What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game of Thrones, tv only, books don't exist, no backstory...NERDS already ruining a series that hasn't started (1 Viewer)

This is where a map would be useful. How far are Jorah and the imp away from Dany?
I always look at this map for reference.They're cutting through the islands (Smoking Sea) on the bottom right, just west of the Red Waste. Then heading NE to Meereen.
What a dumb decision to go thru the Smoking Sea instead of around.
no pirates
:shrug: Apparently Pirates are scared of it for some reason. :shrug:

 
Regarding a map, I tend to agree...wouldn't mind an Indiana Jones style map between scenes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think a timeline would be great. Jorah is banished but ends up very far away from Dany the next time we see him. How long in between his banishment and his chance meeting with Tyrion took place? Now, he's presumably traveling a different way, shorter way, back to where Dany is in Mereen. How long is the trip back?

How far away in distance and time is Sansa from Jon? She's heard a lot of things but hasn't heard that Jon is still alive? Arya is off the map, no one has seen her... ta da... except the fricken knight lady who killed The Hound. She has talked to Sansa since seeing Arya and she didn't think to tell Lady Sansa that her sister was seen alive not to long ago?

Bran is off the beaten path and in hiding so he is rightfully presumed dead. Arya hasn't been in contact with anyone but where are they in relation to each other and over what time frame are we taking here?

 
Do we have any explanation for the stone people or whatever they're called.

Jorah gets touched, he starts turning. Jorah touches Tyrion, no?
It's greyscale, the same thing that's on Stannis' daughter's face. Valyria's like a leper colony except it's, you know, a greyscale colony.

Dunno why they were so unchill though. :shrug:
Seemed like they were kind of mean.
Right? And for what. What's the endgame there? You jump on some guy's boat, are you trying to steal from them? Scare them? What's the upside? Here, get a sword in the #### for your troubles.

 
Sam's wildling girl said that she had siblings that caught greyscale and it turned them into wild animals. They basically become stone zombies.

 
You know, that Forbes spoiler really annoys me. And I can't say why without spoiling it for other people but it really annoys me. If that is where the books were going I would have been truly pissed when I read that chapter and thrown the book. But I guess that is what makes for great drama.

 
You know, that Forbes spoiler really annoys me. And I can't say why without spoiling it for other people but it really annoys me. If that is where the books were going I would have been truly pissed when I read that chapter and thrown the book. But I guess that is what makes for great drama.
I think the general consensus is that what you think happens, does not really happen. Or, that it is not as final as it may appear.

 
You know, that Forbes spoiler really annoys me. And I can't say why without spoiling it for other people but it really annoys me. If that is where the books were going I would have been truly pissed when I read that chapter and thrown the book. But I guess that is what makes for great drama.
I think the general consensus is that what you think happens, does not really happen. Or, that it is not as final as it may appear.
Yeah I do get that which is the only saving grace of the ordeal I guess. For now.

 
You know, that Forbes spoiler really annoys me. And I can't say why without spoiling it for other people but it really annoys me. If that is where the books were going I would have been truly pissed when I read that chapter and thrown the book. But I guess that is what makes for great drama.
I think the general consensus is that what you think happens, does not really happen. Or, that it is not as final as it may appear.
Yeah I do get that which is the only saving grace of the ordeal I guess. For now.
There really are no spoilers at this point. HBO is already ahead of the books in some parts of the story, which will only increase by the end of this season. More importantly, the shows have diverged from the books so much that no one knows what is to come either in print or on screen. (I did not read the Forbes article and have no idea what that spoiler is.)

 
There is definitely a huge spoiler in that article. It is something that seems very likely to happen in the show this season, at some point.

 
There is definitely a huge spoiler in that article. It is something that seems very likely to happen in the show this season, at some point.
Yeah it is setting up for it given what has happened. I have a theory on how to make it work though so it would be interesting to see if it plays anything close to my thoughts.

