Ditkaless Wonders
Footballguy
Correct.I believe the NCCL is the advocacy group across the pond.
Lacks the ring of GBCLU though.
Last edited by a moderator:
Correct.I believe the NCCL is the advocacy group across the pond.
Certainly doesn't roll off the tongue as well as "GubClue"Correct.
Lacks the ring of GBCLU though.
There is a difference between laws and rules of morality. I was speaking of the latter. That being said I do believe, generally, in the rule of law.Excepting immigration laws and employing illegal aliens.
Actually I should not bust your chops since I have been trying to get you to recognize the importance of the rule of law and the constitutional process for years now.
We were talking refugees. Last I checked the Syrians in neighboring countries countWe're talking EU here. Last I checked neither of these three were members..
A Shrödinger's cat situationWas there an attack after they elevated it in '07?
I guess that's why he added "types"I don't think the American Civil Liberties Union has much pull in the U.K.
This is where and why I don't listen to the people that spout off "rule of law" all the time as some justification for why what someone is doing is wrong. The Rule of Law changes, and has changed dramatically over our own history. To say "Rule of Law" and claim that is some finality to whatever situation is at hand is a juvenile practice and does not hold much weight. Who's Rule of law? What Rule of law are we going to apply? Today's? Yesterday's? 1901's? Each of those Rules of Law are dramatically different.Excepting immigration laws and employing illegal aliens.
Actually I should not bust your chops since I have been trying to get you to recognize the importance of the rule of law and the constitutional process for years now.
Muslim Yoga Pants?We should just invite them all to the FFA. They could enjoy (ahem) the "who's hottest?" polls, find the appeal of the #nomarriage argument, and even start their own "Muslim women you find oddly attractive" thread.
Except when you don't.There is a difference between laws and rules of morality. I was speaking of the latter. That being said I do believe, generally, in the rule of law.
:(Reporter just said 12 of the 22 killed were under the age of 16, the youngest being 8 years old.
That is true. When law offends my notions of morality or practicality, I tend to ignore it. As I'm guessing, do you, at least in the latter case. Ever driven over the speed limit? Jaywalked?Except when you don't.
Sure.That is true. When law offends my notions of morality or practicality, I tend to ignore it. As I'm guessing, do you, at least in the latter case. Ever driven over the speed limit? Jaywalked?
They attacked Schrödinger's cat?A Shrödinger's cat situation
In the foyer area, I believe, which is an unticketed area.Did they say if the bomb was outside the arena or just at an exit?
When I first heard ir was going in an exit during the outgoing crowd, I thought it was a security issue that will be corrected going forward. This almost sounds unpreventable :[In the foyer area, I believe, which is an unticketed area.
Already have them, they're drones.going forward, mysterious deadly 'accidents' need to befall the families of terrorists. it can be just a coincidence, but understand, if you wanna be a terrorist, your family wont survive it either.
Well this guy was on a known terrorist watch list but yet still roaming the streets, so maybe not completely unpreventable.When I first heard ir was going in an exit during the outgoing crowd, I thought it was a security issue that will be corrected going forward. This almost sounds unpreventable :[
its a damned if you do, damned if you dont. Is the answer to put 24/7 govt funded surveillance on everyone?Well this guy was on a known terrorist watch list but yet still roaming the streets, so maybe not completely unpreventable.
they should be in jailits a damned if you do, damned if you dont. Is the answer to put 24/7 govt funded surveillance on everyone?
Pedophiles get jailed for downloading child porn but terrorists don't get jailed for downloading Islamic jihad training videos or going to training camps.I wont disagree with your point, but we both know society gives a free pass until a crime goes down. Innocent until proven guilty.they should be in jailPedophiles get jailed for downloading child porn but terrorists don't get jailed for downloading Islamic jihad training videos or going to training camps.
