What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty Value Discussion Thread (7 Viewers)

How do we feel about Goff's future beyond '23?

I'm in a 12 tm, start 2 QB, 2 TE league, and am struggling at QB. I have a contending team outside of QB (Russ, Mac Jones). I have an offer of my '24 1st/3rd for Goff and want to pull the trigger. I hate trading away my future insurance should I run into injuries, but I like Goff and veteran QB's in this format. Any opinions are appreciated!

If you’re a legit contender then yeah I pull the trigger on that. I don’t think Hooker is real competition and they’re going to be a playoff team so not like they have ammo to make a big move to replace Goff. He seems locked in for at least this season and next unless he falls totally on his face.
 
How do we feel about Goff's future beyond '23?

I'm in a 12 tm, start 2 QB, 2 TE league, and am struggling at QB. I have a contending team outside of QB (Russ, Mac Jones). I have an offer of my '24 1st/3rd for Goff and want to pull the trigger. I hate trading away my future insurance should I run into injuries, but I like Goff and veteran QB's in this format. Any opinions are appreciated!
I'm higher on Goff than most, but I'd pull the trigger on that trade if I were in need of a QB. Goff will be your high floor play, I THINK Russ will be much better than last year, and Jones can't get any worse. The trio is likely to allow a good streaming set up based on matchups.
 
Extremely hard question to answer … but I’ll ask it anyways.

What’s the 12th pick (rookie draft) in a 12 team league worth to you guys?

Yearly reset auction budget of $200. Sone teams have upward of $500, some teams as low as $200.

12th overall rookie pick. What’s that cost?

Edit: budget $$, not players or picks.
 
Extremely hard question to answer … but I’ll ask it anyways.

What’s the 12th pick (rookie draft) in a 12 team league worth to you guys?

Yearly reset auction budget of $200. Sone teams have upward of $500, some teams as low as $200.

12th overall rookie pick. What’s that cost?

Edit: budget $$, not players or picks.

What does the available player pool look like in your league? I'm assuming that's what the auction dollars are for. That would help. Couldn't begin to fashion an answer without that information.
 
Extremely hard question to answer … but I’ll ask it anyways.

What’s the 12th pick (rookie draft) in a 12 team league worth to you guys?

Yearly reset auction budget of $200. Sone teams have upward of $500, some teams as low as $200.

12th overall rookie pick. What’s that cost?

Edit: budget $$, not players or picks.

What does the available player pool look like in your league? I'm assuming that's what the auction dollars are for. That would help. Couldn't begin to fashion an answer without that information.
Quick glance at the RFA’s

Tyreek
Stefon Diggs
DJ Moore
Saquon
Chubb
Russ
Mark Andrews

Those are the headliners. A handful of decent roster fillers not worth mentioning though.
 
Extremely hard question to answer … but I’ll ask it anyways.

What’s the 12th pick (rookie draft) in a 12 team league worth to you guys?

Yearly reset auction budget of $200. Sone teams have upward of $500, some teams as low as $200.

12th overall rookie pick. What’s that cost?

Edit: budget $$, not players or picks.

What does the available player pool look like in your league? I'm assuming that's what the auction dollars are for. That would help. Couldn't begin to fashion an answer without that information.
Quick glance at the RFA’s

Tyreek
Stefon Diggs
DJ Moore
Saquon
Chubb
Russ
Mark Andrews

Those are the headliners. A handful of decent roster fillers not worth mentioning though.

Oh wow. Those are some marquee players. I'd imagine each of those is nearly a full budget alone, possibly.

I wouldn't know where to begin. Those are truly impact players and worth more than the twelfth rookie pick, besides Russ. The other guys are in the 1.2-1.5 range, all of them, some maybe even more than that.

Maybe if you think of it that way it'll crystallize for you.
 
Extremely hard question to answer … but I’ll ask it anyways.

What’s the 12th pick (rookie draft) in a 12 team league worth to you guys?

Yearly reset auction budget of $200. Sone teams have upward of $500, some teams as low as $200.

12th overall rookie pick. What’s that cost?

Edit: budget $$, not players or picks.

What does the available player pool look like in your league? I'm assuming that's what the auction dollars are for. That would help. Couldn't begin to fashion an answer without that information.
It might be worth taking a generic player value chart from any number of sources and scaling their point value to your annual auction budget. It won't be exact, but it should give you a good idea of what things cost relative to one another.
 
Extremely hard question to answer … but I’ll ask it anyways.

