Andy Hicks
Footballguy
The winner of this game goes to Philadelphia next week.Post your comments and game thoughts here.
I think that point spread is way too high. These are two very evenly-matched teams. Packers get 3 for being at home, but that's all I think they should get. This should be a terrific game.I think Seattle covers at 7.5.
I've been impressed with Aikman since he started working for Fox. I didn't have high hopes for him, but I think he does a real good job. I like Collinsworth because he isn't afraid to speak his mind, even if the comments seem way out of left field at times. And Buck's a rock solid play-by-play guy.great cutback by Alexander there.these commentators are SO MUCH BETTER than the ESPN crew it's unreal. I can actually listen to this.
Possibly top of the second tier, with Priest Holmes being alone in the first.Alexander isn't quick but is probably the best at reading blocks
As good as Holmes is, Ahman Green is right with him when it comes to reading blocks and showing patience to allow the holes to open for him.Possibly top of the second tier, with Priest Holmes being alone in the first.
tuck rule
Not even close, actually. This was a pretty evident incomplete pass.tuck rule
This was an extreme case, because the play looked like a clear incomplete pass, but would we rather have the officials blow the whistle with no chance at replay? It's a fine line and a situation that they (officials) will never win.This is the best eample I've seen of the complaint that officials are calling the game with challenges in mind. They seemed to let that go expecting a challenge.
I don't agree. If you don't have that rule, you end up with coaches challenging because they want a 3rd & 3 instead of a 3rd & 4, essentially delaying the game.I do agree with the commentary that it's awfully stupid for a team to be penalized for winning a challenge. Holmgren got the challenge right and still loses a challenge in the process. Stupid.
looked to me like he was stopping his throwing motion when the ball slipped outHOW is that a 'tuck rule', it was simply a pass that slipped out of the QBs hand as he was throwing it. Incomplete pass.Refereeing in the NFL sucks this year.
I had to laugh when they played the theme music for "Pirates of the Caribbean" and the play-by-play guy credited it as one of the scores used for those classic NFL films pieces. :rotflmao:great cutback by Alexander there.these commentators are SO MUCH BETTER than the ESPN crew it's unreal. I can actually listen to this.
If they win the challenge, they shouldn't be penalized. I understand the point about delaying the game, but if there's two clear-cut situations later in this game that would benefit the Seahawks, Holmgren may not be able to challenge because he "won" a challenge already. The point of replay should be to rectify mistakes and not enable mistakes to dictate the outcome of the game. By penalizing a team for winning a challenge, that objective is less effective. By the way, great deep ball from Favre to Walker into the wind.I don't agree. If you don't have that rule, you end up with coaches challenging because they want a 3rd & 3 instead of a 3rd & 4, essentially delaying the game.
But his other hand was nowhere near the ball.....If THAT is the tuck rule, it sucks.looked to me like he was stopping his throwing motion when the ball slipped outHOW is that a 'tuck rule', it was simply a pass that slipped out of the QBs hand as he was throwing it. Incomplete pass.Refereeing in the NFL sucks this year.
LOL. You should check out her commentary on the DVD for the movie. She's a riot. She's not only gorgeous, but she seems like the kinda girl you could have a great time with in a bar knocking a few beers back. Ummmm when she turns 21, of course.I saw Pirates of the Caribbean a few days ago. When I die I want to be reincarnated as Kiera Knightley's (sp?) bicycle seat.