What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Movie Poll - 1974 Countdown Monday is here. (2 Viewers)

His performance was very courageous. Film actors are unanimously reluctant to be that neurotic and unattractive and exposed in a protagonist role, but it's what makes the flick.
I thought he played it very well, except for the manic giggling. That needed to go.

 
Loved that. The look on everyone’s faces, until the one guy started clapping. It’s how I felt watching Magnolia in the theater.
:lmao:   I love this visual.

I hadn't had a chance to write up my thoughts, but I absolutely loved this movie.  Took me about 30 seconds to know it was going to be fantastic.  There's something special about a film that can seem simultaneously completely of its time yet also timeless.  I had a lot of trouble watching Dreyfuss - I absolutely abhor people being fidgety, and his tics and twitches really got to me - but I understood why it made sense in context.  It was a bold performance by him.  (On a minor note, I also had a lot of trouble believing him as a 19-year-old when he looked more like early 30s.)  In fact, brilliant performances by all the leads.  By the way, has Jack Warden always been the same age?

This was great storytelling - it seemed complete but efficient.  Not a moment wasted.

 
:lmao:   I love this visual.

I hadn't had a chance to write up my thoughts, but I absolutely loved this movie.  Took me about 30 seconds to know it was going to be fantastic.  There's something special about a film that can seem simultaneously completely of its time yet also timeless.  I had a lot of trouble watching Dreyfuss - I absolutely abhor people being fidgety, and his tics and twitches really got to me - but I understood why it made sense in context.  It was a bold performance by him.  (On a minor note, I also had a lot of trouble believing him as a 19-year-old when he looked more like early 30s.)  In fact, brilliant performances by all the leads.  By the way, has Jack Warden always been the same age?

This was great storytelling - it seemed complete but efficient.  Not a moment wasted.
A thing I liked about it is that there were several points where you thought you knew where they were going to take you with the story, but then they went a different direction, and in the end they took you to a place you probably didn't see coming completely, but made perfect sense once you got there. That was great writing.

 
I just went through the 2010 list. Its awful. I counted 4.5 movies I'd be o.k. with giving points. i'm going to need Krista or someone to get me some foreign films that'll qualify that didn't show up on that wikipedia page for whatever reason.
@krista4 you are compiling a list of 2010 sleepers for us to check out - right?

 
A thing I liked about it is that there were several points where you thought you knew where they were going to take you with the story, but then they went a different direction, and in the end they took you to a place you probably didn't see coming completely, but made perfect sense once you got there. That was great writing.
Completely agree.  I'd say more but might spoil it for those who haven't watched yet.

 
@krista4 you are compiling a list of 2010 sleepers for us to check out - right?
I immediately thought of this one and checked to see if I had the year right...yep!

The Illusionist.  No, not the Edward Norton movie of around the same time, but the French animated one.  With no dialogue.  I mean, who doesn't love French animated movies set in Scotland with no dialogue?

Just trust me on this.  Don't read too much about it - that little imdb synopsis will do - but just watch.  It's pretty short IIRC.  It's devastatingly beautiful, and devastating.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was just taking a look at 2010 documentaries, and the first three that pop up are The Inside Job, Exit Through the Gift Shop, and Restrepo.  That's quite a haul for one year.  That does not even count some of the great 30 for 30s that may not qualify for this, like "The Two Escobars."

 
I was just taking a look at 2010 documentaries, and the first three that pop up are The Inside Job, Exit Through the Gift Shop, and Restrepo.  That's quite a haul for one year.  That does not even count some of the great 30 for 30s that may not qualify for this, like "The Two Escobars."
Not sure how much we should dip into TV movies and docs.  Then we have stuff like Ken Burns' docs entering in the fold.  

I do agree with you about docs for that year.  The three you mentioned are great, and this year also produced Marwencol, Waiting for Superman, Gasland, Waste Land, Catfish, Tabloid, Client 9, Louder than A Bomb, and The Tillman Story.   Some really good stuff out there if people aren't in love with the typical movies out there. 

 
Not sure how much we should dip into TV movies and docs.  Then we have stuff like Ken Burns' docs entering in the fold.  

