Yes it was. If he is a bottom 3 team why in the world would he want to do that trade? ASJ is a solid player but why would he give up a top 15 draft pick for a guy who makes no difference on his team.What are we thinking for ASJ? I offered a bottom 3 team, full ppr who needs help at TE, ASJ for his 2018 2nd.He lol'd me out of the building. Was it that bad of an offer?
If ASJ remains at his current place on the totem pole next season, he's worth that pick if the team needs a TE IMO.Yes it was. If he is a bottom 3 team why in the world would he want to do that trade? ASJ is a solid player but why would he give up a top 15 draft pick for a guy who makes no difference on his team.
That's a major problem with trade offers. Only looking at trade value in a vacuum and not considering overall team goals.
Ok, so like a mid to late 2nd to a TE needy team would be more reasonable in your opinion?Yes it was. If he is a bottom 3 team why in the world would he want to do that trade? ASJ is a solid player but why would he give up a top 15 draft pick for a guy who makes no difference on his team.
That's a major problem with trade offers. Only looking at trade value in a vacuum and not considering overall team goals.
I got an offer of ASJ for OJ Howard, I just "lol'd" him and didn't say anything else. All my leagues are 2TE though so slightly more valuable, I'd pay a mid-early 2nd in a heartbeat.What are we thinking for ASJ? I offered a bottom 3 team, full ppr who needs help at TE, ASJ for his 2018 2nd.He lol'd me out of the building. Was it that bad of an offer?
Yes. A TE needy playoff team would probably pay that.Ok, so like a mid to late 2nd to a TE needy team would be more reasonable in your opinion?
He's not an easy asset to move right now. We're not seeing the garbage time production, and that's keeping him from doing much above baseline.Any other people holding Drew Brees and out of playoff picture??
What are you doing with him....holding for next year or trying to trade him and get something of value??
I am out of it and looking to deal him for younger qb and/or wr .. only problem is teams that would take him I could only get Goff or Trubisky for him.
It's an above average offer, based on what I get. He was a top 15 prospect in his own class and just turned 25 last month. I personally think ASJ has a higher upside than O.J. Howard. That said, he's got a lot of baggage and might be on his last mulligan. Mid-to-late 2nd sounds about right to me.What are we thinking for ASJ? I offered a bottom 3 team, full ppr who needs help at TE, ASJ for his 2018 2nd.He lol'd me out of the building. Was it that bad of an offer?
I am out of the playoff picture and just moved him straight up for Thielen.Any other people holding Drew Brees and out of playoff picture??
What are you doing with him....holding for next year or trying to trade him and get something of value??
I am out of it and looking to deal him for younger qb and/or wr .. only problem is teams that would take him I could only get Goff or Trubisky for him.
He's the perfect type of player to trade to a team making a playoff run...if he were still putting up passing stats like years past.Any other people holding Drew Brees and out of playoff picture??
What are you doing with him....holding for next year or trying to trade him and get something of value??
I am out of it and looking to deal him for younger qb and/or wr .. only problem is teams that would take him I could only get Goff or Trubisky for him.
Only playoff team that needs a qb is the team that lost Rodgers and he has Goff and McCown. I need a QB as I traded Tyrod in a deal to get Freeman ... anyone with Goff from the rest of these that you would deal Brees for:He's the perfect type of player to trade to a team making a playoff run...if he were still putting up passing stats like years past.
In my leagues, he's QB11, which won't put any current playoff contender over the top unless their QB situation is horrible.
I do love the old-guy-for-future-prospect kind of trades when I'm fading mid season. That's what makes dynasty sooo much fun. Even a bad season is a good season when you're looking and planning for next year.
