DraftStreet does seem to have more efficient pricing than FanDuel.
In a way, that's good, because it means that your lineup will overlap less with other people's lineups at DraftStreet.
But in a way, it's bad, because it's harder for the fish to make big mistakes. If the players are accurately priced, it's like the stock market being accurately priced, meaning that a monkey with a dart board can equal the performance of an expert.
I'm going to disagree with this. Draftstreet has pricing that is more reflective of the players current opponent and recent performances, it isn't necessary accurately priced or efficient though. In fact, I'd argue the other way, that a a monkey at a dart board can equal the performance of an expert more easily at Fan Duel than Draftstreet. When lagging prices can cause you to create a "stud" lineup, it becomes more of a game of chance than skill for most. Sure you have some big fish who totally whiff, but that happens at both sites.
I think the Daily Games are also somewhat like poker in that most of your money will not be made by barely outplaying other good players. Most of your money will be made by getting into games with people who don't really know what they're doing. Somebody who had a few nice weeks at baseball or hockey and decides to try their hand at football, filling their lineups pretty haphazardly, will be close to dead money on a site with inefficient prices, but will be legitimate contenders on a site with efficient prices. You can't beat the vigorish by playing against legitimate contenders.
Again, this is a valid argument if prices are totally efficient. IMO, prices at FanDuel are too ineffecient, as in, it's hard to miss some of the incredible values. At draftstreet, the values are still there, they're just not banging you on the head with a hammer.
Part of that depends on the type of contests you're entering, though. What I just wrote applies to 50/50s a lot more than it applies to tournaments. In tournaments, it's more important to avoid overlap with a large number of opponents.
(By the way, my very early On The Daily lineups will be posted on Mondays going forward for the sites that have salary information by then. I'll add the other sites on Tuesdays, and I'll add projections from Dodds and Bloom when they're available, usually Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively. Based on my current projections, it appears that you don't have to include Eddie Lacy, Keenan Allen, or T.Y. Hilton to field a good team at FanDuel. For the three different salary caps, I have each of those guys in at least one lineup, but I don't have all three appearing together in any lineup.)