FDuel Week 11 (1 Viewer)

[donkshow]

Do you guys have more success with running your favorite 2-3 exact lineups across many contests?

Or finding your say top 5 RBs, WRs, top 2-3 QBs, TEs, Ks, DSTs and mixing and matching through many contests?

 

[eoMMan]

Sure, but from the reports I read on Roto about the Game against the Bears last week, the Bears kept two safeties deep and Lacy had tons of room to run. I'd imagine that with Wallace or Flynn or VY or whoever, that won't be the case.

He'll probably be fine... but I don't know that he's a MUST start anymore.

I'm expecting to see Lacy in at least 90% of the lineups I face this week. He's a huge bargain at $6800. You can make a valid argument about Wallace hurting the offense but it's a better than average offense with him running it. Also, Wallace now has a week of snaps with the offense. And at $6800, it's hard to find guys who are pretty much a lock for 20 touches and goal line carries.

IMO, don't get cute. Get Lacy in your lineup.

 

[eoMMan]

There are some great bargains at QB this week (EManning, Locker, etc.).

 

[karmarooster]

Sure, but from the reports I read on Roto about the Game against the Bears last week, the Bears kept two safeties deep and Lacy had tons of room to run. I'd imagine that with Wallace or Flynn or VY or whoever, that won't be the case.

He'll probably be fine... but I don't know that he's a MUST start anymore.

I'm expecting to see Lacy in at least 90% of the lineups I face this week. He's a huge bargain at $6800. You can make a valid argument about Wallace hurting the offense but it's a better than average offense with him running it. Also, Wallace now has a week of snaps with the offense. And at $6800, it's hard to find guys who are pretty much a lock for 20 touches and goal line carries.

IMO, don't get cute. Get Lacy in your lineup.

While I agree Mike James might fall into the "cute" category, Woodhead, Rice, and Bernard do not.

 

[Bhdevault]

However, I'm dabbling in NBA and all I can say is WOW, it's tough. Last night I entered 12 contests and cashed in ONE. So far I think I've done close to 30 contests and maybe cashed in 5 or so.

Wish there was a Basketballguys.com to help a brother out!

have you checked out rotogrinders ? Also http://thefakebasketball.com has daily info

Thank you kind sir!

 

[David Dodds]

Guys I like if things fall right:

- McCown ($5,800) will be anchoring nearly all my lineups if Cutler scratches. I may not know enough to play him on Thursday though.

- If Sproles scratches, Pierre Thomas becomes a must-play ($5,600)

There are some sneaky defenses that could provide huge games:

Miami was already yielding lots of sacks (35 already in 9 games). They will be playing the Bucs ($5,400) without two more lineman (Martin and Incognito). Another defense that I think could be HUGE this week is the Giants ($5,300). They play the Raiders with a less than 100% Pryor (left last game with a knee injury) behind center.

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

Hey Dodds, this may be the kind of thing not many people are interested in, but I'd be curious to hear (either here or on your blog) about your process for actually creating/submitting/updating/etc. multiple different lineups each week on Fanduel. I've been rolling out 10-20 different lineups each week, and it's a little cumbersome to manage it all (though as the weeks have passed I've definitely learned some lessons and streamlined the process). Do you have a method or any tips that help you manage multiple lineups spread amongst hundreds of entries each week?

 

[(HULK)]

Guys I like if things fall right:

- McCown ($5,800) will be anchoring nearly all my lineups if Cutler scratches. I may not know enough to play him on Thursday though.

- If Sproles scratches, Pierre Thomas becomes a must-play ($5,600)

There are some sneaky defenses that could provide huge games:

Miami was already lots of sacks (35 already in 9 games). They will be playing the Bucs ($5,400) without two more lineman (Martin and Incognito). Another defense that I think could be HUGE this week is the Giants ($5,300). They play the Raiders with a less than 100% Pryor (left last game with a knee injury) behind center.

Showing Miami as $5,900 not $5,400.

 

[hagmania]

Guys I like if things fall right:

- McCown ($5,800) will be anchoring nearly all my lineups if Cutler scratches. I may not know enough to play him on Thursday though.