Did you make a deal? I own Rodgers & can't seem to trade him.Only playoff team that needs a qb is the team that lost Rodgers and he has Goff and McCown. I need a QB as I traded Tyrod in a deal to get Freeman ... anyone with Goff from the rest of these that you would deal Brees for:
DParker/Smallwood/Foreman/Conner/DedeWestbrook
Another thought I had was dealing Brees and Kelce for Rodgers (doubt he does it as a Packers fan-but its a thought) .. I also have EEngram
No I did not. He did not want to move RodgersDid you make a deal? I own Rodgers & can't seem to trade him.
What are you asking for him?Did you make a deal? I own Rodgers & can't seem to trade him.
But a lot of people are still overlooking that because of his name. The reality is that Brees hasn't really been a fantasy difference maker since the middle of last season, but because of his name people still give value for him pretty much equal to what it was when he was ACTUALLY producing.He's the perfect type of player to trade to a team making a playoff run...if he were still putting up passing stats like years past.
In my leagues, he's QB11, which won't put any current playoff contender over the top unless their QB situation is horrible.
I do love the old-guy-for-future-prospect kind of trades when I'm fading mid season. That's what makes dynasty sooo much fun. Even a bad season is a good season when you're looking and planning for next year.
Gurley for me. Younger with no character concerns and Rams look good going forward with Goff.non-ppr. Bell or Gurley?
Bell longer record of studly stats but off the field question marks. And does offense start decline with Big Ben retirement pending?
Gurley 2 studly years, 1 dudly. 2 years younger. Up and coming offense (do I dare to call them that?)
thoughts?
I tried some package deals & nothing stuck. Now I'm thinking just try to pair him with Richardson or D. Murray to get a good QB I can start now & keep for the future OR trade him straight up for a RB or WR, but I'm unsure what WRs & RBs I should try to target as equal value. Would be offering Rodgers straight up for someone like Gurley be a pipe dream? Also thinking offer him straight up for Kelce then move Kelce or Gronk for another QB.What are you asking for him?
I play in a league with heavy performance based defensive scoring. I gave up a 4th for Jacksonville in the pre-season as a Seattle owner, and just traded Seattle away for a 2nd. I buy Jacksonville as a special defense long term. I don't know that I see the Broncos dropping off significantly, but if you can target Jacksonville I would.I figure this thread is as good as any for this topic. It concerns team DEF. my league hogs Ds for some reason, so streaming is difficult. I’ve had the Broncos D for years and it’s been good. But I am wondering if this year may be the end of the run for them. They’ve been a mid to low end DEF1 this year. Is it time to trade them? What DEF to target? I’ve been thinking JAX.
Yes. Gurley was a mid-2nd or so startup value before this year, with Rodgers just a bit behind that. But now with the changes in LA taking hold and Rodgers being worth 0 points this season you probably get laughed out of the room.I tried some package deals & nothing stuck. Now I'm thinking just try to pair him with Richardson or D. Murray to get a good QB I can start now & keep for the future OR trade him straight up for a RB or WR, but I'm unsure what WRs & RBs I should try to target as equal value. Would be offering Rodgers straight up for someone like Gurley be a pipe dream? Also thinking offer him straight up for Kelce then move Kelce or Gronk for another QB.
I tried to get Carr for him a week ago & was denied.Yes. Gurley was a mid-2nd or so startup value before this year, with Rodgers just a bit behind that. But now with the changes in LA taking hold and Rodgers being worth 0 points this season you probably get laughed out of the room.
If you're trading Rodgers straight up for QB I think you look in the Mariotta or Carr range - someone in that 2nd tier that is much younger and could progress into elite longer term but that's going to give you solid return this year in mid-QB1 range. As far as RB's go, you might get a McCoy or Freeman if that owner is panicking. Can't imagine you get Kelce. Think late 3rd round value or so in a startup IMO.
I saw Coleman+2nd for DT recently. I tried to move DT for Coleman straight up (DT was WR5 for me) and the offer was rejected. I'm guessing late 1st or an older, but producing WR.Anybody got an idea of what Corey Coleman is worth right now? Considering acquiring, but don't want to overpay.