What’s the 12th pick (rookie draft) in a 12 team league worth to you guys?

Yearly reset auction budget of $200. Sone teams have upward of $500, some teams as low as $200.

12th overall rookie pick. What’s that cost?

Edit: budget $$, not players or picks.

What does the available player pool look like in your league? I'm assuming that's what the auction dollars are for. That would help. Couldn't begin to fashion an answer without that information.
Quick glance at the RFA’s

Tyreek
Stefon Diggs
DJ Moore
Saquon
Chubb
Russ
Mark Andrews

Those are the headliners. A handful of decent roster fillers not worth mentioning though.

Oh wow. Those are some marquee players. I'd imagine each of those is nearly a full budget alone, possibly.

I wouldn't know where to begin. Those are truly impact players and worth more than the twelfth rookie pick, besides Russ. The other guys are in the 1.2-1.5 range, all of them, some maybe even more than that.

Maybe if you think of it that way it'll crystallize for you.
Thanks. Yea I wasn’t trying to buy any of these players for the 12th overall rookie pick; what I am looking to do is purchase the 12th overall rookie pick using auction budget.

Owner of the pick is trying to recoup some budget to protect some of his RFA.
 
Yea I wasn’t trying to buy any of these players for the 12th overall rookie pick; what I am looking to do is purchase the 12th overall rookie pick using auction budget.

Oh yeah, I know. My suggestion was that you think of the budget, see what players are available, and adjust accordingly. One way to do that is to assign each pick their proper valuation proportionally using a trade value chart like suggested above.

What I would do minus that? Here's where I might be ignorant or giving up the ghost, but what I would do is zero in on a player thinking "What would it take to get player X as an RFA" and then offer someone a portion of your budget for the twelfth pick to achieve that.

Say, for example, Saquon is the most highly conveted asset there.

If you think Saquon is worth 500 dollars of the RFA budget (He probably is worth the full, most expensive budget) offer what it would take for that other player to hit that mark with his budget.

Say he started with 340 on your sliding scale. Start with an offer of like, say, 190 to give him 530 and the inside track to Saquon. He might reject or counter thinking, "Well, I want more because I need some left over" or whatever they're thinking. But at least you've let him know you've looked at the player pool and think Saquon is worth what he's worth and that you're helping him get there.

That's where I'd start absent a trade value chart or complicated math.
 
Take a look at FBGs June trading chart for example. An early first round pick is worth 28. Saquon is worth 28. A late first-round pick is worth 14. You could go from there and figure out what Saquon is worth by doing that, but you have a sliding sale of auction bucks. I'm not sure how you'd then figure it out. But that's at least a trading value for a start or inkling.

You have to look at the player pool to gauge what those dollars are worth, though. That's the main takeaway, I'd say.
 
Sorry if this is not the right place for trade advice ... but I feel like the Assistant Coach forum is nearly being phased out of use. I can delete and post there if it's not cool. Anyway, I have collected a lot of picks (8 of first 20) this year. Always looking for ways to acquire a top young RB, though. This league is coo-coo for running back puffs. It is 12-team, 20-man, PPR, QRRWWFKD.

Thinking of offering the #8, #9, #11, and #13 for Breece and the #21.
I feel like both (1) I'm offering too much, and (2) he wouldn't do it anyway. Which pretty much indicates I'm baking up the wrong tree. But regardless, what do you think? I'm win-now, have Hurts, stacked with WR's, and getting Bijan to lead my backfield with Etienne and Swift, no depth at all.

Have to note, though, the way this league drafts, those 8, 9, 11, 13 picks could possibly nab 3 of the top 4 WR's of the class. At least 2 of the top 4 WR would be very likely. But as for RB's, the best any of those four picks could get is probably my RB5 if I'm lucky at #8, or maybe RB11 worst case scenario at #13.

My conclusion: it's a big overpay, but worth it for me. Looking for a sanity check. Thanks for any input. And fyi, I have already made large offers involving at least the 8, 9, and 13 together.
 
Sorry if this is not the right place for trade advice ... but I feel like the Assistant Coach forum is nearly being phased out of use. I can delete and post there if it's not cool. Anyway, I have collected a lot of picks (8 of first 20) this year. Always looking for ways to acquire a top young RB, though. This league is coo-coo for running back puffs. It is 12-team, 20-man, PPR, QRRWWFKD.