- If Sproles scratches, Pierre Thomas becomes a must-play ($5,600)

There are some sneaky defenses that could provide huge games:

Miami was already lots of sacks (35 already in 9 games). They will be playing the Bucs ($5,400) without two more lineman (Martin and Incognito). Another defense that I think could be HUGE this week is the Giants ($5,300). They play the Raiders with a less than 100% Pryor (left last game with a knee injury) behind center.

Showing Miami as $5,900 not $5,400.

pssssst TB

 

[David Dodds]

Guys I like if things fall right:

- McCown ($5,800) will be anchoring nearly all my lineups if Cutler scratches. I may not know enough to play him on Thursday though.

- If Sproles scratches, Pierre Thomas becomes a must-play ($5,600)

There are some sneaky defenses that could provide huge games:

Miami was already lots of sacks (35 already in 9 games). They will be playing the Bucs ($5,400) without two more lineman (Martin and Incognito). Another defense that I think could be HUGE this week is the Giants ($5,300). They play the Raiders with a less than 100% Pryor (left last game with a knee injury) behind center.

Showing Miami as $5,900 not $5,400.

I am saying take the Bucs who play Miami.

 

[David Dodds]

Hey Dodds, this may be the kind of thing not many people are interested in, but I'd be curious to hear (either here or on your blog) about your process for actually creating/submitting/updating/etc. multiple different lineups each week on Fanduel. I've been rolling out 10-20 different lineups each week, and it's a little cumbersome to manage it all (though as the weeks have passed I've definitely learned some lessons and streamlined the process). Do you have a method or any tips that help you manage multiple lineups spread amongst hundreds of entries each week?

There is not a good way to do this, but here is my approach towards diversification:

I play in a lot of different contest groups, Within a contest group, I will have at most two base lineups. So for example, Thursday is a group. As is Sunday only, 1pm only, Sunday/Monday, late games, various cap levels, etc

I only like to have two lineups within a group, because if need be I can quickly change from one lineup to another (within a group) on a very late scratch by using the global replace (with a group).

 

[donkshow]

Do you guys have more success with running your favorite 2-3 exact lineups across many contests?

Or finding your say top 5 RBs, WRs, top 2-3 QBs, TEs, Ks, DSTs and mixing and matching through many contests?

Anybody?

 

[Jayrok]

Do you guys have more success with running your favorite 2-3 exact lineups across many contests?

Or finding your say top 5 RBs, WRs, top 2-3 QBs, TEs, Ks, DSTs and mixing and matching through many contests?

Anybody?

I prefer the second option. I don't like having the same exact lineup across the board. If you hit you hit big, but if you don't you may lose them all.

 

[Jayrok]

Guys I like if things fall right:

- McCown ($5,800) will be anchoring nearly all my lineups if Cutler scratches. I may not know enough to play him on Thursday though.

- If Sproles scratches, Pierre Thomas becomes a must-play ($5,600)

There are some sneaky defenses that could provide huge games:

Miami was already yielding lots of sacks (35 already in 9 games). They will be playing the Bucs ($5,400) without two more lineman (Martin and Incognito). Another defense that I think could be HUGE this week is the Giants ($5,300). They play the Raiders with a less than 100% Pryor (left last game with a knee injury) behind center.

Plus the Giants get the Raiders in the dreaded 1 PM east coast start, after having two weeks to prepare. And they realize they are not out of their own division race.

 

[finger11]

Guys I like if things fall right:

- McCown ($5,800) will be anchoring nearly all my lineups if Cutler scratches. I may not know enough to play him on Thursday though.

- If Sproles scratches, Pierre Thomas becomes a must-play ($5,600)

There are some sneaky defenses that could provide huge games:

Miami was already yielding lots of sacks (35 already in 9 games). They will be playing the Bucs ($5,400) without two more lineman (Martin and Incognito). Another defense that I think could be HUGE this week is the Giants ($5,300). They play the Raiders with a less than 100% Pryor (left last game with a knee injury) behind center.

Plus the Giants get the Raiders in the dreaded 1 PM east coast start, after having two weeks to prepare. And they realize they are not out of their own division race.