Going to terrorist training camps, downloading Islamic jihad training videos, etc... should be a crime like downloading child pron is. Carrying out an attack is obviously a more serious crime, like being the one who performs the act of child pron (as opposed to downloading it), but all steps before the attack should be a crime.I wont disagree with your point, but we both know society gives a free pass until a crime goes down. Innocent until proven guilty.
Fair point and maybe that needs to change. Although that still won't completely stop the problem.they should be in jailPedophiles get jailed for downloading child porn but terrorists don't get jailed for downloading Islamic jihad training videos or going to training camps.
Im still reading/learning on this. I didnt know he went to a training camp. did the UK know this when he re immigrated back into the country?Going to terrorist training camps, downloading Islamic jihad training videos, etc... should be a crime like downloading child pron is. Carrying out an attack is obviously a more serious crime, like being the one who performs the act of child pron (as opposed to downloading it), but all steps before the attack should be a crime.
The only thing I can think of for why they let them continue to plan and gather materials is because they want to find the larger plot and/or more important leaders, but at this point I think a different approach is needed.
A former Navy Seal on Fox just now said he doubts he made this bomb himself. He said that type of suicide vest takes some expertise and the makers of those types of bombs aren't the ones that carry out the suicide mission.So a guy on a watch list managed to procure bomb making components.
I'm not sure if they knew before hand on this one, but they do know who keeps going back and forth between places like Syria, Yemen, etc.. and the UK or US or France. Anyone who does that should be under surveillance and they can put the pieces together from there. IIRC he was already a "person of interest" before the attack so they did know some of it.Im still reading/learning on this. I didnt know he went to a training camp. did the UK know this when he re immigrated back into the country?
So the guy on a watch list had contact with a bomb maker, or received delivery from one. Makes me wondering who is watching the watch list, and how diligently. There are interesting questions here, from my perspective. I doubt we will get answers to them, but interesting nonetheless.A former Navy Seal on Fox just now said he doubts he made this bomb himself. He said that type of suicide vest takes some expertise and the makers of those types of bombs aren't the ones that carry out the suicide mission.
Id the feeling on the street that the UK should have known better with this guy?I'm not sure if they knew before hand on this one, but they do know who keeps going back and forth between places like Syria, Yemen, etc.. and the UK or US or France.
Eliminated?The ACLU types are the reason we will never get a handle on terrorism....They would rather protect the terrorist rights instead of the innocent people that the terrorist continue to kill. There are 3,500 suspected terrorist running around the UK instead of in the pen being interrogated and when need be eliminated.
Apparently this guy was hanging ISIS related flags and yelling out hateful stuff that these terrorists say according to his neighbors. His parents who are back in Libya took away his passport too because they were afraid of what he may do.So the guy on a watch list had contact with a bomb maker, or received delivery from one. Makes me wondering who is watching the watch list, and how diligently. There are interesting questions here, from my perspective. I doubt we will get answers to them, but interesting nonetheless.
hat was your take, if any, when you heard the interview?
I edited my post. I think they knew some things about him, which is why he was a person of interest before the attack, but I don't really know more than you on this. My point is that I agree with your statement that innocent until proven guilty and we have to preserve our freedoms, which will naturally make us open to attack, but I do think certain activities should be policed more harshly at this point and doing things like downloading terrorist training videos should be considered a much worse crime than it currently seems to be. I am tired of all of the after the fact investigations. We need to do a better job of getting them off the street before they kill lots of people.Id the feeling on the street that the UK should have known better with this guy?
They say if you see something, say something. A 22 year old dark skinned male walking around amongst teenage girls, probably bundled up to hide his bomb, I would think would be noticeable. Some will call it profiling, and that's ok with me. In these days if something sticks out like a sore thumb then it's probably worth checking out.its a damned if you do, damned if you dont. Is the answer to put 24/7 govt funded surveillance on everyone?
Occam's razorSo simple it's brilliant.
