lombardi
Footballguy
Sorry about that, I should not have assumed.Please don't put me in the anti gun crowd.Actually I think for many people there aren't a lot of factors. Someone comes into your house with a gun. Someone tries to rob you with a gun. For women especially, some doesn't understand that no means no. These are pretty clear cut circumstances and they all happen to people every single day.Seems to me a lot of highly unlikely factors have to come together just right before a gun makes any sense at all, and only one thing has to go wrong for it to be the worst decision you ever made.I think it depends on the situation. Don't know the facts.You would have had to have fought him like a real man?Every day. I carry a Glock 22. It takes some getting used to, but I am very comfortable with it now. I do alot of long distance driving and it gives me peace of mind. I have only had to pull it once. I was at a hand carwash and was approached by a man who was aggressive and would not stop despite my verbal order to do so. Once I drew my weapon, he stopped. I don't want to think about what would have happened had I not been carrying. He obviously had mistaken me for somebody else.![]()
This is the crap that seems cowardly to me.. you need a gun so you don't have to handle yourself like a normal person? What were you gonna do.. shoot him?
You're life being in danger is different than my life being in danger.
What if you can't fight or you're weaker or a woman and some absolute beast starts coming at you in a rage. Or someone with some obvious martial arts training and skill that can really, truly deal you some serious damage.
What if your kids are with you and you know if this lunatic knocks you out they're defenseless? Every situation is different.
"being a man" or being "tough" doesn't mean jack to me. I'm over 40, I stopped caring about what people think a long time ago. I would do everything I possibly could not to shoot someone. But if I felt my family was in any kind of serious peril, i would shoot without blinking an eye. A guy doesn't have to be armed to be mortally dangerous. Depends on the situation.![]()
I think where you grow up and what you've experienced in your life shape what you think about guns. I'll bet more than half of anti-gun people would start shooting the next day after a serious, close to mortal encounter with someone breaking into their home or trying to rape their daughter or something along those lines. If you've never had need it's probably hard to understand why you would want to walk around with a gun.
If you're someone who has needed to or wished you had one it's probably a no brainer. These are not rare circumstances. They may be rare in my life or in your life, depending on your race, sex, and socio-economic class. But to many people and especially in many places, these things happen every day.
I grew up in a house with several guns, dad in law enforcement, I own 3. The home invasion scenario would be irrelevant in a debate on concealed carry.. unless you sleep with it in your underwear?
As I stated above, I don't argue for a second your right to carry. I have just never heard anyone explain to me a scenario for concealment where it was more likely to turn out right versus wrong. When I think about the topic, it seems obvious that it is more likely for a gun you are carrying to result in poor decision making and or poor results than the other way around.
I think there are tons of stories that prove the opposite. I'm sure I, or someone else, could do a post full of links to news stories of intruders, rapists, and muggers being shot and someone saving their own life. I would be willing to bet there are a lot more of them than stories about people's guns being wrestled away and them being shot.