DEN has a good playoff schedule, from what I recall. But I traded a 3rd for Jax and don't regret it. They're giving me 7 PPG over baseline. They're a pretty young as well.I figure this thread is as good as any for this topic. It concerns team DEF. my league hogs Ds for some reason, so streaming is difficult. I’ve had the Broncos D for years and it’s been good. But I am wondering if this year may be the end of the run for them. They’ve been a mid to low end DEF1 this year. Is it time to trade them? What DEF to target? I’ve been thinking JAX.
I like Gurley more right now. 2 years is a sizable gap for RBs.non-ppr. Bell or Gurley?
Bell longer record of studly stats but off the field question marks. And does offense start decline with Big Ben retirement pending?
Gurley 2 studly years, 1 dudly. 2 years younger. Up and coming offense (do I dare to call them that?)
thoughts?
I reallly liked him in college, but would not pay a 1st for him. I'm not sold on him as a longterm starter. That said, I haven't watched a bunch of him this year.What I wanna know is where people are on Alex Collins. Is he going to cost more than a 2nd?
In what scoring system has Denver been a low Def1? They are the #20 defense in my league that has pretty standard defense scoring.I play in a league with heavy performance based defensive scoring. I gave up a 4th for Jacksonville in the pre-season as a Seattle owner, and just traded Seattle away for a 2nd. I buy Jacksonville as a special defense long term. I don't know that I see the Broncos dropping off significantly, but if you can target Jacksonville I would.
Thanks for the feedback. That DT owner fleeced the Coleman owner, IMO. The Coleman teams are unfortunately out of contention so they are not interested in older WRs. I may have to wait until after the NFL draft, when rookie fever is strong, to successfully trade a late 1st for him.I've saw Coleman+2nd for DT recently. I tried to move DT for Coleman straight up (DT was WR5 for me) and the offer was rejected. I'm guessing late 1st or an older, but producing WR.
Hmm, I wonder if I could steal Coleman by offering Kelvin benajamin or Richardson for him thenThanks for the feedback. That DT owner fleeced the Coleman owner, IMO. The Coleman teams are unfortunately out of contention so they are not interested in older WRs. I may have to wait until after the NFL draft, when rookie fever is strong, to successfully trade a late 1st for him.
He's not better than Diggs. Even if they were equally talented, Thielen is 3.5 years older.Awesome to see Thielen creeping up FBG's dynasty rankings. Wood has him ranked higher than Diggs and stated he thinks Thielen is better than Diggs. I agree. He's on pace for a decent 96-1250-2 season with Case Keenum throwing to him. He's 4th in the league in targets, averaging 9.4 targets a game. That's 3.9 more targets a game than last year. Moving him to the slot this year was huge for his usage. TD's are a funny thing and he's been missed wide open a couple times for TD's. So if he gets hot and catches a few more TD's he could end up a top 10 WR. Volume is there........
Diggs/Thielen Targets first 5 gamesI like Thielen and think he's underrated, but valuing him over Diggs is a bit much. His targets shot up when Diggs went down, and are due for a dip. I think we're seeing his ceiling and doubt that it's sustainable. He's a sneaky buy for guys like DT or Tate; not Diggs.
And Diggs has "never" played a full season........I think you guys are missing a little bit of value here with Thielen but I do understand it's close so not terrible to think Diggs is more valuable.He's not better than Diggs. Even if they were equally talented, Thielen is 3.5 years older.
Yeah, I'd be hesitant to acquire either one. Thielen seems like a sell high (he's probably never going to be on a 150 target pace again) while Diggs just can't seem to stay healthy.And Diggs has "never" played a full season........I think you guys are missing a little bit of value here with Thielen but I do understand it's close so not terrible to think Diggs is more valuable.
