CutlerToCutler
Footballguy
Farverer RWHAHAHAAHHAAHAHA

Last edited by a moderator:
Run the ball to the left Childress. You #######!
This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.I know it is fun to blame a loss like this on Favre, and I am not absolving him of anything - four turnovers is never good - but if Brad Childress had used his brain, the Vikings still would have won this game. Why go for it on 4th and 2 on that opening drive? Longwell can hit a 43-yarder. Hell, if they hit that FG, they could have kicked a winning FG on either of the last two drives. It was almost like Childress was too intent on them finishing drives with touchdowns every time, instead of taking the points when they were there, and look what happened: they lost by 4 points in a game in which your defense allowed 7 points. Childress is simply a horrible coach when it comes to game management.
Lovie Smith syndrome?This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.I know it is fun to blame a loss like this on Favre, and I am not absolving him of anything - four turnovers is never good - but if Brad Childress had used his brain, the Vikings still would have won this game. Why go for it on 4th and 2 on that opening drive? Longwell can hit a 43-yarder. Hell, if they hit that FG, they could have kicked a winning FG on either of the last two drives. It was almost like Childress was too intent on them finishing drives with touchdowns every time, instead of taking the points when they were there, and look what happened: they lost by 4 points in a game in which your defense allowed 7 points. Childress is simply a horrible coach when it comes to game management.
It's easy to say this in hindsight. However, there's plenty of stats to show that in that position, going for it is the better play (just google "going for it on 4th down"). When Bellichik does this, no one blinks an eye. There's plenty of things to criticize Childress about, but this particular decision is not one of them.This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.
So they shun the FG 3 times in deep and lose by 4? Uhhh, WHATTTTT?Chili goes for it instead of the field goal and Dolphins knock down the pass.AP and Harvin look good today.
I know it is fun to blame a loss like this on Favre, and I am not absolving him of anything - four turnovers is never good - but if Brad Childress had used his brain, the Vikings still would have won this game. Why go for it on 4th and 2 on that opening drive? Longwell can hit a 43-yarder. Hell, if they hit that FG, they could have kicked a winning FG on either of the last two drives. It was almost like Childress was too intent on them finishing drives with touchdowns every time, instead of taking the points when they were there, and look what happened: they lost by 4 points in a game in which your defense allowed 7 points. Childress is simply a horrible coach when it comes to game management.
Uh, when Belichick did it, message boards across the internet exploded and melted down.It's easy to say this in hindsight. However, there's plenty of stats to show that in that position, going for it is the better play (just google "going for it on 4th down"). When Bellichik does this, no one blinks an eye.There's plenty of things to criticize Childress about, but this particular decision is not one of them.This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.
Just absolutely have to disagree with you here. Statistics be damned, their offense has done nothing this year to warrant going for it on 4th and 2 on their fist possession of the game, when Longwell's a near lock for a (43 yard?) FG. Fourth and one? Fine, run AP off the LEFT SIDE and smash the Dolphins in the mouth. Fourth and two with a sputtering Favre? You take the points, and let your defense do its thing. But not Childress, he's far too smart for such simplistic thinking.It's easy to say this in hindsight. However, there's plenty of stats to show that in that position, going for it is the better play (just google "going for it on 4th down"). When Bellichik does this, no one blinks an eye. There's plenty of things to criticize Childress about, but this particular decision is not one of them.This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.
If you're going to ignore the data that is available on this particular issue (going for it on 4th down), then you're not being any smarter than you accuse Childress of being. There are plenty of good reasons to go for it in that situation. Enough that characterizing it as "dumb dumb dumb" is flat out wrong. At worst it was marginally wrong. I think Childress is a terrible coach, but not for this.Just absolutely have to disagree with you here. Statistics be damned, their offense has done nothing this year to warrant going for it on 4th and 2 on their fist possession of the game, when Longwell's a near lock for a (43 yard?) FG. Fourth and one? Fine, run AP off the LEFT SIDE and smash the Dolphins in the mouth. Fourth and two with a sputtering Favre? You take the points, and let your defense do its thing. But not Childress, he's far too smart for such simplistic thinking.It's easy to say this in hindsight. However, there's plenty of stats to show that in that position, going for it is the better play (just google "going for it on 4th down"). When Bellichik does this, no one blinks an eye. There's plenty of things to criticize Childress about, but this particular decision is not one of them.This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.
I guess that's true. There was a commotion in that instance. Doesn't mean the critics were right, which was my main point.I forget the exact scenario of that particular decision, but what I do remember is:Uh, when Belichick did it, message boards across the internet exploded and melted down.It's easy to say this in hindsight. However, there's plenty of stats to show that in that position, going for it is the better play (just google "going for it on 4th down"). When Bellichik does this, no one blinks an eye.There's plenty of things to criticize Childress about, but this particular decision is not one of them.This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.
Childress was Lovie before Lovie was Lovie.. .. Childress is still trying to figure out how to coach himself out of aLovie Smith syndrome?This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.I know it is fun to blame a loss like this on Favre, and I am not absolving him of anything - four turnovers is never good - but if Brad Childress had used his brain, the Vikings still would have won this game. Why go for it on 4th and 2 on that opening drive? Longwell can hit a 43-yarder. Hell, if they hit that FG, they could have kicked a winning FG on either of the last two drives. It was almost like Childress was too intent on them finishing drives with touchdowns every time, instead of taking the points when they were there, and look what happened: they lost by 4 points in a game in which your defense allowed 7 points. Childress is simply a horrible coach when it comes to game management.
It's easy to say this in hindsight. However, there's plenty of stats to show that in that position, going for it is the better play (just google "going for it on 4th down"). When Bellichik does this, no one blinks an eye. There's plenty of things to criticize Childress about, but this particular decision is not one of them.This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.
Exactly. You can cite all the statistics you want. But on a fourth and TWO on your first possession of the game with a defense that was rock solid in Week 1, you take the points. That's especially true with a rusty Favre and a sputtering offense with not a single trustworthy receiver.It's easy to say this in hindsight. However, there's plenty of stats to show that in that position, going for it is the better play (just google "going for it on 4th down"). When Bellichik does this, no one blinks an eye. There's plenty of things to criticize Childress about, but this particular decision is not one of them.This. Going for it on fourth and two in what would be a completely makeable FG? That was a dumb dumb dumb decision to begin the game.Late in the 4th quarter, down by a touchdown or more
at that point of the game you take the points..
who would have thunk Jason Allen would be playing so well!You got that right! Two fantastic defensive performances.2-0 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Fantastic start to the season - 2 ROAD victories