 
You know, that Forbes spoiler really annoys me. And I can't say why without spoiling it for other people but it really annoys me. If that is where the books were going I would have been truly pissed when I read that chapter and thrown the book. But I guess that is what makes for great drama.
I think the general consensus is that what you think happens, does not really happen. Or, that it is not as final as it may appear.
Yeah I do get that which is the only saving grace of the ordeal I guess. For now.
There really are no spoilers at this point. HBO is already ahead of the books in some parts of the story, which will only increase by the end of this season. More importantly, the shows have diverged from the books so much that no one knows what is to come either in print or on screen. (I did not read the Forbes article and have no idea what that spoiler is.)
The spoilers to the book people are when certain changes are made or certain characters killed off or eliminated etc., as those changes tell me some things are irrelevant that are in the book for the end game.

 
Leeroy Jenkins said:
CletiusMaximus said:
Yankee23Fan said:
Sinn Fein said:
Yankee23Fan said:
You know, that Forbes spoiler really annoys me. And I can't say why without spoiling it for other people but it really annoys me. If that is where the books were going I would have been truly pissed when I read that chapter and thrown the book. But I guess that is what makes for great drama.
I think the general consensus is that what you think happens, does not really happen. Or, that it is not as final as it may appear.
Yeah I do get that which is the only saving grace of the ordeal I guess. For now.
There really are no spoilers at this point. HBO is already ahead of the books in some parts of the story, which will only increase by the end of this season. More importantly, the shows have diverged from the books so much that no one knows what is to come either in print or on screen. (I did not read the Forbes article and have no idea what that spoiler is.)
The spoilers to the book people are when certain changes are made or certain characters killed off or eliminated etc., as those changes tell me some things are irrelevant that are in the book for the end game.
It is pretty irrelevant. The joy is in the journey, sit back and enjoy both stories, and the various meandering paths they take to (as far as we know) the same destination.

 
There is definitely a huge spoiler in that article. It is something that seems very likely to happen in the show this season, at some point.
Yeah it is setting up for it given what has happened. I have a theory on how to make it work though so it would be interesting to see if it plays anything close to my thoughts.
I didn't read beyong the big spoiler that preceded "Spoilers Ahead".....did the rest of the article make it seem that it is happening for sure, or has already happened in the leather-bound things will all the words in them?

 
There is definitely a huge spoiler in that article. It is something that seems very likely to happen in the show this season, at some point.
Yeah it is setting up for it given what has happened. I have a theory on how to make it work though so it would be interesting to see if it plays anything close to my thoughts.
I didn't read beyong the big spoiler that preceded "Spoilers Ahead".....did the rest of the article make it seem that it is happening for sure, or has already happened in the leather-bound things will all the words in them?
Already happened in books but the absolute result is not yet known so it's a big cliffhanger.
 
There is definitely a huge spoiler in that article. It is something that seems very likely to happen in the show this season, at some point.
Yeah it is setting up for it given what has happened. I have a theory on how to make it work though so it would be interesting to see if it plays anything close to my thoughts.
I didn't read beyong the big spoiler that preceded "Spoilers Ahead".....did the rest of the article make it seem that it is happening for sure, or has already happened in the leather-bound things will all the words in them?
I read it and I didn't even notice the spoiler, I thought it was speculation. Dunno, I don't care I guess either

 
Just read the Forbes article. Can't believe they printed that in an article that seemed geared towards the TV audience. What a ####.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.
Yeah I haven't read the Forbes article, but they should definitely have said through the end of season 5. Most articles about the show say something similar to what was said there and they always mean through the current episode.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.
Yeah I haven't read the Forbes article, but they should definitely have said through the end of season 5. Most articles about the show say something similar to what was said there and they always mean through the current episode.
You guys need to up your reading comprehension I guess.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.
Yeah I haven't read the Forbes article, but they should definitely have said through the end of season 5. Most articles about the show say something similar to what was said there and they always mean through the current episode.
You guys need to up your reading comprehension I guess.
Yes they do, because it does say "through season 5".