Thielen looks like one of the best WR in the league to me. He has a great combo of routes/hands/toughness and he can win anywhere on the field. I'd buy him everywhere. His game isn't about being more athletic either. He will age well and I could see him being a top 20 WR for the next 5-6 years. If he ever gets a good QB he could be a FF star. Hell he could sneak into the top 12 WR this year with a garbage QB. I would sell Diggs right now if I could get WR1 return or even WR2 return maybe and it's not really that I think Diggs is bad. He's very good in his own right but he's never healthy all year and now he has a WR on the team that might be better than he is. Not a good combo.Yeah, I'd be hesitant to acquire either one. Thielen seems like a sell high (he's probably never going to be on a 150 target pace again) while Diggs just can't seem to stay healthy.
We're talking about a really small sample size, from a dynasty perspective. Thielen has never been the #1. (Rudolph led the team in overall targets last year; how quickly things can change.) Thielen getting a few more targets, with less attention, playing out of the slot, does not change that. Adjust the TD rate and do what you need to do to get the below numbers in the same ballpark. You're still taking the 27 YO who came out of nowhere over the 23YO who produced from day 1.Diggs/Thielen Targets first 5 games
Diggs 8-6-11-7-4 36 total targets
Thielen 10-6-8-8-8 40 total targets
Thielen was quietly Minny's #1 when Diggs was there it's just Diggs was scoring TD's at a lot higher rate than his career average and that was hiding it but predicting TD's is next to impossible. Give me that yummy usage over Diggs hot scoring streak any day. They should both be on this team for the next couple years so it should be interesting to see who outscores who over that period. Thielen basically scored the same amount of points as Diggs with 20 less targets last year.
2016 stats
Thielen 69-967-5 on 92 targets 195.20 points
Diggs 84-903-3 on 112 targets 193.30 points
Thielen is on pace for 150 targets this year if you want him to have that usage cut because of Diggs getting healthy that's understandable. With Diggs playing his targets per game put him on pace for 128 targets and Diggs is on pace for 112. If Diggs regresses a little on the TD rate which isn't out of the question Thielen should outscore him on a per game basis as well as total points this year. Right now Diggs is averaging 15.48 points a games this year and Thielen is averaging 14.23 and thats with Diggs scoring 4 TD's in the first 5 games or .80 TDs/gm when his career TD's per game average over the 26 games prior is .27 TD's/gm. It's reasonable to think he will regress a little in that department. Maybe closer to .50 TD's/gm. Another reasonable assumption is Thielen will score more than 1 TD in the second half of the season.
Guys on my roster sometimes look better than they actually are to me, tooThielen looks like one of the best WR in the league to me. He has a great combo of routes/hands/toughness and he can win anywhere on the field. I'd buy him everywhere. His game isn't about being more athletic either. He will age well and I could see him being a top 20 WR for the next 5-6 years. If he ever gets a good QB he could be a FF star. Hell he could sneak into the top 12 WR this year with a garbage QB. I would sell Diggs right now if I could get WR1 return or even WR2 return maybe and it's not really that I think Diggs is bad. He's very good in his own right but he's never healthy all year and now he has a WR on the team that might be better than he is. Not a good combo.
Bolded I disagree with. Moving to the slot has been huge for Thielen. 2 points more a game huge and that's with him running bad scoring TD's. He is tied for the team lead in red zone targets with Rudolph. Diggs was targeted more in the red zone when he was healthy though 5-4 through 5 games. Small sample and very close so I don't think it tells us a lot really. The big outliers is Diggs/Thielen's TD rate's. Which should over time converge unless you think Diggs is a special red zone threat that is just emerging. I don't but can't really hate someone for thinking that. He is good.We're talking about a really small sample size, from a dynasty perspective. Thielen has never been the #1. (Rudolph led the team in overall targets last year; how quickly things can change.) Thielen getting a few more targets, with less attention, playing out of the slot, does not change that. Adjust the TD rate and do what you need to do to get the below numbers in the same ballpark. You're still taking the 27 YO who came out of nowhere over the 23YO who produced from day 1.
2016 PPG/2017 PPG
Thielen: 12.23 / 14.22
Diggs: 14.87 / 15.48