What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FDuel Week 11 (1 Viewer)

My lineups featuring Garcon-Allen-Hilton are going pretty well...

Lineups with DMC and Mathews not so much.

Also seems like most TEs other than Gronk had down to average weeks, so Reed's 7 points or whatever isn't killing me.

Doing fairly well so far, but have a ton of players still to go tonight. McCown, Forte, Marshall, Jeffrey are going to need to bring it on home.
Tight ends had huge weeks.

Graham had over 100 and 2 touchdowns

Witten had over 100 and a touchdown

Gonzo had 80 and a touchdown

Cook if anyone used him had a touchdown

Gate, Reed, and Cameron had average or worse days
To me, I am starting to think it is better to spend a wad at TE and look for the sleepers at other positions. Go with Gronk or Graham and find the cheap WR or QB. My best weeks have come when I have done this so I think that will be the play here on out.

 
Had a good NFL weekend. Went from playing multiple lineups in 40-50 $5/$10 leagues to playing a single lineup in 3 $50/$109 leagues. Headed to bed at halftime of the Colts/Texans game, out of the $$$ in all 3 leagues. Woke up to Hilton going crazy in the 2nd half & getting into the top half in all of them.

This was nice, as I had started playing the NBA 50/50s & was getting destroyed after a good start on Tuesday. I think I'll go down to the $2 NBA games until I get a better handle on it.
NFL seems fairly easy to make a decent ROI...as there are so many newbs and average NFL fans throwing their money away...but NBA is brutal. Your lineup has to be perfect to cash in the top 10 percent of a tourny. It's pretty much all grinders playing nightly NBA. Even 285 doesnt win 50/50s all the time.
Yeah, I'm finding that out. I started out 6-0 on Tuesday & had a little false confidence. Wednesday & Thursday I got killed (2-15). There are so many players, even when you hit on 2/3rds of your guys there are other players blowing up that will just kill you.

Live & learn I guess. But yeah, the pool of games is much smaller than with football & it does seem to be a much more educated group of players.
I think this has to do alot with the way Fan Duel is set up. The pricing on players is so slow to reflect current market conditions that it makes it easy to field a super star lineup. Because of that almost all of your players need to hit. It's one of the reasons I'm not a huge fan of fanduel and find myself putting more and more of my action in at DraftStreet.
This is my thoughts, too. I'm going to try some DraftStreet this week and see if I notice a difference.

 
2 questions about DraftStreet for those that use it.

1) Can I turn off that stupid chat to never show up in my life again.

2) Do they have a "my games" that you can view them all and your current winnings like FanDuel? Or just the thing on the right that is "green" if you're in the money? It also doesn't update very fast or often.

Thanks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone please answer me this?

How the hell is Zac Stacy 7500 but Eddie Lacy is still 6800. I understand they are both up and coming and have been playing well for a month.
They don't update the Sunday and Monday night players for the next week. Hilton is still at $6,000 as well. Going to be lots of Lacy/Hilton combos going next week
this is one of the things about DFS that is making me think too much *I think* "everyone will have K.Allen, Lacy, HIlton" now stacy @ 7.5k .... and why not? Soi tried staying away from those guys, Jordy included this week. basically broke even w/ Forte, Woodhead, Garcon, Gonzo (over Reed) grrrr

 
Had a good NFL weekend. Went from playing multiple lineups in 40-50 $5/$10 leagues to playing a single lineup in 3 $50/$109 leagues. Headed to bed at halftime of the Colts/Texans game, out of the $$$ in all 3 leagues. Woke up to Hilton going crazy in the 2nd half & getting into the top half in all of them.

This was nice, as I had started playing the NBA 50/50s & was getting destroyed after a good start on Tuesday. I think I'll go down to the $2 NBA games until I get a better handle on it.
NFL seems fairly easy to make a decent ROI...as there are so many newbs and average NFL fans throwing their money away...but NBA is brutal. Your lineup has to be perfect to cash in the top 10 percent of a tourny. It's pretty much all grinders playing nightly NBA. Even 285 doesnt win 50/50s all the time.
Yeah, I'm finding that out. I started out 6-0 on Tuesday & had a little false confidence. Wednesday & Thursday I got killed (2-15). There are so many players, even when you hit on 2/3rds of your guys there are other players blowing up that will just kill you.