 
I read it willingly. I knew it was through the season. Like I said previously, spoilers don't bother me that much. I enjoy the ride as much as the destination so I have no complaints that there are spoilers at all. I've read most of the book thread for the most part as well since I discovered the show.

The actual spoiler itself is what bothered me because of what it is - but I can't specifically say why without spoiling it for everyone else.

Overall though, people need to relax on this show and with books and spoilers and coming soon videos and all that. It's the age we live in. You have the choice not to be spoiled by simply not going to website, link or video about the show in any way shape or form. If you seek out any information on the show at all, you simply do so at your own risk. YMMV. And so on. No biggie to me. You can make a case that knowing the spoilers and knowing what happens in the books can actually increase the enjoyment of the show because you can focus on deeper things than simply watching and waiting for what happens next. If you know a book character exists but isn't in the show, can you figure out how they are using the story of that character if at all? If someone died in either medium that didn't die in the other, how will the show work with that and so on. And the fact that it is moving away from the books so clearly at this point is probably a good thing. Or not. Again, YMMV.

 
My "close but not" favorite name so far is Zazu with a side of duck sauce (the guy in the vault in quarth).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.
Yeah I haven't read the Forbes article, but they should definitely have said through the end of season 5. Most articles about the show say something similar to what was said there and they always mean through the current episode.
You guys need to up your reading comprehension I guess.
"through season 5" implies that it's discussing the TV show, which is currently at episode 5. That is all that exists of season 5. The spoiler hasn't happened in the TV show. There is a difference.

I do agree with Yankee23Fan that we take risks reading these articles, but most have been very good about alerting readers that it's a book spoiler vs TV. And while I also agree that there are other ways to enjoy this show if you know what's coming, I personally enjoy not knowing what's happening and being shocked by it when it does happen. Ultimately, I'll need to curb my reading if I want to continue to enjoy the show in this manner.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.
Yeah I haven't read the Forbes article, but they should definitely have said through the end of season 5. Most articles about the show say something similar to what was said there and they always mean through the current episode.
You guys need to up your reading comprehension I guess.
"through season 5" implies that it's discussing the TV show, which is currently at episode 5. That is all that exists of season 5. The spoiler hasn't happened in the TV show. There is a difference.
Oh good grief. If you have watched the first four seasons of GoT, you know damn well that a season doesn't consist of just five episodes.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.
Yeah I haven't read the Forbes article, but they should definitely have said through the end of season 5. Most articles about the show say something similar to what was said there and they always mean through the current episode.
You guys need to up your reading comprehension I guess.
"through season 5" implies that it's discussing the TV show, which is currently at episode 5. That is all that exists of season 5. The spoiler hasn't happened in the TV show. There is a difference.
Oh good grief. If you have watched the first four seasons of GoT, you know damn well that a season doesn't consist of just five episodes.
That's not what he's saying.

It would be easy to misunderstand that to mean "through season 5" up until the current episode.

 
I think it is funny that people are complaining about the Forbes article when the first line reads:

Spoilers through Season 5 of ‘Game of Thrones’ follow.
Many articles out there say something similar but it means through the current episode. That's how I took it.
Yeah I haven't read the Forbes article, but they should definitely have said through the end of season 5. Most articles about the show say something similar to what was said there and they always mean through the current episode.
You guys need to up your reading comprehension I guess.
"through season 5" implies that it's discussing the TV show, which is currently at episode 5. That is all that exists of season 5. The spoiler hasn't happened in the TV show. There is a difference.
Oh good grief. If you have watched the first four seasons of GoT, you know damn well that a season doesn't consist of just five episodes.
That's not what he's saying.

It would be easy to misunderstand that to mean "through season 5" up until the current episode.
:lmao:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top