Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
How about the other INT?Look, I agree, the fumbles were a bigger problem than Favre, but he is not off the hook for the 2 big INTs.AP's fumbling was making him a liability in that game. Not to mention Harvin and Berrian coughing the ball up. Favre tried to make a play at the end and failed but others failed long before that play.
The bolded has already happened. YWIA
Yup, people still aren't going to read whats actually posted and just get hung up on how many posts were made.Who posted in: Favre won't play this year?
Poster Posts
sho nuff 31
scott72 15
TheFanatic 14
identikit 11
Winky the tunnel ferret 11
Some things never change.
Who posted in: Favre won't play this year?
Poster Posts
sho nuff 31
scott72 15
TheFanatic 14
identikit 11
Winky the tunnel ferret 11
Some things never change.
I dont know whats creepier JMon and Kobe or Sho nuff and Favre
The Playboy shoot hyperlink is NSFW so don't do it.
Check out the Tarvaris will be a top ten fantasy qb thread. It's clear he's improved throughout his career and he was considered to be incredibly raw coming into the league.Godsbrother said:
seriously?
That was totally necessary. Thanks for stepping in before things got out of control!
Id say its creepier that adults like to keep up with how many times people post.Who posted in: Favre won't play this year?
Poster Posts
sho nuff 31
scott72 15
TheFanatic 14
identikit 11
Winky the tunnel ferret 11
Some things never change.
Sorry to disappoint....seriously as low-brow as Deadspin may be, my guess is that they chose not to post the taquito. Kudos on the "watch" citing...hey, this could be crap, but there could also have been a warning shot a few days ago and he just wanted to disappear. For what it is worth, I have noticed that Favre has blonde, hairy arms and the pic seems to also have them. Could be a sophisticated stand-in or the real McCoy. I tend to think this may be crap, but it is a wid story that is evidence-based (text versus he said/she said), so we will find out soon enough.
To the first question, nope. Favre threads are about as tedious as Patriots threads were back during Spygate. To the second question, pretty much.Yup, people still aren't going to read whats actually posted and just get hung up on how many posts were made. :(Who posted in: Favre won't play this year?
Poster Posts
sho nuff 31
scott72 15
TheFanatic 14
identikit 11
Winky the tunnel ferret 11
Some things never change.
Anything to add about the topic? Or just come to show us you know how to post how many times somebody posted in here?
Yeah, I am a lesser man for taking those 22 seconds it took to click on the replies button and then copy and paste the info into this thread.
Favre's Playoff StatsLook at what he's done this past decade. It's a pretty awful performance record. 18 INTs in 10 post season games this decade. 5 games with a QB rating of 70 or less (three of those in the 50's), with some of the most mind boggling INTs in NFL post season history (his horrible INT vs. the Eagles in 2003, his 6 INT performance against the Rams in '01, his awful throw back to the middle of the field on third down against the Saints last year that possibly cost the Vikes the game)... there is hardly room for debate here.
Pretty sure the Kart and I weren't debating all of his post-season performances for the last decade but rather just the Vikes-Saints game last season. HTH.Favre's Playoff StatsLook at what he's done this past decade. It's a pretty awful performance record. 18 INTs in 10 post season games this decade. 5 games with a QB rating of 70 or less (three of those in the 50's), with some of the most mind boggling INTs in NFL post season history (his horrible INT vs. the Eagles in 2003, his 6 INT performance against the Rams in '01, his awful throw back to the middle of the field on third down against the Saints last year that possibly cost the Vikes the game)... there is hardly room for debate here.AP's fumbling was making him a liability in that game. Not to mention Harvin and Berrian coughing the ball up. Favre tried to make a play at the end and failed but others failed long before that play.
Pretty sure the Kart and I weren't debating all of his post-season performances for the last decade but rather just the Vikes-Saints game last season. HTH.Favre's Playoff StatsLook at what he's done this past decade. It's a pretty awful performance record. 18 INTs in 10 post season games this decade. 5 games with a QB rating of 70 or less (three of those in the 50's), with some of the most mind boggling INTs in NFL post season history (his horrible INT vs. the Eagles in 2003, his 6 INT performance against the Rams in '01, his awful throw back to the middle of the field on third down against the Saints last year that possibly cost the Vikes the game)... there is hardly room for debate here.AP's fumbling was making him a liability in that game. Not to mention Harvin and Berrian coughing the ball up. Favre tried to make a play at the end and failed but others failed long before that play.
Right, but he's a jackass for doing it. Just about anyone here would do the exact same thing. It's his last chance to make money outside of endorsements that will eventually dry up.Grigs Allmoon said:
Yeah, if any non pro athlete was considering retiring every year, nobody would care if they changed their mind. But because the media and fans want to know (and go overboard on every little tweet and text), Brett's "selfish."It's his life and he has to live with the decision. If he wants to take the time to think it over it's his right. If he changes his mind a few times, what's the problem? It's a HUGE decision for him.