Live & learn I guess. But yeah, the pool of games is much smaller than with football & it does seem to be a much more educated group of players.
i agree, football doesn't take as much effort to find "the value play" whereas in basketball ... all the profit lies in the value play

Who started Omri Casspi tonight? I'd bet they won ...

 
Although I had hoped to wager close to $25K this week, I only managed to get about $16,000 down. This was mostly due to me attending a FBG Tech Summit (where we discussed next year's apps). Because I knew I would be traveling during the early games, I got spooked into having too much going before the inactives list.

I ended up winning $7,764 this week to bring my bankroll to $74,484

 
Although I had hoped to wager close to $25K this week, I only managed to get about $16,000 down. This was mostly due to me attending a FBG Tech Summit (where we discussed next year's apps). Because I knew I would be traveling during the early games, I got spooked into having too much going before the inactives list.

I ended up winning $7,764 this week to bring my bankroll to $74,484
dirty :)

 
Ended up 14 and 2 on the week in my 50/50s. Pretty much offsett my $21 in tourney losses. Have one 50/50 open where I should cash.

 
oof. :bag: for putting Nate Washington into a bunch of my lineups.

Even with him, I still scored just over 140 points in a 3 team $109 league :excited:

But, turns out, that was only 3rd place :(

I'm having a BAD week. I'm right on the line in 2 $109 50/50s tonight... if I manage to hang on I'll come out just ahead of even. If I don't, I'm down about $400 on the weekend. Oof.
Lucked out and held on to only lose $28. Could've been a MUCH worse week. Did much better in high stakes 50/50s than H2H or 3man leagues (lost all of those).

Probably just doing $109 50/50s this week, with maybe a few cheap tourneys.

 
Geez...this week the $60k cap seems like $65. First lineup I did I had $1000 left I couldn't figure out how to spend. How do you not start Lacy or Hilton?

 
I went 14-7 this week in H2H and 2-0 in 50/50s. I even took a shot at a $50 H2H (normally I'm in the $2-$10 range) and won that one. Finished with 130 points - would have won a few more but I'm having trouble finding kickers the last couple of weeks - Bironas had 4 XP this week but no FGs.

 
Despite Having Jordy Nelson across the board I managed to go 8-2 in 50/50s and double ups this week. I think I am going to give up on the tournaments other than double ups. I don't know if I am playing too safe of a lineup or am picking players that have too high of a percentage of ownership but I can't get close to even finishing in the money. I feels like I am just throwing money away and am blowing all the money that I win on the entry fee for these.

 
ended up 2nd in that tournament for $510. lost by 6 points...it would have interesting if Rogers had stayed healthy. the winner was done and I had nelson and lacy plus I had all the Rogers owners covered by quite a bit. the guy who finished 3rd had richardson and ray rice at rb :excited: .

 
Not really sure how this week will turn out, as I still have Lacy and Nelson left to play in a majority of my entries, as well as Marshall in some, but it seems a lot of others also have players left to go tonight so I'm not sure how it will all shake out. It feels like it was a good week, but we'll see exactly where my balance is tomorrow morning.
Pretty good week, ended up winning back most of the money I lost in my disastrous week 8.

My foray into cherrypicking leagues vs. "inexperienced" opponents probably isn't going to work out for me. Currently in 8th place in the 20-person league that pays the top 6, and I'm not optimistic about moving up tonight. May cash in the other one (6 team league that pays top 3). The problem is that I had 20+ different lineups I used this week, some of which would've easily landed me in the money in these leagues, but I picked the wrong ones. That's what I get for going outside my comfort zone, I guess. I still expect to make a decent profit this week but I'm kicking myself for blowing a little chunk of money on this experiment.
Ended up coming in 1st in the 6-teamer and 7th in the 20-teamer (5 points out of the money, ugh).

All in all, I won money and learned a few more lessons, on to week 10!

 
Great week here. Still preferring 2QB leagues, I had combos with Foles, Campbell, Keenum that were ridiculous. At FanDuel this thread encouraged me to go a little bolder with 109s. Cashed a 5050, two head to heads, lost a 5 teamer and took second in a ten teamer. Best week at FanDuel ever.