Thinking of offering the #8, #9, #11, and #13 for Breece and the #21.
I feel like both (1) I'm offering too much, and (2) he wouldn't do it anyway. Which pretty much indicates I'm baking up the wrong tree. But regardless, what do you think? I'm win-now, have Hurts, stacked with WR's, and getting Bijan to lead my backfield with Etienne and Swift, no depth at all.

Have to note, though, the way this league drafts, those 8, 9, 11, 13 picks could possibly nab 3 of the top 4 WR's of the class. At least 2 of the top 4 WR would be very likely. But as for RB's, the best any of those four picks could get is probably my RB5 if I'm lucky at #8, or maybe RB11 worst case scenario at #13.

My conclusion: it's a big overpay, but worth it for me. Looking for a sanity check. Thanks for any input. And fyi, I have already made large offers involving at least the 8, 9, and 13 together.
I just drafted Breece 1.8 in a startup and no way I trade him for this in this draft. The qty is nice but it's a rather weak WR class. I think the best value is in a lot of the rd2 RBs (which coincidentally may be reaches with this package of picks.) I can also see why you feel it's an overpay as well - it likely took you a handful of decent assets to accumulate 4 solid picks like that. But, especially with 20 man rosters, I take the dollar over the 4 quarters.
 
So I've been offered 1.06 and his next years 1st for davante adams. His team is just okay. 1 QB league and I recently traded with him(my 1.06/3.06 for his 1.08/2.08).

Would leave my wrs as: CD Lamb, C. Watson, Hollywood Brown, Darnell Mooney, Terrace Marshall, Doubs, Shakir. I would definitely be weaking my wr corp short term but I don't want to get caught holding the bag on Adams. May be to early though.

Any thoughts?
 
So I've been offered 1.06 and his next years 1st for davante adams. His team is just okay. 1 QB league and I recently traded with him(my 1.06/3.06 for his 1.08/2.08).

Would leave my wrs as: CD Lamb, C. Watson, Hollywood Brown, Darnell Mooney, Terrace Marshall, Doubs, Shakir. I would definitely be weaking my wr corp short term but I don't want to get caught holding the bag on Adams. May be to early though.

Any thoughts?

I'd take it but I'm lower on Davante.

How good is his team...in other words, how good is that 2024 first going to be?
 
I think his team will be mid tier at best.
It's start 2rb/2wr/2flex full ppr.

My team is definitely in contention.
My rbs: Jacobs/Breece/Etienne/allgeier, Zamir white/Fournette/Jerome Ford/Chandler/Z. Knight

QB is a little weak with Love and Lance but planning on taking Richardson.
 
I think his team will be mid tier at best.
It's start 2rb/2wr/2flex full ppr.

My team is definitely in contention.
My rbs: Jacobs/Breece/Etienne/allgeier, Zamir white/Fournette/Jerome Ford/Chandler/Z. Knight

QB is a little weak with Love and Lance but planning on taking Richardson.
I'd take the trade but I think giving up Davante and contending will be hard.

When I see your team I see a team that lacks quality depth. You have what I'd classify as 7 quality players for 6 positions, then it's like falling off a cliff based on what we know right now IMO. So if you lose Davante you'll be down to 6 quality players for 6 positions which is really thin anyway but especially when Breece is one of them and what he's dealing with.

Now when I look at your team, and please don't take this the wrong way, with or without Davante I'd feel like I was a few injuries away from those top 7 players to maybe crumpling. That if I had any notion to really contend I'd need at least 5 of the 7 to stay relatively healthy and be such for the playoffs. Then on top of that you might have to overcome losing QB points to your comp.

You know the league better then me but this seems like a precarious contender with Adams.

The core of your team is young. Jacobs as a 25 year old RB is basically your "old" core player.

So it is was me I'd shed my really old valuable piece, try to compete but if you can't at least you armed your team with a lot more young assets to build around the core of the remaining youth you have left.
 
Last edited:
I could also sell Jacobs for the 1.04 and 2024 first.. should I just embrace a super young team
I was actually going to say earlier if I moved Adams I'd try and compete but if things were not working out I'd try and move Jacobs.

So if it was me I'd do both of these deals and build a powerhouse young nucleus. Still would not give up on the season, but you'd be set up for the future no matter how it goes.
 
I could also sell Jacobs for the 1.04 and 2024 first.. should I just embrace a super young team
I was actually going to say earlier if I moved Adams I'd try and compete but if things were not working out I'd try and move Jacobs.

