Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch (1 Viewer)

[BustedKnuckles]

http://media.cmgdigi...54b2855e904d640

Holy crap....not one drop of blood. Anywhere. Hes wearing a grey t shirt that could easily be have mistaken as a white t shirt . That unzipped red jacket comes off at anytime during the struggle then its a t shirt that women saw , not a grey hoodie.

1) It is a red jacket. Not sure blood would exactly stand out.2) You would have to ignore John's statement that the guy on the bottom was wearing red.

John! Forgot about John!They've shown that video about 20 times in the last half hour. There's no blood. There's no injury at all.

He was treated at the scene.

They also send him to the laundromat?

AND they healed any and all injuries. This is crazy that people dont even trust there own eyes ...wow. Is it THAT important to keep denying that the zimmerman was full of #### !!! So you want people to believe that the beating that trey was giving him, you know, the one that was so bad he had to kill his attacker,left NO bloodanywhere in sight...not even blood from shooting trey who was on top of him when he shot the gun...ya ok.

 

[timschochet]

Sorry Christo, I hadn't realized you saw it yourself. OK, so with regard to the red shirt, we have two possibilities:1. The kid saw a red shirt, told the police and reporters he saw a red shirt, and has now been pressured by his mom and others to change his story.2. The kid wasn't sure what he saw because it was too dark, but was convinced by the police that he saw a red shirt, and, once having agreed to this, told the reporters the same. But now he realizes that the police manipulated him and he's back to his original stance, that he couldn't tell one way or another.Who the heck knows? But I'm skeptical of #1, only for the reason that it was too dark to see.

I'm skeptical of it all because there's too much pressure on the kid, who is black, to side with Trayvon. It doesn't seem like he knows who was actually screaming (although he did use the word 'man') and having any doubt is going to make him lean to Trayvon.

Martin was 17. Would his voice have changed in the next year? In one year he would have been a "man" as well. I'm just not buying this crap about man v child and that all of these witnesses are so sure of themselves that they could distinguish a 17 year old's voice from a 26 year old's voice. Are we forgetting Zimmerman's voice on the phone call to the police? It wasn't like James Earl Jones was making the call.

Dude, this is the part where the jury is looking at you really skeptically- they're saying to themselves "are you ####### kidding me?" If you're in a civil trial, this is the part where you tell your client, "we need to settle."

 

[BustedKnuckles]

Come on you guys. Why can't you just admit it? This guy's story is total BS. Yes, it's still going to be extremely difficult to convict him, but it's obvious he's lying.

You sure about that?

100%

 

[Christo]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

 

[timschochet]

Come on you guys. Why can't you just admit it? This guy's story is total BS. Yes, it's still going to be extremely difficult to convict him, but it's obvious he's lying.

You sure about that?

Nope.

 

[SeveredHorseHeads]

http://media.cmgdigi...54b2855e904d640

Holy crap....not one drop of blood. Anywhere. Hes wearing a grey t shirt that could easily be have mistaken as a white t shirt . That unzipped red jacket comes off at anytime during the struggle then its a t shirt that women saw , not a grey hoodie.

1) It is a red jacket. Not sure blood would exactly stand out.2) You would have to ignore John's statement that the guy on the bottom was wearing red.

John! Forgot about John!They've shown that video about 20 times in the last half hour. There's no blood. There's no injury at all.

He was treated at the scene.

They also send him to the laundromat?

They pre-treated the stains with a tide pen.

 

[Fennis]

http://media.cmgdigi...54b2855e904d640

Holy crap....not one drop of blood. Anywhere. Hes wearing a grey t shirt that could easily be have mistaken as a white t shirt . That unzipped red jacket comes off at anytime during the struggle then its a t shirt that women saw , not a grey hoodie.

1) It is a red jacket. Not sure blood would exactly stand out.2) You would have to ignore John's statement that the guy on the bottom was wearing red.

John! Forgot about John!They've shown that video about 20 times in the last half hour. There's no blood. There's no injury at all.

He was treated at the scene.

They also send him to the laundromat?

No, but they might have cleaned off his face.

They probably spit into a napkin and rubbed the blood off like my mom would do.Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

 

[identikit]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

 

[timschochet]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

Which basic facts? The ones that have turned out to be bogus?

 

[BustedKnuckles]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/trayvon-martin-case-video-zimmerman-16024564?