Also up $1500 on the week at the 2QB sites. I was close to reeling it all in after a run of bad weeks, but... I'm back baby! [/costanza]

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone please answer me this?

How the hell is Zac Stacy 7500 but Eddie Lacy is still 6800. I understand they are both up and coming and have been playing well for a month.
They don't update the Sunday and Monday night players for the next week. Hilton is still at $6,000 as well. Going to be lots of Lacy/Hilton combos going next week
this is one of the things about DFS that is making me think too much *I think* "everyone will have K.Allen, Lacy, HIlton" now stacy @ 7.5k .... and why not? Soi tried staying away from those guys, Jordy included this week. basically broke even w/ Forte, Woodhead, Garcon, Gonzo (over Reed) grrrr
I had this problem earlier this year and then I went back and looked what made me win money last year. Instead of worrying about who everyone else had last year I went with who I thought would be good. Last year I started in week 10 and won 480 dollars through the divisional playoffs.

 
A good week turned into a gooooooood week:

Hit the money in 18/27 lineups (50/50s, Doubles, Triples mostly), went from $187 to $306 (started with $100 deposit, but I guess $29 of that is 'bonus' money')

....Does anyone have a link to this past weeks $25 Sun Bomb? Curious to see where my 166 point lineup from a $25 triple up would've put me (finished 2 out of 40).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Playing 8-15 matchups a week, getting killed trying to vary my lineup. The cheap price no brainers, (Allen, Lacy, Hilton), hurt the way I like to play, which is to find the gems no one else mines for. Dont need to find gems when you have cheap no brainers.

My stud vrs your stud is not my strength, I always seem to lose those, sounds like Draftstreet is a better fit for me.

 
Playing 8-15 matchups a week, getting killed trying to vary my lineup. The cheap price no brainers, (Allen, Lacy, Hilton), hurt the way I like to play, which is to find the gems no one else mines for. Dont need to find gems when you have cheap no brainers.

My stud vrs your stud is not my strength, I always seem to lose those, sounds like Draftstreet is a better fit for me.
Wonder in Fanduel does this to keep more people in the money? You don't have to look outside of Dodd's top ten postion projections to field a lineup.

 
2 questions about DraftStreet for those that use it.

1) Can I turn off that stupid chat to never show up in my life again.

2) Do they have a "my games" that you can view them all and your current winnings like FanDuel? Or just the thing on the right that is "green" if you're in the money? It also doesn't update very fast or often.

Thanks.
For 1) I believe you can hit the disconnect button. The chat box never bothered me, so I'm not sure if it's something you have to disconnect everytime you log on or not.

For 2) they do have a screen similar to it, although I like FanDuels better.

 
I wonder if people will keep paying for a fairly certain lock 3/4 TD week for Peyton...or go for more of the cheaper possibilities at a 3 TD week like Eli, Foles and co.

it always looks great to get that cheap QB with a good matchup, but when the Peyton/Knowshown team wins all the contests again, I will kick myself again.

 
Playing 8-15 matchups a week, getting killed trying to vary my lineup. The cheap price no brainers, (Allen, Lacy, Hilton), hurt the way I like to play, which is to find the gems no one else mines for. Dont need to find gems when you have cheap no brainers.

My stud vrs your stud is not my strength, I always seem to lose those, sounds like Draftstreet is a better fit for me.
Wonder in Fanduel does this to keep more people in the money? You don't have to look outside of Dodd's top ten postion projections to field a lineup.
My guess is yes. It increases the luck factor which will keep the "unskilled" around longer, which will increase the number of contests that fill, which increases their rake. Instead of their money going directly to the "skilled" player, it passes back and forth a bit eventually ending up with the skilled player, but not before FanDuel (or any other site really) can grab a few bucks.

 
Playing 8-15 matchups a week, getting killed trying to vary my lineup. The cheap price no brainers, (Allen, Lacy, Hilton), hurt the way I like to play, which is to find the gems no one else mines for. Dont need to find gems when you have cheap no brainers.