I do agree with you about docs for that year.  The three you mentioned are great, and this year also produced Marwencol, Waiting for Superman, Gasland, Waste Land, Catfish, Tabloid, Client 9, Louder than A Bomb, and The Tillman Story.   Some really good stuff out there if people aren't in love with the typical movies out there. 
Don't get me started on that pile of crap

 
Not sure how much we should dip into TV movies and docs.  Then we have stuff like Ken Burns' docs entering in the fold.  
I avoided the great TV "movies" for '74 - Miss Jane Pittman, Missiles of October & QB VII (which woulda been in my Top 10) - and intend to do the same in all subsequent years

Anyone catch the HBO special the Zen Diaries of Gary Schandling? Saw part 1. It's remarkable.
Rodney, Robin & Gary Shandling are the three standups i cant think critically about - the first two cuz they just had the keys to my ticklebox, but Shandling because i always felt he adjusted the human condition in some way with every joke. Cant wait to see this

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do tell.  :popcorn:  

I haven't seen it since it came out, so honestly don't remember a ton of details about it.  
It's full of lies and is basically just a big puff piece for corporate charters, testing companies, etc. I often don't like documentaries because they almost always have an agenda. People  take documentaries more seriously than scripted films so when docs distort the truth to tell their story, the audience often doesn't recognize it and just accepts the documentary as being accurate.

 
It's full of lies and is basically just a big puff piece for corporate charters, testing companies, etc. I often don't like documentaries because they almost always have an agenda. People  take documentaries more seriously than scripted films so when docs distort the truth to tell their story, the audience often doesn't recognize it and just accepts the documentary as being accurate.
Now I am interested in watching it again with a fresh eye.  

Docs are one of my favorite genres, but I have trouble rating them.  I like just about all of them and get at least a little out of each, but unless it REALLY grabs me and sticks out, they do blur together a bit and I tend to not remember details.  I get what you are talking about with them being slanted and I know that going in, but I get what you are saying in that a majority of the population might not take the time to think about that accept everything on the screen as gospel.  People need to realize they are more on the lines of reality TV in that what you are seeing is just the 90mins of the hours and hours of footage that were shot, and just like any other filmmaker they are trying to tell a compelling story.  

 
I was just taking a look at 2010 documentaries, and the first three that pop up are The Inside Job, Exit Through the Gift Shop, and Restrepo.  That's quite a haul for one year.  That does not even count some of the great 30 for 30s that may not qualify for this, like "The Two Escobars."
Have all 3 on my list - although I am a big documentary guy.  

 
Couple days left and I am sure peeps like 80s and krista are working on theirs, but we are sitting at <20 lists and I've only gotten one in the last couple days.  

Where are all these people who voted to have the 70s chopped up by individual years? ;)

 
Couple days left and I am sure peeps like 80s and krista are working on theirs, but we are sitting at <20 lists and I've only gotten one in the last couple days.  

Where are all these people who voted to have the 70s chopped up by individual years? ;)
Wife and I are watching Pelham 123- it’s pretty damn fun so far 

 
Couple days left and I am sure peeps like 80s and krista are working on theirs, but we are sitting at <20 lists and I've only gotten one in the last couple days.  

Where are all these people who voted to have the 70s chopped up by individual years? ;)
Let's move on.

 
Couple days left and I am sure peeps like 80s and krista are working on theirs, but we are sitting at <20 lists and I've only gotten one in the last couple days.  

Where are all these people who voted to have the 70s chopped up by individual years? ;)
Well, considering it was the vast majority, I’d say they’re around.  And I only recall one person saying they couldn’t participate due to the year chosen, and an equal number saying the same about 2010 so far.

There’s a bit of a tension between the “submit my list immediately and move on” crew and those who want to take their time (I’ve vacillated between the two so not judging).  I think there will be some attrition on that basis as well.

Why do we care how many lists are submitted?  I’m more interested in the discussion that ensues.

 
Well, considering it was the vast majority, I’d say they’re around.  And I only recall one person saying they couldn’t participate due to the year chosen, and an equal number saying the same about 2010 so far.

There’s a bit of a tension between the “submit my list immediately and move on” crew and those who want to take their time (I’ve vacillated between the two so not judging).  I think there will be some attrition on that basis as well.

Why do we care how many lists are submitted?  I’m more interested in the discussion that ensues.
It was just my theory that the more lists we got, the less it would look like whatever random list pops up first on google.  I thought it would spread the votes out more, have more surprises pop up on the countdown, and lead to slightly more discussion.  That said, it does seem like there is more discussion pre-countdown than after anyway.  

Mostly I was just  :pokey: and being an ### because I was more in the camp of doing the 70s by decade and was nervous about a drop off in participation as we go back in time.  I didn't realize how few I had until I just looked.  I am sure more will come in over the weekend though.  

That said, there has been some great discussion in here already and people posting about movies they've tried for the poll, and that's what this is about.  

 
Just watched. Thanks for the rec, but didn't turn my crank at all.
Surprised!  I thought it would be in your wheelhouse.

Speaking of stuff that should be in the wheelhouse but wasn't, and at risk of having @Eephus hate me forever, I couldn't get into The Yakuza despite its sounding like right up my alley.  And even worse, I wasn't able to love Female Trouble despite being a Waters fan.  On the latter, I think it was the pain of watching that singular manner of purposeful over-acting, by everyone.  After a while I just couldn't stand it.  I realize it's by design, like the Mamet non-acting acting is, but it pained me greatly.