As a Gmen fan I'd love to take them in lineups, but at only $800 more I think I'm going to do TEN in almost every lineup vs. JAX. Eagles vs. Seneca Wallace and the Packers is a pretty good price point too I think at $5000.

 

[andrewd173]

Do you guys have more success with running your favorite 2-3 exact lineups across many contests?

Or finding your say top 5 RBs, WRs, top 2-3 QBs, TEs, Ks, DSTs and mixing and matching through many contests?

Anybody?

I have been blending from pools of players, but I think I will change over to running 5 lineups per contest type/time, just to maintain some ease of entry. Starting to need more volume and it is getting to tough to try and make each one unique, as I am starting to use lesser players for the sake of variety.

 

[Steeler]

I made a minor change to the "User Screen Short Cut" bookmarklet and it is now available from the link in my sig. All the previous functionality works the same when you hover over a name on the "list of players" screen, but I've added that same functionality to the the Lobby page for H2H contests. After the new version of the bookmarklet is installed, you can simply hover over the user name when you are searching for H2H opponents to see their win totals, rather than having to click the user name and having the entire "user" screen load. Again, it's a minor change but I think it's a little better user experience than constantly toggling between the lobby and the individual user pages.

Let me know if anyone finds this useful.

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

Awesome!

 

[Maurile Tremblay]

I've added a secret new feature to the On the Daily column. It's secret for now because I'm still working on the various intros and links and stuff, so there's no link to it from anywhere on the main site, but I'll post it here:

Secondary Lineups.

It's a list of lineups that are "second best." They're the best lineups that can be made if we exclude all players from the primary lineups on the main page. So taking the Bloom StarStreet lineup as an example, the primary lineup is the best lineup we can make using Bloom's projections with the StarStreet scoring system, salary cap, and roster requirements. The secondary Bloom StarStreet lineup eliminates from consideration all players in the original Bloom StarStreet lineup, and forms the best lineup that can be made with the leftover players.

I'm not sure if the secondary lineups would be +EV on their own. They're at a disadvantage (roughly 5%-7% just by very quickly eyeballing it) because most of the really good values are in the primary lineups and are therefore off limits.

But they may have some value either as a type of diversification or hedge, or as a source of additional players for you to do some mixing and matching with on your own.

I'm not sure if there's a better way to present them than giving them their own separate page. I thought about doing little pop-up windows such that the Dodds DraftKings secondary lineup would pop up to the right of the Dodds DraftKings primary lineup (either with a mouse-over or with a click), but ultimately that seemed kind of clumsy. I'm open to ideas . . .

 

[andrewd173]

Just for my own use, I would love a way to click on each individual lineup, or a line: additional information, and get tiers 1-3. Or even better, each type of contest - for example: Fanduel 60k, and have all 3 tier 1 lineups, plus tier 2 and 3 for each, in a 9 lineup matrix.

My personal style involves creating 3-5 base lineups, and having several unique sets would really make it easy for me

*Disclaimer: I do compare across multiple sites/sources as well, so this would simplify one step of the whole, but still a large time savings.

**Crazy idea: Create a sister site: Football Geeks, that imports many different projections and allows you to blend the sources by % and position. If I remember correctly, I believe the FBG iPad app allows that between the native rankings as a whole. There are times where I think Dodds is spot on for QB, and maybe Bloom for RB and Tremblay for WR, etc. Finally, throw in a projections/results score for each source and position as well for the priormweek and season as a whole. Just thinking 'out loud'.

 

[Maurile Tremblay]

**Crazy idea: Create a sister site: Football Geeks, that imports many different projections and allows you to blend the sources by % and position. If I remember correctly, I believe the FBG iPad app allows that between the native rankings as a whole. There are times where I think Dodds is spot on for QB, and maybe Bloom for RB and Tremblay for WR, etc. Finally, throw in a projections/results score for each source and position as well for the priormweek and season as a whole. Just thinking 'out loud'.

Yeah, I've been thinking about something like this (just with projections from me, Dodds, Bloom, and perhaps Wisdom of the Crowd*), but it wouldn't make sense to do it as a series of html tables.