My stud vrs your stud is not my strength, I always seem to lose those, sounds like Draftstreet is a better fit for me.
That's exactly why I've moved on to draft street
 
DraftStreet does seem to have more efficient pricing than FanDuel.

In a way, that's good, because it means that your lineup will overlap less with other people's lineups at DraftStreet.

But in a way, it's bad, because it's harder for the fish to make big mistakes. If the players are accurately priced, it's like the stock market being accurately priced, meaning that a monkey with a dart board can equal the performance of an expert.

I think the Daily Games are also somewhat like poker in that most of your money will not be made by barely outplaying other good players. Most of your money will be made by getting into games with people who don't really know what they're doing. Somebody who had a few nice weeks at baseball or hockey and decides to try their hand at football, filling their lineups pretty haphazardly, will be close to dead money on a site with inefficient prices, but will be legitimate contenders on a site with efficient prices. You can't beat the vigorish by playing against legitimate contenders.

Part of that depends on the type of contests you're entering, though. What I just wrote applies to 50/50s a lot more than it applies to tournaments. In tournaments, it's more important to avoid overlap with a large number of opponents.

(By the way, my very early On The Daily lineups will be posted on Mondays going forward for the sites that have salary information by then. I'll add the other sites on Tuesdays, and I'll add projections from Dodds and Bloom when they're available, usually Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively. Based on my current projections, it appears that you don't have to include Eddie Lacy, Keenan Allen, or T.Y. Hilton to field a good team at FanDuel. For the three different salary caps, I have each of those guys in at least one lineup, but I don't have all three appearing together in any lineup.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Managed another good week after a slow start with the early games. After the 1 PM games I really thought I was toast. Ended up 25-15 in H2H ($2-$5). Only cashed in 1 of 7 Tourneys ($1-$2). Special thanks to TY Hilton and Mike James for saving the week.

Played $137

Won $201.50

+47%

 
Playing 8-15 matchups a week, getting killed trying to vary my lineup. The cheap price no brainers, (Allen, Lacy, Hilton), hurt the way I like to play, which is to find the gems no one else mines for. Dont need to find gems when you have cheap no brainers.

My stud vrs your stud is not my strength, I always seem to lose those, sounds like Draftstreet is a better fit for me.
Wonder in Fanduel does this to keep more people in the money? You don't have to look outside of Dodd's top ten postion projections to field a lineup.
it is an interesting strategy. you'd think this will eventually drive away fish who are the ones losing money at a high rate while people like us on this board are likely almost all making money recently. their goal is to maximize people playing and this way is almost surely drawing more people who can recognize values and probably isn't driving away the fish who don't realize there are better options for them to have a better shot at winning

 
Good news is I won 9 of 10 bets this week. Bad news is I bet less money this week. Still a nice return and my balance is finally more than I put in after pissing away some money on baseball when I first joined.

 
DraftStreet does seem to have more efficient pricing than FanDuel.

In a way, that's good, because it means that your lineup will overlap less with other people's lineups at DraftStreet.

But in a way, it's bad, because it's harder for the fish to make big mistakes. If the players are accurately priced, it's like the stock market being accurately priced, meaning that a monkey with a dart board can equal the performance of an expert.

I'm going to disagree with this. Draftstreet has pricing that is more reflective of the players current opponent and recent performances, it isn't necessary accurately priced or efficient though. In fact, I'd argue the other way, that a a monkey at a dart board can equal the performance of an expert more easily at Fan Duel than Draftstreet. When lagging prices can cause you to create a "stud" lineup, it becomes more of a game of chance than skill for most. Sure you have some big fish who totally whiff, but that happens at both sites.

I think the Daily Games are also somewhat like poker in that most of your money will not be made by barely outplaying other good players. Most of your money will be made by getting into games with people who don't really know what they're doing. Somebody who had a few nice weeks at baseball or hockey and decides to try their hand at football, filling their lineups pretty haphazardly, will be close to dead money on a site with inefficient prices, but will be legitimate contenders on a site with efficient prices. You can't beat the vigorish by playing against legitimate contenders.

Again, this is a valid argument if prices are totally efficient. IMO, prices at FanDuel are too ineffecient, as in, it's hard to miss some of the incredible values. At draftstreet, the values are still there, they're just not banging you on the head with a hammer.