 
Surprised!  I thought it would be in your wheelhouse.

Speaking of stuff that should be in the wheelhouse but wasn't, and at risk of having @Eephus hate me forever, I couldn't get into The Yakuza despite its sounding like right up my alley.  And even worse, I wasn't able to love Female Trouble despite being a Waters fan.  On the latter, I think it was the pain of watching that singular manner of purposeful over-acting, by everyone.  After a while I just couldn't stand it.  I realize it's by design, like the Mamet non-acting acting is, but it pained me greatly.
The acting in Female Trouble is definitely bad but it's usually not the first thing mentioned by people who don't like the film

 
The acting in Female Trouble is definitely bad but it's usually not the first thing mentioned by people who don't like the film
:lol:   Too bad it won’t make the list, so we could see what kind of negative review KP could pull up.

 
Am I weird that I haven't had to watch anything yet because I've seen so many of these movies? I will grant I don't remember every single scene but it only takes me a quick search to jar loose the stored memories of seeing all of these movies.

That and I am a fairly opinionated and rigid conservative who isn't fond of change.

 
Yankee23Fan said:
Am I weird that I haven't had to watch anything yet because I've seen so many of these movies? I will grant I don't remember every single scene but it only takes me a quick search to jar loose the stored memories of seeing all of these movies.

That and I am a fairly opinionated and rigid conservative who isn't fond of change.
For me, it really depends on the year. In 99, I didn't have to watch anything new. In 82, I saw a few new movies. For 74, I had to watch a lot. The 70s are a bit of a blnd spot for me. 

 
For me, it really depends on the year. In 99, I didn't have to watch anything new. In 82, I saw a few new movies. For 74, I had to watch a lot. The 70s are a bit of a blnd spot for me. 
This is basically where I am as well.  For whatever reason, the only years that I am probably going to have issues with are the 70s.  I have 3-4 for most years, but can't go much deeper than that with stuff I liked or remember enough to bother ranking.  For '99 I had about 35-40 after I looked at the list of docs, same with the year we will do after that.   

 
Yankee23Fan said:
Am I weird that I haven't had to watch anything yet because I've seen so many of these movies? I will grant I don't remember every single scene but it only takes me a quick search to jar loose the stored memories of seeing all of these movies.

That and I am a fairly opinionated and rigid conservative who isn't fond of change.
I don't think it's odd that some of you have seen so many of these movies, but I do find it a little odd that you and El Floppo are able to or just prefer to go off of memory for these.  A big part that I find interesting is going back and seeing how some of these movies hold up vs. how I have them in my mind.  So many have flipped rankings for me.  Sometimes it's sad as I watch these flicks I hold dear in my memory from my youth and realize they aren't that great, but mostly I still enjoy the process.  

 
I don't think it's odd that some of you have seen so many of these movies, but I do find it a little odd that you and El Floppo are able to or just prefer to go off of memory for these.  A big part that I find interesting is going back and seeing how some of these movies hold up vs. how I have them in my mind.  So many have flipped rankings for me.  Sometimes it's sad as I watch these flicks I hold dear in my memory from my youth and realize they aren't that great, but mostly I still enjoy the process.  
amoral pissant!

 
Yankee23Fan said:
Am I weird that I haven't had to watch anything yet because I've seen so many of these movies? I will grant I don't remember every single scene but it only takes me a quick search to jar loose the stored memories of seeing all of these movies.

That and I am a fairly opinionated and rigid conservative who isn't fond of change.
I'm the exact same. Other than the conservative thing. I'm only putting movies in that I have seen and most of them are movies that I saw all the way back

 
I don't think it's odd that some of you have seen so many of these movies, but I do find it a little odd that you and El Floppo are able to or just prefer to go off of memory for these.  A big part that I find interesting is going back and seeing how some of these movies hold up vs. how I have them in my mind.  So many have flipped rankings for me.  Sometimes it's sad as I watch these flicks I hold dear in my memory from my youth and realize they aren't that great, but mostly I still enjoy the process.  
I have and have always had Exquisite taste. I don't need to go back and challenge it.

I also don't have the time or energy

 
Yankee23Fan said:
Am I weird that I haven't had to watch anything yet because I've seen so many of these movies? I will grant I don't remember every single scene but it only takes me a quick search to jar loose the stored memories of seeing all of these movies.

That and I am a fairly opinionated and rigid conservative who isn't fond of change.
I've seen plenty of the 74 offerings, but most of them are not point worthy IMO. I'm trying to find 10 that I feel are at least point worthy, and beyond that its worthwhile experiencing some films I may never have thought to view otherwise.

 
There are quite a few similarities between Pelham 123 and Murder on the ORNTXPRS.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top