I would bet he would be paid very well by the networks. He would be gold on NFLN or ESPN.
Lol... it also affects his teammates... ask the Packers, and the Jets, and now the Vikes may be victimized by the same annual Favre selfishness and insatiable need to be the drama prom queen. Favre couldn't care less about his teammates - his history proves it.It's also funny how every other athlete in history has managed to retire without a 5 year long 3 ring circus.
Maybe he is screaming in pain.
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
You might want to read the article before going off on rants. Deadspin pressured her into it basically saying "we're going live with or wihtout you" after promising to not take this story to the public eye (it was off the record). **** journalism IMO (pun intended).
And he went forward without explicit permission as well, it was good enough for him that she wanted to meet and talk about it. She may have wanted to keep her name out of it still, and now her rep's saying she's got no comment at the time.
Lol... most people out there have co-workers and family members that are affected if they retire too... just ask my new boss who had to wait for five years of my former boss' waffling on retirement.The same thing happens to tons of people when they're close to retiring. It's just that they don't have hordes of media and fans looking for something to gripe about. As far as other athletes retiring, just guessing here but I bet the majority of them usually just end up retiring because they're simply not good enough any more.
The first interception was the one where the hit on Favre should have been penalized, giving the Vikings the ball in the red zone instead of giving the Saints the turnover. See NFL Admits they blew call on Favre's INT. So, yes, he should be "off the hook" for that one.How about the other INT?Look, I agree, the fumbles were a bigger problem than Favre, but he is not off the hook for the 2 big INTs.
Lesser man? I don't know.Pretty toolish behavior by some though.To the first question, nope. Favre threads are about as tedious as Patriots threads were back during Spygate. To the second question, pretty much.Yup, people still aren't going to read whats actually posted and just get hung up on how many posts were made.Who posted in: Favre won't play this year?
Poster Posts
sho nuff 31
scott72 15
TheFanatic 14
identikit 11
Winky the tunnel ferret 11
Some things never change.
Anything to add about the topic? Or just come to show us you know how to post how many times somebody posted in here?
Yeah, I am a lesser man for taking those 22 seconds it took to click on the replies button and then copy and paste the info into this thread.
for the brilliance of it, even if it is a bit underhanded.
It was still a bad pass. So, no, he is not off the hook for a pass he made, the hit was after the throw and did nothing to affect the pass.The first interception was the one where the hit on Favre should have been penalized, giving the Vikings the ball in the red zone instead of giving the Saints the turnover. See NFL Admits they blew call on Favre's INT. So, yes, he should be "off the hook" for that one.How about the other INT?Look, I agree, the fumbles were a bigger problem than Favre, but he is not off the hook for the 2 big INTs.
I would too if some dude was sticking his thumb up my bung.Maybe he is screaming in pain.
No. He was interviewed on ESPN today and said it was never about the money. If he's healthy enough he will play.
I don't think they're bothered by the questions.... I think their expecting questions from the media every year, and more likely, team owners like their teams being in the media. If there weren't media questions about Farve, there would be some about something else. You and I and every other sports fan out there are more the cause of it then Farve is.sho nuff said:
And do you believe that?
Again.... Now he has actually made a statement.. And the media will not relent. How are you going to content that he is still to blame?sho nuff said:
Almost every single Vikings fan will say that the game should have never been on the line at that point and we should have never been in that type of third and 15 situation(12 men penalty). Yes he was responsible for the for the final play, but he also made a ton of amazing plays to keep the Vikings in the game and to discount the rest of the team's very large role in the loss is just foolish.It was still a bad pass. So, no, he is not off the hook for a pass he made, the hit was after the throw and did nothing to affect the pass.
The 3 ring circus is lead by our hunger for news.... and the media....Farve isn't the only player ever to change his mind about retirement a few times.. And until he's unable to play the game at a high level, I think it's his purgative....
Tarvaris Jackson donated 1 cent
sho will find a way in his warped mind to blame Favre. He always does. It is a known fact here.
sho and the word "foolish"....a marriage made in heaven.Almost every single Vikings fan will say that the game should have never been on the line at that point and we should have never been in that type of third and 15 situation(12 men penalty). Yes he was responsible for the for the final play, but he also made a ton of amazing plays to keep the Vikings in the game and to discount the rest of the team's very large role in the loss is just foolish.It was still a bad pass. So, no, he is not off the hook for a pass he made, the hit was after the throw and did nothing to affect the pass.
Of course....you turned on him a long time ago.
Yet.......you lead this thread in total number of posts.sho nuff said:
Considering I did not blame him for anything more than letting it go too long yesterday, not sure what you are getting at.