Part of that depends on the type of contests you're entering, though. What I just wrote applies to 50/50s a lot more than it applies to tournaments. In tournaments, it's more important to avoid overlap with a large number of opponents.

(By the way, my very early On The Daily lineups will be posted on Mondays going forward for the sites that have salary information by then. I'll add the other sites on Tuesdays, and I'll add projections from Dodds and Bloom when they're available, usually Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively. Based on my current projections, it appears that you don't have to include Eddie Lacy, Keenan Allen, or T.Y. Hilton to field a good team at FanDuel. For the three different salary caps, I have each of those guys in at least one lineup, but I don't have all three appearing together in any lineup.)
To be straight, I'm not saying one is better than the other. I've had success at both sites, and I enjoy playing at both sites, but they are very different, I'd totally get why one player might like one over the other. To me, FanDuel is a good site for people who don't like thinking outside the box, if you take the time to look, the value plays each week are pretty apparent, you take them and then fill the rest of your lineup with some "studs" (don't mean to make it sound too easy, cause it's not easy, it's just straightforward) . To me, Draftstreet is more for people who like to get a little more creative with their lineups. Values are still there, they're just not as apparent, and the multi-QB, and multi-Flex positions make strategy even more important.

I started last year at Fan Duel signing up through FBG, and I didn't care for it much because I felt that it was too much "my stud is better than your stud". I then switched to Draftstreet and really enjoyed it. I re-upped at Fan Duel this year for the subscription contest, but still have the same feelings about it.

 
See, the reason I'm moving to DraftStreet (well maybe not moving, but shifting my focus there) is because I love the lineup variance.

 
See, the reason I'm moving to DraftStreet (well maybe not moving, but shifting my focus there) is because I love the lineup variance.
becoming a big fan of Draftstreet.Love not having to mess with kickers . Won $215 + additional $5 in the M Berry contest this week & last time I entered it I won $115

 
Just signed up for Draftstreet and moved some money over from Fanduel, figure I'll check it out too. First impression is that (imo) their website is uglier and harder to navigate than Fanduel, which has nothing to do with anything but bugs me nonetheless.

 
Took 2nd place for $1,200 in the $10k Sunday Scramble #2....screen name bowlinmoe1. It was a $10 entry fee.

:flex:
Congratulations, How many points did your team put up? I play big tournies all the time and won like 700 one week. I'm still playing with that money but haven't really cashed big since. What is your strategy for the tournies?
 
Took 2nd place for $1,200 in the $10k Sunday Scramble #2....screen name bowlinmoe1. It was a $10 entry fee.

:flex:
Congratulations, How many points did your team put up? I play big tournies all the time and won like 700 one week. I'm still playing with that money but haven't really cashed big since. What is your strategy for the tournies?
191.3

QB
Case Keenum
RB
Jamaal Charles
RB
Zac Stacy
WR
Jordy Nelson
WR
Andre Johnson
WR
Kendell Wright
TE
Rob Gronkowski
K
Dan Bailey
D
Carolina Panthers

 
Just signed up for Draftstreet and moved some money over from Fanduel, figure I'll check it out too. First impression is that (imo) their website is uglier and harder to navigate than Fanduel, which has nothing to do with anything but bugs me nonetheless.
I agree, the site was ugly as sin but after just 1 day I'm already familiar with everything.

Only thing I cannot find (maybe it doesn't exist) is when you click on "live" on fanduel, it lists what you're currently set to win. On this, on the right it lists if you're in the money, but I cannot see what I'm "winning" without clicking on each contest.

 
Hard to leave fanduel win I'm winning 50/50s at a 67% clip.
For sure the guys winning have a good thing going.

I am playing for the enjoyment, not the money. I would rather win with a guy like Beasley in my lineup that no one else used than Dez at 50% owned.

Maybe I am playing the wrong game :D

 
So I just started Fanduel this season, week 2. Since then, in NFL, I've turned my initial deposit into 10x the amount. Every week I feel like 'THIS' is going to be the week I lose, but I continue winning.

