James Daulton
Footballguy
These things are still too expensive.
I mean all cars are stupid expensive. A F250 is now a 100k car too.These things are still too expensive.
TruthI mean all cars are stupid expensive. A F250 is now a 100k car too.
Camber is set by adjusting the suspension. Not how the tire's mounted. Are you thinking of an alignment? During an alignment the camber could be adjusted.This is true. You also can't/shouldn't go to just any tire shop to have them replaced. Some of the models have tires that are purposely set with negative camber. The geometry/angles of how their tires are to be properly installed is something that many typical tire shops are not familiar with. You'll want to go to places that are very familiar with Tesla's and have plenty of knowledge with their unique geometry.
which model do you have?Got a software update overnight. I haven't checked out all of the changes but three things that were clear:
There are a bunch of other updates too but I've not checked those out yet.
- Updated the media - looks much easier to use now;
- Updated the app - can control the media from the app now; and
- Added lane change to autodrive. So it says if you turn on your turn signal when on autodrive, it will change lanes for you.
I do love it. Its really great. I've had it for a month and I don't think I've used all of the cool #### it can do.And you love it I assume? Do you have the performance one?
This was mostly an issue with the P85+ (2013-14) running 21 inch rims on 265s. 19 inch rims seem to largely mitigate the issue.This is true. You also can't/shouldn't go to just any tire shop to have them replaced. Some of the models have tires that are purposely set with negative camber. The geometry/angles of how their tires are to be properly installed is something that many typical tire shops are not familiar with. You'll want to go to places that are very familiar with Tesla's and have plenty of knowledge with their unique geometry.
Just FYI - I have the rear wheel drive, large battery premium model. And it cost $53 or $54k.Really thinking about a Model 3. Perhaps not the performance one but the AWD one. Should run around $50k.
But I don't think I can pull the trigger before Dec 31st, so I lose half the $7,500 tax rebate, right?
Or the body will still rust out if it's in Minnesota. Have to duct tape the battery into the compartment when the battery shelf turns to rust.One of the things that will be interesting on the used Tesla market is that a lot of the major costs that ICE cars incur will not be present in an EV, but others will be.
The thing is as ICE cars depreciate towards the <$5k range their cost of ownership still approach that of a much newer car.
This may or may not be true for Teslas. As the battery packs deplete, they can be replaced. Electric motor drivers will last more or less forever, things like that.
A complete pack swap is a 5-figure expense. Do you drop that on a 8-10 year old car with degraded interiors? Things like that will factor a lot in the long term value of these things. What if replacement pack costs come way down?
Or the body will still rust out if it's in Minnesota. Have to duct tape the battery into the compartment when the battery shelf turns to rust.
I thought the debate was over?Currently actively debating a used S vs a new 3.
Going to have to make a final decision soon. Shopping the S for the next week, and at that point if I haven't found THE one, then I'll need to decide if I'm holding out for that to materialize or put in the order for the 3 before the tax cr. is gone. I like them both. Pluses and minuses comparing them. Can't have best of both worlds, so leaning towards my preferred aesthetic atm.I thought the debate was over?
We should go take it for a test drive...There's a 2015 S85 with 9k miles on it in Vegas. Gotta be a blue hair.
I agree the S is a whole lot nicer looking than the 3.Going to have to make a final decision soon. Shopping the S for the next week, and at that point if I haven't found THE one, then I'll need to decide if I'm holding out for that to materialize or put in the order for the 3 before the tax cr. is gone. I like them both. Pluses and minuses comparing them. Can't have best of both worlds, so leaning towards my preferred aesthetic atm.
While I like the 3 I also agree the S is nicer looking. For those who have driven both, what advantages does the 3 have over the S?I agree the S is a whole lot nicer looking than the 3.
Game on indeed...Game on, Tesla....this Audi looks awesome...
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/29/audi-just-unveiled-its-challenge-to-the-tesla-model-s.html
Meh. It looks good, don't get me wrong, but no mention of cost or when it will be available for the public.
Spoiler alert, Tesla will start charging for SC space to non Teslas.Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but Audi and Rivian (those things look badass) are rolling out these new autos to go head to head with Tesla. Thats awesome, but none of these other companies have the nationwide supercharging network do they? And I don't think the others will be compatible with the Tesla.
I feel like I'm 2-3 years away from ordering one of these EV's, but Tesla would be the only option for me just so I can make a 400+ mile road trip.
Am I missing something? I know you can charge EV's at a lot of places, but if you wanted to recharge an EV thats not using a Tesla supercharger it would take hours.
I'd love to see the prices on a used Model X just because I have 2 kids now, but the added cost over the 3 makes a new 3 look like the way to go.
Audi is claiming 80 percent charge in only 20 minutes.Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but Audi and Rivian (those things look badass) are rolling out these new autos to go head to head with Tesla. Thats awesome, but none of these other companies have the nationwide supercharging network do they? And I don't think the others will be compatible with the Tesla.
I feel like I'm 2-3 years away from ordering one of these EV's, but Tesla would be the only option for me just so I can make a 400+ mile road trip.
Am I missing something? I know you can charge EV's at a lot of places, but if you wanted to recharge an EV thats not using a Tesla supercharger it would take hours.
I'd love to see the prices on a used Model X just because I have 2 kids now, but the added cost over the 3 makes a new 3 look like the way to go.
I hadn't seen that. I heard SC's in most places are already overloaded.Spoiler alert, Tesla will start charging for SC space to non Teslas.
Thats crazy if true. And that would make me lean Audi.Audi is claiming 80 percent charge in only 20 minutes.
Audi is claiming 80 percent charge in only 20 minutes.