So if it was me I'd do both of these deals and build a powerhouse young nucleus. Still would not give up on the season, but you'd be set up for the future no matter how it goes.
As you said earlier I wouldn't expect his team to be a serious contender even if he kept both players. If he trades both (which I probably would, primarily because I don't think he'd contend with them), I absolutely would give up on the season as that would be what's best for his team long term.

My only hesitation would be if it's possible to get a better deal for these players, even if he had to wait a bit.
 
I could also sell Jacobs for the 1.04 and 2024 first.. should I just embrace a super young team
I was actually going to say earlier if I moved Adams I'd try and compete but if things were not working out I'd try and move Jacobs.

So if it was me I'd do both of these deals and build a powerhouse young nucleus. Still would not give up on the season, but you'd be set up for the future no matter how it goes.
As you said earlier I wouldn't expect his team to be a serious contender even if he kept both players. If he trades both (which I probably would, primarily because I don't think he'd contend with them), I absolutely would give up on the season as that would be what's best for his team long term.

My only hesitation would be if it's possible to get a better deal for these players, even if he had to wait a bit.
Perhaps on the bolded but two things I'd add to that. I may be wrong in feeling this way but it's never been my style to give up on a season before it starts and have never had a team so god awful I thought I just had zero chance. I will make moves with the future in mind but that's just a little different then giving up without a fight. Rather try and compete and then re-assess if things don't start well. There is still a path for his team if his core stays healthy, hit a few picks, worked FA, one of those many JAG looking types he has on his bench actually evolved, etc,etc

Key for me is if he makes these two trades he no longer has any old pieces of value so there is no reason to "blow it up" now so to speak. That would enable me to feel patient trying to contend and having flexibility to reverse course later. Holding onto some of these young key pieces also opens up other trade scenarios in-season such as what if I contending team has a Breeece Hall type injury to a player? I love trades like that when you can get a young stud who may be out for all or most of the season at a discounted rate by offering someone a usable piece.
 
I could also sell Jacobs for the 1.04 and 2024 first.. should I just embrace a super young team
I was actually going to say earlier if I moved Adams I'd try and compete but if things were not working out I'd try and move Jacobs.

So if it was me I'd do both of these deals and build a powerhouse young nucleus. Still would not give up on the season, but you'd be set up for the future no matter how it goes.
As you said earlier I wouldn't expect his team to be a serious contender even if he kept both players. If he trades both (which I probably would, primarily because I don't think he'd contend with them), I absolutely would give up on the season as that would be what's best for his team long term.

My only hesitation would be if it's possible to get a better deal for these players, even if he had to wait a bit.
Perhaps on the bolded but two things I'd add to that. I may be wrong in feeling this way but it's never been my style to give up on a season before it starts and have never had a team so god awful I thought I just had zero chance. I will make moves with the future in mind but that's just a little different then giving up without a fight. Rather try and compete and then re-assess if things don't start well. There is still a path for his team if his core stays healthy, hit a few picks, worked FA, one of those many JAG looking types he has on his bench actually evolved, etc,etc

Key for me is if he makes these two trades he no longer has any old pieces of value so there is no reason to "blow it up" now so to speak. That would enable me to feel patient trying to contend and having flexibility to reverse course later. Holding onto some of these young key pieces also opens up other trade scenarios in-season such as what if I contending team has a Breeece Hall type injury to a player? I love trades like that when you can get a young stud who may be out for all or most of the season at a discounted rate by offering someone a usable piece.
I don't mean give up as in log off and say "see you next year", I'm talking more about roster management. I think FF managers tend to be pretty biased and overestimate their teams/players, and I think that's happening here.

For instance, he said the other team will be mid-tier at best and his is definitely a contender. Looking at the picks he's talking about, the other team finished 2 spots higher than his last year, and if you subtract the best WR off of his team and add him onto the other it seems much more likely that gap will widen than shrink. Also, he referred to his QBs as "a little weak"- sorry, but Love and Lance has to be if not the very worst in the league pretty darn close. Even if he takes Richardson (a big if, he very well may not get the opportunity), it would still very likely leave him at or near the bottom of the league at QB (this year). Obviously we know very little about the league and the other teams but unless it's a 16+ teamer I don't see how that team is a legit contender this year. Never say never of course, but almost everything would have to go his way IMO. To be clear, I think it has a good chance to be a contender in the near future, but needs time for the young guys to develop.