However, I'm dabbling in NBA and all I can say is WOW, it's tough. Last night I entered 12 contests and cashed in ONE. So far I think I've done close to 30 contests and maybe cashed in 5 or so.

Wish there was a Basketballguys.com to help a brother out! :)

 
I noticed on Dodds' blog he says "And this is why I hate the $65k cap contests" when he posted his lineup for those cap contests. I think this is a very good point. He put together a stud lineup and thought it was invincible. Trouble is, with the beginner contests, everyone has a stud lineup. I have done this every week, where I think I have an incredible lineup and find myself struggling to make the cut in 50/50. I watch anxiously Monday night pulling for Lacy and Nelson. Dez seemed like a no brainer against MIN as was SEA against TB at home. oof.

I played in a few 1 PM only leagues (5 player, $60k) and won them all mainly because of Cam, Stacy and KC. Maybe the lower cap games are easier.

Do you agree with Dodds regarding the $65k leagues?

 
I noticed on Dodds' blog he says "And this is why I hate the $65k cap contests" when he posted his lineup for those cap contests. I think this is a very good point. He put together a stud lineup and thought it was invincible. Trouble is, with the beginner contests, everyone has a stud lineup. I have done this every week, where I think I have an incredible lineup and find myself struggling to make the cut in 50/50. I watch anxiously Monday night pulling for Lacy and Nelson. Dez seemed like a no brainer against MIN as was SEA against TB at home. oof.

I played in a few 1 PM only leagues (5 player, $60k) and won them all mainly because of Cam, Stacy and KC. Maybe the lower cap games are easier.

Do you agree with Dodds regarding the $65k leagues?
I've found that if you want to get away from Standard cap, expert is the way to go. Generally it's not to hard to field a lineup if you have a few sleeper/cheap options, which are often easy to find -- well, easier when K.Allen was like 4500 every week.

BTW - are we sold that Lacy is a rock-solid option at 6800 without Rodgers? Playing against the Giants who've had a week to get chewed out by Coughlin. There are several decent options in the neighborhood... Woodhead at 6600, FJax at 6600, Rice at 6600, Bernard at 6500, Mike James at 6000... etc.

 
I noticed on Dodds' blog he says "And this is why I hate the $65k cap contests" when he posted his lineup for those cap contests. I think this is a very good point. He put together a stud lineup and thought it was invincible. Trouble is, with the beginner contests, everyone has a stud lineup. I have done this every week, where I think I have an incredible lineup and find myself struggling to make the cut in 50/50. I watch anxiously Monday night pulling for Lacy and Nelson. Dez seemed like a no brainer against MIN as was SEA against TB at home. oof.

I played in a few 1 PM only leagues (5 player, $60k) and won them all mainly because of Cam, Stacy and KC. Maybe the lower cap games are easier.

Do you agree with Dodds regarding the $65k leagues?
I have not played in many 65k leagues, but I have to agree with Dodds in the few that I have played in. Part of it might be my fault in that I look at my roster and think I have to spend all of the 65k rather than go with the players I think will produce. It seems like I overlook the good value players and go with the expensive ones because I have the money to spend, and end up shooting myself in the foot.

 
I noticed on Dodds' blog he says "And this is why I hate the $65k cap contests" when he posted his lineup for those cap contests. I think this is a very good point. He put together a stud lineup and thought it was invincible. Trouble is, with the beginner contests, everyone has a stud lineup. I have done this every week, where I think I have an incredible lineup and find myself struggling to make the cut in 50/50. I watch anxiously Monday night pulling for Lacy and Nelson. Dez seemed like a no brainer against MIN as was SEA against TB at home. oof.

I played in a few 1 PM only leagues (5 player, $60k) and won them all mainly because of Cam, Stacy and KC. Maybe the lower cap games are easier.

Do you agree with Dodds regarding the $65k leagues?
I've found that if you want to get away from Standard cap, expert is the way to go. Generally it's not to hard to field a lineup if you have a few sleeper/cheap options, which are often easy to find -- well, easier when K.Allen was like 4500 every week.

