Hairy Snowman
Footballguy
Um guys - Moose was there when Orton was playing. In fact, the WR corps is identical except for Bradley.And Grossman got hurt in the first preseason game his 2nd year, I believe the 3rd game of his rookie year. When did he get all this gme experience? Seems Orton was ahead of him the 4th game in.You're right, but because Grossman's sample size is so small for his first three seasons (3 games max), its difficult to draw on any other info. FWIW, Grossman's worst YPA is 6.1 from his rookie year, and Orton's was far worse. It's a difficult comparison to make based on numbers, with better WR's and experience definitely giving Grossman an advantage, but the coaches selected Rex as their guy based upon watching both play on a daily basis, and their professional lives depend on him. I am not a fan of Rex at all, but he did enough to earn the #1 seed and win the NFCC game in his first full season as a starter. Orton is not the answer, and the Bears front office knows this.I'm certainly no particular fan of his, but you're comparing Orton's rookie season, without a WR of the caliber of Muhammed, to Grossman's fourth season, and third in the same offense? Doesn't that seem like a bit of a reach to you?I still say Orton is their best option. Dude was run out of the lineup while posting similar numbers to Grossman.![]()
Orton had an abysmal 5.1 YPA and only threw 9 TD's vs. 13 picks in 15 games during 2005.
Grossman has a career YPA of 6.7 and has more TD's than INT's in his career.
Its quite a stretch to say Orton is the best option in Chicago based upon his performance.
Last edited by a moderator: