Some maybe overly excited. Anyone with any sense knows not to read too much into one game. Anyone starting him blindly after 1 big game must have been desperate for a WR. Reading too much into his failures the past two games could be a mistake too.
So is attaching some sort of Revis like status to Joseph in attempting to explain Moore's performance yesterday. I'm a Moore owner, but I'm just a bit more realistic than some.
two weeks ago it was because Bill (allegedly) rolled coverage his way . . . can't wait to see next week's reasoning . . .

 
What a bunch of know-it-all douchebags — Moore was worth taking a flier on. I don't recall anyone declaring him an every-week starter, but I'm not going to read through 19 pages to check....Clearly, it was a risk to think the Raiders passing game might take off with these young receivers. I'm pretty sure you don't hit it big without going out on a limb now and then.

That said, Ford is worth owning for me as a bye-week fill in because he got me 20 points in my PPR-return yardage league so it was worth owning Moore to see if the two of them could produce. Campbell may not be a worthy fantasy starter but he is managing a very good offense with an elite running back and is in position to help the Raiders contend for a division title. And any dumb### knows that a rookie like Moore is going to be inconsistent.
then go back and read - some posters had him as the second coming . . .please read before you comment . . .
I'd read most of this thread. Let me apologize for not memorizing every single thing that I've read in the past weeks...what I recall is people being excited about his big game against Buffalo. Some maybe overly excited. Anyone with any sense knows not to read too much into one game. Anyone starting him blindly after 1 big game must have been desperate for a WR. Reading too much into his failures the past two games could be a mistake too.
So is attaching some sort of Revis like status to Joseph in attempting to explain Moore's performance yesterday. I'm a Moore owner, but I'm just a bit more realistic than some.
two weeks ago it was because Bill (allegedly) rolled coverage his way . . . can't wait to see next week's reasoning . . .
Umm..it's not illogical to suggest that Bill — as you refer to your pal? — who's the best coach in the NFL, made it a point to slow down a rookie wide receiver in a game in which New England was coming off a loss. The Pats have seemed to cure some defensive problems the past couple weeks. As Peter King said about them after 3 games:

“It’s only been three games, so there’s plenty of time to come out of this,” King said. “There’s no reason for people to be jumping off buildings. Because Belichick’s the smartest guy in the league when it comes to fixing what is wrong during the season. We’ll just see if there’s enough talent there to fix it.”

Do I think Moore caught Bill's attention? In his words before the matchup: "Obviously you look at the draft, you see a lot of players that have those kind of capabilities, that kind of potential. Which guys hit it, which guys don't, which of those later rounds picks end up with that kind of production and which ones don't - that's hard. He's done a great job for them. Down the field with the ball in his hands, he's made some really big plays. It's really been impressive - I mean their whole receiver corps is impressive. Moore has been outstanding. That catch he had against Buffalo was you know, [he] just went up and took the ball away from two guys there. Reverses, he's made a lot of plays for them. They have a good group of receivers though, very good."

 
only problem is that those people were speculating in an attempt to rationalize Moore's bad FF day - more than one NE poster watched the whole game and they didnt see that AT ALL . . . that's my point . . .

 
only problem is that those people were speculating in an attempt to rationalize Moore's bad FF day - more than one NE poster watched the whole game and they didnt see that AT ALL . . . that's my point . . .
All of your posts have come after week 4, all but 1 came after this most recent game. If you want to take an "I told you so" angle, you need to first tell them in the first place. Otherwise, you are just coming into the thread and taking a dump. But this is all premature. I'm sure should Moore play well in the following weeks, you'll go away (hopefully forever).
 
only problem is that those people were speculating in an attempt to rationalize Moore's bad FF day - more than one NE poster watched the whole game and they didnt see that AT ALL . . . that's my point . . .
All of your posts have come after week 4, all but 1 came after this most recent game. If you want to take an "I told you so" angle, you need to first tell them in the first place. Otherwise, you are just coming into the thread and taking a dump. But this is all premature. I'm sure should Moore play well in the following weeks, you'll go away (hopefully forever).
your post had ZERO to do with what I said . . .
 
only problem is that those people were speculating in an attempt to rationalize Moore's bad FF day - more than one NE poster watched the whole game and they didnt see that AT ALL . . . that's my point . . .
All of your posts have come after week 4, all but 1 came after this most recent game. If you want to take an "I told you so" angle, you need to first tell them in the first place. Otherwise, you are just coming into the thread and taking a dump. But this is all premature. I'm sure should Moore play well in the following weeks, you'll go away (hopefully forever).
when he plays well again, I will give him his props . . .until then, he's just another overhyped rookie . . .
 
only problem is that those people were speculating in an attempt to rationalize Moore's bad FF day - more than one NE poster watched the whole game and they didnt see that AT ALL . . . that's my point . . .
All of your posts have come after week 4, all but 1 came after this most recent game. If you want to take an "I told you so" angle, you need to first tell them in the first place. Otherwise, you are just coming into the thread and taking a dump. But this is all premature. I'm sure should Moore play well in the following weeks, you'll go away (hopefully forever).
when he plays well again, I will give him his props . . .until then, he's just another overhyped rookie . . .
Dont give props, just go away. Thanks!
 
He is a matchup play. When they play a bad pass D team, start him. Otherwise sit him. I dont think he is startable till week 9. If you are smart, he can win championships!!

 
What's with the revisionist history all the sudden?

Those of us on the D-Moore train from BEFORE the season didn't think he was the second coming of Rice.

I posted back a few troll-ridden pages the pros and cons.

A guy who had a phenomenal preseason, then had a couple great plays in a game that SHOWS his talent and knack for the ball, should be considered a potential breakout. Maybe not for you hobby team this week, but evaluating talent and finding it now can pay off later in the season, or in dynasty, a few years down the road.

I have picked up Roddy White and Finley off waivers when people dropped them after lack of production. Talent should be held if possible.

 
What's with the revisionist history all the sudden?

Those of us on the D-Moore train from BEFORE the season didn't think he was the second coming of Rice.

I posted back a few troll-ridden pages the pros and cons.

A guy who had a phenomenal preseason, then had a couple great plays in a game that SHOWS his talent and knack for the ball, should be considered a potential breakout. Maybe not for you hobby team this week, but evaluating talent and finding it now can pay off later in the season, or in dynasty, a few years down the road.

I have picked up Roddy White and Finley off waivers when people dropped them after lack of production. Talent should be held if possible.
good points, but guys in this thread either started him or at least talked like they would, and Moore did little (the past three weeks) . . .

 
What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?

Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.

No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's with the revisionist history all the sudden?

Those of us on the D-Moore train from BEFORE the season didn't think he was the second coming of Rice.

I posted back a few troll-ridden pages the pros and cons.

A guy who had a phenomenal preseason, then had a couple great plays in a game that SHOWS his talent and knack for the ball, should be considered a potential breakout. Maybe not for you hobby team this week, but evaluating talent and finding it now can pay off later in the season, or in dynasty, a few years down the road.

I have picked up Roddy White and Finley off waivers when people dropped them after lack of production. Talent should be held if possible.
good points, but guys in this thread either started him or at least talked like they would, and Moore did little (the past three weeks) . . .
It's nice that you are concerned about who the posters in this thread are starting in their lineups. You are well on your way to earning some new BFFs. :goodposting: @ Mr Roboto. I agree with your synopsis. Makes sense to hold talented players like D Moore if you can. He has potential and over performed for a couple weeks. He should get better as the season progresses.

 
What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.
It's hard for a 5th round rookie WR to earn a roster spot, let alone starting role in his first season anywhere. Moore has quickly turned heads and earned the right to garner some playing time which is impressive. It appears to be just a matter of time before he becomes a consistent producer.
 
If you toss out game 1, when I am not sure how much he played, he has 12 catches for 199 yards, plus 2 TDs (with a 3rd on the ground)

Calvin Johnson's first 4 games as a rookie: 11-192-2; for the season 48-756-4

Not saying Moore is Johnson at all, just pointing out how difficult it is for any rookie WR to have an impact. Moore looks to have good talent and opportunity. There will be games like Buffalo, and games like Houston for the rest of the year. I see him as a high up-side, low floor kind of guy, who will not be consistent week-to-week.

If you need 7 points from your WR to win, he may not be the right guy for your line-up. But, if you have to find a WR who can get you 15 points in a week, he is a decent gamble in any given week.

Dynasty - definite hold

 
He's just playing possum, lulling everybody into a false sense of security.

Next week, he's going to POUNCE, like a possum.

You heard it here first, folks!

 
'RavenLunatic said:
What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.
well he played the most snaps of any wr, 51 to dhb's 48, so its not like he was relegated. the problem is that hes either not getting open or campbell is not inclined to find him. the injured players coming back did not cut into his playing time at all, and its actually increased.
 
'RavenLunatic said:
What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.
well he played the most snaps of any wr, 51 to dhb's 48, so its not like he was relegated. the problem is that hes either not getting open or campbell is not inclined to find him. the injured players coming back did not cut into his playing time at all, and its actually increased.
I think what it is, is that opposing defenses are so scared of Moore's big play ability, that coverage is always rolled to him. This leaves things open for McFadden, DHB, Shillens, Murphy, Ford, Boss, Hagan. Jackson likes having him on the field, even just as a decoy.
 
he's looking like a classic boom/bust receiver - I'm encouraged that Campbell looked his way as many times as he did last week; unfortunately the accuracy wasn't perfect in getting him the ball. I'm holding and he'll be in the mix as bye week filler / flex; I just hope he's in my lineup when he has one of the 2-3 big days he'll have this year.

 
im starting to think hes more of a decoy until big play redzone time. which is fine but doesnt guarantee any productivity if hes in such a limited role.

 
Raiders' last posession of the game; lead by 5; Texans had just taken their last time out:

2-9-OAK21

(2:52) J.Campbell pass incomplete deep right to D.Moore

It was a 35 yard pass down the right sideline. That's not decoy usage - particularly in light of the game situation. There's no way this was the play called by the sideline, but Campbell saw Moore with a step and took a shot.

 
It is tough to believe but DHB is the #1 WR in Oakland. DHB should have lost his job with his poor play before this season but Davis plays his guys. Now, DHB is playing well.

Moore more lose playing time and targets as the other WRs get healthy. Moore is a rookie and may eventually lose playing time to more polished WRs on the team such as Schillens, Ford, and Murphy.

 
Raiders' last posession of the game; lead by 5; Texans had just taken their last time out:2-9-OAK21(2:52) J.Campbell pass incomplete deep right to D.MooreIt was a 35 yard pass down the right sideline. That's not decoy usage - particularly in light of the game situation. There's no way this was the play called by the sideline, but Campbell saw Moore with a step and took a shot.
If I remember that play, Jonathan Joseph got away with trapping Moore's left (I think) arm just as the ball was coming to him as well. Ref was on their backside so he didn't see it. I believe without that contact Moore would have had it. Just my two cents.
 
Raiders' last posession of the game; lead by 5; Texans had just taken their last time out:2-9-OAK21(2:52) J.Campbell pass incomplete deep right to D.MooreIt was a 35 yard pass down the right sideline. That's not decoy usage - particularly in light of the game situation. There's no way this was the play called by the sideline, but Campbell saw Moore with a step and took a shot.
that play was pretty close to connecting and this thread would be a lot different if it did. at this point, it just doesnt look like he is reliable enough to be in starting lineups.
 
It is tough to believe but DHB is the #1 WR in Oakland. DHB should have lost his job with his poor play before this season but Davis plays his guys. Now, DHB is playing well.

Moore more lose playing time and targets as the other WRs get healthy. Moore is a rookie and may eventually lose playing time to more polished WRs on the team such as Schillens, Ford, and Murphy.
The data doesn't support what you're saying. DHB has been the top target in the offense, and he's produced for a couple of weeks in a row. However, Moore has had 1, 8, 6, 5, 6 ( with weeks 2-4 over 60% catch rate ). Since week 1, he's been the 2nd or 3rd most targeted receiver, and currently is 2nd in total targets through week 5, 3 behind DHB. Since week 1, his role has been pretty consistent, even if his numbers haven't. I don't buy the rolling coverage, he hasn't earned that type of attention to take Moore out of the game. I didn't see that as an issue in the NE game, fwiw. I didn't see the HOU game, so I can't comment there. I was surprised to see 6 targets this past game ( with 0 rec ). Can anyone comment on the quality of the looks? I know the late bomb was not accurate/catchable, but what about the other 5?

Moore's snap count is still high, he's the 2nd or 3rd option in the passing game, and he's shown some ball skills. I'll hold and see if he develops later in the year. He could be a nice bye week fill-in ( or not, as this week showed ) and I'd suggest he has as much upside as any WW receiver out there. Whats not to like at the end of your bench?

 
1 he should have had; couldn't see the ball looking backwards over his shoulder and it glanced off his hands. 1 was batted at the line. 1 was a throwaway in his direction. The rest were inaccurate throws by Campbell.