 

[Christo]

Sorry Christo, I hadn't realized you saw it yourself. OK, so with regard to the red shirt, we have two possibilities:1. The kid saw a red shirt, told the police and reporters he saw a red shirt, and has now been pressured by his mom and others to change his story.2. The kid wasn't sure what he saw because it was too dark, but was convinced by the police that he saw a red shirt, and, once having agreed to this, told the reporters the same. But now he realizes that the police manipulated him and he's back to his original stance, that he couldn't tell one way or another.Who the heck knows? But I'm skeptical of #1, only for the reason that it was too dark to see.

I'm skeptical of it all because there's too much pressure on the kid, who is black, to side with Trayvon. It doesn't seem like he knows who was actually screaming (although he did use the word 'man') and having any doubt is going to make him lean to Trayvon.

Martin was 17. Would his voice have changed in the next year? In one year he would have been a "man" as well. I'm just not buying this crap about man v child and that all of these witnesses are so sure of themselves that they could distinguish a 17 year old's voice from a 26 year old's voice. Are we forgetting Zimmerman's voice on the phone call to the police? It wasn't like James Earl Jones was making the call.

Dude, this is the part where the jury is looking at you really skeptically- they're saying to themselves "are you ####### kidding me?" If you're in a civil trial, this is the part where you tell your client, "we need to settle."

Juries are full of idiots who think they know what happened before they hear the first word of testimony. That doesn't mean they are right.

 

[Christo]

Now, I won't be responding to you again.

 

[timschochet]

Watch CNN right now. They are totally trashing the "injuries" defense.

 

[Christo]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/trayvon-martin-case-video-zimmerman-16024564?

There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.

 

[Christo]

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

 

[timschochet]

Now, I won't be responding to you again.

Don't be rude. I am only repeating what I am watching. There are prosecutors and medical experts on TV right now and they are all ridiculing the injuries defense. And BTW, per every one of these guys, Zimmerman was never medically treated, either at the scene or otherwise. So apparently they are all as ignorant as I am of your "basic facts of the case."

 

[timschochet]

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

CNN experts (prosecutors, police) just answered this question. The answer is yes. And they didn't. And Zimmerman refused medical treatment.

 

[pantherclub]

http://media.cmgdigi...54b2855e904d640

Holy crap....not one drop of blood. Anywhere. Hes wearing a grey t shirt that could easily be have mistaken as a white t shirt . That unzipped red jacket comes off at anytime during the struggle then its a t shirt that women saw , not a grey hoodie.

1) It is a red jacket. Not sure blood would exactly stand out.2) You would have to ignore John's statement that the guy on the bottom was wearing red.

John! Forgot about John!They've shown that video about 20 times in the last half hour. There's no blood. There's no injury at all.

He was treated at the scene.

They also send him to the laundromat?

No, but they might have cleaned off his face.

Wouldnt they take photos as evidence?

 

[Parrothead]

Sorry Christo, I hadn't realized you saw it yourself.

OK, so with regard to the red shirt, we have two possibilities:

1. The kid saw a red shirt, told the police and reporters he saw a red shirt, and has now been pressured by his mom and others to change his story.

2. The kid wasn't sure what he saw because it was too dark, but was convinced by the police that he saw a red shirt, and, once having agreed to this, told the reporters the same. But now he realizes that the police manipulated him and he's back to his original stance, that he couldn't tell one way or another.

Who the heck knows? But I'm skeptical of #1, only for the reason that it was too dark to see.

I'm skeptical of it all because there's too much pressure on the kid, who is black, to side with Trayvon. It doesn't seem like he knows who was actually screaming (although he did use the word 'man') and having any doubt is going to make him lean to Trayvon.

Martin was 17. Would his voice have changed in the next year? In one year he would have been a "man" as well. I'm just not buying this crap about man v child and that all of these witnesses are so sure of themselves that they could distinguish a 17 year old's voice from a 26 year old's voice. Are we forgetting Zimmerman's voice on the phone call to the police? It wasn't like James Earl Jones was making the call.

Dude, this is the part where the jury is looking at you really skeptically- they're saying to themselves "are you ####### kidding me?" If you're in a civil trial, this is the part where you tell your client, "we need to settle."

Juriesthis thread are is full of idiotspeople who think they know what happened before they hear the first word of testimony. That doesn't mean they are right.

fixed.. this thread is AWESOME

 

[BustedKnuckles]

Now, I won't be responding to you again.