It would have to be dynamic, so the user could set all the parameters, and then it would run and give the results.

It's something for next year, but it would have to be either an executable file that's downloaded and run on the user's computer, or it could be something that's run within a browser, or it could be something that's run on the FBG servers and then sent to the browser. The last one seems like the least likely solution, but the other two could be possibilities.

____

*Wisdom of the Crowd gives rankings rather than projections, but I think I have a way to convert them into reasonable projections that are consistent with the rankings.

 

[finger11]

I made a minor change to the "User Screen Short Cut" bookmarklet and it is now available from the link in my sig. All the previous functionality works the same when you hover over a name on the "list of players" screen, but I've added that same functionality to the the Lobby page for H2H contests. After the new version of the bookmarklet is installed, you can simply hover over the user name when you are searching for H2H opponents to see their win totals, rather than having to click the user name and having the entire "user" screen load. Again, it's a minor change but I think it's a little better user experience than constantly toggling between the lobby and the individual user pages.

Let me know if anyone finds this useful.

this. is. AWESOME.

 

[Bobcat10]

I made a minor change to the "User Screen Short Cut" bookmarklet and it is now available from the link in my sig. All the previous functionality works the same when you hover over a name on the "list of players" screen, but I've added that same functionality to the the Lobby page for H2H contests. After the new version of the bookmarklet is installed, you can simply hover over the user name when you are searching for H2H opponents to see their win totals, rather than having to click the user name and having the entire "user" screen load. Again, it's a minor change but I think it's a little better user experience than constantly toggling between the lobby and the individual user pages.

Let me know if anyone finds this useful.

this. is. AWESOME.

 

[andrewd173]

____

*Wisdom of the Crowd gives rankings rather than projections, but I think I have a way to convert them into reasonable projections that are consistent with the rankings.

A quick and dirty method could be to rank the average predicted point totals in decreasing order, then match the ranked players in decreasing order. Possible issues with outlier point totals, but 95% should be good

 

[karmarooster]

I've added a secret new feature to the On the Daily column. It's secret for now because I'm still working on the various intros and links and stuff, so there's no link to it from anywhere on the main site, but I'll post it here:

Secondary Lineups.

It's a list of lineups that are "second best." They're the best lineups that can be made if we exclude all players from the primary lineups on the main page. So taking the Bloom StarStreet lineup as an example, the primary lineup is the best lineup we can make using Bloom's projections with the StarStreet scoring system, salary cap, and roster requirements. The secondary Bloom StarStreet lineup eliminates from consideration all players in the original Bloom StarStreet lineup, and forms the best lineup that can be made with the leftover players.

I'm not sure if the secondary lineups would be +EV on their own. They're at a disadvantage (roughly 5%-7% just by very quickly eyeballing it) because most of the really good values are in the primary lineups and are therefore off limits.

But they may have some value either as a type of diversification or hedge, or as a source of additional players for you to do some mixing and matching with on your own.

I'm not sure if there's a better way to present them than giving them their own separate page. I thought about doing little pop-up windows such that the Dodds DraftKings secondary lineup would pop up to the right of the Dodds DraftKings primary lineup (either with a mouse-over or with a click), but ultimately that seemed kind of clumsy. I'm open to ideas . . .

This is awesome. It's useful in a few ways - to provide several options for each position just for diversification (I'm looking at you, PK) - but also in case I just don't like someone who the primary projections spit out. For example, this week my first thought when I saw Darren Sproles was "huh?" and that it must have been just a glitch. I'm sure his price went down after getting knocked out early in the game, and the computer hasn't taken into account the fact that Sproles might miss the next game. So, it was sort of just a write-off for me. Having multiple secondary options really helps in a situation like that.

 

[karmarooster]

Of course as soon as I write that:

Darren Sproles (concussion) is practicing in full Wednesday.
It's a surefire sign that the concussion Sproles sustained on the first drive of last week's loss to the Jets was not of the severe variety. He said he's fine and has gone through the NFL's protocols. Barring a setback, the PPR maven will suit up in a tasty matchup with the Cowboys on Sunday Night Football.

