barackdhouse
Footballguy
Outlier. And interesting. Interesting trades get posted too.lmao - I just posted a Tyler Huntley for Marcus Mariota deal.
Outlier. And interesting. Interesting trades get posted too.lmao - I just posted a Tyler Huntley for Marcus Mariota deal.
I would prefer Watson especially now that no criminal charges are happening. I think Lance is really raw and will not be very consistent. I am assuming you are talking about a 1QB league because that does change things a bit. I value Lance a lot more in a 2QB/SF because of the upside but in a 1 QB the risk is too great to be reliant on him alone.Who has more value - Deshaun Watson or Trey Lance?
What would it take to get either of these guys? Top __ RB? Top __ WR?
Say you are owning both these guys, who do you value more? You need to improve at RB badly and your WR could use some depth. What would it take?
Praying hard for a MM to the Colts scenario.Outlier. And interesting. Interesting trades get posted too.
Who has more value - Deshaun Watson or Trey Lance?
I do own them both on the same team and I have considered this same question. I like both of them so much I basically bought them both for a late and early second last year in separate deals in a one QB league I already have Kyler.Say you are owning both these guys, who do you value more?
Do you have another QB you're comfortable starting for the 6-12 games that Watson gets suspended?Who has more value - Deshaun Watson or Trey Lance?
What would it take to get either of these guys? Top __ RB? Top __ WR?
Say you are owning both these guys, who do you value more? You need to improve at RB badly and your WR could use some depth. What would it take?
I don't think either direction is crazy but I'd hold.I might have the opportunity to pick up a 6th 1st round pick in 2023, something in the 8-12 range, in trade for Carter.
I don't think either direction is crazy but I'd hold.
Laken Tomlinson is a nice addition and in general the entire OL could take another step up could be a really big strength and he'll catch his share of passes. He's someone whose value I project to rise, obvious risk being them adding a signfiicant RB but hard to see Carter not having his role.
Also in-season you will usually run into a situation were a contending team in the mix of the chase has a good young player go out for all or most of the season. Now this might present itself as a buying opportunity for you to use Carter to buy a proven young player instead of a projected later first.
I think it would be an option to consider exploring. Depending on how much the other manager wants Carter, it would not be out of the realm of possibility that you could get more than the late first, seeing as how Carter will be improving the other team and potentially making the pick later.Advice needed:
I’m rebuilding for 2023 with a decent corps of receivers but very little at RB.
I have 5x 1sts in 2023, including likely picks 1, 2 and ether 3 or 4. Plus 2 in the 9-12 range, and 2.01, and 2.03 or 2.04
My one viable RB is Michael Carter (just acquired for 1.08 & Daniel Jones) who I see as a decent but unspectacular RB2 (around RB23-25) with some upside, and also some risk.
I might have the opportunity to pick up a 6th 1st round pick in 2023, something in the 8-12 range, in trade for Carter.
Should I hold, or should I continue to invest in the 2023 draft?
It should be noted that I intend to lose as many games as possible in 2022, so having Carter could hurt more than help.
TIA for any advice here.
What's the league size and other starting requirements? The larger the league, the more likely I would be to keep the QBs. Even Brady if you're planning on contending. Otherwise, Brady and Trubisky are who I would be looking to trade because of longevity concerns but there is no reason to force a below market trade as you have the assets that others want. There is no replacement level production at QB as opposed to other positions (meaning you can't play a backup QB and get 50% of the points). Let it be known that you are open to discussing moving a QB without getting one back but only if it makes sense for your team. You'll still get lots of junk offers but the closer to the season we get, the desperation will increase.Not a bad problem to have but I’d like some words of wisdom in super flex. I went from having weak QBs to a decent situation I think.
any idea on the values of Tom Brady, Deshaun Watson, Ryan tannehill, Trey Lance, Mitchell Trubisky, and Davis Mills? I’m almost definitely keeping Tannehill and Lance, the others could be expendable. Or would you just keep the group? Considering mills and Lance aren’t proven, I have no idea what Trubisky does although I do like the situation for him, Watson will probably miss time this year and Brady probably retires in 23.
Thanks. I appreciate the suggestion.I think it would be an option to consider exploring. Depending on how much the other manager wants Carter, it would not be out of the realm of possibility that you could get more than the late first, seeing as how Carter will be improving the other team and potentially making the pick later.
Unless it's a return that you have to take at this time, I agree with the others that Carter's value is likely to rise as we get closer to the season. You are taking on the risk with holding him (injury) but even if he does get injured, that helps in your desired goal for 2022. Trading him just before the season starts would accomplish both of your goals of losing in 2022 and investing in 2023. Best of luck to you in finding a good deal.