 
Raiders' last posession of the game; lead by 5; Texans had just taken their last time out:2-9-OAK21(2:52) J.Campbell pass incomplete deep right to D.MooreIt was a 35 yard pass down the right sideline. That's not decoy usage - particularly in light of the game situation. There's no way this was the play called by the sideline, but Campbell saw Moore with a step and took a shot.
that play was pretty close to connecting and this thread would be a lot different if it did. at this point, it just doesnt look like he is reliable enough to be in starting lineups.
FWIW, Campbell is the No. 12 QB in my league.
 
1 he should have had; couldn't see the ball looking backwards over his shoulder and it glanced off his hands. 1 was batted at the line. 1 was a throwaway in his direction. The rest were inaccurate throws by Campbell.
Thanks!
Moore almost reeled in a two point conversion in traffic that was thrown high.It appears this attempt wasn't included in Moore's total of six targets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
only problem is that those people were speculating in an attempt to rationalize Moore's bad FF day - more than one NE poster watched the whole game and they didnt see that AT ALL . . . that's my point . . .
All of your posts have come after week 4, all but 1 came after this most recent game. If you want to take an "I told you so" angle, you need to first tell them in the first place. Otherwise, you are just coming into the thread and taking a dump. But this is all premature. I'm sure should Moore play well in the following weeks, you'll go away (hopefully forever).
Yeah, well, I was hoping that I was wrong. Seems his "floor" is 0. That was always my concern. DM's talent was not questioned but the team's focus on gettin HIM the ball was.
 
What WR tier are we putting him in now realistically? Above the likes of Harvin and Crabtree (two other under-performing guys)?
I would think he is right there realistically. Percy has a greater history of production, but on a bad passing offense. Crabtree has more natural ability than Moore maybe, but can't put it together and is often hurt.I would think Moore is somewhere, in dynasty, a WR 3/4 prospect in a 12 team league. I see his upside now around Maclin honestly, with the potential in a couple years to be a viable low-end #1. But he doesn't have the QB or the organization around him like Maclin in Philly. So he would need to have Campbell progress a bit, and the offense throw more often to get in the top 10.
 
'Sergeant Spelt said:
'McBokonon said:
'Sarnoff said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden has a knee injury and is questionable at best this week.
The way Campbell threw the ball Moore's way it won't matter.2pt conv. incomplete. no one's catching that ball.2nd. Q. 1st & 10 15 sec left in half.incomplete - deep right - uncatchable, out of bounds.3rd Q. 3rd & 4incomplete - deep left - no idea what kind of pass that was. Would have been a miraculous catch.3rd Q. 2nd & 7incomplete - deep right - Moore caught the horrible pass out of bounds.3rd Q. 3rd & 7incomplete - short left - open, totally uncatchable pass low to the ground.4th Q. 1st & 10incomplete - short right - uncatchable, running out of room, he threw it away near the sidelines, Moore closest WR.4th Q. 2nd & 9incomplete - deep right - Closest catchable pass is slightly overthrown.Bottom line Larry Fitz would have been blanked with those 6 passes thrown his way.
 
'Sergeant Spelt said:
'McBokonon said:
'Sarnoff said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden has a knee injury and is questionable at best this week.
The way Campbell threw the ball Moore's way it won't matter.2pt conv. incomplete. no one's catching that ball.2nd. Q. 1st & 10 15 sec left in half.incomplete - deep right - uncatchable, out of bounds.3rd Q. 3rd & 4incomplete - deep left - no idea what kind of pass that was. Would have been a miraculous catch.3rd Q. 2nd & 7incomplete - deep right - Moore caught the horrible pass out of bounds.3rd Q. 3rd & 7incomplete - short left - open, totally uncatchable pass low to the ground.4th Q. 1st & 10incomplete - short right - uncatchable, running out of room, he threw it away near the sidelines, Moore closest WR.4th Q. 2nd & 9incomplete - deep right - Closest catchable pass is slightly overthrown.Bottom line Larry Fitz would have been blanked with those 6 passes thrown his way.
Thanks for the synopsis. As a deadskins "homer," I've never thought much of Campbell's ball skills. Was my primary concern about spending excessively on Moore... which I made the mistake of doing.Dude definitely has talent, but the QB and the run-heavy offense will pretty much destroy his value.He's the last dude on my bench... I keep only because, having watched his highlights, he is immensely talented... and I am hoping something changes...
 
Raiders will get a better QB next year, I'm sure we aren't the only ones that realize Campbell can't throw a deep accurate ball to save his life.

 
D Moore is the most schemed against player by NFL defenses. Thats the only reason he isn't performing. Otherwise, he'd be 140/2 every week.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top