 

[eoMMan]

I'm rolling out a lineup in several tourneys with AP, AMorris, and JReed. Even though Thursday night games typically suck, both of these defenses kinda suck and I think it'll be a pretty high scoring game. I didn't take either kicker but they'd be decent plays too.

 

[Gustavo Fring]

Rolling this lineup out tonight...could really careless how it fares, as I do not typically like Thursday night matchups. I mainly enter one or 2 contests, just so I can get an idea of who the top grinders like every week, so I can get an idea of their value plays, $$$$ plays, etc. for my own Sunday lineups.

QB Jake Locker
TEN v JAC
RB Alfred Morris
WAS @ MIN
RB Zac Stacy
STL @ IND
WR Pierre Garcon
WAS @ MIN
WR Eric Decker
DEN @ SD
WR T.Y. Hilton
IND v STL
TE Jimmy Graham
NO v DAL
K Justin Tucker
BAL v CIN
D Indianapolis Colts
IND v STL

 

[andrewd173]

Of course as soon as I write that:

Darren Sproles (concussion) is practicing in full Wednesday.

It's a surefire sign that the concussion Sproles sustained on the first drive of last week's loss to the Jets was not of the severe variety. He said he's fine and has gone through the NFL's protocols. Barring a setback, the PPR maven will suit up in a tasty matchup with the Cowboys on Sunday Night Football.

Pulled P Thomas from my lineups when I heard this earlier - was hoping for a scratch by Sproles.

Also replaced Lacey - getting a bad feeling that w/o Rodgers the Eagles will go 8 or even 9 in the box to force the throw, and Starks is looking good as well. He still may get 15 points, but looking elsewhere for a higher upside, though Lacy should have a high floor.

 

[hagmania]

I'm rolling out a lineup in several tourneys with AP, AMorris, and JReed. Even though Thursday night games typically suck, both of these defenses kinda suck and I think it'll be a pretty high scoring game. I didn't take either kicker but they'd be decent plays too.

I'm still of the mind that if you want to play someone on a Thursday Night, stud RBs are the way to go.

 

[Bobcat10]

Not bad, Gus. How's NBA treating you? I have not dabbled much at all this year.

 

[hagmania]

Thursday Night Tourney Lineup:

Josh McCown - 5800

Low price vs great matchup


Reggie Bush - 8500

Going for monster score
Le'Veon Bell - 7200

Fading Lacy & Stacy, might be outthinking myself. Like the matchup vs BUF.

Brandon Marshall - 8200

Paired with McCown

Riley Cooper - 6000

Foles loves him, good matchup vs GB

Golden Tate - 4500

Unique flyer (I hope)

Jimmy Graham - 8700

Playing Jimmy in every single one of my lineups, I think.

Garrett Hartley - 5100

Shootout. See: Prater, Week 5

Tennessee Titans - 5800

Great chance for defensive scores here.

Total: 59,800

 

[Bobcat10]

Do these large contests ever not fill? The $1 or $2 Squib's, Dive's, etc sure seem to have alot of open spots. I never really look at these tournys.

 

[(HULK)]

Only in two Thursday start games. Didn't intentionally avoid those players but ended up with no Skins or Vikes on my teams. Just better value elsewhere. Tempted by AP, should have a huge game, but he's too expensive to fit in when I'm rolling with Jimmy Graham (and I am in most lineups).

In 3 seperate 1PM only 50/50s @ the $109 level. Usually one or two guys with a ton of wins, and the rest are <30 wins. It seems like that particular format attracts less experienced players for some reason.

 

[Pantherz]

Do these large contests ever not fill? The $1 or $2 Squib's, Dive's, etc sure seem to have alot of open spots. I never really look at these tournys.

They've pretty much got the timing down to a science. It will run if it doesn't fill but they almost always do.

 

[finger11]

Cutler is starting. Dammit! Wanted to use McCown

 

[Steeler]

I had McCown in 20% of my lineups and P. Thomas in 40%.... back to the drawing board.