Definitely a good issue to have. I would be moving Brady (how many years left, realistically?!), Trubisky (before he struggles in PIT) and Mills asap.Not a bad problem to have but I’d like some words of wisdom in super flex. I went from having weak QBs to a decent situation I think.
any idea on the values of Tom Brady, Deshaun Watson, Ryan tannehill, Trey Lance, Mitchell Trubisky, and Davis Mills? I’m almost definitely keeping Tannehill and Lance, the others could be expendable. Or would you just keep the group? Considering mills and Lance aren’t proven, I have no idea what Trubisky does although I do like the situation for him, Watson will probably miss time this year and Brady probably retires in 23.
12 teams, QRRWWWTFFSK, 7 IDPWhat's the league size and other starting requirements? The larger the league, the more likely I would be to keep the QBs. Even Brady if you're planning on contending. Otherwise, Brady and Trubisky are who I would be looking to trade because of longevity concerns but there is no reason to force a below market trade as you have the assets that others want. There is no replacement level production at QB as opposed to other positions (meaning you can't play a backup QB and get 50% of the points). Let it be known that you are open to discussing moving a QB without getting one back but only if it makes sense for your team. You'll still get lots of junk offers but the closer to the season we get, the desperation will increase.
Cheers. With these requirements and your inclination to contending, I would keep Brady and look to trade Trubisky for a roster player that upgrades a starting lineup spot over who you already have. Most likely that you'll get offers of WR and/or IDP. If you need depth, you could consider taking multiple pieces to accomplish that goal.12 teams, QRRWWWTFFSK, 7 IDP
I’m planning to contend after a down year last year (Henry and Watson out hurt).
thanks![]()
I have him worth about 2x firsts. 2022 & 2023?Value check on Dak in superflex? I'd love to sell now, but not getting much interest from buyers.
I think the top tier QBs in SF are almost unobtainable. Last offseason I paid Antonio Gibson and a 1st for Russell Wilson. It would take a lot of cheddar for me to get off of a top QB in this format. I later moved that Wilson share and Juju (and Higbee IIRC) for Waller and another 1st. TE premium and I know none of those players are named Dak, but best as I can do for a (possibly) reasonable estimate.Value check on Dak in superflex? I'd love to sell now, but not getting much interest from buyers.
Nobody wants to buy high. That's why I say players like him are hard to get. Not because the price is wrong, but because it is hard for anyone to stomach putting that many assets into an offer.Value check on Dak in superflex? I'd love to sell now, but not getting much interest from buyers.
Value check on Dak in superflex? I'd love to sell now, but not getting much interest from buyers.
I have him worth about 2x firsts. 2022 & 2023?
something like that.
Agreed. Two mid-high firsts probably gets it done but I’d rather have Dak. frankly I wouldn’t want either of those picks this year unless you’re loaded at QB.I think the top tier QBs in SF are almost unobtainable. Last offseason I paid Antonio Gibson and a 1st for Russell Wilson. It would take a lot of cheddar to get off of a top QB in this format. I later moved that Wilson share and Juju (and Higbee IIRC) for Waller and another 1st. TE premium and I know none of those players are named Dak, but best as I can do for a (possibly) reasonable estimate.
I don't think two 1sts is enough as mentioned above, unless they are absolutely premium. And even then the deal probably doesn't happen unless there is a premium vet player involved.
Have been dancing around basically a Dak for Pitts trade in a SF 2pt TE premium league but we both are hesitant to pull the trigger. I really like Pitts but hate to give up a QB in a trade without getting one back in SF. Dak was my first rounder (1.11) in the startup last year and Pitts was his 2nd rounder (2.03), it was the pick after my 2nd round pick of Justin Herbert. (He took Jonathan Taylor in the 1st)Value check on Dak in superflex? I'd love to sell now, but not getting much interest from buyers.
Yeah, I think Dak is *worth* 2x 1stsNobody wants to buy high. That's why I say players like him are hard to get. Not because the price is wrong, but because it is hard for anyone to stomach putting that many assets into an offer.
Yeah, fair.Yeah, I think Dak is *worth* 2x 1sts
that doesn’t mean the owner will accept that, or that a buyer will be willing to pay that.
Selling high was 2 days ago dude. Not likely anyone is paying what they would have pre Dolphins trade now.Is it time to sell high?
Agreed. If you can get Top 12 WR value for him with all the question marks around him, you’d be lucky. He is an absolute HOLD right now imo.Wigglytuff's Gruff said:Selling high was 2 days ago dude. Not likely anyone is paying what they would have pre Dolphins trade now.
exactly.Wigglytuff's Gruff said:Selling high was 2 days ago dude. Not likely anyone is paying what they would have pre Dolphins trade now.