I agree that he may get a better deal later, which is why I wrote my last sentence. However, holding off could backfire as well as any number of things could go wrong/change. I would be shopping those two guys now and see if he can get a better deal, but if not I'd very likely take them both and be happy with it, better a year too early than too late IMO. I'd also overpay if necessary to move up from 4 to 2 or 3- he'll have the ammo.
 
Anyone seen any moves for Chubb recently?

I took over an orphan in a 16 team league with Chubb on the roster. Another owner offered (then immediately revoked) their 2024 1st + 2023 3.16 for Chubb + Chig Okonkwo. I then offered Chubb + 5.01 + 5.11 for their 2024 1st + Elijah Moore and was completely ignored.

I thought the offer they sent was pretty low. Future 1st + current late 3rd isn't enough to get Chubb, let alone Chubb + Chig. I thought my offer was much more reasonable and still likely in their favor since Moore is a wildcard, especially if Nuk lands in CLE.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Anyone seen any moves for Chubb recently?

I took over an orphan in a 16 team league with Chubb on the roster. Another owner offered (then immediately revoked) their 2024 1st + 2023 3.16 for Chubb + Chig Okonkwo. I then offered Chubb + 5.01 + 5.11 for their 2024 1st + Elijah Moore and was completely ignored.

I thought the offer they sent was pretty low. Future 1st + current late 3rd isn't enough to get Chubb, let alone Chubb + Chig. I thought my offer was much more reasonable and still likely in their favor since Moore is a wildcard, especially if Nuk lands in CLE.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
What is with other GMs offering trades and then immediately revoking them? I've seen that multiple times in a few leagues now. Is it some kind of new strategy??
 
Anyone seen any moves for Chubb recently?

I took over an orphan in a 16 team league with Chubb on the roster. Another owner offered (then immediately revoked) their 2024 1st + 2023 3.16 for Chubb + Chig Okonkwo. I then offered Chubb + 5.01 + 5.11 for their 2024 1st + Elijah Moore and was completely ignored.

I thought the offer they sent was pretty low. Future 1st + current late 3rd isn't enough to get Chubb, let alone Chubb + Chig. I thought my offer was much more reasonable and still likely in their favor since Moore is a wildcard, especially if Nuk lands in CLE.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
What is with other GMs offering trades and then immediately revoking them? I've seen that multiple times in a few leagues now. Is it some kind of new strategy??
I see and have done that when the trade is really close in value or just completely off in value. Shrugs…
 
I just sent out offers (same team) of Mixon, 24 1st, 24 2nd and 25 1st. For chase OR Jefferson. Other team needs some rbs but has chase Jefferson evans olave and kupp at wr. 10t start 2rb/wr and two flex. Solid offer???
 
I just sent out offers (same team) of Mixon, 24 1st, 24 2nd and 25 1st. For chase OR Jefferson. Other team needs some rbs but has chase Jefferson evans olave and kupp at wr. 10t start 2rb/wr and two flex. Solid offer???
Not for JJ or Chase. I’m of the opinion that you don’t move either of them unless you’re getting a stud back and draft picks on top of it. Mixon isn’t a stud and draft picks are a total crapshoot.

Edit: of course not everyone thinks a like so it wouldn’t hurt to send the offer out. If you can get either of for that than I’d totally do it.
 
I wouldn’t trade Jefferson for that either but some of these responses seem a bit over-board. It’s 2 firsts a second and a guy that still puts up RB1 numbers, albeit with a finish line in sight.
I think switching in a younger RB that’s as productive as Mixon and it’s, at least, a legit offer.
 
I wouldn’t trade Jefferson for that either but some of these responses seem a bit over-board. It’s 2 firsts a second and a guy that still puts up RB1 numbers, albeit with a finish line in sight.
I think switching in a younger RB that’s as productive as Mixon and it’s, at least, a legit offer.
What about Bijan and a 2024 1st for Jefferson in a start 2-3 RBs and start 3-4 WRs Dynasty League? Personally I would take the Bijan side. What about straight up?
 
I wouldn’t trade Jefferson for that either but some of these responses seem a bit over-board. It’s 2 firsts a second and a guy that still puts up RB1 numbers, albeit with a finish line in sight.
I think switching in a younger RB that’s as productive as Mixon and it’s, at least, a legit offer.
What about Bijan and a 2024 1st for Jefferson in a start 2-3 RBs and start 3-4 WRs Dynasty League? Personally I would take the Bijan side. What about straight up?
I’d take Bijan and the first.