 

[Steeler]

Anyone else kicking around the idea of starting S. Wallace? He scored 13 points last week when he wasn't expected to play. I imagine a full week of practice getting all the first team reps in addition to a game plan that plays to his strengths will only help. Plus, you cant beat the price. I'm probably rolling out this lineup in a few contests:

S.Wallace 5000
M.Forte 9000
R.Bush 8500
TY.Hilton 6000
W.Welker 8100
G.Tate 4500
J.Graham 8700
Hartely 5100
Colts 5100


Edited to remove the incorrect score from last week that was listed at Fan Duel.

 

[finger11]

Anyone else kicking around the idea of starting S. Wallace? He scored 13 points last week when he wasn't expected to play. I imagine a full week of practice getting all the first team reps in addition to a game plan that plays to his strengths will only help. Plus, you cant beat the price. I'm probably rolling out this lineup in a few contests:

I think there's a mistake? If you look at this profile he only scored 3 points. it says he rushed 7/70, but I don't see that anywhere else.

 

[Steeler]

Anyone else kicking around the idea of starting S. Wallace? He scored 13 points last week when he wasn't expected to play. I imagine a full week of practice getting all the first team reps in addition to a game plan that plays to his strengths will only help. Plus, you cant beat the price. I'm probably rolling out this lineup in a few contests:

I think there's a mistake? If you look at this profile he only scored 3 points. it says he rushed 7/70, but I don't see that anywhere else.

I just looked at the points and didn't drill down to his profile page at Fan Duel... looks like you are right. So just forget the part about him scoring 13 points last week ... everything else I mentioned makes me consider him.

 

[Blue-Kun]

Running with Cecil Shorts, TY Hilton and Jimmy Graham in basically every line-up. Riley Cooper will probably also sneak into a few.

Disappointed I can't value out my QB and RB position to Pierre and Josh McCown now. Probably run a handful of Case Keenum anyway to get away with 6 of 9 positions for 6k or less.

 

[eoMMan]

Anyone else kicking around the idea of starting S. Wallace? He scored 13 points last week when he wasn't expected to play. I imagine a full week of practice getting all the first team reps in addition to a game plan that plays to his strengths will only help. Plus, you cant beat the price. I'm probably rolling out this lineup in a few contests:

I think there's a mistake? If you look at this profile he only scored 3 points. it says he rushed 7/70, but I don't see that anywhere else.

I just looked at the points and didn't drill down to his profile page at Fan Duel... looks like you are right. So just forget the part about him scoring 13 points last week ... everything else I mentioned makes me consider him.

I would stay away. The Packers will lean more on Lacy and Starks and look for Wallace to be more of a game manager than a play maker, imo. Besides, the Eagle defense is playing much better now and the total stats for the year might mislead you.

I think if you are looking for a bargain QB this week, you are much better spending a little more and going with a EManning or Locker.

 

[karmarooster]

My game plan for the week is to put 60-75% of my wagers on (mostly) Thursday fades. I will probably have a few lineups with AP, Reed (but last week's stinker?), Garcon (loved him last week, but his price shot up), and maybe RG3 (don't love him especially on the short week) -- for the most part I'm staying away. I tend to do better on the Thursday games than the Sunday games over the last few weeks. I'm also going for bigger returns here - lots of Doubles, Triples, a few Quintuples.

For Sunday, because I've not fared as well, I'll be putting only the remaining 25-40% of my wagers on Sunday games, but sticking to the 50/50 deals. My only hesitation about this is that I prefer big 100+ entry games. The $5 50/50 suits me, but at $10 there are only 20 people. So i'll probably enter all the $5 games and then start on the $10s.

Idea here is to go heavy where I do well, and try to hit the returns. Then, to scale it back where I've had more trouble, and shoot for lower payouts.

Any thoughts on meta-strategy this week?

 

[andrewd173]

My game plan for the week is to put 60-75% of my wagers on (mostly) Thursday fades. I will probably have a few lineups with AP, Reed (but last week's stinker?), Garcon (loved him last week, but his price shot up), and maybe RG3 (don't love him especially on the short week) -- for the most part I'm staying away. I tend to do better on the Thursday games than the Sunday games over the last few weeks. I'm also going for bigger returns here - lots of Doubles, Triples, a few Quintuples.