BTW - are we sold that Lacy is a rock-solid option at 6800 without Rodgers? Playing against the Giants who've had a week to get chewed out by Coughlin. There are several decent options in the neighborhood... Woodhead at 6600, FJax at 6600, Rice at 6600, Bernard at 6500, Mike James at 6000... etc.
They are playing Philly not the Giants. I think Lacy will be fine. 20 carries 100 yards and maybe a td even without Rodgers.
 
Sure, but from the reports I read on Roto about the Game against the Bears last week, the Bears kept two safeties deep and Lacy had tons of room to run. I'd imagine that with Wallace or Flynn or VY or whoever, that won't be the case.

He'll probably be fine... but I don't know that he's a MUST start anymore.

 
So I just started Fanduel this season, week 2. Since then, in NFL, I've turned my initial deposit into 10x the amount. Every week I feel like 'THIS' is going to be the week I lose, but I continue winning.

However, I'm dabbling in NBA and all I can say is WOW, it's tough. Last night I entered 12 contests and cashed in ONE. So far I think I've done close to 30 contests and maybe cashed in 5 or so.

Wish there was a Basketballguys.com to help a brother out! :)
Same here. I would have won last night if Tyson Chandler had not gotten injured though. So far I've been trying to pick 1-2 studs and fill with good solid players. But I'm wondering if I should be buying 4 studs and filling with 5 very cheap options. The studs are at least consistent. Those 6000 something dollar players are inconsistent as hell from what I've seen.

 
I noticed on Dodds' blog he says "And this is why I hate the $65k cap contests" when he posted his lineup for those cap contests. I think this is a very good point. He put together a stud lineup and thought it was invincible. Trouble is, with the beginner contests, everyone has a stud lineup. I have done this every week, where I think I have an incredible lineup and find myself struggling to make the cut in 50/50. I watch anxiously Monday night pulling for Lacy and Nelson. Dez seemed like a no brainer against MIN as was SEA against TB at home. oof.

I played in a few 1 PM only leagues (5 player, $60k) and won them all mainly because of Cam, Stacy and KC. Maybe the lower cap games are easier.

Do you agree with Dodds regarding the $65k leagues?
I've found that if you want to get away from Standard cap, expert is the way to go. Generally it's not to hard to field a lineup if you have a few sleeper/cheap options, which are often easy to find -- well, easier when K.Allen was like 4500 every week.

BTW - are we sold that Lacy is a rock-solid option at 6800 without Rodgers? Playing against the Giants who've had a week to get chewed out by Coughlin. There are several decent options in the neighborhood... Woodhead at 6600, FJax at 6600, Rice at 6600, Bernard at 6500, Mike James at 6000... etc.
I like Lacy at 6800 better than FJax at 6600. But I do like Woodhead this week as he figures to be catching a lot of dump offs in what looks to be a shootout in SD. I like James on MNF, but wish he was 4900 instead of 6000.

I haven't heard anything on Sproles' concussion, but if he doesn't play I like P. Thomas' potential this week. Also love the Giants defense.

 
I play in the 65K, 60K, and 55K contests because I like the differences in each. I think it's lazy to say the 65K sucks because a stud player didn't produce. That's part of the fun of the 65K.... to pick the studs that will produce each week and avoid the ones that put up a dud. Just because Dodds missed on Dez doesn't mean the game sucks

 
I play in the 65K, 60K, and 55K contests because I like the differences in each. I think it's lazy to say the 65K sucks because a stud player didn't produce. That's part of the fun of the 65K.... to pick the studs that will produce each week and avoid the ones that put up a dud. Just because Dodds missed on Dez doesn't mean the game sucks
I've always liked the 65k too. It just seems those are closer to a crap shoot than the others. Sometimes in those you feel compelled to pick Dez and Calvin because if you don't they'll go nuts and you know most everyone else has them. In the 55k you can't afford them anyway so you don't have to "hedge" your lineup with them. You are free to play sleepers with good matchups and don't have to worry about being railroaded by everyone who played chalk like Calvin, Dez, AJ, etc.

I call it the Tiger factor (during his dominant years). We used to have pools for major golf tourneys and everyone was compelled to include Tiger in their list, just because you knew everyone else had him. So we started having pools where you could select any 5 golfers, leaving Tiger out altogether. It worked fine. Just thinking out loud.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top