Straight up would depend on my team I guess but generally I’d have to side with Jefferson. As much as we all believe in Bijan he wouldn’t be the first high profile RB to bust. We know what we have in Jefferson.
 
I wouldn’t trade Jefferson for that either but some of these responses seem a bit over-board. It’s 2 firsts a second and a guy that still puts up RB1 numbers, albeit with a finish line in sight.
I think switching in a younger RB that’s as productive as Mixon and it’s, at least, a legit offer.
What about Bijan and a 2024 1st for Jefferson in a start 2-3 RBs and start 3-4 WRs Dynasty League? Personally I would take the Bijan side. What about straight up?
Bijan and a 2024 1st would move the needle at least a little. Straight up Bijan for Jefferson doesn't.
 
12 team SF, PPR no K, no D/ST

Rebuilt team, likely will compete this year.

RBs = Bijan, ETN, Montgomery, AJD, & Mattison
Have an offer for a 2025 1st for Mattison. Decent team. Pick’s probably going to be 8-12, but hard to say 2 years out. A lot can change. Pick could improve. Or not.

Value seems right.

Yes, make this deal?

No, keep the RB depth?
 
Last edited:
Anyone seen any moves for Chubb recently?
Was offered Javonte Williams and Deebo for Chubb and passed. Injury to Williams scares me. Other owner has Etienne, Stevenson, Williams, Mattison, Akers, and Pacheco. He won't trade Etienne or Mattison. Would you take a different RB and Deebo for Chubb? I have CMC, Barkley, Henry, Chubb, AJones (can start 3) with ARSB and Higgins at WR (only need to start 1 WR if I start 3 RBs)
 
Anyone seen any moves for Chubb recently?
Was offered Javonte Williams and Deebo for Chubb and passed. Injury to Williams scares me. Other owner has Etienne, Stevenson, Williams, Mattison, Akers, and Pacheco. He won't trade Etienne or Mattison. Would you take a different RB and Deebo for Chubb? I have CMC, Barkley, Henry, Chubb, AJones (can start 3) with ARSB and Higgins at WR (only need to start 1 WR if I start 3 RBs)
Id take Williams and deebo over chubb
 
Last edited:
Anyone seen any moves for Chubb recently?
Was offered Javonte Williams and Deebo for Chubb and passed. Injury to Williams scares me. Other owner has Etienne, Stevenson, Williams, Mattison, Akers, and Pacheco. He won't trade Etienne or Mattison. Would you take a different RB and Deebo for Chubb? I have CMC, Barkley, Henry, Chubb, AJones (can start 3) with ARSB and Higgins at WR (only need to start 1 WR if I start 3 RBs)
I would've taken that and I'm probably lower than most on Deebo, particularly in dynasty.
 
I wouldn’t trade Jefferson for that either but some of these responses seem a bit over-board. It’s 2 firsts a second and a guy that still puts up RB1 numbers, albeit with a finish line in sight.
I think switching in a younger RB that’s as productive as Mixon and it’s, at least, a legit offer.
What rb that’s younger would use as an example? Etn?
 
12 team SF, PPR no K, no D/ST

Rebuilt team, likely will compete this year.

RBs = Bijan, ETN, Montgomery, AJD, & Mattison
Have an offer for a 2025 1st for Mattison. Decent team. Pick’s probably going to be 8-12, but hard to say 2 years out. A lot can change. Pick could improve. Or not.

Value seems right.

Yes, make this deal?

No, keep the RB depth?
Anyone? Something economics? Voodoo economics
:oldunsure:
 
12 team SF, PPR no K, no D/ST

Rebuilt team, likely will compete this year.

RBs = Bijan, ETN, Montgomery, AJD, & Mattison
Have an offer for a 2025 1st for Mattison. Decent team. Pick’s probably going to be 8-12, but hard to say 2 years out. A lot can change. Pick could improve. Or not.

Value seems right.

Yes, make this deal?

No, keep the RB depth?
Anyone? Something economics? Voodoo economics
:oldunsure:
I’d take that deal personally.
 
I wouldn’t trade Jefferson for that either but some of these responses seem a bit over-board. It’s 2 firsts a second and a guy that still puts up RB1 numbers, albeit with a finish line in sight.
I think switching in a younger RB that’s as productive as Mixon and it’s, at least, a legit offer.
What rb that’s younger would use as an example? Etn?
ETN, maybe Najee Harris, Tony Pollard or Ken Walker. Honestly there aren’t many young RBs right now with prominent rolls if we’re not counting Robinson and Gibbs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top