Don't be rude. I am only repeating what I am watching. There are prosecutors and medical experts on TV right now and they are all ridiculing the injuries defense. And BTW, per every one of these guys, Zimmerman was never medically treated, either at the scene or otherwise. So apparently they are all as ignorant as I am of your "basic facts of the case."

hes being rude because he just found out hes defending a murderer and he wasted days on here lmao

 

[timschochet]

http://media.cmgdigi...54b2855e904d640

Holy crap....not one drop of blood. Anywhere. Hes wearing a grey t shirt that could easily be have mistaken as a white t shirt . That unzipped red jacket comes off at anytime during the struggle then its a t shirt that women saw , not a grey hoodie.

1) It is a red jacket. Not sure blood would exactly stand out.2) You would have to ignore John's statement that the guy on the bottom was wearing red.

John! Forgot about John!They've shown that video about 20 times in the last half hour. There's no blood. There's no injury at all.

He was treated at the scene.

They also send him to the laundromat?

No, but they might have cleaned off his face.

Wouldnt they take photos as evidence?

Christo has no idea. The rest of the world does. The answer is yes. But they didn't.

 

[SacramentoBob]

Not sure I'm willing to put too much into a still photo that doesn't show his face or head clearly. But if they didn't take photos of the injuries, that makes either the police or Zimmerman look bad.

 

[ATC1]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/trayvon-martin-case-video-zimmerman-16024564?

There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.

Other than the police report?

 

[Chaos Commish]

For Zim to be full of crap on the issue of injuries then the eye witness named John would have to be lying about seeing him get beat up (unless what he saw caused no injuries), the police would have to be lying in reporting injuries, and the fire department person who treated the injuries at the scene will have to prove bogus. That's tossing quite a few folks into a conspiracy theory. Do you really think the police are stupid enough to lie about something so easily disproved?

Further, I corrected cstu somewhere today about this happening on the grass. I was wrong. Martin's body was found feet on the sidewalk, body in the grass.

 

[SacramentoBob]

As he's walking in, the back of his head looks fine. At least you'd expect something more noticeable if his head was rammed into the sidewalk repeatedly.

 

[FavreCo]

http://media.cmgdigi...54b2855e904d640

Holy crap....not one drop of blood. Anywhere. Hes wearing a grey t shirt that could easily be have mistaken as a white t shirt . That unzipped red jacket comes off at anytime during the struggle then its a t shirt that women saw , not a grey hoodie.

1) It is a red jacket. Not sure blood would exactly stand out.2) You would have to ignore John's statement that the guy on the bottom was wearing red.

John! Forgot about John!They've shown that video about 20 times in the last half hour. There's no blood. There's no injury at all.

He was treated at the scene.

They also send him to the laundromat?

No, but they might have cleaned off his face.

Wouldnt they take photos as evidence?

Christo has no idea. The rest of the world does. The answer is yes. But they didn't.

That's a no brainer. I mean, someone is dead. This has to be one of the dumbest police dept's ever.

 

[ATC1]

Not sure I'm willing to put too much into a still photo that doesn't show his face or head clearly. But if they didn't take photos of the injuries, that makes either the police or Zimmerman look bad.

This is big, IMO. Although the police are not required by law to release photos. They are required to release the 911 tapes.

 

[timschochet]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.co...erman-16024564?

There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.

Other than the police report?

You mean the first police report that made no mention of injuries? Or the second report which said he was bleeding and treated by EMTs?

 

[Christo]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/trayvon-martin-case-video-zimmerman-16024564?

There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.

Other than the police report?

I'm just talking about the tape. Apparently, everyone and his uncle has now watched that grainy tape and come to the indisputable conclusion that there couldn't be a cut on the back of Zimmerman's head.

 

[pantherclub]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/trayvon-martin-case-video-zimmerman-16024564?

There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.

Other than the police report?

I'm just talking about the tape. Apparently, everyone and his uncle has now watched that grainy tape and come to the indisputable conclusion that there couldn't be a cut on the back of Zimmerman's head.

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

 

[timschochet]

For Zim to be full of crap on the issue of injuries then the eye witness named John would have to be lying about seeing him get beat up (unless what he saw caused no injuries), the police would have to be lying in reporting injuries, and the fire department person who treated the injuries at the scene will have to prove bogus. That's tossing quite a few folks into a conspiracy theory. Do you really think the police are stupid enough to lie about something so easily disproved?

This is a good argument. I'm especially interested in the fire department person- is there separately testimony from that person apart from the second police report? He never checked into the hospital. He never required stitches. Maybe he was slightly injured and exaggerated it, which would save us from having to call the police liars. But there's obviously a discrepancy here.

 

[FavreCo]

I'm watching videotape of Zimmerman being brought into the police station on the night of the shooting. No broken nose that I can see. No bruises or blood at the back of the head, either.

Not sure why they did not call you sooner. This would have been wrapped up weeks ago.