For Sunday, because I've not fared as well, I'll be putting only the remaining 25-40% of my wagers on Sunday games, but sticking to the 50/50 deals. My only hesitation about this is that I prefer big 100+ entry games. The $5 50/50 suits me, but at $10 there are only 20 people. So i'll probably enter all the $5 games and then start on the $10s.

Idea here is to go heavy where I do well, and try to hit the returns. Then, to scale it back where I've had more trouble, and shoot for lower payouts.

Any thoughts on meta-strategy this week?

Very similar to what I try to do. However, I tend to fall into chasing the big tournies and losing my grinding gains.Check out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_criterion. Basically a formula for what makes sense.

I have noticed one issue though: I hit every 50/50 and double in my target price, and then I am searching for additional contests to join. Starting to offer some h2h with the extra, will see how that goes.

 

[snellman]

The talk of Cutler starting has thrown my Thurs plays into a spiral. I had a few of my rosters set up for McCown's salary with little wiggle room so no I am looking for a cheaper QB so I don't ruffle up my line-ups too much.

What is everyone's thoughts on Keenum? He is only at 6100 so it would not shake up the roster too much, but AZ has a pretty good defense. (shoot, I am thinking too much now)

 

[andrewd173]

The talk of Cutler starting has thrown my Thurs plays into a spiral. I had a few of my rosters set up for McCown's salary with little wiggle room so no I am looking for a cheaper QB so I don't ruffle up my line-ups too much.

What is everyone's thoughts on Keenum? He is only at 6100 so it would not shake up the roster too much, but AZ has a pretty good defense. (shoot, I am thinking too much now)

Going with Eli (cringe) Rivers and Brees this week, with a few others thrown in. Thought about Keenum, but suspect Peterson will be glued to Andre Johnson.

 

[karmarooster]

The talk of Cutler starting has thrown my Thurs plays into a spiral. I had a few of my rosters set up for McCown's salary with little wiggle room so no I am looking for a cheaper QB so I don't ruffle up my line-ups too much.

What is everyone's thoughts on Keenum? He is only at 6100 so it would not shake up the roster too much, but AZ has a pretty good defense. (shoot, I am thinking too much now)

Personally I don't like that matchup, on the road, with Patrick Petterson covering AJ.

I've got a mix at QB that includes Peyton, Brees, Rivers, Eli, and Locker.

 

[finger11]

I seem to have a mixture of Eli/Locker/RG3/Rivers so far. RG3 has shown some decent numbers the last few weeks and had 3 TDs taken away by the RB last week. MIN is TERRIBLE and I think the Skins will carve them up. The Skins D is bad enough that Ponder/AP will score some points too. I have Reed in a ton of lineups. I think the price is too good to pass up

 

[AngryGorilla]

The talk of Cutler starting has thrown my Thurs plays into a spiral. I had a few of my rosters set up for McCown's salary with little wiggle room so no I am looking for a cheaper QB so I don't ruffle up my line-ups too much.

What is everyone's thoughts on Keenum? He is only at 6100 so it would not shake up the roster too much, but AZ has a pretty good defense. (shoot, I am thinking too much now)

Personally I don't like that matchup, on the road, with Patrick Petterson covering AJ.

I've got a mix at QB that includes Peyton, Brees, Rivers, Eli, and Locker.

agreed, fading the Houston passing game this week

 

[snellman]

The talk of Cutler starting has thrown my Thurs plays into a spiral. I had a few of my rosters set up for McCown's salary with little wiggle room so no I am looking for a cheaper QB so I don't ruffle up my line-ups too much.

What is everyone's thoughts on Keenum? He is only at 6100 so it would not shake up the roster too much, but AZ has a pretty good defense. (shoot, I am thinking too much now)

Personally I don't like that matchup, on the road, with Patrick Petterson covering AJ.

I've got a mix at QB that includes Peyton, Brees, Rivers, Eli, and Locker.

agreed, fading the Houston passing game this week

Ended up shaking the rosters up and went Manning, Rivers and RG3