As if they care about friends and family. They strap bombs to their children and wives and send them to the front lines. The terrorists view of life and a Westerners view of life are very different but you are probably more aware of this than most. You've traveled the world and seen it up close, do you really believe it would matter to someone who is resigned to blowing themselves up and taking as many innocent civilians with them as possible would care much about what happens to their family?going forward, mysterious deadly 'accidents' need to befall the families of terrorists. it can be just a coincidence, but understand, if you wanna be a terrorist, your family wont survive it either.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/the-manchester-attack-will-change-british-life-for-the-worse/article35084237/Well this guy was on a known terrorist watch list but yet still roaming the streets, so maybe not completely unpreventable.
Totally with you on this one. The problem is that most people take an all or nothing approach to it. now if I had to take an all or nothing side, I'd take the nothing. At least until the govt can show they screen people appropriately.I edited my post. I think the knew some things about him, but I don't really know more than you on this. My point is that I agree with your statement that innocent until proven guilty and we have to preserve our freedoms, which will naturally make us open to attack, but I do think certain activities should be policed more harshly at this point and doing things like downloading terrorist training videos should be considered a much worse crime than it currently seems to be. I am tired of all of the after the fact investigations. We need to do a better job of getting them off the street before they kill lots of people.
Agreed - preserving our way of life needs to be the priority. Even though we need a different approach, since an all or nothing tactic clearly isn't working, one thing to keep in mind is that many of the successes the CIA or FBI or MI6 have are secret, while their failures are front and center on TV. I know people who work in IC and they are smart and hard working. They want the same things as you and I and they do a lot of good things we don't hear about.Totally with you on this one. The problem is that most people take an all or nothing approach to it. now if I had to take an all or nothing side, I'd take the nothing. At least until the govt can show they screen people appropriately.
Their security services are overwhelmed.Apparently this guy was hanging ISIS related flags and yelling out hateful stuff that these terrorists say according to his neighbors. His parents who are back in Libya took away his passport too because they were afraid of what he may do.
As far as your question, I think these terrorists are doing what they can to remain one step ahead of the people monitoring them.
Well that's not happening. They've cancelled a victory parade for Chelsea and deployed the Army in the streets. Also, concerts will likely be extremely vetted.Agreed - preserving our way of life needs to be the priority. Even though we need a different approach, since an all or nothing tactic clearly isn't working, one thing to keep in mind is that many of the successes the CIA or FBI or MI6 have are secret, while their failures are front and center on TV. I know people who work in IC and they are smart and hard working. They want the same things as you and I and they do a lot of good things we don't hear about.
If they can prove these guys are providing material support or taking part in terrorism training (i.e. a legal process) revoking citizenship and deportation should be on the table. Here,too.Eliminated?
If im hearing you correctly, you want to shortcut the legal process and actually kill suspects who fall into a group you philosophically believe is making the world a worst place.
You sound like a terrorist yourself.
youre a good dudeAgreed - preserving our way of life needs to be the priority. Even though we need a different approach, since an all or nothing tactic clearly isn't wood dudeorking, one thing to keep in mind is that many of the successes the CIA or FBI or MI6 have are secret, while their failures are front and center on TV. I know people who work in IC and they are smart and hard working. They want the same things as you and I and they do a lot of good things we don't hear about.
ACLU types = bleeding heartsACLU stands for American Civil Liberties Union.
They bear absolutely no responsibility for what happened in Manchester yesterday nor in the UK, nor in France, nor in Europe nor anywhere else outside of our borders.
Well I don't see how letting millions more unvetted people isn't the answer, then. Carry on!Their security services are overwhelmed.
What I want is to skip the" rule" where they (terror suspects) have to actually kill somebody before they can be dealt with...If they are on a terror watch list they should be brought in, investigated and given there day in court and if convicted of terror or supporting terror , eliminated. You can define eliminated however you like.... That's what I want..Eliminated?
If im hearing you correctly, you want to shortcut the legal process and actually kill suspects who fall into a group you philosophically believe is making the world a worst place.
You sound like a terrorist yourself.
Yea i don't get itWell I don't see how letting millions more unvetted people isn't the answer, then. Carry on!