Looks like that claim is based on technology thats not readily available. I'm sure its something that can be built in your own garage, but charging that fast at the EV charge point at Whole Foods looks unlikely.The 90-kilowatt hour lithium ion battery in the GT concept can be charged either by using a cable or by wireless induction.
The cable option employs Audi's 800-volt electrical architecture that will charge to 80 percent in 20 minutes. Audi said the car can also be recharged at public charging points with lower voltages.
This is short term imo. The big brands are slow, but they have better capability to do affordable EVs. I'm a fan of Tesla and I think they are a very big reason why EV is blooming, but I think they'll get boxed out eventually. They will be better focused making luxury EVs and building out their Super Charging network. I think the Super Charging network is their best potential for making money.The Audi looks nice. But with a $78k starting price, it’s nothing more than a niche, competing against other high end luxuries brands. Which is great, don’t get me wrong as I’m all for getting off of oil.
Tesla is still top dog for semi affordable EVs and will be for the foreseeable future.
Not to be argumentative, but does Audi make affordable gasoline vehicles? Like ones that start at $17k or so? My guess is Audi never will have a sub $50k EV. Making it a luxury and not a car for most people. That’s where Tesla shines, and will continue to build a huge base of owners/fans. I think Toyota, Honda are better positioned to sell boatloads of EVs at some point.Foosball God said:This is short term imo. The big brands are slow, but they have better capability to do affordable EVs. I'm a fan of Tesla and I think they are a very big reason why EV is blooming, but I think they'll get boxed out eventually. They will be better focused making luxury EVs and building out their Super Charging network. I think the Super Charging network is their best potential for making money.
Audi is VW's luxury brand. For that matter Porsche is also owned by VW. Technology will work its way over and be applied to more affordable vehicles and there is rumor about a Ford and VW partnership in the EV space. GM already makes a good affordable EV in the Bolt, it isn't yet on par with a Tesla but it is good. If you think that the big companies are just going to leave that space to Tesla then I think you are mistaken. Short term, next 5 years, I think Tesla does well with the Model 3, but they haven't yet shown they can reliably produce vehicles on a mass scale.Not to be argumentative, but does Audi make affordable gasoline vehicles? Like ones that start at $17k or so? My guess is Audi never will have a sub $50k EV. Making it a luxury and not a car for most people. That’s where Tesla shines, and will continue to build a huge base of owners/fans. I think Toyota, Honda are better positioned to sell boatloads of EVs at some point.
Gotcha. I thought Audi was a stand-alone brand and not a leg of VW.Audi is VW's luxury brand. For that matter Porsche is also owned by VW. Technology will work its way over and be applied to more affordable vehicles and there is rumor about a Ford and VW partnership in the EV space. GM already makes a good affordable EV in the Bolt, it isn't yet on par with a Tesla but it is good. If you think that the big companies are just going to leave that space to Tesla then I think you are mistaken. Short term, next 5 years, I think Tesla does well with the Model 3, but they haven't yet shown they can reliably produce vehicles on a mass scale.
They are and they aren't. They share certain economies of scale, but for all intents develop their cars independently.Gotcha. I thought Audi was a stand-alone brand and not a leg of VW.
They drive off the same platforms. Of course there are engineering differences, but the underlying platform is shared across VW brands including Audi.They are and they aren't. They share certain economies of scale, but for all intents develop their cars independently.
Most of these partnerships are to develop battery packs with Anhui (Ford) and SAIC (GM)/BAIC (VW). Something they already do for the china market. Idea being they buy the pack in china and connect it in final assembly in the US or wherever.Audi is VW's luxury brand. For that matter Porsche is also owned by VW. Technology will work its way over and be applied to more affordable vehicles and there is rumor about a Ford and VW partnership in the EV space. GM already makes a good affordable EV in the Bolt, it isn't yet on par with a Tesla but it is good. If you think that the big companies are just going to leave that space to Tesla then I think you are mistaken. Short term, next 5 years, I think Tesla does well with the Model 3, but they haven't yet shown they can reliably produce vehicles on a mass scale.
This is a new partnership they are talking about. https://cleantechnica.com/2018/11/01/ford-volkswagen-to-partner-on-electric-autonomous-cars/Most of these partnerships are to develop battery packs with Anhui (Ford) and SAIC (GM)/BAIC (VW). Something they already do for the china market. Idea being they buy the pack in china and connect it in final assembly in the US or wherever.
The investments/partnerships are getting factory space and capacity and signing over R/D expenses.This is a new partnership they are talking about. https://cleantechnica.com/2018/11/01/ford-volkswagen-to-partner-on-electric-autonomous-cars/
It feels like we're talking across different things. Are you saying you don't think that big auto will bring affordable EV to the US because they will be focusing on the Chinese market?The investments/partnerships are getting factory space and capacity and signing over R/D expenses.
Keep in mind that China government is putting out Billions if not Trillions in dollars of incentives so Big-3 and EU companies are getting a lot out of these partnerships.
The scale the factories that are going in Anhui is staggering. China is NOT ####### around here. The long game here is not getting a EV for every soccer mom with a fresh botox. They are going for the lower end of the scale.
No, and keep in mind I am exceptionally close to this industry.It feels like we're talking across different things. Are you saying you don't think that big auto will bring affordable EV to the US because they will be focusing on the Chinese market?
i like this:Our latest charger pumps out juice at 3x the rate of Tesla Superchargers (350kw or 200km/150mi range in 8 mins) but unfortunate no cars can handle that much power just yet.
"Filling up a lithium battery is a lot like filling an empty milk jug with a pressure washer. If it's completely empty, you can squeeze that trigger and just blast it in there. But almost right away, you've gotta start backing off the pressure or the water will start foaming out – and that's where you can get actual physical damage to the battery."