Dude. make fun of me all you want. I'm not making any assumptions. I'm just watching this on TV.

Medical diagnoses via your TV.

Just saying that I thought he would have looked more beat up if his story was true, that's all. In the grand scheme of things, means nothing. Since I started following this story, I've believed two things:1. Zimmerman is a liar and guilty of murder or manslaughter.2. There's no way to prove it that would hold up against a reasonable doubt defense.Those have been my suppositions all along, and I have heard nothing that changes them- yet.

I'll second the above as we stand right now. 3. The dude's life is ####ed regardless.

 

[parasaurolophus]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.co...erman-16024564?

There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.

Other than the police report?

You mean the first police report that made no mention of injuries? Or the second report which said he was bleeding and treated by EMTs?

Can you post a link to the first police report?

 

[timschochet]

When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?

I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.

he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.co...erman-16024564?

There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.

Other than the police report?

You mean the first police report that made no mention of injuries? Or the second report which said he was bleeding and treated by EMTs?

Can you post a link to the first police report?

Nope. Heard all this on TV. For all I know, it might be total BS.Unlike several people here, I am not claiming to be sure of ANYTHING in this case. What the CNN experts are saying make a lot more sense to me than Christo's various arguments here. But that's just me, and it's entirely subjective.

 

[Chaos Commish]

For Zim to be full of crap on the issue of injuries then the eye witness named John would have to be lying about seeing him get beat up (unless what he saw caused no injuries), the police would have to be lying in reporting injuries, and the fire department person who treated the injuries at the scene will have to prove bogus. That's tossing quite a few folks into a conspiracy theory. Do you really think the police are stupid enough to lie about something so easily disproved?

This is a good argument. I'm especially interested in the fire department person- is there separately testimony from that person apart from the second police report? He never checked into the hospital. He never required stitches. Maybe he was slightly injured and exaggerated it, which would save us from having to call the police liars. But there's obviously a discrepancy here.

I took an elbow playing hoops in high school. Broke my nose. Blood coming from both nostrils, but nothing crazy. The athletic director put a locker towel over my face, set my nose, stuffed my nostrils and told me to ice it still it stopped bleeding and go home. When I got home my parents had no idea I had a broken nose. The next morning two black eyes gave it away.

 

[timschochet]

For Zim to be full of crap on the issue of injuries then the eye witness named John would have to be lying about seeing him get beat up (unless what he saw caused no injuries), the police would have to be lying in reporting injuries, and the fire department person who treated the injuries at the scene will have to prove bogus. That's tossing quite a few folks into a conspiracy theory. Do you really think the police are stupid enough to lie about something so easily disproved?

This is a good argument. I'm especially interested in the fire department person- is there separately testimony from that person apart from the second police report? He never checked into the hospital. He never required stitches. Maybe he was slightly injured and exaggerated it, which would save us from having to call the police liars. But there's obviously a discrepancy here.

I took an elbow playing hoops in high school. Broke my nose. Blood coming from both nostrils, but nothing crazy. The athletic director put a locker towel over my face, set my nose, stuffed my nostrils and told me to ice it still it stopped bleeding and go home. When I got home my parents had no idea I had a broken nose. The next morning two black eyes gave it away.

Fair enough. Still think it looks awfully suspicious, but who knows?

 

[Christo]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

 

[ATC1]

For Zim to be full of crap on the issue of injuries then the eye witness named John would have to be lying about seeing him get beat up (unless what he saw caused no injuries), the police would have to be lying in reporting injuries, and the fire department person who treated the injuries at the scene will have to prove bogus. That's tossing quite a few folks into a conspiracy theory. Do you really think the police are stupid enough to lie about something so easily disproved?

This is a good argument. I'm especially interested in the fire department person- is there separately testimony from that person apart from the second police report? He never checked into the hospital. He never required stitches. Maybe he was slightly injured and exaggerated it, which would save us from having to call the police liars. But there's obviously a discrepancy here.

He refused to go to the hospital, so he obviously did not think it was that bad. Who described it as a severe injury? The report noted there was blood out his nose and behind his head.

 

[FavreCo]

At the friend of zimmerman on Nancy Grace.

Nancy: What about thse injuries. Did he have a broken nose.

Moron: Yes he did and he had cuts on the back of the head.

Nancy: Did you see them?

Moron: No, I heard about it.

 

[Billy Bats]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

Wait, hold on a minute. This guy started yelling self defense as soon as he fired the gun. You're telling me someone claiming self defense WOULDN'T have his injuries photographed by police on scene to corroborate his self defense claim??? Seriously?