It's a tough question. Dude is a beast, and did not appear to be falling off at all last year.Price check on aisle 3. What’s Davonte Adams worth now? I have Him and trying to rebuild but now he’s being treated like a WR2. One team made a fair offer I think, two firsts but in 23 and 24 and probably late. In a league where WR are king.
What's a fair price at this point?IF I didn’t already have him, I would be out shopping for Ronald Jones ASAP.
IMO chances are very good he signs with the Kansas City Chiefs. And as we’ve seen in the recent past, CEH is not a feature back, because Andy Reid does not want to use him that way.
Ronald Jones is arguably better in short yardage, and also more powerful between the tackles.
There’s a very realistic chance that Ronald Jones could end up being the better/more valuable Kansas City running back if he signs there.
Chances are he could still be had on the cheap. He’s still only 24.
Just throwing that out there.
That's a hard question. I would think a 2023 late 2nd or early 3rd would still get it done?What's a fair price at this point?
I would possibly trade a 4th for him now, maybe a 5th. Now, if he actually ends up in KC then I could see the 2nd/3rd that Hot Sauce Guy states. Just my 2 cents.What's a fair price at this point?
Anyone reporting he's brought in for a backup role is not really reporting but making up an opinion to go along with actual report they brought him in. I would venture to guess the team is not relaying any message to media that he's just brought in to be a backup.The reporting so far is "brought him in, would be for a backup role"
As an owner, I’m not moving him for a 3rd or later. He’s still only 24 and there are still a few opportunities out there where he could fall into a decent role. I’d rather crash and burn with him then sell him for a crapshoot pick in the 3rd or 4th round.I would possibly trade a 4th for him now, maybe a 5th. Now, if he actually ends up in KC then I could see the 2nd/3rd that Hot Sauce Guy states. Just my 2 cents.
Yep - pretty much what I said. The reporting seems disconnected from what I believe the Chiefs what bring him in to do.Anyone reporting he's brought in for a backup role is not really reporting but making up an opinion to go along with actual report they brought him in. I would venture to guess the team is not relaying any message to media that he's just brought in to be a backup.
But I've heard no updates and would guess he left town without a deal.
As to his value it's hard as heck to say right now. I mean I'm just hoping he signs in next week because I have to do cut downs in a league and depending were he signs I range from cutting/giving up for peanuts or valuing over a solid second.
So right now, if you want to buy him, I'd maybe try a third and worst case he's a 24 year old high end backup maybe someplace like Chargers/Cardinals/Broncos, best case he's in KC competing for a job.
The problem is, owners have seen the news. No Ronald Jones owner is going to part with him for a fourth or fifth right now. We have held for this long waiting for just such an opportunity to come up.I would possibly trade a 4th for him now, maybe a 5th. Now, if he actually ends up in KC then I could see the 2nd/3rd that Hot Sauce Guy states. Just my 2 cents.
Yup. This is exactly what I was talking about in my last postAs an owner, I’m not moving him for a 3rd or later. He’s still only 24 and there are still a few opportunities out there where he could fall into a decent role. I’d rather crash and burn with him then sell him for a crapshoot pick in the 3rd or 4th round.
That's when you want them. 23 will be stacked.two firsts but in 23 and 24
Monty is a UFA in 2023. Better OL, hopefully better QB play, and a more run focused offense. In my books, he is a hold as a low end RB1/high end RB2 for 2022. I'm not sure the Bears will keep him into 2023 unless he absolutely lights it up this year. To answer your question, I'd value him somewhere in the 2022 low first rounder range. Take this all with a grain of salt from an admitted homer.David Montgomery price check?
I'm torn on what to do with him. He had 20 carries in each of his last 3 games. I think they'll run the ball a lot. I also don't envision the Bears offense being anything special. Another sub 4.0 ypc season last year.
If he has another holhum season, does he wind up with a lesser role elsewhere?
I'm tempted to move him. But don't feel like people are super interested at this point, either.
Okay........just asking for comparison sake then:The problem is, owners have seen the news. No Ronald Jones owner is going to part with him for a fourth or fifth right now. We have held for this long waiting for just such an opportunity to come up.
so while I agree with you that it is probably his value, it’s unrealistic to try to obtain him for that.
basically, to get him now, you need to pay as if he already signed with KC
And after he signs, I could see him going for a late second.
Oof. Probably equal to Mattison, better than Mostert (old) and behind Chase Edmonds.Okay........just asking for comparison sake then:
Would RoJo be a better keeper than, say, Mattison-Minn or either of the 2 new Miami RBs in Edmonds or Mosteret??