 

[pantherclub]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

It was a potential homicide with the explanation being self defense. The police would have without a doubt taken pictures if there was something there. You are looking foolish and quite racist in here.

 

[Fennis]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

The cop overheard Zimmerman at the scene say he was acting in self-defense. I would have thought his injuries would be considered more relevant. For example, people in this thread are claiming Zimmerman’s head was cracked repeatedly against the sidewalk. If they didn’t take pictures it was clearly a bad decision by the police. I understand the police make mistakes. But it was clearly a mistake.

 

[FavreCo]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

You are such a joke.

 

[mad sweeney]

They said they "didn't need him" to follow.. The didn't say "don't follow" or "we advise against that"[

People keep repeating this and I have to say it's truly annoying. It reminds me of Bill Clinton discussing the definition of "is". Look, by now we've all heard the 911 tape. What was said to Zimmerman was pretty firm. They didn't want him to pursue Martin. If you don't get this, you're being deliberately obtuse.

Firm would have been "Stop following him", or "Don't follow him"This was the opposite of firm and even if the 911 operator had the authority to give advice, or direct citizens, that argument wouldn't stand up in court.. That's how far opposite of "Firm" that statement was...Sorry it bothers you, but it's true.. They didn't tell him to do or not to do anything.. They left him to make his own decisions.. they just told him what they needed or didn't need..

You need help with context. When a 911 operator tells you they don't need you to do something, it's not phrased as a command, but it's still what the legal authorities want you to do (or not do). As much of a clown as you are about some things, you should at least be intellectually honest about this.

I know what the intent was, but it wasn't an "order" to be "disobeyed".. It wasn't direction to be followed, and it wasn't advice to be taken.. It was anything but a firm order, direction, request, advice, etc...

It was a 911 operator telling him, without using commanding language, not to do what he did. The reason why is that he's not a trained police officer and something ####ed up might happen. Like it did. Period.

 

[Christo]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

Wait, hold on a minute. This guy started yelling self defense as soon as he fired the gun. You're telling me someone claiming self defense WOULDN'T have his injuries photographed by police on scene to corroborate his self defense claim??? Seriously?

He just shot and killed someone. Unless he is a psychopath, there's a good chance he wasn't thinking straight at that point in time.

 

[Christo]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

It was a potential homicide with the explanation being self defense. The police would have without a doubt taken pictures if there was something there. You are looking foolish and quite racist in here.

 

[pantagrapher]

It all makes sense now. Police can't really photograph injuries that aren't there.

 

[BustedKnuckles]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

you mean the same police who drug tested the dead kid and NOT the shooter? Watch that ''grainy'' video again...hes standing next to a bald cop and his head looks as undamaged as the cops. Sorry but you sound like the defense lawyer that was on CNN , and he sounded ridiculous. No blood from a shooting and a beating...not one drop could be seen anywhere. 2 guys wrestling and punching at close quarters and the victim gets shot point blank and no blood spray ...hmmm.

 

[mad sweeney]

Martin was a thug, he attacked Zimmerman, they both went after Zimmerman's gun after Martin started beating him up and Martin lost...

We went over this yesterday, all supported by witnesses, that's why no charges were files, that's why the "stand your ground" defense will not be used and Zimmerman if charged will be acquitted because he was attacked and defended himself...

All he is guilty of is being stupid, maybe...

No it's not.

The attack on Zimmerman was most definitely supported by witnesses, the thug part was my addition, wait to see how this all unfolds, bet I am a lot closer than you ...Explains the injuries the first 911 call and no evidence to charge Zimmerman...

Which on site witnesses are you looking at???

The girlfriend is absolutely unreliable and Martin has his reputation and Zimmerman has his from many, many previous instances...

Almost all of what you wrote is pure speculation. One witness said he saw them fighting. That's it. You think Martin was a thug because he was young and black and you're old and white and prejudiced.

Don't forget to look at his school history and his facebook postings...Besides we determined your status yesterday...

Yeah, teenagers never put stupid stuff on facebook or goof off at school. And I think we determined your status a long time ago.

Don't forget the kids' history of violence due to participating in school sports.

 

[pantherclub]

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?

Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?

I have no idea.

Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.

Wait, hold on a minute. This guy started yelling self defense as soon as he fired the gun. You're telling me someone claiming self defense WOULDN'T have his injuries photographed by police on scene to corroborate his self defense claim??? Seriously?

He just shot and killed someone. Unless he is a psychopath, there's a good chance he wasn't thinking straight at that point in time.

wat?